A further extension of R\"odl's theorem

Abstract

Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0 and a nonnull graph HH. A well-known theorem of R\"odl from the 80s says that every graph GG with no induced copy of HH contains a linear-sized ε\varepsilon-restricted set S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G), which means SS induces a subgraph with maximum degree at most ε∣S∣\varepsilon\vert S\vert in GG or its complement. There are two extensions of this result: ∙\bullet quantitatively, Nikiforov (and later Fox and Sudakov) relaxed the condition "no induced copy of HH" into "at most κ∣G∣∣H∣\kappa\vert G\vert^{\vert H\vert} induced copies of HH for some κ>0\kappa>0 depending on HH and ε\varepsilon"; and ∙\bullet qualitatively, Chudnovsky, Scott, Seymour, and Spirkl recently showed that there exists N>0N>0 depending on HH and ε\varepsilon such that GG is (N,ε)(N,\varepsilon)-restricted, which means V(G)V(G) has a partition into at most NN subsets that are ε\varepsilon-restricted. A natural common generalization of these two asserts that every graph GG with at most κ∣G∣∣H∣\kappa\vert G\vert^{\vert H\vert} induced copies of HH is (N,ε)(N,\varepsilon)-restricted for some κ,N>0\kappa,N>0 depending on HH and ε\varepsilon. This is unfortunately false, but we prove that for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, κ\kappa and NN still exist so that for every d≥0d\ge0, every graph with at most κd∣H∣\kappa d^{\vert H\vert} induced copies of HH has an (N,ε)(N,\varepsilon)-restricted induced subgraph on at least ∣G∣−d\vert G\vert-d vertices. This unifies the two aforementioned theorems, and is optimal up to κ\kappa and NN for every value of dd.Comment: 11 pages, revised according to the referees' comment

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions