Balkir, Esma

Blodgett, Su Lin

Goldfarb-Tarrant, Seraphina

Ungless, Eddie

English

Bias research in NLP seeks to analyse models for social biases, thus helping NLP practitioners uncover, measure, and mitigate social harms. We analyse the body of work that uses prompts and templates to assess bias in language models. We draw on a measurement modelling framework to create a taxonomy of attributes that capture what a bias test aims to measure and how that measurement is carried out. By applying this taxonomy to 90 bias tests, we illustrate qualitatively and quantitatively that core aspects of bias test conceptualisations and operationalisations are frequently unstated or ambiguous, carry implicit assumptions, or be mismatched. Our analysis illuminates the scope of possible bias types the field is able to measure, and reveals types that are as yet under-researched. We offer guidance to enable the community to explore a wider section of the possible bias space, and to better close the gap between desired outcomes and experimental design, both for bias and for evaluating language models more broadly

Edinburgh Research Explorer

This Prompt is Measuring &lt; MASK &gt; : Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models

https://www.pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/files/367068047/This_Prompt_is_Measuring_GOLDFARB_TARRANT_DOA02052023_VOR_CC_BY.pdf

This Prompt is Measuring < MASK > : Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Edinburgh Research Explorer

This Prompt is Measuring &lt; MASK &gt; : Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Edinburgh Research Explorer

This Prompt is Measuring < MASK > : Evaluating Bias Evaluation in Language Models