Marsman, M.

Waldorp, L.

English

The Gaussian graphical model (GGM) has become a popular tool for analyzing networks of psychological variables. In a recent article in this journal, Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (FWMK) voiced the concern that GGMs that are estimated from partial correlations wrongfully remove the variance that is shared by its constituents. If true, this concern has grave consequences for the application of GGMs. Indeed, if partial correlations only capture the unique covariances, then the data that come from a unidimensional latent variable model ULVM should be associated with an empty network (no edges), as there are no unique covariances in a ULVM. We know that this cannot be true, which suggests that FWMK are missing something with their claim. We introduce a connection between the ULVM and the GGM and use that connection to prove that we find a fully-connected and not an empty network associated with a ULVM. We then use the relation between GGMs and linear regression to show that the partial correlation indeed does not remove the common variance.</p

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications

Relations between Networks, Regression, Partial Correlation, and the Latent Variable Model

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/109694577/Relations_between_Networks_Regression_Partial_Correlation_and_the_Latent_Variable_Model.pdf

Relations between Networks, Regression, Partial Correlation, and the Latent Variable Model

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications