Timothy Williamson has argued that the applicability of classical mathematics
in the natural and social sciences raises a problem for the adoption, in
non-mathematical domains, of a wide range of non-classical logics, including
quantum logics (QL). We first reconstruct the argument and present its
restriction to the case of QL. Then we show that there is no inconsistency
whatsoever between the application of classical mathematics to quantum
phenomena and the use of QL in reasoning about them. Once we identify the
premise in Williamson's argument that turns out to be false when restricted to
QL, we argue that the same premise breaks down for a wider variety of
non-classical logics. In the end, we also suggest that the alleged tension
between these non-classical logics and applied classical mathematics betrays a
misunderstanding of the nature of mathematical representation in science.Comment: 22 page