Evolutionary robotics offers a powerful framework for designing and evolving
robot morphologies, particularly in the context of modular robots. However, the
role of query mechanisms during the genotype-to-phenotype mapping process has
been largely overlooked. This research addresses this gap by conducting a
comparative analysis of query mechanisms in the brain-body co-evolution of
modular robots. Using two different query mechanisms, Breadth-First Search
(BFS) and Random Query, within the context of evolving robot morphologies using
CPPNs and robot controllers using tensors, and testing them in two evolutionary
frameworks, Lamarckian and Darwinian systems, this study investigates their
influence on evolutionary outcomes and performance. The findings demonstrate
the impact of the two query mechanisms on the evolution and performance of
modular robot bodies, including morphological intelligence, diversity, and
morphological traits. This study suggests that BFS is both more effective and
efficient in producing highly performing robots. It also reveals that
initially, robot diversity was higher with BFS compared to Random Query, but in
the Lamarckian system, it declines faster, converging to superior designs,
while in the Darwinian system, BFS led to higher end-process diversity.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2303.12594. substantial
text overlap with arXiv:2309.1309