Since the outset of body image reconstruction for diagnosis purposes, ultrasound has been
used to investigate structural changes located in tendons. Ultrasound has clinical applications
in the intensive care unit, but its utility for tendon imaging remains unknown. Thus, we
aimed to determine intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of measures obtained by images
generated through morphological tendon sonographic analysis recorded from critically ill
patients. We designed a cross-sectional study to assess thickness, cross-sectional area,
and echogenicity of patellar and quadriceps tendons in a convenience sample formed with
20 critically ill patients. Two independent raters (experienced and novice) recorded repeated
measures, checking for agreement (Kappa statistics) and reliability (Intraclass coefficient
Correlation-ICC and Bland-Altman). The quality of images acquired by the two independent
raters substantially agreed (k = 0.571–1.000), regardless of the region on the patellar tendon
or the studied tendon (patellar or quadriceps). Regardless of how much experience the rater
had, their repeated records (intra-rater reliability) always demonstrated almost complete
correlation, ICC ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 for both tendons in all outcomes. At the same
way, the statistically significant inter-rater ICC ranging from 0.87 to 0.97. Both repeated
measures by the raters (intra-rater) and the repeated single and double measures between
the raters (inter-rater) presented a minimum measurement error constituting a predominant
pattern of random variability. We conclude that ultrasound imaging acquisition performed by
independent raters for tendon thickness, CSA, and echogenicity monitoring of critically ill
patients are acceptable and are not influenced by rater experience