Boyette, L.-L.

de Haan, L.

Doedens, P.

Latour, C.

ter Riet, G.

Twisk, J.

English

ObjectiveTo compare estimates of effect and variability resulting from standard linear regression analysis and hierarchical multilevel analysis with cross-classified multilevel analysis under various scenarios.Study design and settingWe performed a simulation study based on a data structure from an observational study in clinical mental health care. We used a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach to simulate 18 scenarios, varying sample sizes, cluster sizes, effect sizes and between group variances. For each scenario, we performed standard linear regression, multilevel regression with random intercept on patient level, multilevel regression with random intercept on nursing team level and cross-classified multilevel analysis.ResultsApplying cross-classified multilevel analyses had negligible influence on the effect estimates. However, ignoring cross-classification led to underestimation of the standard errors of the covariates at the two cross-classified levels and to invalidly narrow confidence intervals. This may lead to incorrect statistical inference. Varying sample size, cluster size, effect size and variance had no meaningful influence on these findings.ConclusionIn case of cross-classified data structures, the use of a cross-classified multilevel model helps estimating valid precision of effects, and thereby, support correct inferences

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications

Cross-classified multilevel models improved standard error estimates of covariates in clinical outcomes – a simulation study

https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/99343994/1_s2.0_S0895435622000117_main.pdf

Cross-classified multilevel models improved standard error estimates of covariates in clinical outcomes – a simulation study

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion online publications