Optimal Testing of Generalized Reed-Muller Codes in Fewer Queries

Abstract

A local tester for an error correcting code CβŠ†Ξ£nC\subseteq \Sigma^{n} is a tester that makes QQ oracle queries to a given word w∈Σnw\in \Sigma^n and decides to accept or reject the word ww. An optimal local tester is a local tester that has the additional properties of completeness and optimal soundness. By completeness, we mean that the tester must accept with probability 11 if w∈Cw\in C. By optimal soundness, we mean that if the tester accepts with probability at least 1βˆ’Ο΅1-\epsilon (where Ο΅\epsilon is small), then it must be the case that ww is O(Ο΅/Q)O(\epsilon/Q)-close to some codeword c∈Cc\in C in Hamming distance. We show that Generalized Reed-Muller codes admit optimal testers with Q=(3q)⌈d+1qβˆ’1βŒ‰+O(1)Q = (3q)^{\lceil{ \frac{d+1}{q-1}\rceil}+O(1)} queries. Here, for a prime power q=pkq = p^{k}, the Generalized Reed-Muller code, RM[n,q,d], consists of the evaluations of all nn-variate degree dd polynomials over Fq\mathbb{F}_q. Previously, no tester achieving this query complexity was known, and the best known testers due to Haramaty, Shpilka and Sudan(which is optimal) and due to Ron-Zewi and Sudan(which was not known to be optimal) both required q⌈d+1qβˆ’q/pβŒ‰q^{\lceil{\frac{d+1}{q-q/p} \rceil}} queries. Our tester achieves query complexity which is polynomially better than by a power of p/(pβˆ’1)p/(p-1), which is nearly the best query complexity possible for generalized Reed-Muller codes. The tester we analyze is due to Ron-Zewi and Sudan, and we show that their basic tester is in fact optimal. Our methods are more general and also allow us to prove that a wide class of testers, which follow the form of the Ron-Zewi and Sudan tester, are optimal. This result applies to testers for all affine-invariant codes (which are not necessarily generalized Reed-Muller codes).Comment: 42 pages, 8 page appendi

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions