Andresh, Manuel

Haase, Martina

Patyk, Andreas

Rösch, Christine

English

KITopen

KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association www.kit.eduSustainability Assessment of NET fuel production processesMartina Haase, Manuel Andresh, Andreas Patyk, Christine RöschWorkshop NET@KIT, 23. März 2023NET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase2AgendaApproach for Sustainability AssessmentFuel Production Processes (Examples from the reFuels project)ResultsLife Cycle Impact AssessmentMCDA for Sustainablity AssessmentTakeawaysNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase3Approach for Sustainability AssessmentPlug-in Sustainability assessmentCriteriaSDG WizardTriple-Bottom-Line WizardMethodsMethod selection wizardStakeholders Online surveys Decision Support Tool for MCDA assisted sustainability assessment(Haase et al. 2022a, 2022b) KIT MCDA Tool (https://portal.iket.kit.edu/projects/MCDA/)(Mesa Estrada et al. 2022)NET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina HaaseMulti Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to support decision-making processesComparison of alternatives based on relevant, often conflicting, criteria. Mathematical procedures to aggregate results from sub-problemsSystematically determine the best choice for a decision makerSelection and weighting of criteria as key aspects* Weighted Sum Method ** Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution *** Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluationCommon MCDA methods for criteria aggregationApproach for Sustainability AssessmentMCDA for Sustainability AssessmentMethod Description Pros ConsWSM* Simple linear additive models simple computation, transparentonly basic estimations, -only single preferenceTOPSIS** best alternative should have the shortest (Euclidian) distance from the positive ideal solution while it has the longest distance from the negative ideal solutionsimple computation does not consider difference between neg. & pos. valuesPROMETHEE*** construction of outranking relation to compare each pair of actions; considers interdependency of criteriacomplex method, computation efforts high(Guitouni and Martel 1998,  Wang et al. 2009)NET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase5Plug-in Sustainability assessmentCriteriaSDG WizardTriple-Bottom-Line WizardMethodsMethod selection wizardStakeholders Online surveysDecision Support Tool for MCDA assisted sustainability assessmentApproach for Sustainability Assessment(Haase et al. 2022a, 2022b) KIT MCDA Tool (https://portal.iket.kit.edu/projects/MCDA/)(Mesa Estrada et al. 2022)NET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase6Life Cycle Assessment of fuel production pathwaysExamples from the reFuels projectComparison of potential environmental impacts of different fuel production pathways Analysis of the effects of different process constellations and locationsIdentification of hotspots and potentialsFocus on Global Warming Potential (GWP), Fine Particulate Matter Formation, Fossil Resource ScarcityFuel production pathwaysMicrostructured Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis with CO2 from Direct Air Capture (DAC)Conventional Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis with CO2 from a cement plantBioliq Dimethyl Ether (DME) fuel synthesis with CO2 capture by biomassNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase7Plug-in Sustainability assessmentCriteriaSDG WizardTriple-Bottom-Line WizardMethodsMethod selection wizardStakeholders Online surveysDecision Support Tool for MCDA assisted sustainability assessmentApproach for Sustainability Assessment(Haase et al. 2022a, 2022b) KIT MCDA Tool (https://portal.iket.kit.edu/projects/MCDA/)(Mesa Estrada et al. 2022)NET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase8Process data from Vázquez et al. (2018)(Andresh et al. 2021)Fuel production processesExamples from the reFuels projectMicrostructured Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesisNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase9Process data from Institute for Industrial Production (KIT-IIP)  (Andresh et al. 2021)Fuel production processesExamples from the reFuels projectConventional Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesisNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase10Process data from Trippe (2013): Techno-ökonomische Bewertung alternativer Verfahrenskonfigurationen zur Herstellung von Biomass-to-Liquid (BtL) Kraftstoffen und Chemikalien(Andresh et al. 2021)Fuel production processesExamples from the reFuels projectBioliq DME petrol synthesisNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase11Plug-in Sustainability assessmentCriteriaSDG WizardTriple-Bottom-Line WizardMethodsMethod selection wizardStakeholders Online surveys KIT MCDA Tool (https://portal.iket.kit.edu/projects/MCDA/)Decision Support Tool for MCDA assisted sustainability assessmentApproach for Sustainability Assessment(Haase et al. 2022a, 2022b)(Mesa Estrada et al. 2022)NET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase12Life Cycle Impact AssessmentGlobal Warming Potential of considered alternatives(Andresh et al. 2021)ConventionalMicrostructured FT, CO2 from DAC Conve tional FT, CO2 from cement plantFossil referencesBioliqPower-bound load 90 % load Power-bound load 90 % loadGlobal warming potential through fuel production – kg CO2 Äqkg CO2 uptakeSumGlobal warming potential through transport by ship – kg CO2 ÄqCredit for by-products– kg CO2 Äqkg CO2 uptake, fossilCO2 emission through usageNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase13Life Cycle Impact AssessmentReCiPe 2016 Midpoint(Andresh et al. 2021)Impact categories ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint Unit Mikrostrukturierte FT, DAC als CO2-QuelleKonventionelle FT, Zementwerk   als CO2-QuelleBioliq Fossil (Diesel)…90 % Auslastung 90 % Auslastung ohne H2Deutschland Wind, offshoreDeutschland Wind, offshoreStroh,regionalFine particulate matter formation kg PM2,5 eq -4.0E-05 -3.2E-05 4.4E-05 3.6E-05 …Fossil resource scarcity kg oil eq -1.2E-02 -2.5E-02 1.7E-03 2.9E-02 …Freshwater ecotoxicity kg 1,4-DCB 2.2E-02 3.7E-02 7.3E-04 1.1E-04 …Freshwater eutrophication kg P eq -4.6E-05 -2.5E-05 -1.1E-05 7.3E-07 …Global warming kg CO2 eq -2.0E-02 -7.4E-02 2.0E-03 8.6E-02 …Human carcinogenic toxicity kg 1,4-DCB 1.5E-02 2.3E-02 5.5E-04 5.7E-04 …Human non-carcinogenic toxicity kg 1,4-DCB 4.0E-02 1.2E-01 4.2E-02 2.6E-03 …Ionizing radiation kBq Co-60 eq -3.0E-02 -2.5E-02 -2.4E-03 7.6E-04 …Land use m2a crop eq -6.7E-04 5.6E-04 1.7E-04 1.1E-04 …Marine ecotoxicity kg 1,4-DCB 2.7E-02 4.5E-02 1.1E-03 2.1E-04 …Marine eutrophication kg N eq -2.8E-06 -7.9E-07 -8.7E-07 1.1E-07 …Mineral resource scarcity kg Cu eq 7.3E-04 1.1E-03 2.4E-04 1.7E-05 …Ozone formation, Human health kg NOx eq -4.3E-05 -3.1E-05 9.9E-05 5.0E-05 …Ozone formation, Terrestrial ecosystems kg NOx eq -4.2E-05 -3.1E-05 1.0E-04 5.3E-05 …Stratospheric ozone depletion kg CFC11 eq 3.1E-07 -2.3E-08 8.0E-09 2.3E-08 …Terrestrial acidification kg SO2 eq -1.1E-04 -1.2E-04 8.6E-05 1.1E-04 …Terrestrial ecotoxicity kg 1,4-DCB 1.1E-01 1.9E-01 1.5E-01 4.2E-02 …Water consumption m3 -2.6E-03 -1.2E-05 1.4E-04 9.9E-06 …                           - . - - . - . - . -    - . - - . - . - . -  . - . - . - . -   - . - - . - - . - . -   - . - - . - . - . -   . - . - . - . -   . - . - . - . -   - . - - . - - . - . -   - . - . - . - . -  . - . - . - . -   - . - - . - - . - . -    . - . - . - . -     - . - - . - . - . -     - . - - . - . - . -    . - - . - . - . -   - . - - . - . - . -  . - . - . - . - - . - - . - . - . -Microstructured FT, CO2 from DACConventionalFT, CO2 fromcement plantBioliq, CO2capture bybiomassFossil (Diesel) loadGermany, wind, offshoreGermany, wind, off reStraw, regionalNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase14Stability of weights – GWPEqual weighting of criteriaMCDA for Sustainability AssessmentExemplary results – TOPSIS*KIT MCDA Tool (https://portal.iket.kit.edu/projects/MCDA/)*Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to ideal SolutionNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase15TakeawaysPresented fuel production processes show negative CO2 equivalentsconsidering production and use of primary and by-productsFor sustainability assessment, economic, social and further environmental impacts need to be consideredMCDA for integrative consideration of criteriaSelection and weighting of criteria has a decisive influence on results Integration of stakeholdersNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina Haase16Andresh et al. (2021): Ökobilanzen im Projekt reFuels – Kraftstoffe neu denken. Forschungsbericht, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT). DOI: 10.5445/IR/1000141494 Guitouni, Martel (1998). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European journal of operational research, 109(2), 501-521Haase et al (2022a): Prospective assessment of energy technologies: a comprehensive approach forsustainability assessment. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12 (20), Article no: 20. doi:10.1186/s13705-022-00344-6Haase et al. (2022b): Multi criteria decision analysis for prospective sustainability assessment of alternative technologies and fuels for individual motorized transport. Clean technologies and environmental policy, 24 (10), 3171–3197. doi:10.1007/s10098-022-02407-wMesa Estrada et al. (2022): Status of MCDA Tool Development. Helmholtz Workshop “MCDA for Sustainability Assessment”, 10.11.2022, onlineTrippe, Techno-ökonomische Bewertung alternativer Verfahrenskonfigurationen zur Herstellung von Biomass-to-Liquid (BtL) Kraftstoffen und Chemikalien, Print on demand. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, 2013.Vázquez et al. (2018): Power-to-X technology using renewable electricity and carbon dioxide from ambient air: SOLETAIR proof-of-concept and improved process concept. Journal of CO2 Utilization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.026Wang et al. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(9), 2263-2278.LiteratureNET@KIT, 23. März 2023 Martina HaaseContactDr. Martina HaasePhone: +49 721 608-26094Email: martina.haase@kit.edu

Sustainability Assessment of NET fuel production processes

https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000157424/150610424

Sustainability Assessment of NET fuel production processes

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

KITopen