This document details the work conducted through the development of this thesis, and it
is structured as follows:
• Chapter 1, Introduction, has briefly presented the motivation, objectives, and contributions
of this thesis.
• Chapter 2, Fundamentals, exposes a series of concepts that are necessary to correctly
understand the information presented in the rest of the thesis, such as the
concepts of virtualization, hypervisors, or software-based fault tolerance. In addition,
this chapter includes an exhaustive review and comparison between the different
hypervisors used in scientific studies dealing with safety-critical systems, and a
brief review of some works that try to improve fault tolerance in the hypervisor itself,
an area of research that is outside the scope of this work, but that complements
the mechanism presented and could be established as a line of future work.
• Chapter 3, Problem Statement and Related Work, explains the main reasons why
the concept of Hypervisor-Based Fault Tolerance was born and reviews the main
articles and research papers on the subject. This review includes both papers related
to safety-critical embedded systems (such as the research carried out in this thesis)
and papers related to cloud servers and cluster computing that, although not directly
applicable to embedded systems, may raise useful concepts that make our solution
more complete or allow us to establish future lines of work.
• Chapter 4, Proposed Solution, begins with a brief comparison of the work presented
in Chapter 3 to establish the requirements that our solution must meet in order to
be as complete and innovative as possible. It then sets out the architecture of the
proposed solution and explains in detail the two main elements of the solution: the
Voter and the Health Monitoring partition.
• Chapter 5, Prototype, explains in detail the prototyping of the proposed solution,
including the choice of the hypervisor, the processing board, and the critical functionality
to be redundant. With respect to the voter, it includes prototypes for both
the software version (the voter is implemented in a virtual machine) and the hardware
version (the voter is implemented as IP cores on the FPGA).
• Chapter 6, Evaluation, includes the evaluation of the prototype developed in Chapter
5. As a preliminary step and given that there is no evidence in this regard, an
exercise is carried out to measure the overhead involved in using the XtratuM hypervisor
versus not using it. Subsequently, qualitative tests are carried out to check that
Health Monitoring is working as expected and a fault injection campaign is carried
out to check the error detection and correction rate of our solution. Finally, a comparison
is made between the performance of the hardware and software versions of
Voter.
• Chapter 7, Conclusions and Future Work, is dedicated to collect the conclusions
obtained and the contributions made during the research (in the form of articles in
journals, conferences and contributions to projects and proposals in the industry).
In addition, it establishes some lines of future work that could complete and extend
the research carried out during this doctoral thesis.Programa de Doctorado en Ciencia y Tecnología Informática por la Universidad Carlos III de MadridPresidente: Katzalin Olcoz Herrero.- Secretario: Félix García Carballeira.- Vocal: Santiago Rodríguez de la Fuent
