Porello, D.

English

In this paper I discuss logic in the pragmatic approach of (Brandom, 2008). I consider different logical consequence relations (classical, intuitionistic and linear) and I will argue that the formal treatment proposed by Brandom, even if I believe it provides powerful intuitions and an interesting framework on logic in general, doesn't allow to state properly the relationship between different logics. I propose an alternative account of the elaboration of logical vocabularies not based on incompatibility semantics, rather on a particular notion of interaction, which I claim is implicit in the practice of giving and asking for reasons, which allows to state the relationship between different logics in terms of different aspects of the inferential practice

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications

Logic and pragmatics: Linear logic for inferential practice

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/55500757/75384_315232.pdf

Logic and pragmatics: Linear logic for inferential practice

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications