CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Leptosphaeria maculans isolates with variations in AvrLm1 and AvrLm4 effector genes induce differences in defence responses but not in resistance phenotypes in cultivars carrying the Rlm7 gene
Authors
Ajisa Muthayil Ali
Lucia Robado de Lope
+5 more
Bruce David Ledger Fitt
Yong‐Ju Huang
Georgia Konstantinou Mitrousia
Mohammed Sajid Rafi
Henrik Uwe Stotz
Publication date
28 March 2023
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
© 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/BACKGROUND: The phoma stem canker pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans is one of the most widespread and devastating pathogens of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) in the world. Pathogen colonization is stopped by an interaction of a pathogen Avr effector gene with the corresponding host resistance (R) gene. While molecular mechanisms of this gene‐for‐gene interaction are being elucidated, understanding of effector function remains limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the action of L. maculans effector (AvrLm) genes on incompatible interactions triggered by B. napus noncorresponding R (Rlm) genes. Specifically, effects of AvrLm4‐7 and AvrLm1 on Rlm7‐mediated resistance were studied. RESULTS: Although there was no major effect on symptom expression, induction of defence genes (e.g. PR1) and accumulation of reactive oxygen species was reduced when B. napus cv. Excel carrying Rlm7 was challenged with a L. maculans isolate containing AvrLm1 and a point mutation in AvrLm4‐7 (AvrLm1, avrLm4‐AvrLm7) compared to an isolate lacking AvrLm1 (avrLm1, AvrLm4‐AvrLm7). AvrLm7‐containing isolates, isogenic for presence or absence of AvrLm1, elicited similar symptoms on hosts with or without Rlm7, confirming results obtained with more genetically diverse isolates. CONCLUSION: Careful phenotypic examination of isogenic L. maculans isolates and B. napus introgression lines demonstrated a lack of effect of AvrLm1 on Rlm7‐mediated resistance despite an apparent alteration of the Rlm7‐dependent defence response using more diverse fungal isolates with differences in AvrLm1 and AvrLm4. As deployment of Rlm7 resistance in crop cultivars increases, other effectors need to be monitored because they may alter the predominance of AvrLm7. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.Peer reviewe
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of Hertfordshire Research Archive
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:uhra.herts.ac.uk:2299/2618...
Last time updated on 04/05/2023