This study shows radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitors in clinical practice and ex vivo by fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosomal breaks. Nevertheless, radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy is feasible with an acceptable increase in toxicity. Vemurafenib is a more potent radiosensitizer than dabrafenib in both the patient study and the ex vivo experiment

Bauch, J.

Berking, C.

Clemens, P.

Distel, L. V.

Eich, H. T.

Fietkau, R.

Forschner, A.

Gleisner, S.

Goldinger, S. M.

Grabbe, S.

Grabenbauer, G.

Gutzmer, R.

Hecht, M.

Heinzerling, L.

Keikavoussi, P.

Loquai, C.

Müller-Brenne, T.

Schadendorf, D.

Schuler, G.

Schulze, B.

Schuster, B.

Semrau, S.

Weishaupt, C.

Zimmer, L.

Background: Recent evidence suggests that ionizing radiation may be associated with unexpected side-effects in melanoma patients treated with concomitant BRAF inhibitors. A large multicenter analysis was carried out to generate reliable safety data and elucidate the mechanism.



Methods: A total of 161 melanoma patients from 11 European skin cancer centers were evaluated for acute and late toxicity, of whom 70 consecutive patients received 86 series of radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy. To further characterize and quantify a possible radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitors, blood samples of 35 melanoma patients were used for individual radiosensitivity testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosomal breaks after ex vivo irradiation.



Results: With radiotherapy and concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy the rate of acute radiodermatitis ≥2° was 36% and follicular cystic proliferation was seen in 13% of all radiotherapies. Non-skin toxicities included hearing disorders (4%) and dysphagia (2%). Following whole-brain radiotherapy, rates of radiodermatitis ≥2° were 44% and 8% (P < 0.001) for patients with and without BRAF inhibitor therapy, respectively. Concomitant treatment with vemurafenib induced acute radiodermatitis ≥2° more frequently than treatment with dabrafenib (40% versus 26%, P = 0.07). In line with these findings, analysis of chromosomal breaks ex vivo indicated significantly increased radiosensitivity for patients under vemurafenib (P = 0.004) and for patients switched from vemurafenib to dabrafenib (P = 0.002), but not for patients on dabrafenib only. No toxicities were reported after stereotactic treatment.



Conclusion: Radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy is feasible with an acceptable increase in toxicity. Vemurafenib is a more potent radiosensitizer than dabrafenib

OPUS FAU - Online-Publikationssystem der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitor therapy—mechanism and frequency of toxicity in melanoma patients

RERO DOC Digital Library

Background: Recent evidence suggests that ionizing radiation may be associated with unexpected side-effects in melanoma patients treated with concomitant BRAF inhibitors. A large multicenter analysis was carried out to generate reliable safety data and elucidate the mechanism.

Methods: A total of 161 melanoma patients from 11 European skin cancer centers were evaluated for acute and late toxicity, of whom 70 consecutive patients received 86 series of radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy. To further characterize and quantify a possible radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitors, blood samples of 35 melanoma patients were used for individual radiosensitivity testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosomal breaks after ex vivo irradiation.

Results: With radiotherapy and concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy the rate of acute radiodermatitis ≥2° was 36% and follicular cystic proliferation was seen in 13% of all radiotherapies. Non-skin toxicities included hearing disorders (4%) and dysphagia (2%). Following whole-brain radiotherapy, rates of radiodermatitis ≥2° were 44% and 8% (P < 0.001) for patients with and without BRAF inhibitor therapy, respectively. Concomitant treatment with vemurafenib induced acute radiodermatitis ≥2° more frequently than treatment with dabrafenib (40% versus 26%, P = 0.07). In line with these findings, analysis of chromosomal breaks ex vivo indicated significantly increased radiosensitivity for patients under vemurafenib (P = 0.004) and for patients switched from vemurafenib to dabrafenib (P = 0.002), but not for patients on dabrafenib only. No toxicities were reported after stereotactic treatment.

Conclusion: Radiotherapy with concomitant BRAF inhibitor therapy is feasible with an acceptable increase in toxicity. Vemurafenib is a more potent radiosensitizer than dabrafenib

Hecht, M.

Zimmer, L.

Loquai, C.

Weishaupt, C.

Gutzmer, R.

Schuster, B.

Gleisner, S.

Schulze, B.

Goldinger, S. M.

Berking, C.

Forschner, A.

Clemens, P.

Grabenbauer, G.

Müller-Brenne, T.

Bauch, J.

Eich, H. T.

Grabbe, S.

Schadendorf, D.

Schuler, G.

Keikavoussi, P.

Semrau, S.

Fietkau, R.

Distel, L. V.

Heinzerling, L.

OPEN FAU Online-Publikationssystem der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

http://doc.rero.ch/record/303268/files/mdv139.pdf

Radiosensitization by BRAF inhibitor therapy—mechanism and frequency of toxicity in melanoma patients

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

OPUS FAU - Online-Publikationssystem der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

RERO DOC Digital Library

OPEN FAU Online-Publikationssystem der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg