Hoek, Jet

Rohde, Hannah

Wilke, Hans

English

Comprehenders make predictions about upcoming content and discourse structure based on different linguistic cues (e.g., Cristea &amp; Webber, 1997; Roland et al., 2012). For example, comprehenders can anticipate upcoming referents based on discourse particles (Van Bergen &amp; Bosker, 2018) or implicit causality biases of verbs (Koornneef &amp; Sanders, 2012). Here, we investigate how at-issueness influences comprehenders' expectations about which element is most likely to be re-mentioned as discourse progresses

Edinburgh Research Explorer

     Edinburgh Research Explorer                                      It was/wasn't what I expectedCitation for published version:Wilke, H, Hoek, J & Rohde, H 2022, 'It was/wasn't what I expected: Predicting the right antecedent', 55thAnnual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Bucharest, Romania, 24/08/22 - 27/08/22.Link:Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research ExplorerDocument Version:Peer reviewed versionGeneral rightsCopyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s)and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise andabide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.Take down policyThe University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorercontent complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright pleasecontact openaccess@ed.ac.uk providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately andinvestigate your claim.Download date: 16. Aug. 2023   ‐

It was/wasn't what I expected:Predicting the right antecedent

https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/files/354067718/WilkeHoekRohde.2022.SLE.pdf

It was/wasn't what I expected:Predicting the right antecedent

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Edinburgh Research Explorer