Imitation is an important social learning heuristic in animal and human
societies that drives the evolution of collective behaviors. Previous
explorations find that the fate of cooperators has a sensitive dependence on
the protocol of imitation, including the number of social peers used for
comparison and whether one's own performance is considered. This leads to a
puzzle about how to quantify the impact of different styles of imitation on the
evolution of cooperation. Here, we take a novel perspective on the personal and
social information required by imitation. We develop a general model of
imitation dynamics with incomplete social information, which unifies classical
imitation processes including death-birth and pairwise-comparison update rules.
In pairwise social dilemmas, we find that cooperation is most easily promoted
if individuals neglect personal information when imitating. If personal
information is considered, cooperators evolve more readily with more social
information. Intriguingly, when interactions take place in larger groups on
networks with low degrees of clustering, using more personal and less social
information better facilitates cooperation. We offer a unifying perspective
uncovering intuition behind these phenomena by examining the rate and range of
competition induced by different social dilemmas.Comment: 14pages, 5 figure