Heemskerk, E.M.

Takes, F.W.

Valeeva, D.

English

The long tradition of scholarly work on corporate interlocks has left us with competing theoretical frameworks on the causes of interlock networks. Board interlocks are studied either as means to overcome the resource dependence of corporations or as a group cohesion mechanism of business elites. This contrast is due to an empirical divide of the literature where either the firms or the individuals are considered as decision-making bodies. In systematically ignoring the agency of the other group of actors, these literatures suffer from both theoretical and empirical biases in understanding the drivers of new interlocks. In this paper, we employ a relational event modeling technique that allows us to overcome this problem. The analysis of board appointments in Denmark demonstrates how in fact both personal and corporate considerations simultaneously drive the evolution of the corporate networks. The study of the duality of actors is essential for understanding the causes and consequences of corporate networks across time and space

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications

The duality of firms and directors in board interlock networks: A relational event modeling approach

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/52461573/1_s2.0_S0378873320300186_main.pdf

The duality of firms and directors in board interlock networks: A relational event modeling approach

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications