Hodler, Jürg

Zanetti, Marco

RERO DOC Digital Library

He is obviously right regarding minutes and seconds instead ofhours and minutes for sequencetimes. We apologize for this errorwhich was missed by us duringcopyediting.We also agree that there are somepotential methodological problemssuch as the use of a gradient-echosequence of imaging of the labrum.The problems with the use of the sequences are addressed in the Discussion. On the other hand, we believe that some of the pointsbrought up by A. Karantanas cannoteasily be addressed, and that theywould not change the message ofour paper.References1. Zanetti M, Cartensen T, Weishaupt D,Jost B, Hodler J (2001) MR arthro-graphic variability of the arthroscopical-ly normal glenoid labrum: qualitativeand quantitative assessment. Eur Radiol11:559–566M. Zanetti · J. HodlerDepartment of Radiology,Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist,Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, SwitzerlandEur Radiol (2002) 12:492DOI 10.1007/s003300101134 L E T T E R  T O  T H E  E D I T O RMarco ZanettiJürg HodlerReply to A. Karantanas: MR arthrographic variability of the arthroscopically normalglenoid labrum: qualitative andquantitative assessmentPublished online: 31 October 2001© Springer-Verlag 2001We thank A. Karantanas for his interest in our article [1] and his comments (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003300101133).

Reply to A. Karantanas: MR arthrographic variability of the arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum: qualitative and quantitative assessment

http://doc.rero.ch/record/312504/files/330_2014_Article_1134.pdf

Reply to A. Karantanas: MR arthrographic variability of the arthroscopically normal glenoid labrum: qualitative and quantitative assessment

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

RERO DOC Digital Library