Cherix, D.

Faucherre, J.

Wyss, C.

RERO DOC Digital Library

Journal of Insect Behavior, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1999Short CommunicationBehavior of Calliphora vicina (Diptera,Calliphoridae) Under Extreme ConditionsJ. Faucherre,1,2 D. Cherix,1,2,4 and C. Wyss3KEY WORDS: Calliphora vicina; blowflies; forensic entomology; oviposition; activity.If a dead human body is left exposed above the ground it will attract blowflies,which will rapidly lay eggs. The maggots found may contribute to police inves-tigation in several ways. One of them is the estimate of postmortem interval(PMI) (see Greenberg, 1991; Erzinclioglu, 1996). But as discussed by differentauthors (e.g., Erzinclioglu, 1996), we are missing data about several aspects suchas flight activity and egg-laying behavior under extreme conditions.Temperature is one of the most important factors affecting fly ovipositionactivity and rate of larval development. It is generally accepted that activity ofnecrophagous flies stops below an air temperature of 10°C (Williams, 1984) or12°C (Erzinclioglu, 1996). Nevertheless, some authors showed that during thecold season, sun is probably more important than ambiant air temperature (seeGreen, 1951; Nuorteva, 1965; Greenberg, 1973). Deonier (1940) indicated thatCalliphora spp. were active at a minimum of 1.7°C with the usual minimumbeing between 4.5 and 10°C. Nuorteva (1959) found that Calliphora vicina andC. vomitoria were active when exposed to sun with an air temperature mea-sured in the shade of 5-6°C (a typical winter situation). Moreover, during win-ter, most of the captured species belongs to the genus Calliphora (Wyss, 1997;C. Wyss, personal observation). Some of these species seem more cold-adaptedthan species of Lucilia. Meyer and Schaub (1973) demonstrated that Calliphoraspecies had a higher metabolic rate for identical temperatures compared to warm-adapted species (see also Greenberg, 1991). According to Greenberg (1991) this1Museum of Zoology, Palais de Rumine, P.O. Box 448, 1000 Lausanne 17, Switzerland.2 Institute of Ecology, University of Lausanne, Biology Building, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.3Criminal Police, Centre Blecherette, 1014 Lausanne, Switzerland.4To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 41 21 316 34 79. e-mail; daniel.cherix@ie-zea.unil.ch.6870892-7553/99/0900-0687$ 16.00/0 © 1999 Plenum Publishing Corporationcould be responsible for the lower-limit activity of Calliphora (2.5–4°C) com-pared to Lucilia sericata (10–12.5°C). But flight activity and oviposition are alsodependent on other factors. Generally, blowflies are not active and do not layeggs at night or during bad weather (Greenberg, 1985; Catts, 1992; Erzin9lioglu,1996). Nevertheless, some species have been found to lay eggs during the day inshady or dark places such as chimneys and cellars (Erzinclioglu, 1996) or in cartrunks (Greenberg, 1990). Observations made by Green (1951) and Greenberg(1990) showed, however, that some species such as L. sericata, C. vicina, andPhormia regina could be active at night.The literature about the influence of temperature on larval development isquite abundant, but there are surprisingly few studies on egg-laying and larvaldevelopment at low temperatures. It has been said that eggs of C. vicina will nothatch at or below 4°C (Nielsen and Nielsen, 1946). But Davies and Ratcliffe (1994)indicated that complete larval development was possible at 5°C and that embryo-genesis started even at 3.5°C. This research was conducted under laboratory con-ditions where flies were allowed to oviposit at higher temperatures (17-20°C).We report here a case where C. vicina was able to fly and oviposit underextreme conditions.The body of a 77-year-old male was discovered on 25 July 1997, 18 daysafter being reported missing, in a 10-m-deep cave located in a forest, in theSwiss Jura mountains at an altitude of 1260 m. He was lying on his back anddressed without visible injuries. The location of the body in the cave was intotal darkness and the ambient temperature was constant (5°C). Following thelocal investigations made by the police, the body was carried to the Institute ofForensic Medicine (University of Lausanne) and kept for 3 days in a cold room(4°C) until postmortem investigations started. At that time, we collected severalbatches of eggs (a total of about 70) on the top of the head and in the mouth.Reared under laboratory conditions (26°C, 70% RH), the first eggs hatched about6 h later and all reached the adult stage (see Fig. 1) and belonged to C. vicina,a common blowfly in Europe (Rognes, 1991). The autopsy of the corpse couldnot estimate the day of death but revealed that death was due to an epiduralematoma subsequent to the downfall.In order to demonstrate that blowflies were able to fly and lay eggs in thiscave and to estimate the PMI, on 12 August (Day 1, fig. 1) we placed, at theprevious body location, 1.5 kg of fresh meat and 1 kg of pork liver. We alsorecorded temperatures close to the meat. The bait was checked each day to detectthe presence of eggs. On 23 August (day 12), the first eggs were found (about50). They were left for 6 days, corresponding to the same interval of 18 daysbetween the disappearance of the victim and his discovery, and then transportedand left another 3 days in the cold room at the institute. Afterward, eggs werecollected and reared as mentioned above. The first eggs hatched the same day,corresponding to day 21. All emerged adults belonged to C. vicina.688 Faucherre, Cherix, and WyssBehavior of Calliphora vicinaFig. 1. Succession of the main events.Comparing both set of data, we have good evidence that the man died theday he was reported missing (8/7/97) or 1 day later. This assumption is sup-ported on the following bases. First, according to Davies and Ratcliffe (1994),eggs of C. vicina need about 9 days at 5°C to hatch. We can reasonably assumethat the mean temperature supported by eggs during the case study was about5-5.5°C. Therefore from 28 July (hatching day), we cut off 9 days and estimatedthe egg-laying day as the 19th. Second, in our experiment 12 days was neededto attract blowflies to the bait. This delayed attractivity of our bait is due partlyto the low-temperature limiting decomposition. Cutting 12 days off the egg-lay-ing day we get 8 July. This is exactly what the results of our experimental caseshowed.This brings new limits to forensic entomology because, as mentioned pre-viously, it was generally assumed that blowflies did not fly and lay eggs under10-12°C and normally not in total darkness. But females were nevertheless689attracted to the corpse or the bait, coming from outside and flying downwardabout 10 m until they reached the substrate. We suppose that the higher metabolicrate of C. vicina and the heat stored by sunlight could explain the possibility ofentering a cold cave to oviposit. However, in a series of experiments done underlaboratory conditions with C. vicina, when females (collected in winter) were leftat different temperatures, ranging from 5 to 21°C, they stopped ovipositing atabout 8°C (unpublished).ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe would like to express our thanks to Dr. B. Merz for comments on themanuscript.REFERENCESCatts, E. P. (1992). Problems in estimating the postmortem interval in death investigations. J. Agr.Entomol 9: 245-255.Davies, L., and Ratcliffe, G. G. (1994). Development rates of some pre-adult stages in blowflieswith reference to low temperatures. Med. Vet. Ent. 8: 245-254.Deonier, C. C. (1940). Carcass temperatures and their relation to winter blowfly populations andactivity in the Southwest. J. Econ. Entomol. 33: 166–170.Erzinclioglu, Y. Z. (1996). Blowflies, Naturalists' Handbook 23, Richmond.Green, A. A. (1951). The control of blow flies infesting slaughter houses. 1. Field observations ofthe habits of blow flies. Ann. Appl. Biol. 38: 475–494.Greenberg, B. (1973). Flies and Disease, Vol. 2, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Greenberg, B. (1985). Forensic entomology: Case studies. Bull. Entomol. Soc: Am. 31: 25-28.Greenberg, B. (1990). Noctural oviposition behavior of blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae). J. Med.Entomol. 27: 807-810.Greenberg, B. (1991). Flies as forensic indicators. J. Med. Entomol. 28: 565-577.Meyer, S. G. E., and Schaub, G. (1973). Der respiratorische Stoffwechsel von Calliphoridenlarvenin Beziehung zu Temperaturadaption und Regulation. J. Insect Physiol. 19: 2183-2198.Nielsen, B. O., and Nielsen, S. A. (1946). Schmeissfliegen (Calliphoridae) und vakuumverpackterSchinken. Anzeiger Schadlingsk. Pflanzen Umweltschutz 49: 113-115.Nuorteva, P. (1959). Studies on the significance of flies in the transmission of poliomyelitis. Thecomposition of the blowfly fauna in different parts of Finland during the year 1958. Ann. Ento-mol Fenn. 25: 137-162.Nuorteva, P. (1965). The flying activity of blowflies (Dipt., Calliphoridae) in subarctic conditions.Ann. Entomol Fenn. 31: 242-245.Rognes, K. (1991). Blowflies (Diptera, Calliphoridae) of Fennoscandia and Denmark, Vol. 24,E. J. Brill/Scandinavian Science Press.Williams, H. (1984). A model for the aging of fly larvae in forensic entomology. Forens. Sci. Int.25: 191-199.Wyss, C. (1997). Forensic entomology in Lausanne (CH). Oistros 5: 2-5.690 Faucherre, Cherix, and Wyss

Behavior of Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) Under Extreme Conditions

http://doc.rero.ch/record/321845/files/10905_2004_Article_409947.pdf

Behavior of Calliphora vicina (Diptera, Calliphoridae) Under Extreme Conditions

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

RERO DOC Digital Library