Algoritmisch Ritme is an interactive dance installation that responds to the position of the body’s core. The projection is fractal art. This paper reports on the applied aesthetic principles, as well as on the applied equations. The result is an inspiring and responsive experience

Feijs, Loe M.G.

Muller, Daphne

English

Pure OAI Repository

 Algoritmisch ritme: algorithmic art as material in an interactivedance-projectionCitation for published version (APA):Muller, D., & Feijs, L. M. G. (2018). Algoritmisch ritme: algorithmic art as material in an interactive dance-projection. In C. S. Eve Torrence Bruce Torrence, & K. Fenyvesi (Eds.), Proceedings of Bridges 2018:Mathematics, Art, Music, Architecture, Education, Culture (pp. 415-418). Tessellations Publishing.Document status and date:Published: 01/01/2018Document Version:Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)Please check the document version of this publication:• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can beimportant differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. Peopleinterested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit theDOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and pagenumbers.Link to publicationGeneral rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright ownersand it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.            • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.            • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain            • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, pleasefollow below link for the End User Agreement:www.tue.nl/taverneTake down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:openaccess@tue.nlproviding details and we will investigate your claim.Download date: 16. Nov. 2023   Algoritmisch Ritme: Algorithmic Art as Material in an Interactive Dance-Projection  Daphne A. Muller and Loe M.G. Feijs  Dept. Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands info@daphnemuller.nl, l.m.g.feijs@tue.nl  Abstract  Algoritmisch Ritme is an interactive dance installation that responds to the position of the body’s core. The projection is fractal art. This paper reports on the applied aesthetic principles, as well as on the applied equations. The result is an inspiring and responsive experience.  Introduction Fractal art [4] is art generated by a mathematical algorithm (also referred to as “algorithmic art”). Fractals are defined as “an object or quantity that displays self-similarity, in a somewhat technical sense, on all scales“ [9]. This project focuses on the algorithm of the Symmetric Binary Tree. These fractal trees are created by using a line called the trunk as a starting point, and adding two shorter lines under the rotation of an angle θ to the left and the right. This action is a recursive definition (a function that calls itself [3]) which is repeated an infinite number of times [5]. The Recursive Tree code, programmed by Daniel Shiffman [8], is built up using this principle. In his code, the θ angle of the tree branches is dependent on the x-position of the device’s mouse. This was developed with the intent to combine an interactive fractal tree animation with dance. During previous research in collaboration with RISE Interactive Umeå in Umeå, Sweden, Daphne Muller explored how interactions between tango dancers can inspire interaction design. The study showed that a lot of value comes from interaction that starts from the body’s core: movement begins from shifting the balance in the core-body. From this vision, this installation is developed.  Design The design process consisted of two iterations: creating an animation (see Figure 1), and translating this animation into an interactive projection that responds to movement. A recursive function written by Daniel Shiffman [8] is the basis of the code and applied to draw the fractals of the circles. The design is coded in Processing.                 Figure 1:  Screenshots from the animation developed during iteration one. Bridges 2018 Conference Proceedings415   Angle Calculations The animation determined the angle of the branches based on the x-position of the mouse. The end-goal at this stage of the design process was making this angle dependent on the spatial position of a dancer as viewed from above, which would allow the animation to be projected on the floor. Firstly, the angular coordinate 𝜃𝜃 of the mouse position was derived, choosing the centre of the screen as its origin. Then the formula 𝜃𝜃 = cos−1 (adjacent / hypotenuse) can be applied. The hypotenuse is taken as the distance between the mouse position and the centre of the screen. The screen is then divided into four squares. For the upper-left square and lower-right square adjacent = Δy mouse, centre screen. For the lower-left square and upper-right square adjacent = Δxmouse, centre screen. The range of the coordinates is translated to create a range of 2 , by adding 0 for the upper-left square, 1.571 for the lower-left square, 3.142 for the lower-right square and 4.712 for the upper-right square. See Figure 2.     Figure 2:  Output: angle = 123 degrees.  Later in the design process, it was decided to track the dancer from side-view instead. The same principle is applied, but the y-position of the “centre” is translated to a higher position. As the position of the user is unlikely to be higher than this value, the difference between upper and lower level is deleted. To create a range of 2 , the angle is multiplied by 2. Transformations The first translation that can be found in the code are the coordinates from the Kinect, which are translated to match the projection. This translation depends on the resolution of the output screen (1920,1200 pixels). The resolution of the Kinect output is 640, 520 pixels. This firstly results in the addition of 640 pixels to the x-coordinate to translate the coordinate to the “screen” of the projection. Secondly, factor 3 is applied to both the x- and y-coordinate. Thirdly, the x-coordinate is vertically reflected to match the position of the dancer with the projected output. And lastly, the y-coordinate is translated 300 pixels upward, a value found through experimentation that makes the interaction slightly more intuitive. The resulting formulas are Tx(x) = 2560  – 3x and Ty(y) = 3y – 350.  A second transformation T' is in adjusting the position of the screen’s centre for the angle calculations. Firstly, the coordinates of the middle of the screen were increased by the width of the Kinect (640 pixels), as the output of the Kinect is drawn on the left-side of the projection. Secondly, the x-coordinate is translated 300 pixels towards the top. This value was found through experimentation, and makes the projected movements smoother. The resulting formula is T'x(x) = 640 + (projection width/2) and T'y(y) = (projection height/2) – 300.  Furthermore, rotations are applied to shift the position of the circles in accordance to the dancer’s position. Finally, the internal coordinate system of Processing is transformed in the function, through the use of the pushMatrix(), popMatrix(), and translate(0, -h) functions, which makes the coordinate system move to the end of the branch.  Muller and Feijs416  Data The input data describes the position of the core body in x- and y-coordinates. The input data is generated through a Kinect 1414 which is set up in to capture the same field as the projector it was calibrated to. The code is designed to work with Kinect for Windows version 2 as well, and the applied library is Open Kinect for Processing by Daniel Shiffman [7]. The applied example code is AveragePointTracking [6] which tracks the average location behind a given threshold. This means that the output of a full-body is the position of the body’s core, and that the library is not designed for tracking multiple people. However, when being aware of the limits of the technology, it is possible to give the impression to users that the system responds to other body parts or to multiple people. For example, it is possible to make the projection respond to one’s own arms when positioning the rest of one’s body out of the field of the sensor.  Output Participants found the result inspiring and responsive. The projection responds in all degrees of movement freedom and feels aesthetically pleasing with several dance disciplines (see Figure 3). A dance battle has been held with amateur dancers in hip-hop and modern styles (see https://vimeo.com/damuller/aritme, the music of the video did not accompany the live performance).                  Figure 3:  Modern dance (top), hip-hop dance (left) and modern dance (right).  Algoritmisch Ritme: Algorithmic Art as Material in an Interactive Dance-Projection417  Summary and Conclusions Algoritmisch Ritme is an interactive dance installation that responds on the position of the core-body through fractal art. Participants found the result aesthetically pleasing, it inspired them to dance, and it created new bodily-awareness. It is significant that the branches of the tree are not rendered: the apparent structures look less like an organic tree. They morph between very different patterns:  Koch-like fractals (Figure 6, left) or Cantor sets (right).  Applications of this project are possible in sports to stimulate coordination of the body. For example, it can be used when training popping (a street dance) because the core body needs to be completely still during these exercises: the installation reveals this clearly. Another application is in improvisation performance or participatory performance (in for example modern dance). Furthermore, it would fit well with technology or dance-related exhibitions or festivals. The installation will be brought to Stockholm for a live performance and demonstration.  Related work Several projects exist that combine Kinect technology with projections. Aatish Bhatia used the same Recursive Tree example code. By moving the arms, the dancer can move the branches of the tree [1]. A similar concept is exhibited by the museum MoMath in New York, called “Human Tree” [2]. Whereas these works used arm-movement to manipulate the fractal imagery, this project chose whole-body movement. Furthermore, these projects stayed close to the literal tree-structure, opposed to abstracting the tree into circles. This project was developed independently as part of a student project for a course offered to students at Eindhoven University of Technology. The course teaches mathematical principles to design students. These related projects were found after the project was completed.   Acknowledgements We would like to thank Mathias Funk for his great help and support during the development of this project. We would like to thank the dancers Wong Siyu and Vincent Visser for their creative input, and Merel Vermeeren for proofreading this paper.   References [1] A. Bhatia. “How to Dance with a Tree: Visualizing Fractals With Dance.”  https://www.wired.com/2014/12/empzeal-fractal-tree/ [2] Blue Telescope Studios. “MoMath: Human Tree.”  http://studios.blue-telescope.com/project/museum-of-mathematics-human-tree/ [3] GeeksforGeeks. “Recursion.” http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/recursion/ [4] HiSoUR. “Algorithmic Art.” https://hisour.com/algorithmic-art-12807/ [5] L. Riddle. “Symmetric Binary Tree.” http://ecademy.agnesscott.edu/~lriddle/ifs/pythagorean/symbinarytree.htm [6] D. Shiffman and D. O’Sullivan. “Average Point Tracking.” https://github.com/shiffman/OpenKinect-for-Processing/tree/master/OpenKinect-Processing/examples/Kinect_v1/AveragePointTracking [7] D. Shiffman. “Getting Started with Kinect and Processing.” http://shiffman.net/p5/kinect/ [8] D. Shiffman. “Recursive Tree.” https://processing.org/examples/tree.html  [9] E. W. Weisstein. “Fractal.” http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Fractal.html   Muller and Feijs418

Algoritmisch ritme: algorithmic art as material in an interactive dance-projection

https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/115773789/bridges2018_415.pdf

Algoritmisch ritme: algorithmic art as material in an interactive dance-projection

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Pure OAI Repository