The questions of why things are the way they are and if they could have been any different are frequently occupying the minds of us human beings. One way out is provided by the assumption of contingency, the view that long-term development is mainly dependent on the results of many random events. However, I argue that from a scientific point of view, fundamentally revolving around skepticism and the search for underlying patterns, contingency does not provide a comfortable answer and should always be perceived as a preliminary resort. This thesis revolves around the investigation of evolutionary alternatives related to case studies at three different levels of biological complexity. Key aspects of evolutionary alternatives are the pool of available elements to choose from, the pressures which lead to the preference for the selection of certain choices over others, and the conditions under which these selections comprise a viable or even optimal choice for the organism(s)
