Glasbey, James

English

IntroductionThe Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire is a universal reporter outcome measure developed in the UK for remote detection of surgical site infection (SSI) after abdominal surgery. This study aimed to explore cross-cultural equivalence, acceptability, and content validity of the WHQ for use across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and make recommendations for its adaptation.MethodsThis was a mixed-methods study within a trial (SWAT) embedded in an international randomised trial, conducted according to best practice guidelines, and co-produced with community and patient partners (TALON-1). First, structured interviews and focus groups were used to gather data regarding cross-cultural, cross-contextual equivalence of the individual items and scale and conduct a translatability assessment. Second, translation was completed in accordance with Mapi recommendations into five languages. Next, data from a prospective cohort SWAT were interpreted using Rasch analysis to explore scaling and measurement properties of the WHQ. Finally, qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated using a modified, exploratory, instrumental design model.ResultsIn the qualitative phase, 10 structured interviews and 6 focus groups were performed with a total of 47 investigators across six countries. Themes related to comprehension, response mapping, retrieval and judgment were identified with rich cross-cultural insights. In the quantitative phase, an exploratory Rasch model was fitted to data from 537 patients (369 excluding extremes). Due to the number of extreme (floor) values the overall level of power was low. The single WHQ scale satisfied tests of unidimensionality indicating validity of the ordinal total WHQ score. There was significant overall model misfit, misfit of five items (5, 9, 14, 15, 16) and local dependency in 11 item pairs. The person separation index (PSI) was estimated as 0.48 suggesting weak discrimination between classes, whereas Cronbach’s alpha was high at 0.81. Triangulation of qualitative data with the Rasch analysis supported recommendations for cross-cultural adaptation of the WHQ of items 1 (Redness), 3 (Clear fluid), 7 (Deep wound opening), 10 (Pain), 11 (Fever), 15 (Antibiotics), 16 (Debridement), 18 (Drainage), 19 (Reoperation). Changes to three item response categories (1 = Not at all, 2 = A little, 3 = A lot) were adopted for symptom items 1 to 10 and two categories (0 = No, 1 = Yes) for item 11 (Fever). ConclusionThis study made recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the WHQ for use in global surgical research and practice, using co-produced mixed methods data from three continents. Translations are now available for implementation into remote wound assessment pathways.<br/

Explore Bristol Research

Adaptation of the Wound Healing Questionnaire universal-reporter outcome measure for use in global surgery trials (TALON-1 study):mixed-methods study and Rasch analysis

BACKGROUND: The Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) is a universal-reporter outcome measure developed in the UK for remote detection of surgical-site infection after abdominal surgery. This study aimed to explore cross-cultural equivalence, acceptability, and content validity of the WHQ for use across low- and middle-income countries, and to make recommendations for its adaptation.METHODS: This was a mixed-methods study within a trial (SWAT) embedded in an international randomized trial, conducted according to best practice guidelines, and co-produced with community and patient partners (TALON-1). Structured interviews and focus groups were used to gather data regarding cross-cultural, cross-contextual equivalence of the individual items and scale, and conduct a translatability assessment. Translation was completed into five languages in accordance with Mapi recommendations. Next, data from a prospective cohort (SWAT) were interpreted using Rasch analysis to explore scaling and measurement properties of the WHQ. Finally, qualitative and quantitative data were triangulated using a modified, exploratory, instrumental design model.RESULTS: In the qualitative phase, 10 structured interviews and six focus groups took place with a total of 47 investigators across six countries. Themes related to comprehension, response mapping, retrieval, and judgement were identified with rich cross-cultural insights. In the quantitative phase, an exploratory Rasch model was fitted to data from 537 patients (369 excluding extremes). Owing to the number of extreme (floor) values, the overall level of power was low. The single WHQ scale satisfied tests of unidimensionality, indicating validity of the ordinal total WHQ score. There was significant overall model misfit of five items (5, 9, 14, 15, 16) and local dependency in 11 item pairs. The person separation index was estimated as 0.48 suggesting weak discrimination between classes, whereas Cronbach's α was high at 0.86. Triangulation of qualitative data with the Rasch analysis supported recommendations for cross-cultural adaptation of the WHQ items 1 (redness), 3 (clear fluid), 7 (deep wound opening), 10 (pain), 11 (fever), 15 (antibiotics), 16 (debridement), 18 (drainage), and 19 (reoperation). Changes to three item response categories (1, not at all; 2, a little; 3, a lot) were adopted for symptom items 1 to 10, and two categories (0, no; 1, yes) for item 11 (fever).CONCLUSION: This study made recommendations for cross-cultural adaptation of the WHQ for use in global surgical research and practice, using co-produced mixed-methods data from three continents. Translations are now available for implementation into remote wound assessment pathways.</p

Li, Elizabeth

University of Birmingham Research Portal

http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/194049529/znad058.pdf

Adaptation of the Wound Healing Questionnaire universal-reporter outcome measure for use in global surgery trials (TALON-1 study):mixed-methods study and Rasch analysis

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Explore Bristol Research

University of Birmingham Research Portal

University of Birmingham Research Portal