Abstract

Large variability exists across brain regions in health and disease, considering their cellular and molecular composition, connectivity and function. Large-scale whole-brain models comprising coupled brain regions provide insights into the underlying dynamics that shape complex patterns of spontaneous brain activity. In particular, biophysically grounded mean-field whole-brain models in the asynchronous regime were used to demonstrate the dynamical consequences of including regional variability. Nevertheless, the role of heterogeneities when brain dynamics are supporting by synchronous oscillating state, which is a ubiquitous phenomenon in brain, remains poorly understood. Here, we implemented two models capable of presenting oscillatory behaviour with different levels of abstraction: a phenomenological Stuart Landau model and an exact mean-field model. The fit of these models informed by structural-to-functional–weighted MRI signal (T1w/T2w) allowed to explore the implication of the inclusion of heterogeneities for modelling resting-state fMRI recordings from healthy participants. We found that disease-specific regional functional heterogeneity imposed dynamical consequences within the oscillatory regime in fMRI recordings from neurodegeneration with specific impacts in brain atrophy/structure (Alzheimer patients). Overall, we found that models with oscillations perform better when structural and functional regional heterogeneities are considered showing that phenomenological and biophysical models behave similarly at the brink of the Hopf bifurcation.Fil: Sanz Perl Hernandez, Yonatan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de San Andrés; Argentina. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Zamora Lopez, Gorka. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Montbrió, Ernest. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Monge Asensio, Martí. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; EspañaFil: Vohryzek, Jakub. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Fittipaldi, María Sol. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de San Andrés; Argentina. University of California; Estados Unidos. Trinity College; IrlandaFil: Gonzalez Campo, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de San Andrés; ArgentinaFil: Moguilner, Sebastian Gabriel. University of California; Estados Unidos. Trinity College; Irlanda. Universidad Adolfo Ibañez; ChileFil: Ibañez, Agustin Mariano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de San Andrés; Argentina. University of California; Estados Unidos. Trinity College; Irlanda. Universidad Adolfo Ibañez; ChileFil: Tagliazucchi, Enzo Rodolfo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de San Andrés; Argentina. Universidad Adolfo Ibañez; ChileFil: Yeo, B. T. Thomas. National University of Singapore; SingapurFil: Kringelbach, Morten L.. University of Oxford; Reino Unido. University Aarhus; Dinamarca. Universidade do Minho; PortugalFil: Deco, Gustavo. Universitat Pompeu Fabra; España. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences; Alemania. Monash University; Australi

    Similar works