Chirichella R., Preatoni D.G. (Eds.) Hystrix the Italian Journal of Mammalogy
Abstract
Natura 2000 is the largest coordinated network of protected areas
in the world and the main tool for biodiversity conservation
within the European Union. Monitoring the protected habitats
and species in all network sites by efficient survey methods is
essential to plan effective conservation strategies. Small mammals, although including species of conservation interest and
being major components of the food web, are often understudied.
Through an intensive survey, we investigated the small mammal community of the Special Area of Conservation IT1110057
Serra di Ivrea (Piedmont, NW Italy).
We overimposed a 1×1 km grid to the study area and selected
a random linear transect in each cell. From mid-May to midJune 2016 we collected small mammal presence data along 55
transects, where we set 955 hair-tubes of 60 mm (n=369) and
30 mm (n=586) in diameter, in a number proportional to each
transect length. The largest hair-tubes were positioned on trunks
or horizontal branches of trees (ca. 160 cm above ground level)
about 100 m from each other, whereas the smallest tubes were
tied to shrubs (ca. 80 cm a.g.l.) with 30 m spacing. A bait (hazelnut cream) was used to attract animals and an adhesive strip was
attached at each end of the tube to collect the hairs. We checked
the hair-tubes twice, with an interval of 15 days. We examined
the hairs using a microscope (20× and 40× magnifications) and
species were identified by comparing the characteristics of the
cuticle scale pattern, medulla and cross-section of the hairs.
To collect information on ground-dwelling species, in September 2019 we carried out a four-nights capture session using
Sherman traps (7.5×9×23 cm). We placed 10 traps at a distance
of 10 m from each other along each of three selected transects.
Hazelnut cream was spread at the entrance of each trap, while seeds, a slice of apple and cotton were put at the bottom.
Traps were checked daily and trapped individuals were sexed and
weighted before being released at the site of capture.
In 28650 trap-days we found 185 positive hair-tubes. We detected a total of five to six species: Sciurus vulgaris, Eliomys
quercinus, Moscardinus avellanarius, Glis glis and Apodemus
sylvaticus/flavicollis, mice’s hairs being indistinguishable by
hair morphology. Most occurrences were in the second check
(n=156) when we found 126 Apodemus sp., 15 Sciurus vulgaris,
7 Eliomys quercinus, 6 Moscardinus avellanarius and 2 Glis
glis. In the first check (n=29) only 19 Apodemus sp., 3 Sciurus
vulgaris, 4 Eliomys quercinus and 3 Moscardinus avellanarius
were detected. Overall, 168 presence data were collected: 132
Apodemus sp. (13.82%), 17 Sciurus vulgaris (1.78%), 10 Eliomys quercinus (1.05%), 7 Moscardinus avellanarius (0.73%)
and 2 Glis glis (0.21%).
Sherman trapping allowed detection of 41 small rodents belonging to two species: Apodemus sylvaticus (92.7%) and Myodes
glareolus (7.3%).
Hair-trapping allowed to record a species not included in the
SAC Standard Data Form, namely Moscardinus avellanarius,
included in Annex 4 of the Habitats Directive, and also an elusive
and understudied species such as Eliomys quercinus. Hair-tubes
are a non-invasive and cost-effective method to get information on small mammal distribution. Anyway, considering the
number of hair-tubes deployed, capture success was low, also
for a potentially common species such as Glis glis, suggesting
that a large trapping effort is needed for assessing spatial niche
overlap between ecologically similar species and their habitat
preferences. The simultaneous use of multiple survey methods
may provide a more complete assessment of the small mammal
community and allow to collect more reliable data about the
genus Apodemus and others ground-dwelling species such as
Myodes glareolus