Kalir, B.

English

UvA-DARE

3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemic

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – duringpandemicKalir, B.Publication date2020Document VersionFinal published versionLink to publicationCitation for published version (APA):Kalir, B. (Author). (2020). 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation– during pandemic. Web publication or website, Identities.https://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-pandemicGeneral rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an opencontent license (like Creative Commons).Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, pleaselet the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the materialinaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letterto: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Youwill be contacted as soon as possible.Download date:15 Apr 20238/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 1/627/4/20203D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation –during pandemic0 Comments Barak Kalir, University of Amsterdam, NetherlandsImage credit: Author's own.Illegalised migrants – people who are denoted an illegal status by the state authorities and are thereby rendered deportable(undocumented/irregular migrants and so-called failed or bogus asylum seekers) – mostly  nd work in notorious 3D jobs: dirty,dangerous and demanding. An oppressive treatment of illegalised migrants by the authorities presents this already marginalised and8/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 2/6Right hereThe horrendous lives of illegalised migrants unfold right here, often at a short distance from where many of us, who readthis short essay, live and work. It is in fact in western states – and not in the global south – that we  nd the moststaggering evidence for a systematic destruction of illegalised migrants’ lives.Let us take the Netherlands as our example here. The 15th richest country on the planet, with a society that praises itselffor historically upholding tolerance towards Others, has an estimated population of around 100,000 illegalised migrants.Illegalised migrants in the Netherlands fear that any encounter with state of cials, especially the police, can result intheir violent arrest, a lengthy detention of up to 18 months, and a forced deportation. The most known Dutch group ofillegalised migrants is called We Are Here. The group is known because it opted to make its abhorrent situation visible tothe Dutch public. Most illegalised migrants lead invisible lives, working informally or begging on the streets, residing inoverpopulated apartments without registration or in deserted buildings and relaying on the charity or solidarity ofconcerned citizens and voluntary organisations that take on them to do the work that state has purposively forsaken.Out of desperation, members in the We Are Here group decided to take their cause to the streets of Amsterdam; the placewhere they have been living in for years. Almost eight years ago, in the winter of 2012, a number of homeless illegalisedmigrants – mostly rejected asylum seekers from countries in Africa – put up tents and built a makeshift camp in a yardof a deserted school. After a few months, and some failed attempts to negotiate with the local authorities an alternativesolution for the situation, hundreds of police agents, some on horses, arrived early in the morning to forcefully evict thecamp. Some illegalised migrants were arrested, a few were deported, but the majority simply found themselves back onthe streets of Amsterdam, deserted once more, with no shelter, no work permit, no access to healthcare, and no way tosecure a minimal subsistence. Alarmingly, among the members in the We Are Here group were a few pregnant womenand a number of families. Within a few days after their eviction, and in collaboration with some local squatters, a newdeserted place in Amsterdam was inhabited by the group. A few months later the police arrived once more to evict thegroup. Ever since, this vicious cycle has been going on in changing intervals. Sometimes the We Are Here group is able tostay for a few months in one place, on other occasions it takes the police only a few weeks or even days to arrange for aneviction.COVID-19 has infused with earnestness the realities of illegalised migrants. As many have been quick to observe, the callto stay at home only applies to those who have a home to stay in. The same goes for the call to frequently wash handswith soap, which only relates to those who have access to a steady supply of water and enough detergents. In fact, almostnone of these measures for  ghting the spread of COVID-19 are applicable for illegalised migrants. There is no way forpeople who live in overly congested makeshift camps or squatted spaces to keep a protective 'social distance'. Nor is itpossible in case of suspected infection or mild symptoms to isolate oneself. A visit to the hospital is out of reach formost illegalised migrants who have no medical insurance and are afraid that putting their name on any medicaldocument could lead to their arrest and deportation in the future.In many respects, COVID-19 has revealed the dreadful limits of a governing modality that is based on an ‘inclusiveexclusion’ (Mezzadra and Neilson 2011). Deserted illegalised migrants are always also included within the de factogoverned population of the state in whose territory they reside. COVID-19 has brought to the fore the irresponsibility thatmarks states’ attempt to reduce the legibility of their governed population; to no longer account for every subject withintheir sovereign territory but, instead, to legitimate the discounting of certain subjects, as if they no longer exist.One would have expected that in light of the risk of COVID-19 new remedial measures would be implemented swiftly toprotect vulnerable illegalised migrants. Yet, this has not happened in most countries. In the Netherlands, for example, bymid-February 2020, when global air traf c was brought to a halt, the Dutch authorities did not announce the immediatesuspension of all deportation operations. Correspondingly, the authorities refused to set free illegalized migrants inweak population with 3D threats: desertion, detention and deportation. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemia these threats take on new dimensions in placing illegalised migrants under increased and palpable risk for their lives. Declaring people’s status 'illegal',state institutions often deny them access to healthcare services, shelter and other basic needs. The new realities of the COVID-19pandemia throw into question the institutional approach in managing illegalised migrants. Beyond the inhumanity implicit inabandoning tens of thousands of people within states’ sovereign territory, can states now afford not knowing the whereabouts ofillegalised migrants and their health condition? At a time that criminals are released from prisons in light of the COVID-19 risk, isadministrative detention of non-criminal migrants can be considered an appropriate policy?8/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 3/6administrative detention, even when by 15 March 2020 it was announced that deportation would not be possible in aforeseeable future. One should recall here that administrative detention in the Netherlands, as in most western states, isonly allowed on the ground of securing illegalised migrants’ impending deportation. By default, if deportation is notpossible, detention is not legal.On 18 March 2020 the Dutch State Secretary for Justice and Security responded to a question in parliament concerningthe sending away of asylum seekers who approached reception centers for refugees. The State Secretary conceded thatnew asylum claimants were denied access to reception centers: ‘The need to control the spreading of the virus makes thehandling of the asylum procedure impossible…in light of the intensive contact that the procedure requires, it is notresponsible to take any other decision’. Interestingly, the State Secretary did  nd it feasible that ‘in special situations,return interviews [with illegalised migrants] can continue taking place’. In the Dutch lexicon, ‘return’ stands fordeportation, and ‘return interviews’ stand for an attempt to convince an illegalised migrant to agree on a planneddeportation.[1] In spite of a public campaign to release all illegalised migrants from administrative detention, theauthorities declined such a move, and on 30 March 2020 the Netherlands kept around 360 detainees, although by thendeportation operations had been completely suspended.Back in Amsterdam, around one hundred illegalised migrants – mostly young male from countries in Africa with a Dublinclaim or a rejected asylum case – have been living for months in an abandoned parking garage in bestial conditions. Onthe freezing cement  oor, they put up their tents one next to another. Some sleep alone in a small camping tent, whileothers squeeze together in bigger tents. There are no running water and people must go to a nearby park to use thetoilets and wash themselves up. It is dark and dirty inside the deserted parking garage. Basic cooking is done on portablegas stoves. Electricity cables have been improvised to allow for some light. The whole setup is a dismal safety hazard. Asone of the illegalised migrants says, ‘even dogs live better’, signaling with his head towards the exterior of the parkinggarage.[2]Some concerned residents in the neighbourhood have taken on them to regularly bring food and basic sanitary gear tothe migrants in the parking garage. Yet with the outbreak of COVID-19, neighbours stopped coming. The local authoritiesknow for months about the conditions in the parking garage, but only by the end of March 2020 they placed a fewportable toilet booths just outside the place. It was meant to help the migrants in practicing self-quarantine andmanaging the lockdown. The voluntary organisation ‘Doctors of the World’ has taken on itself to visit the garage once aweek and offer medical attention for the migrants. As one of the doctors despondently vented: ‘The right for healthcareand the right for shelter are human rights, and once upon a time this state signed for these [rights]! But, well, here we arenow…’.It’s racism, stupidFormally speaking, at stake in the deadlock that pits the Dutch government against illegalised migrants is the legalframework that regulates the status of migrants and refugees in the Netherlands. Dutch politicians insistently maintainthat people who are processed by the immigration and asylum authorities, and are denied a legal status, must leave thecountry in line with the law. Most illegalised migrants refuse to leave the Netherlands. They maintain that their case waseither not handled fairly or that they can simply not return to their country of origin for different reasons, from lackingidentity documents to fearing for their life.Practically speaking, thousands of illegalised migrants in the Netherlands live in horri c conditions for many years. It isclear that the authorities are unable to forcefully deport them. It is also clear that these illegalised migrants would neverleave voluntarily. They prefer to stay and live a terrible life as abject members in Dutch society than to return to theplaces they escaped. The Dutch authorities doggedly believe that only by making their lives unbearable, would illegalisedmigrants give up and leave the country. This belief, which is not grounded in the direct experience of politicians and isrefuted by several academic studies, is nevertheless staunchly upheld as the Holy Grail of getting the Dutch migrationpolicy to work properly.In 2014, some activists  led a complaint with the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) against the Dutchgovernment for its callous treatment of illegalised migrants. It resulted in a special report by ECSR that condemned theDutch government for its inhumane and degrading policies. In response, the then acting State Secretary for Justice andSecurity announced that he did not feel obliged by the report and was not planning to allocate ‘a single cent’ forimproving the situation of illegalised migrants in the country. In 2015, the European Committee of Ministers rati ed theECSR report and obliged the Netherlands to take measures in reparation of its current policies. Forced to act, the Dutchgovernment moved to subsidize a very basic shelter – with ‘somber conditions’, in the of cial language of the state – fora limited number of illegalised migrants in dire circumstances. In Amsterdam, where this new policy has been8/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 4/6implemented to its utmost extent, there are only 500 beds available. All beds were immediately  lled up, and a hugewaiting list of anxious illegalised migrants now exists.Weeks into the spread of COVID-19, the Amsterdam municipality offered illegalised migrants in the parking garage tosleep in a nearby sport hall that was converted into an emergency shelter, keeping in line with social distancing andbasic sanitarian conditions. Migrants could come every day after 4pm and leave in the morning before 9am. Yet, manyillegalised migrants declined the offer. They feared that the authorities would condition their stay in the shelter bycollaboration with the Dutch immigration unit on their future deportation. Tying up any assistance to illegalisedmigrants with an explicit agreement to work ‘in good faith’ with the Dutch deportation unit is a renowned pattern amongthe Dutch authorities. It is astonishing to realize that even in times of a deadly viral pandemia, securing basic protectionfor human beings in a vulnerable position is made tentative and negotiable.From steadily underfunding national healthcare systems to slowly raising populations’ susceptibility to statesurveillance, the spread of COVID-19 has magni ed some important existing dynamics in liberal democratic societies.With respect to the treatment of illegalised migrants in rich western country, the pandemia has exposed the authorities’authentic lack of concern for the lives of those deemed 'illegal'. Death – social, gradual or abrupt – is the unpronouncedsanction that underly 3D threats – desertion, detention, deportation – pugnaciously imposed on illegalised migrants. It isnot that countries like the Netherlands lack the budget or the space to accommodate more humanly illegalisedmigrants. It is a conscious political decision to sacralise the legalistic immigration framework more than the lives ofcertain human beings who are considered disposable. This devilish political constellation condemns illegalisedmigrants to become ‘the wretched of the earth’, to evoke Franz Fanon’s depiction of the tarnished mental and physicalconditions under which colonial violence forced racialised people to live and to die.Important debates are being weighed at the moment as to whether a push for a premature ‘exit strategy’ out of theCOVID-19 crisis is propelled by a rapacious capitalist system that puts the economy before the lives of workers. Weponder on this question because we clearly realise that prioritizing capital over the lives of workers is not a speculativepossibility here and now, but an historical fact in various periods and different places. Capitalism assumes its predatoryquality, as Cedric Robinson (1983) has laid bare, from the fact that it has always been, from its inception, racialcapitalism. In Robinson’s words: ‘The tendency of European civilization through capitalism was thus not to homogenizebut to differentiate–to exaggerate regional, subcultural, and dialectical differences into “racial” ones’ (26). Racism, whichpreceded and informed capitalism, is an ideology that squares more comfortably with the idea that the lives of somepeople are inferior – in value – to those of others.'Not a single cent', said in 2015 the Dutch State Secretary for Justice and Security, when faced with a demand from theEuropean Committee of Social Rights to improve the inhumane treatment of illegalised migrants. Can we expect that indealing with the deadly implications of the COVID-19 pandemia, which will cost billions of Euros in direct and indirectcost to national economies, the logic of racial capitalism will be sidelined, and a different, more humane one will reign?Judging by examples worldwide – from the president of the US calling COVID-19 the 'Chinese virus' and threatening thatChina will pay for its damage, to the German authorities allowing gastarbeiters to  y in from Romania under conditionsthat completely disregard basic precautionary measures – we should all be concerned about the bleak answer.[1] The complete written response of the state secretary is available online at:https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2020/03/18/antwoorden-kamervragen-over-het-bericht-dat-asielzoekers-niet-welkom-zijn-in-ter-apel-vanwege-het-coronavirus (accessed April 18, 2020)[2] A  lmed report on the situation of this group of illegalised migrants in Amsterdam can be viewed online at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiUr591NatBarak KalirBarak Kalir is an anthropologist at University of Amsterdam and the Co-Director of the Institute for Migration and EthnicStudies (IMES). He has recently rounded off a 5-year ERC project on ‘The Social Life of State Deportation Regimes: AComparative Study of the Implementation Interface in Greece, France, Spain, Ecuador and Israel’. His recent publicationsinclude: ‘State desertion and "out-of-procedure" asylum seekers in the Netherlands’ (Focaal: Journal of Global andHistorical Anthropology 2017), ‘Departheid: The Draconian Governance of Illegalized Migrants in Western States’ (Societyand Con ict 2019), and a special issue on ‘Re‐searching access: what do attempts at studying migration control tell usabout the state?’ (Social Anthropology 2019).

NARCIS 

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – duringpandemicKalir, B.Publication date2020Document VersionFinal published versionLink to publicationCitation for published version (APA):Kalir, B. (Author). (2020). 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation– during pandemic. Web publication or website, Identities.https://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-pandemicGeneral rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an opencontent license (like Creative Commons).Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, pleaselet the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the materialinaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letterto: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Youwill be contacted as soon as possible.Download date:26 Oct 20238/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 1/627/4/20203D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation –during pandemic0 Comments Barak Kalir, University of Amsterdam, NetherlandsImage credit: Author's own.Illegalised migrants – people who are denoted an illegal status by the state authorities and are thereby rendered deportable(undocumented/irregular migrants and so-called failed or bogus asylum seekers) – mostly  nd work in notorious 3D jobs: dirty,dangerous and demanding. An oppressive treatment of illegalised migrants by the authorities presents this already marginalised and8/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 2/6Right hereThe horrendous lives of illegalised migrants unfold right here, often at a short distance from where many of us, who readthis short essay, live and work. It is in fact in western states – and not in the global south – that we  nd the moststaggering evidence for a systematic destruction of illegalised migrants’ lives.Let us take the Netherlands as our example here. The 15th richest country on the planet, with a society that praises itselffor historically upholding tolerance towards Others, has an estimated population of around 100,000 illegalised migrants.Illegalised migrants in the Netherlands fear that any encounter with state of cials, especially the police, can result intheir violent arrest, a lengthy detention of up to 18 months, and a forced deportation. The most known Dutch group ofillegalised migrants is called We Are Here. The group is known because it opted to make its abhorrent situation visible tothe Dutch public. Most illegalised migrants lead invisible lives, working informally or begging on the streets, residing inoverpopulated apartments without registration or in deserted buildings and relaying on the charity or solidarity ofconcerned citizens and voluntary organisations that take on them to do the work that state has purposively forsaken.Out of desperation, members in the We Are Here group decided to take their cause to the streets of Amsterdam; the placewhere they have been living in for years. Almost eight years ago, in the winter of 2012, a number of homeless illegalisedmigrants – mostly rejected asylum seekers from countries in Africa – put up tents and built a makeshift camp in a yardof a deserted school. After a few months, and some failed attempts to negotiate with the local authorities an alternativesolution for the situation, hundreds of police agents, some on horses, arrived early in the morning to forcefully evict thecamp. Some illegalised migrants were arrested, a few were deported, but the majority simply found themselves back onthe streets of Amsterdam, deserted once more, with no shelter, no work permit, no access to healthcare, and no way tosecure a minimal subsistence. Alarmingly, among the members in the We Are Here group were a few pregnant womenand a number of families. Within a few days after their eviction, and in collaboration with some local squatters, a newdeserted place in Amsterdam was inhabited by the group. A few months later the police arrived once more to evict thegroup. Ever since, this vicious cycle has been going on in changing intervals. Sometimes the We Are Here group is able tostay for a few months in one place, on other occasions it takes the police only a few weeks or even days to arrange for aneviction.COVID-19 has infused with earnestness the realities of illegalised migrants. As many have been quick to observe, the callto stay at home only applies to those who have a home to stay in. The same goes for the call to frequently wash handswith soap, which only relates to those who have access to a steady supply of water and enough detergents. In fact, almostnone of these measures for  ghting the spread of COVID-19 are applicable for illegalised migrants. There is no way forpeople who live in overly congested makeshift camps or squatted spaces to keep a protective 'social distance'. Nor is itpossible in case of suspected infection or mild symptoms to isolate oneself. A visit to the hospital is out of reach formost illegalised migrants who have no medical insurance and are afraid that putting their name on any medicaldocument could lead to their arrest and deportation in the future.In many respects, COVID-19 has revealed the dreadful limits of a governing modality that is based on an ‘inclusiveexclusion’ (Mezzadra and Neilson 2011). Deserted illegalised migrants are always also included within the de factogoverned population of the state in whose territory they reside. COVID-19 has brought to the fore the irresponsibility thatmarks states’ attempt to reduce the legibility of their governed population; to no longer account for every subject withintheir sovereign territory but, instead, to legitimate the discounting of certain subjects, as if they no longer exist.One would have expected that in light of the risk of COVID-19 new remedial measures would be implemented swiftly toprotect vulnerable illegalised migrants. Yet, this has not happened in most countries. In the Netherlands, for example, bymid-February 2020, when global air traf c was brought to a halt, the Dutch authorities did not announce the immediatesuspension of all deportation operations. Correspondingly, the authorities refused to set free illegalized migrants inweak population with 3D threats: desertion, detention and deportation. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemia these threats take on new dimensions in placing illegalised migrants under increased and palpable risk for their lives. Declaring people’s status 'illegal',state institutions often deny them access to healthcare services, shelter and other basic needs. The new realities of the COVID-19pandemia throw into question the institutional approach in managing illegalised migrants. Beyond the inhumanity implicit inabandoning tens of thousands of people within states’ sovereign territory, can states now afford not knowing the whereabouts ofillegalised migrants and their health condition? At a time that criminals are released from prisons in light of the COVID-19 risk, isadministrative detention of non-criminal migrants can be considered an appropriate policy?8/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 3/6administrative detention, even when by 15 March 2020 it was announced that deportation would not be possible in aforeseeable future. One should recall here that administrative detention in the Netherlands, as in most western states, isonly allowed on the ground of securing illegalised migrants’ impending deportation. By default, if deportation is notpossible, detention is not legal.On 18 March 2020 the Dutch State Secretary for Justice and Security responded to a question in parliament concerningthe sending away of asylum seekers who approached reception centers for refugees. The State Secretary conceded thatnew asylum claimants were denied access to reception centers: ‘The need to control the spreading of the virus makes thehandling of the asylum procedure impossible…in light of the intensive contact that the procedure requires, it is notresponsible to take any other decision’. Interestingly, the State Secretary did  nd it feasible that ‘in special situations,return interviews [with illegalised migrants] can continue taking place’. In the Dutch lexicon, ‘return’ stands fordeportation, and ‘return interviews’ stand for an attempt to convince an illegalised migrant to agree on a planneddeportation.[1] In spite of a public campaign to release all illegalised migrants from administrative detention, theauthorities declined such a move, and on 30 March 2020 the Netherlands kept around 360 detainees, although by thendeportation operations had been completely suspended.Back in Amsterdam, around one hundred illegalised migrants – mostly young male from countries in Africa with a Dublinclaim or a rejected asylum case – have been living for months in an abandoned parking garage in bestial conditions. Onthe freezing cement  oor, they put up their tents one next to another. Some sleep alone in a small camping tent, whileothers squeeze together in bigger tents. There are no running water and people must go to a nearby park to use thetoilets and wash themselves up. It is dark and dirty inside the deserted parking garage. Basic cooking is done on portablegas stoves. Electricity cables have been improvised to allow for some light. The whole setup is a dismal safety hazard. Asone of the illegalised migrants says, ‘even dogs live better’, signaling with his head towards the exterior of the parkinggarage.[2]Some concerned residents in the neighbourhood have taken on them to regularly bring food and basic sanitary gear tothe migrants in the parking garage. Yet with the outbreak of COVID-19, neighbours stopped coming. The local authoritiesknow for months about the conditions in the parking garage, but only by the end of March 2020 they placed a fewportable toilet booths just outside the place. It was meant to help the migrants in practicing self-quarantine andmanaging the lockdown. The voluntary organisation ‘Doctors of the World’ has taken on itself to visit the garage once aweek and offer medical attention for the migrants. As one of the doctors despondently vented: ‘The right for healthcareand the right for shelter are human rights, and once upon a time this state signed for these [rights]! But, well, here we arenow…’.It’s racism, stupidFormally speaking, at stake in the deadlock that pits the Dutch government against illegalised migrants is the legalframework that regulates the status of migrants and refugees in the Netherlands. Dutch politicians insistently maintainthat people who are processed by the immigration and asylum authorities, and are denied a legal status, must leave thecountry in line with the law. Most illegalised migrants refuse to leave the Netherlands. They maintain that their case waseither not handled fairly or that they can simply not return to their country of origin for different reasons, from lackingidentity documents to fearing for their life.Practically speaking, thousands of illegalised migrants in the Netherlands live in horri c conditions for many years. It isclear that the authorities are unable to forcefully deport them. It is also clear that these illegalised migrants would neverleave voluntarily. They prefer to stay and live a terrible life as abject members in Dutch society than to return to theplaces they escaped. The Dutch authorities doggedly believe that only by making their lives unbearable, would illegalisedmigrants give up and leave the country. This belief, which is not grounded in the direct experience of politicians and isrefuted by several academic studies, is nevertheless staunchly upheld as the Holy Grail of getting the Dutch migrationpolicy to work properly.In 2014, some activists  led a complaint with the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR) against the Dutchgovernment for its callous treatment of illegalised migrants. It resulted in a special report by ECSR that condemned theDutch government for its inhumane and degrading policies. In response, the then acting State Secretary for Justice andSecurity announced that he did not feel obliged by the report and was not planning to allocate ‘a single cent’ forimproving the situation of illegalised migrants in the country. In 2015, the European Committee of Ministers rati ed theECSR report and obliged the Netherlands to take measures in reparation of its current policies. Forced to act, the Dutchgovernment moved to subsidize a very basic shelter – with ‘somber conditions’, in the of cial language of the state – fora limited number of illegalised migrants in dire circumstances. In Amsterdam, where this new policy has been8/26/2021 3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemichttps://www.identitiesjournal.com/the-viral-condition-virtual-symposium/3d-threats-to-illegalised-migrants-desertion-detention-deportation-during-p… 4/6implemented to its utmost extent, there are only 500 beds available. All beds were immediately  lled up, and a hugewaiting list of anxious illegalised migrants now exists.Weeks into the spread of COVID-19, the Amsterdam municipality offered illegalised migrants in the parking garage tosleep in a nearby sport hall that was converted into an emergency shelter, keeping in line with social distancing andbasic sanitarian conditions. Migrants could come every day after 4pm and leave in the morning before 9am. Yet, manyillegalised migrants declined the offer. They feared that the authorities would condition their stay in the shelter bycollaboration with the Dutch immigration unit on their future deportation. Tying up any assistance to illegalisedmigrants with an explicit agreement to work ‘in good faith’ with the Dutch deportation unit is a renowned pattern amongthe Dutch authorities. It is astonishing to realize that even in times of a deadly viral pandemia, securing basic protectionfor human beings in a vulnerable position is made tentative and negotiable.From steadily underfunding national healthcare systems to slowly raising populations’ susceptibility to statesurveillance, the spread of COVID-19 has magni ed some important existing dynamics in liberal democratic societies.With respect to the treatment of illegalised migrants in rich western country, the pandemia has exposed the authorities’authentic lack of concern for the lives of those deemed 'illegal'. Death – social, gradual or abrupt – is the unpronouncedsanction that underly 3D threats – desertion, detention, deportation – pugnaciously imposed on illegalised migrants. It isnot that countries like the Netherlands lack the budget or the space to accommodate more humanly illegalisedmigrants. It is a conscious political decision to sacralise the legalistic immigration framework more than the lives ofcertain human beings who are considered disposable. This devilish political constellation condemns illegalisedmigrants to become ‘the wretched of the earth’, to evoke Franz Fanon’s depiction of the tarnished mental and physicalconditions under which colonial violence forced racialised people to live and to die.Important debates are being weighed at the moment as to whether a push for a premature ‘exit strategy’ out of theCOVID-19 crisis is propelled by a rapacious capitalist system that puts the economy before the lives of workers. Weponder on this question because we clearly realise that prioritizing capital over the lives of workers is not a speculativepossibility here and now, but an historical fact in various periods and different places. Capitalism assumes its predatoryquality, as Cedric Robinson (1983) has laid bare, from the fact that it has always been, from its inception, racialcapitalism. In Robinson’s words: ‘The tendency of European civilization through capitalism was thus not to homogenizebut to differentiate–to exaggerate regional, subcultural, and dialectical differences into “racial” ones’ (26). Racism, whichpreceded and informed capitalism, is an ideology that squares more comfortably with the idea that the lives of somepeople are inferior – in value – to those of others.'Not a single cent', said in 2015 the Dutch State Secretary for Justice and Security, when faced with a demand from theEuropean Committee of Social Rights to improve the inhumane treatment of illegalised migrants. Can we expect that indealing with the deadly implications of the COVID-19 pandemia, which will cost billions of Euros in direct and indirectcost to national economies, the logic of racial capitalism will be sidelined, and a different, more humane one will reign?Judging by examples worldwide – from the president of the US calling COVID-19 the 'Chinese virus' and threatening thatChina will pay for its damage, to the German authorities allowing gastarbeiters to  y in from Romania under conditionsthat completely disregard basic precautionary measures – we should all be concerned about the bleak answer.[1] The complete written response of the state secretary is available online at:https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2020/03/18/antwoorden-kamervragen-over-het-bericht-dat-asielzoekers-niet-welkom-zijn-in-ter-apel-vanwege-het-coronavirus (accessed April 18, 2020)[2] A  lmed report on the situation of this group of illegalised migrants in Amsterdam can be viewed online at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiUr591NatBarak KalirBarak Kalir is an anthropologist at University of Amsterdam and the Co-Director of the Institute for Migration and EthnicStudies (IMES). He has recently rounded off a 5-year ERC project on ‘The Social Life of State Deportation Regimes: AComparative Study of the Implementation Interface in Greece, France, Spain, Ecuador and Israel’. His recent publicationsinclude: ‘State desertion and "out-of-procedure" asylum seekers in the Netherlands’ (Focaal: Journal of Global andHistorical Anthropology 2017), ‘Departheid: The Draconian Governance of Illegalized Migrants in Western States’ (Societyand Con ict 2019), and a special issue on ‘Re‐searching access: what do attempts at studying migration control tell usabout the state?’ (Social Anthropology 2019).

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/63322966/3D_threats_to_illegalised_migrants_desertion_detention_deportation_during_pandemic.pdf

3D threats to illegalised migrants – desertion, detention, deportation – during pandemic

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UvA-DARE

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications

NARCIS

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications