We initiate the study of a novel problem in mechanism design without money,
which we term Truthful Interval Covering (TIC). An instance of TIC consists of
a set of agents each associated with an individual interval on a line, and the
objective is to decide where to place a covering interval to minimize the total
social cost of the agents, which is determined by the intersection of this
interval with their individual ones. This fundamental problem can model
situations of provisioning a public good, such as the use of power generators
to prevent or mitigate load shedding in developing countries. In the strategic
version of the problem, the agents wish to minimize their individual costs, and
might misreport the position and/or length of their intervals to achieve that.
Our goal is to design truthful mechanisms to prevent such strategic misreports
and achieve good approximations to the best possible social cost. We consider
the fundamental setting of known intervals with equal lengths and provide tight
bounds on the approximation ratios achieved by truthful deterministic
mechanisms. We also design a randomized truthful mechanism that outperforms all
possible deterministic ones. Finally, we highlight a plethora of natural
extensions of our model for future work, as well as some natural limitations of
those settings