A presentation of a PhD study focused on professionals' views of children's involvement in research. Findings suggest that the potential benefits of inclusive, representative and diverse PPI identified in this study, bear relevance to all 'publics' and across a range of public health issues

Stokes, G

English

UCL Discovery

Potential benefits of PPI for public health????? ? ??InclusiveRepresentativeDiverseStudy aim:  Examine how professionals associated with medicines R&D viewed children’s involvement and it’s impact on the uptake of children’s involvement.  Multimethod study:• Systematic analysis of political speeches • Scoping review • Discourse analysis of key informant interviews. Relevant to all publics across a range of  public health issuesWider implicationsAdvocatesContrary AdvocatesReticent AdvocatesSilent CriticsFindings: incl.  barriers/facilitators, impact of role conflict, conceptual framework, …• Increased PPI interest• Methods development• Teaching (e.g. MSc, REPI)• Systematic reviews with PPI• Cross-department collaborationImpactBegan with children…Innovations from being inclusive: PPI* for health of the public(s)Dr Gillian Stokes, The Social Research Institute, UCL Institute of Educatione.g.• Patient insight• Greater innovation• Improved intervention uptake• Better communication• Improved processes/practices• Reduced health inequalitiesPPI is an integral part of public health research within our research unit and beyond *PPI= Patient and public involvement… but affects all publics

Innovations from being inclusive: PPI for health of the public(s)

https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10113389/1/Gillian%20Stokes%20FINAL%20-%20Innovations%20from%20being%20inclusive%20-%20PPI%20for%20the%20health%20of%20the%20public%28s%29.pdf

Innovations from being inclusive: PPI for health of the public(s)

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UCL Discovery