The solutions obtained for low Reynolds‐number incompressible flows using the same flow solver and solution technique on body‐fitted, embedded surface and immersed body grids of similar size are compared. The cases considered are a sphere at Re  = 100 and an idealized stented aneurysm. It is found that the solutions using all these techniques converge to the same grid‐independent solution. On coarser grids, the effect of higher‐order boundary conditions is noticeable. Therefore, if the manual labor required to set up a body‐fitted domain is excessive (as is often the case for patient‐specific geometries with medical devices), and/or computing resources are plentiful, the embedded surface and immersed body approaches become very attractive options
