The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a social dilemma; "social distancing" was
required to stop the spread of disease, but close social contacts were needed
more than ever to collectively overcome the unprecedented challenges of the
crisis. How did Americans mobilize their social ties in response to the
pandemic? Drawing from a nation-wide daily online survey of 36,345 Americans
from April 2020 through April 2021, we examine the characteristics of
Americans' core networks within which people discuss "important matters."
Comparing the COVID-19 networks to those previously collected in eight national
core network surveys from 1985 to 2016, we observe remarkable stability in the
size and relationship composition of core networks during COVID-19. In contrast
to the robust nature of core networks, we discover a significant rise in racial
homophily among kin ties, and political homophily among non-kin ties.
Simultaneously, our study reveals a significant surge in the adoption of remote
communication technology to connect with individuals who are geographically
distant. We demonstrate that the changing mode of communication contributes to
increases in racial and political homophily. These results suggest that the
COVID-19 pandemic may bring people remotely together but only with the
like-minded, deepening social divides in American society