Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction 20.1 Endnote

JOURNAL, CISR

English

James Madison University

Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction Volume 20 Issue 1 The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction Article 16 April 2016 Endnotes Issue 20.1 CISR JOURNAL Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU (CISR) Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal  Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation JOURNAL, CISR (2016) "Endnotes Issue 20.1," Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 16. Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol20/iss1/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction by an authorized editor of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact dc_admin@jmu.edu. ENDNOTES @ THE JOURNAL OF CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS DESTRUCTION66Technology Research in Mine Action: Enough is Enough by Gasser [ from page 6 ]1. Gasser, Russell. “Technology for Humanitarian Landmine Clearance.” Ph.D. Thesis, Development Technology Unit, School of Engineering, Warwick University, (2000): 2–3. Accessed 14 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1QpdHEC. 2. Development Technology Workshop. Global Development. Accessed 1 February 2016. http://bit.ly/20kfIYq. 3. Keeley, Robert. “Added value: the requirements of mine clearers and donors from new mine detection technologies.” Proceedings of EUREL International Conference on the Detection of Abandoned Landmines, IEE Conference Publication 431 (1996): 21–5.4. “ITV 10 April 2012.” YouTube video, 0:20, posted by MineseekerOperations. Accessed 14 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1NPLTXP. Stockpile Destruction of Obsolete Surface-to-air Missiles in Mali by Dupouy and Frisby [ from page 10 ]1. “Unplanned Explosions at Munitions Sites.” Small Arms Survey. Accessed 9 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1Dc5SZv. 2. “Countdown to Catastrophe: The MPILA Ammunition Depot Explosions.” Small Arms Survey, 2014. Accessed 9 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1IEXWqD. UNMAS Gaza Emergency Response Report by Frankish [ from page 19 ] 1. United Nations Department of Safety and Security Joint Security Information Office.2. The figure of 10% is generally used to detail the percentage failure rate of ammunition.3. “50 Days of Death & Destruction: Israel’s “Operation Protective Edge.” Institute for Middle East Understanding. 10 September 2014. http://bit.ly/1xTBcgo. Accessed 26 February 2016.4. “Impact of the 2014 Conflict in the Gaza Strip UNOSAT Satellite Derived Geospatial Analysis.” United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR). 2014. http://bit.ly/1Gg3538. Accessed 26 February 2016.5. United Nations Relief and Works Agency includes sanitary works, field offices, pumping stations, etc.6. Interview with Deputy Head of Gaza Coordination and Liaison Administration. 10 December 2014. 7. Direct fire refers to the launching of a projectile directly at a target within the line-of-sight of the firer.8. Indirect fire is aiming and firing a projectile without relying on a direct line of sight between the gun and its target.Arms Management and Destruction Programming: Taking Stock by Chris Loughran and Gillesen [ from page 25 ]1. “International Ammunition Technical Guidelines Version 2 English (updated 2015).” UN SaferGuard. Accessed 18 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1MlBWvQGICHD’s Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Outreach Programme by Paktian [ from page 30 ]1. Clearance of ERW Tasks by the Armed Forces and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus. Presentation made at the EECCA workshop in Minisk, Belarus, 5 June 2015.Unfinished Business: Cluster Munition Remnants in Kosovo by Lisica and Maslen [ from page 34 ]1. HALO Trust. “Kosovo Community Liaison Survey,” Final report presented at Pristina, Kosovo, September 2007.2. “Kosovo.” Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor Report 2010. Accessed 21 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1UWzFyb.3. Ahmet Sallova. Email correspondence with Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor, 18 March 2015.4. Ahmet Sallova. Email correspondence with author, 18 March 2015.5. A case was brought against three NATO member states before the European Court of Human Rights based on the death of a child and serious injury of another from an unexploded submunition in Mitrovica municipality in March 2000. The court declared the case inadmissible on jurisdictional grounds without consideration of its merits. European Court of Human Rights, Behrami and Behrami v. France and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (Grand Chamber Decision as to the Admissibility), 2 May 2007. Accessed 21 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1OGiEmA.6. Lisica, Darvin and Goran Peršić. Cluster Munition Remnants in Northern Kosovo. Non-Technical Survey of Contamination and Impact, NPA, Sarajevo, 2015, 3.5, p. 15. Accessed 10 February 2016. http://bit.ly/1NrQ7FZ. Provision of Emergency Risk Education to IDPs and Returnees in Ukraine by Jones and Crowther [ from page 37 ]1. Keeley, Robert. “Counting the Uncountable: Measuring the Benefits of MRE.” The Journal of ERW and Mine Action, no. 19.2 (July 2015): 35–38. Accessed 7 December 2015. http://bit.ly/1XWQZmp. Explosive Hazards in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters: Lessons Learned by Neitzey and Daly [ from page 41 ]1. Ruan, Juan C. “Hurricane Mitch jet stream.” Journal of Mine Action. 4(3). Accessed 30 November 2015.  http://bit.ly/1NDIzRw.2. Agence France-Presse. “New landmine threat in flood-ravaged Mozambique: FM.” ReliefWeb. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1TgbXvl.3. UN Development Programme. “Mozambique maps out post-flood landmine problem with support from UNDP.” ReliefWeb. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1LIGKLz.4. Durrani, Shandana A. “UNICEF responds to unexploded ordnance threat in aftermath of Pakistan flood crisis.” UNICEF – Pakistan. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://uni.cf/1NixFdr.5. Bhalla, Nita. “Disease, hunger and mines threaten flood-hit Sri Lankans – UN.” Thomson Reuters Foundation. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://tmsnrt.rs/1TnKUP7.6. Wilson, Christopher. (Ed.). “Rains let loose land mines, shut Peru-Chile border.” Reuters. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://reut.rs/1jtOc6E.7. IRIN News. “Flooding unearths Cambodia’s landmines.” IRIN News. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1jtOSsF.8. UNDP News Centre. “UNDP: Flooding unearths landmine danger.” United Nations Development Programme. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1yyRyIf.ENDNOTES1JOURNAL: Endnotes Issue 20.1Published by JMU Scholarly Commons, 2016ISSUE 20.1 @ MARCH 2016 679. Cerkez, Aida. “Bosnia floods create new land-mine risk in Balkans.” Associated Press. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1NYay8F.10. International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2014). Landmine Monitor 2014. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1qmtkQy.11. Guha-Sapir, Debarati., Hoyois, P. and Below, R. “Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2013: The Numbers and Trends.” Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1RgNZBq.12. Lennard, Jeremy. (Ed.).  “Global Estimates 2014: People displaced by disasters.” Geneva: Norwegian Refugee Council. p. 7. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1HA6Qpf.13. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. “War’s Human Cost: UNHCR Global Trends 2013.” Geneva: UNHCR. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1qkyV7f.14. Jennings, Steve. “Time’s Bitter Flood: Trends in the number of reported natural disasters.” Oxford: Oxfam GB. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1jtVt6x.15. McGuire, Michael, and Schneck, D. “What if Hurricane Katrina Hit in 2020? The Need for Strategic Management of Disasters.” Public Administration Review 70 (12/02):201-7. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1lUrgiQ.16. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. “What is the international strategy?” UNISDR. Accessed 30 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1NYaTZ5.Mozambique’s Mine-free District Process by Belchior Martíns and Risser [ from page 47 ]1. “Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention.” Article 5, paragraphs 1 and 2. Anti-personnel Mine Ban Convention. Accessed 28 October 2015. http://bit.ly/1w99Ek7.2. “Final Report Sixth Meeting of the States Parties to the APMBC.” Part II, paragraph 62, Zagreb, Croatia 2005. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Accessed 28 October 2015. http://bit.ly/1GJo6HU.3. “The HALO Trust: Getting the Survey Right.” The HALO Trust. Accessed 28 October 2015. http://bit.ly/1LC7yk6. Further details of the HALO Trust’s Mine Impact Free District Process are available in the HALO Trust’s SOP for the MFID Surveys.4. Rebelo, Pamela. “Transitioning Mine Action Programmes to National Ownership: Mozambique.” GICHD. Accessed 2 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1iy0Bpz. Since 1999, the National Demining Institute of Mozambique or Instituto Nacional de Desminagem (IND) serves as the National Mine Action Center for the country, responsible for coordinating all mine action activities in Mozambique and formulating policy and strategies for the implementation of the APMBC.5. The HALO Trust. “The Mine Impact Free Survey of Northern Mozambique Final Report. October 2004–June 2007” submitted to the IND, Maputo, Mozambique, 2007.6. “Understanding Mine Clearance in the Context of the AP Mine Ban Convention.” Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. Accessed 28 October 2015. http://bit.ly/1kRMm0J. This use of the term “mine-free” is in line with advice provided by the APMBC’s Implementation Support Unit which stated, “For public relations purposes, ‘mine-free’ may be used as a short reference to communicate that there are no areas in a particular location or country are considered dangerous, due to the presence or suspected presence of mines.”Transition and National Capacity After Article 5 Compliance in Mozambique by Risser and Ruge [ from page 53 ]1. For more information on how Mozambique met its Article 5 obligation, please see Martins, Antonio Belchoir and Hans Risser. “Mozambique’s Mine-free District Process.” The Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction 20, no. 1 (2016).TIRAMISU Final Technology Demonstration at SEDEE-DOVO by Yvinec, Lacroix and Baudoin [ Rfrom page 58 ]1. TIRAMISU: Humanitarian Demining Toolbox. Accessed 8 January 2016. http://www.fp7-tiramisu.eu.2. “Geoinformation for demining.” TIRAMISU: Humanitarian Demining Toolbox. Accessed 5 February 2016. http://bit.ly/1R9NAkU. 3. Cepolina, Emanuela Elisa and Matteo Zoppi. “Could Local Agricultural Machines Make a Country ‘Impact Free’ by 2010?” Journal of ERW and Mine Action 13.2 (2009). Accessed 6 January 2016. http://bit.ly/1RaT2of.4. Bajic, Milan, Tamara Ivelja, Emina Hadzic, Haris Balta, Goran Skelac and Zoran Grujić. “Impact of Flooding on Mine Action in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia,and Serbia.” The Journal of ERW and Mine Action 19.1 (2015). http://bit.ly/22LlUYd.5. Scapolla, Luisa and Emanuela Elisa Cepolina. “Billy Goat Radio: MRE in Sahrawi Refugee Camps.” The Journal of ERW and Mine Action 18.3 (2014). Accessed 8 January 2016. http://bit.ly/1ZOfN2Y. Small Caliber De-armers: An Answer to Explosive Acquisition Problems by Pearson [ from page 62 ]1. The complete de-bulleting process can be seen here: http://bit.ly/1ormHNG. onhttps://issuu.com/cisr-journal2Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 20, Iss. 1 [2016], Art. 16https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol20/iss1/16

Endnotes Issue 20.1

https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1944&context=cisr-journal

Endnotes Issue 20.1

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

James Madison University