Storm-resolving models (SRMs) have gained widespread interest because of the
unprecedented detail with which they resolve the global climate. However, it
remains difficult to quantify objective differences in how SRMs resolve complex
atmospheric formations. This lack of appropriate tools for comparing model
similarities is a problem in many disparate fields that involve simulation
tools for complex data. To address this challenge we develop methods to
estimate distributional distances based on both nonlinear dimensionality
reduction and vector quantization. Our approach automatically learns
appropriate notions of similarity from low-dimensional latent data
representations that the different models produce. This enables an
intercomparison of nine SRMs based on their high-dimensional simulation data
and reveals that only six are similar in their representation of atmospheric
dynamics. Furthermore, we uncover signatures of the convective response to
global warming in a fully unsupervised way. Our study provides a path toward
evaluating future high-resolution simulation data more objectively.Comment: 22 pages, 19 figures. Submitted to journal for consideratio