Parametric X-Ray radiation (PXR) is a phenomenon due to the interaction of charged particles inside a crystal well ordered lattice. The passage of the particles inside the potential field into the crystal causes small deflections which result in radiation emissions. By this way the emission is diffracted by the crystal planes. In this work the results of the last five years of activity on PXR detection during UA9 experiment are reported. The beam provided in H8 area, protons or Pb ions, is channeled inside different crystals and PXR emission is detected

Capitolo, E.

Dabagov, S. B.

Gogolev, A.

Hampai, D.

Liedl, A.

Polese, C.

English

Open Access Repository

               Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati   ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE                  INFN-16-05/LNF         17th March 2016       PARAMETRIC X-RAY DETECTION IN UA9 EXPERIMENT Dabagov S.B.1, Capitolo E.1, Gogolev A.2, Hampai D. 1, Liedl A. 1, Polese C. 1   1)INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Via E. Fermi 40, Frascati, Italy 2)Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia   Abstract  Parametric X-Ray radiation (PXR) is a phenomenon due to the interaction of charged particles inside a crystal well ordered lattice. The passage of the particles inside the potential field into the crystal causes small deflections which result in radiation emissions. By this way the emission is diffracted by the crystal planes. In this work the results of the last five years of activity on PXR detection during UA9 experiment are reported. The beam provided in H8 area, protons or Pb ions, is channeled inside different crystals and PXR emission is detected.        Pubblicato da SIDS–Pubblicazioni      Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati    PACS.: 41.50.+h; 41.60.−m; 41.75.Fr; 61.80.Cb; 61.85.+p 	   - 2 -	  FIRST ATTEMPT The first attempt to observe PXR radiation at UA9 experiment is dated in 2010. For this experimental run a beam composed by 400 GeV/c protons, with measured RMS divergence σx=10.7 µrad and σy=7.6 µrad, was provided. The average cycle time was 45s with a pulse duration of 10s and an average of (1.3±0.1)·106 particles per spill. The beam is analyzed through different microstrip detectors represented in FIG.	  1.  FIG. 1: PXR Scheme. The microstrip detectors are labeled by S. The bent crystal, BC, is stricken by the proton beam, p, and the PXR signal is detected by detector, D.  In this first attempt the detector used for the observation was a semiconductor silicon detector with a 13 mm2 active area and a 25 µm beryllium window. The distance crystal-detector was in the range [94,127] mm and a cylindrical collimator (diameter 5 mm, length 50 mm) was placed between them. The entire detection system was placed inside a lead cavity in order to reduce the radiation noise. During the experiment three crystals were analyzed: one quasi-mosaic (QM) crystal and two strip (ST) crystals. The beam was parallel to the deflecting planes, (111) for QM crystal and (110) for ST. A high precision goniometer allowed the orientation of the crystal with an accuracy of 2 µrad. QM crystal was 40x30x2 mm3 (Height x Width x Thickness) while ST1 70x5x2 mm3 and ST2 70x5x0.4 mm3. The PXR characteristic emission lines energies for these crystals are summarized in TAB. 1. TAB. 1: PXR characteristic emission for QM and ST crystals. Reflection Order QM  ST 1st 5.58 keV 6.46 keV 2nd 11.18 keV 12.85 keV 3rd 16.70 keV 19.31 keV  Due to the low emission of the PXR signal the observation has a duration of several hours. In the TAB. 2 the results are summarized. The spectra acquired during this observation are shown in Figure 2. By looking at these spectra it is possible to realize that QM crystal has a greater emission due to the higher density of the reflecting planes (110). Furthermore, when comparing the two strip crystals the ST2 shows higher intensity than the ST1 probably due to the smaller thickness and consequently the signal is less reduced by the absorption of the radiation within the crystal itself. However, for the ST2 crystal, the proton flux and the acquisition time were not available (not recorded).     	   - 3 -	   TAB. 2: Results for the observation of PXR signal for QM and ST crystals.  Reflection order PXR signal [counts] Flux [phot/prot 10-7] Acquisition time [hour] QM      1st 420±20 6.9±0.8 7.8  2nd 230±16 3.8±0.4   3rd 47±8 0.77±0.12  ST1      1st 179±13 3.4±0.4 6.75  2nd 101±10 1.9±0.3  ST2      1st 287±17    2nd 62     FIG. 2: PXR spectra for QM and ST crystal. In these spectra the background has been subtracted.  PARAMETRIC X-RAY RADIATION FROM PB ION BEAM: EXSTIMATIONS In this simulation the layout of the numerical experiment is similar to the first attempt [1]. Figure 3 shows the layout in the horizontal plane for the experiments with quasi-mosaic (QM) and strip (ST) silicon crystals. A beam of Pb nuclei with energy 158 GeV/u entered a crystal in the collimation geometry being parallel to the deflecting planes, which are the (111) and (110) crystallographic planes for the QM and ST crystals, respectively.  The simulation was carried out for a Gaussian incident beam with the cross-section σ = 1.0x0.7 mm2 and divergence σ = 10.7x7.8 µrad2. A beam of Pb ions crosses the crystal with an offset of 0.7 mm depth in the QM case and in the centre in the ST case. PXR is generated by the particle field crossing a set of the crystallographic planes. PXR reflexes (110) and (100) in the case of (a) and (b) shown in Fig. 3, respectively, were calculated.   	   - 4 -	   FIG. 3: The simulation scheme details: (a) quasi-mosaic crystal, (b) strip crystal.  The energy of PXR photons is determined by the following equation:  yDBndcnEθθεβθβπcoscos1sin2−= where n is the diffraction order, d is the interplanar distance, β = v/c and ε is the dielectric constant of the target material (ε = 1 – (ωp/ω)2 ≈ 1, ω is the frequency of PXR photons, ωp is the plasmon frequency), θB is the Bragg angle, θD and θy are the radiation registration angles, θD is the angle between the projection of the radiation direction and the momentum in the diffraction plane, and θy is the angle between the projection of the radiation direction on the diffraction plane and the radiation direction. The diffraction plane (shown in Figure 3) is determined by the particle momentum and by the vector normal to the crystal planes.  According to the formula, PXR photons energy from plane (110) for detection angle (θD=2θB) 70.52° is equal to 5.59 keV and from (100) for detection angle 90° is equal to 6.46 keV. The distance between the crystal and the screen D was 117 and 200 mm for QM and ST crystals, correspondently. The calculations of PXR parameters have been performed according to the PXR kinematic theory [2], which well describes many experimental results. In the simulation a crystal considered as a set of straight samples and PXR yield from all crystal can be represented as superposition of separate contributions from each sample. It should be noted that, in ideal case, the PXR intensity must increase with the charge number Z of the particle as Z2 therefore the PXR intensity from nuclei is much more intense then from protons. The dependence on the particle charge was experimentally observed in [3] with a large error. However, here we have to underline that theoretical prediction for Z2-dependence has to be correct for real experimental conditions. Figure 4 presents the simulation results for the ideal case.  	   - 5 -	  In calculations absorption in the crystal and in the air, without convolution detector characteristics (ideal case), were taken into account. Expected values of the intensities are given in Table 3.	   FIG. 4: The spectra and angular distributions on the detector plane PXR from QM crystal (left) and ST crystal (right). Any mistake in the vertical direction-independent positioning of the detector in 1 mm in case of (100) will result in 60% difference between measured and simulated values (the same conclusion is valid also for the (110) orientation).   TAB. 3: Simulation results. Reflex Energy of maximum, (keV) Intensity I,	  (ph/Pb/sr) FWHM, (eV) (220) 5.6 0.864 258 (440) 11.2 0.314 366 (660) 16.8 0.071 499 (400) 6.4 0.906 211 (600) 12.9 0.179 281 (800) 19.4 0.020 370  OBSERVATION ON 2011 In 2011 the preliminary study by UA9-LNF section in parasitic acquisition was performed. We used a SDD detector by XGLab s.r.l. with a polymeric window (AP3.7) by MoxTek. The run was performed with completely stripped Pb ions characterized by 	   - 6 -	  momentum GeV/c and a flux of 2·104 charges/spill. The beam size observed was 5.96x5.97 mm2. According on the crystal plane (Si100), the detector was placed at 90° respect to the primary beam, at a distance of 100 mm.   FIG. 5: Experimental Layout run 2011. On Gonio it is visible the ST crystal, on the left the SDD detector and the two concrete bricks. 	  The SDD detector has an active area of 30 mm2 with an energy resolution of 123 eV at MnKα and a degradation of energetic resolution of 4 eV at 100 kcps. In order to reduce the noise coming from the primary beam, in particular to directly expose the detector to the pipe window, the SDD was protected by two concrete bricks. Even if we are not sure of the primary beam spectrum, we had a clear evidence of the PXR emission. The acquisition time was estimated in 40 hours: such a long acquisition time coupled with a very weak acquisition indicating that the system was not well aligned and the beam did not consist of Pb ions only.    FIG. 6: This spectrum is obtained by the sum of two days acquisitions. At 6.5 keV is evident the PXR first order signal and at 13 keV the second order.   	   - 7 -	  OBSERVATION ON JUNE 2015 The run at H8 of June 2015 was planned for a 400 GeV/c proton beam and the main goal for the PXR acquisition was the testing of a new Silicon Drift Detector. The device in analysis was an XGLab detector with specifications described in TAB. 4.  TAB. 4: XGLab SDD specifications XGL-SPCM-4110-CUBE based on 25mm2 SDD: 25 mm2 SDD active area Beryllium window, thickness 12.5 µm Silicon thickness 500 µm Case: 47 mm finger length, diameter 18 mm Resolution <135 eV at MnKα  The detector has been mounted on a linear stage remotely controlled allowing a movement parallel to the beam in a range of 100 mm, and on a manual vertical movimentation system for the displacement also on this direction.  . FIG. 7: Experimental layout for June 2015. P2 and P3 tracker planes enclose the experimental table. The crystal, C, stricken by the beam emitting PXR signal is analyzed by the SDD detector, D.  This time some tracker planes have been added for the analysis of the beam upstream and downstream relatively to the crystal such as represented in Fig. 7. The system has been tested in two configurations:   1st configuration 2nd configuration Collimation Aluminium: Length 33 mm, Thickness 10 mm, Window diameter 23 mm No Shielding Aluminium: 10 mm,  Aluminium: 5 mm  Lead: 2 mm Crystal-Detector Distance 140 mm 30 mm  	   - 8 -	  During this run the acquisition times were between 30 minutes and 1 hour. The detector was placed in the supposed best position for the PXR detection. The beam flux was detected as 2·106 particles per spill and the results of these acquisitions show how the addition of tracker planes is connected to an increment of two kind of noisy artifacts during the measurement, one in the first interval of energy channels and the other in the last part.  The two spectra in Figure 8 show how the configuration 2 was less afflicted by the second noise effect, and even that the smaller distance allowed the detection of Si emission from the crystal.  FIG. 8: Spectra for the two configurations.  These kind of noise are probably the result of the interpretation of the shape of the signal registered by the detector. The high flux of heterogeneous particles during the 10s spill is wrongly interpreted and generates at high channels a pile-up behavior and in the low channels a sort of bin effect for all the not interpreted signals. These results brought to some conclusion for the next run: Collimation has to be redesigned with the aim of reducing the crystal-detector distance and observed area; A new shielding system is needed in order to reduce the noise effect coming from the environment, tracker planes in primis; Movimentation system allowing remotely displacements on the two axis of the plane parallel to the crystal is crucial for the searching of the PXR emission before the long statistics acquiring.  OBSERVATION ON NOVEMBER 2015 For this run a new PXR detection system has been designed and is shown in Figure 9. This device is composed by a two-axis movimentation system and the detector placed inside a shielding box. From design to realization, the entire process has been curated at INFN-LNF. The core of the new system is the shielding box designed to guarantee a layer of 2 mm of Pb and more than 6 mm of Al alloy all around the detector (Fig. 10). 	   - 9 -	  The detector finger, with the sensible area, is shielded by the same lead thickness and by a brass probe coupled with a cap of the same material. This cap permits the addition of an internal lead pin-hole.   FIG. 9: New PXR system. Two linear stages permit scanning parallel to the crystal plane, the shielding box covers the detector from the background radiation and allows a first raw alignment.  Last feature of the box is represented by the two lateral grooves. These are suitable to take advantage of the laser system used for the first alignment of the crystal. In this way the detector window can be placed at a distance of 100 mm with a good approximation perpendicular to the beam and on the 75° line from the striking point on the crystal.  FIG. 10: Shielding box exploded view drawing. 	   - 10 -	   At the distance of 100 mm the PXR spot emitted for QM is simulated to be 1x2.5 mm2 (divergence of 10x25 mrad). Considering a circular active area with a diameter of 5.6 mm, a couple of mm of misalignment become relevant and a preceding scanning step, before acquisition, for a fine alignment is required.  For these run a Pb Ion beam had been provided. Due to the lack of information about the exact composition of the beam it is not possible to deduce a reliable quantitative analysis of the results. Theoretically a completely stripped Pb ion beam has been provided with a 5·105 charges/s flux, the estimated size is on x axis 10 mm, 80 µrad divergent, and on y 7 mm, 100 µrad divergent.  The crystal in analysis is a Quasi Mosaic, QM46, and due to the large beam size the entire crystal is put in front of it. The limited available acquisition time has also reduced the chances of the experiment to a single 4 hour acquisition, avoiding also the scanning for the fine alignment. In order to have the maximum active area available, no pin-hole has been applied in front of detector window.  However in this way the acceptance angle is opened to any possible scattering and fluorescent signal coming from the crystal area. The acquired spectrum is shown in Figure 11.   FIG. 11: Spectrum acquired for 4h. Five peaks are clearly visible. 	  After calibration it is possible to summarize in Table 5 the results:  TAB. 5 : Interpretation of the acquired spectrum. Channel Energy [keV] Emission Line Coming from 570 3.006  Ar Kα Air 843 4.539 Ti Kα Crystal Holder (Ti alloy) 920 4.971 Ti Kβ Crystal Holder (Ti alloy) 1468 8.049 Cu Kα Cap of shielding box (brass) 1575 8.650 Zn Kα Cap of shielding box(brass)  The spectrum points out that the alignment was not enough precise. In optimal condition the detector should be rotated in 15° respect to the real position used. In that case it would be 	   - 11 -	  possible to collect all the PXR cone, while during our measurements the half part of the working windows was shadowed by the brass shielding cap. As we can conclude, the detected radiation is due to the fluorescence of air (Ar), the crystal holder (Ti alloy) and the cap of the shielding box (brass). This hypothesis is confirmed by the comparable intensities of the peaks of channels 1468 and 1575 relative to Cu and Zn, as the specific brass used for the shielding is the CuZn40Pb2 alloy (Cu ≈ 60% and Zn ≈ 40%). The fluorescence of Si is absorbed by the air path between crystal and detector.  CONCLUSION In 2011, having a 40h run duration, the evidence of PXR emission by the Pb ion beam was clear but the lack of information on the primary beam composition avoided the possibility of any detailed analysis. In November 2015 while the run duration was approximately one order less, 4h, assuming that we have even detected PXR, our estimation proves that the low flux of radiation was not enough to be resolved for this S/N ratio in presence of other fluorescence contribution, even for primary emission, integral less than 20. The problem can be solved in the same experimental conditions just by increasing the recording time (dedicated for the PXR) up to 8-10 hours. Another important point is that the quality of the primary ion beam must be well defined: all our estimations have been done supposing a complete stripped Pb ions beam, information not confirmed by the machine group.  We also know that the transverse size of the beam exceeds the front cross section of the crystal reducing the number of particles emitting PXR by almost one order of magnitude. On the other hand the part of beam out of crystal front entrance contributes to the fluorescence of the Titanium Crystal holder, clearly detected.  FUTURE AIMS In the next run it will be required: Enough time for the detection of the signal: either dedicated or parasitic without changes. A scanning procedure for the searching of the best alignment position. With the best alignment, also the application of a pin-hole to increase the S/N of the entire measurement.  The description of the beam composition in order the compare theoretical hypothesis and experimental observations. Such first attempt ST crystals are preferred for the easier alignment procedure: the 90° emission is more easily detectable.  REFERENCES (1) W. Scandale et al., Phys. Lett. B 701, 180, (2011).  (2) H. Nitta, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7621, (1992).  (3) Yu.N. Adishchev et al., JETP Lett. 81, 241, (2005).  

Parametric X-Ray detection in UA9 experiment

https://www.openaccessrepository.it/record/76790/files/parametric-x-ray-detection-in-ua9-experiment_.._Note_INFN_INFN-16-05-LNF.pdf

Parametric X-Ray detection in UA9 experiment

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Open Access Repository