Balayage and fractional harmonic measure in minimum Riesz energy problems with external fields

Abstract

For the Riesz kernel ΞΊΞ±(x,y):=∣xβˆ’yβˆ£Ξ±βˆ’n\kappa_\alpha(x,y):=|x-y|^{\alpha-n} on Rn\mathbb R^n, where nβ©Ύ2n\geqslant2, α∈(0,2]\alpha\in(0,2], and Ξ±<n\alpha<n, we consider the problem of minimizing the Gauss functional ∫κα(x,y) d(ΞΌβŠ—ΞΌ)(x,y)+2∫f dΞΌ,Β whereΒ f:=βˆ’UΟ‰:=βˆ’βˆ«ΞΊΞ±(β‹…,y) dΟ‰(y),\int\kappa_\alpha(x,y)\,d(\mu\otimes\mu)(x,y)+2\int f\,d\mu,\text{ where $f:=-U^\omega:=-\int\kappa_\alpha(\cdot,y)\,d\omega(y)$}, Ο‰\omega being a given positive (Radon) measure on Rn\mathbb R^n, and ΞΌ\mu ranging over all positive measures of finite energy, concentrated on AβŠ‚RnA\subset\mathbb R^n and having unit total mass. We prove that if AA is a quasiclosed set of nonzero inner capacity cβˆ—(A)c_*(A), and if the inner balayage Ο‰A\omega^A of Ο‰\omega onto AA is of finite energy, then the solution Ξ»A,f\lambda_{A,f} to the problem exists if and only if either cβˆ—(A)<∞c_*(A)<\infty, or Ο‰A(Rn)β©Ύ1\omega^A(\mathbb R^n)\geqslant1. We also analyze the support S(Ξ»A,f)S(\lambda_{A,f}) of Ξ»A,f\lambda_{A,f}, thereby discovering new surprising phenomena. To be precise, we say that xβˆˆβˆ‚RnAx\in\partial_{\mathbb R^n}A is inner Ξ±\alpha-ultrairregular for AA if cβˆ—(Axβˆ—)<∞c_*(A^*_x)<\infty, Axβˆ—A^*_x being the inverse of AA with respect to {∣yβˆ’x∣=1}\{|y-x|=1\}; let AuA^u consist of all those xx. We show that for any x∈Auβˆͺ(Rnβˆ–ClRnA)x\in A^u\cup(\mathbb R^n\setminus{\rm Cl}_{\mathbb R^n}A), there is qx∈[1,∞)q_x\in[1,\infty) such that Ξ»A,fq\lambda_{A,f_q} do exist for all q∈[qx,∞)q\in[q_x,\infty). Here fq:=βˆ’qUΞ΅xf_q:=-qU^{\varepsilon_x}, Ξ΅x\varepsilon_x being the unit Dirac measure at xx. Thus, for any x∈Aux\in A^u and qβ©Ύqxq\geqslant q_x, no compensation effect occurs between two oppositely signed charges carried by the same conductor, which seems to contradict our physical intuition. Another interesting phenomenon is that, if AA is closed while βˆ‚RnA\partial_{\mathbb R^n}A unbounded, then for any x∈Auβˆͺ(Rnβˆ–A)x\in A^u\cup(\mathbb R^n\setminus A), S(Ξ»A,fqx)S(\lambda_{A,f_{q_x}}) is noncompact, whereas S(Ξ»A,fqx+t)S(\lambda_{A,f_{q_x+t}}) is already compact for any t∈(0,∞)t\in(0,\infty) -- even arbitrarily small.Comment: 24 page

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions