Bimmler, Daniel

Frick, Thomas

Graf, Rolf

RERO DOC Digital Library

lnternationJ/.hmrnal ofPancreatology, vol. 25, ~1o. 3,252-253, June 1999 9 Copyright 1999 by Humana Press Inc. All rights of any nature whatsoever reserved. 0169-4197/99/25:252-253/$10.50 New Concepts in Understanding the Pathophysiology of Chronic Pancreatitis To the Editor: The recently published paper entitled "New Con- cepts in Understanding the Pathophysiology ofChronic Pancreatitis" by S. Freedman summarizes "the current research knowledge" on the patho- physiology of chronic pancreatitis (1). With respect to the formation of intraductal p ugs and pancreatic stones, we would like to comment on these concepts, since evidence from recent literature has not been incorporated. Two secretory pancreatic proteins have been iden- tified as components of intraductal plugs: pan- creatic stone protein (PSP) and GP-2, a membrane- anchored glycoprotein that is released into the juice during the secretion process. The presence of GP-2 in plugs has been associated with an acidification of the centroacinar lumen. However, aggregate for- mation has not been achieved in vitro by simple acid- ification (1). PSP, reportedly the predominant protein component ofpancreatic plugs and stones (2-5), on the other hand, may be rendered insoluble through "partial activation of pancreatic zymogens within smaller ducts," since minimal amounts of active trypsin suffice to cleave PSP, thereby shortening the protein by 11 amino acids and leading to sponta- neous precipitation of the product (5). In our own work with recombinant rat PSP (6), we were able to reproduce this finding in vitro (7). In our view, PSP is still the best-documented protein component of pancreatic plugs or stones. Further in his paper, Freedman recapitulates the issue "pancreatic stones." There he selectively cites Mul-tigner et al.'s paper (8) on the capacity of PSP (="lithostathine") to prevent calcium carbonate pre- cipitation in vitro. However, the experimental basis ofthe"lithostathine hypothesis" was seriously ques- tioned by our own group in 1997 (9). The in vitro activity reported by Sarles' group according to our experiments, merely turned out to be a nonspecific effect of a protein at micromolar concentrations, an effect that PSP shared with many other randomly chosen proteins and furthermore with phosphate ions, thus an effect hat does not deserve to be called a functional activity. We therefore consider the "lithostathine hypothesis" unsupportable and the name "lithostathine" misleading. We have recently found support for our view in a paper published by DeReggi et al. (I0). Freedman mentions only the still unresolved controversy regarding PSP levels in pancreatic juice of different groups of patients, but fails to discuss that the function of PSP/reg has not been clarified, which makes interpretations of fluc- tuations in PSP levels highly speculative. Daniel Bimmler Rolf Graf, Pancreatitis Research Laboratory Department ofSurgery University Hospital CH-8091 Ziirich E-mail: daniel.bimmler@chi.usz.ch and Thomas W. Frick, Chiru1~ische Klinik, Spital Pflegi-Neumiinster CH-8125 Zollikerberg 252 Letters to the Editor 253 References 1 Freedman S. New concepts in understanding the patho- physiology of chronic pancreatitis, lnt J Pancreatol 1998; 24: 1-8. 2 Forstner GG, Vesely SM, Durie PR. Selective precipita- tion of 14 kDa stone/thread proteins by concentration ofpancreaticobiliary secretions: relevance topancreatic ductal obstruction, pancreatic failure, and CF. J Pediatr Gas- tlventerol Nutr 1989; 8:313-320. 3 Gross J, Carlson RI, Brauer AW, Margolies MN, Warshaw AL, Wands JR. Isolation, characterization, and distribu- tion of an unusual pancreatic human secretory protein. J Clin lm, est 1985; 76:2115-2126. 4 Guy O, Robles-Diaz G, Adrich Z, Sahel J, Sarles H. Pro- tein content of precipitates present in pancreatic juice of alcoholic subjects and patients with chronic alcify ing pan- creatitis. Gastroenterology 1983; 84: 102-107. 5 Rouimi E Bonicel J, Rovery M, De Caro A. Cleavage of the Arg-Ile bond in the native polypeptide chain of human pancreatic stone protein. FEBS Lett 1987; 216: 195-199. 6 Bimmler D, Frick TW, Scheele GA. High-level secretion of native rat pancreatic Lithostathine in a baculovirus expression system. Pancreas i995; 11(1): 63-76. 7 Graf R, Bimmler D, Scheele G, Frick T. The major tryptic fragment of recombinant lithostathine behaves like pan- creatic thread protein, ln t J  PwwreatoI 1996; 19: 226. 8 Multigner L, De Caro A, Lombardo D, Campese D, Sarles H. Pancreatic stone protein, a phosphoprotein which inhibits calcium carbonate precipitation from human pan- creatic juice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1983; 110: 69-74. 9 Bimmler D, Graf R, Scheele GA, Frick TW. Pancreatic stone protein (Lithostathine), a physiologically relevant pancreatic calcium carbonate crystal inhibitor? J. Biol Chem 1997; 272: 3073-3082. 10 De Reggi M, Gharib B, Patard L, Stoven V. Lithostathine, the presumed pancreatic stone inhibitor, does not interact specifically with calcium carbonate crystals..I Biol Chem 1998; 273: 4967-4-971. lntcrmttio~lal ,lyre'hal q/" Pwl~'re~zto/o,,,y ~ bhtme 25, / 999 

New concepts in understanding the pathophysiology of chronic pancreatitis

http://doc.rero.ch/record/317997/files/12029_2008_Article_BF02925974.pdf

New concepts in understanding the pathophysiology of chronic pancreatitis

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

RERO DOC Digital Library