CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Reference frame for home pulse pressure based on cardiovascular risk in 6470 subjects from 5 populations
Authors
L.S. Aparicio Thijs, L. Asayama, K. Barochiner, J. Boggia, J. Gu, Y.-M. Cuffaro, P.E. Liu, Y.-P. Niiranen, T.J. Ohkubo, T. Johansson, J.K. Kikuya, M. Hozawa, A. Tsuji, I. Imai, Y. Sandoya, E. Stergiou, G.S. Waisman, G.D. Staessen, J.A.
Publication date
1 January 2014
Publisher
Abstract
The absence of an outcome-driven reference frame for self-measured pulse pressure (PP) limits its clinical applicability. In an attempt to derive an operational threshold for self-measured PP, we analyzed 6470 participants (mean age 59.3 years; 56.9% women; 22.5% on antihypertensive treatment) from 5 general population cohorts included in the International Database on HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome. During 8.3 years of follow-up (median), 294 cardiovascular deaths, 393 strokes and 336 cardiac events occurred. In 3285 younger subjects (<60 years), home PP only predicted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (P≤0.036), whereas in 3185 older subjects (≥60 years) PP predicted total and cardiovascular mortality (P≤0.0067) and all cardiovascular and coronary events (P≤0.044). However, PP did not substantially refine risk prediction based on classical risk factors including mean blood pressure (generalized R 2 statistic ≤0.20%). In older subjects, the adjusted hazard ratios expressing the risk in the upper decile of home PP (≥76 mm Hg) versus the average risk in whole population were 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.81; P=0.0081) for all-cause mortality, 1.62 (1.11-2.35; P=0.012) for cardiovascular mortality and 1.31 (1.00-1.70; P=0.047) for all fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular end points combined. The low number of events precluded an analysis by tenths of the PP distribution in younger participants. In conclusion, a home PP of ≥76 mm Hg predicted cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly with the exception of stroke, whereas in younger subjects no threshold could be established. © 2014 The Japanese Society of Hypertension All rights reserved
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Pergamos : Unified Institutional Repository / Digital Library Platform of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:lib.uoa.gr:uoadl:3088417
Last time updated on 10/02/2023