In this presentation we outline the planned impact assessment strategy for the AgriLAC Resiliente Initiative

Lopera, Diana

Quintero, Katherine

Reyes, Byron

Lopera, Diana Carolina

CGSpace

AgriLAC Resiliente: Planned Impact AssessmentSPIA Matchmaking Event, Cali, ColombiaDiana Lopera, Byron Reyes, Katherine Quintero15-17 November 2022www.cgiar.orgAgriLAC Resiliente: Integrated work packagesWP1 will bring together CGIAR knowledge on agronomy, ecology, nutrition and climate change to co-develop SET innovations with local AFS partnersWP2 will focus on enabling access and use of agroadvisory services through inclusive digital tools for managing tailored and localized risksWP3 will develop mechanisms for AFS actors to meet both climate change mitigation and development goalsWP4 will generate collaborative bottom-up pathways for scaling SET innovations and inclusive digitally enabled agro-advisories to strengthen AFSWP5 will work together with governments and investors to support up-scaling of AgriLAC’s SET innovations through public policies and sustainable investments Shaping nutrition-sensitive socioecological-technological (SET) ‘best bets’Inclusive digitally enabled agro-advisories for risk managementAFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsInnovaHub networks for agrifood innovation and scalingScience-informed policies, investments and institutionsStrengthen agri-food innovation systems at different scales to increase the resilience, ecosystem services, and competitiveness of agri-food systems so that they are better equipped to address the most pressing needs of food and nutrition security, climate crisis, and migrationCrosscuttingMELIAGSIwww.cgiar.orgAgriLAC Resiliente: Integrative Regional Initiative•Guatemala & Honduras primary target (extend to CA-4)•Colombia, Mexico y Perú scaling countries•Co-design process with +160 organizations across the region• Integrated research focus: Demand-driven scientific research•Collaboration with other initiatives and bilateral projectsFocal countries Scaling countriesMexicoColombiaGuatemalaHondurasNicaraguaEl SalvadorPeruWP1, WP4WP1, WP3WP3WP1, WP2, WP4WP1, WP2, WP4, WP5• Collaborative science• Effective scaling• Comprehensive impactwww.cgiar.orgEnd of Initiative outcomes 2022–2024: understand, co-design, test, and pilot phases of the Initiative2025–2030: broader mainstreaming, realignment of policy and investment, scaling, and integration By 2024: Innovations5 countries250k farmers(EoI-O1) Nutrition-sensitive socio-ecological-technological (SET) innovations3 countries200k farmers(EoI-O2) Agrifood innovation systems empowered by a digitally-enabled ecosystem3 countries300k hectares(EoI-O3) Low-emission strategies integrated into development goals4 countries250k farmers(EoI-O4) InnovaHubs to better accelerate on-farm uptake of SET innovations 3 countries(EoI-O5) Transformative and climate adaptation-friendly AFS-related policies, incentives, and investmentswww.cgiar.orgAR4D Systemic and integrated approachWP1- Shaping nutrition-sensitive SET ‘best bets’WP2-Inclusive digitally-enabled agro-advisories for risk managementWP3-AFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsWP4INNOVAHUBSCO2WP5-Science-informed policies, investments and institutionsI n te r ven t i ons Sca l i ng Impactwww.cgiar.orgNow looking briefly at our evaluation strategy and planned studiesStudy Objective1 Network analysis2 Two-stage evaluation of adoption of MTA outputs3Impact evaluation of AgriLAC’s interventions thru the InnovaHubs4 Gender learning studywww.cgiar.orgAgriLAC evaluation strategyWP3-AFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsWP5-Science-informed policies, investments and institutionsI n te r ven t i ons Sca l i ng ImpactWP2-Inclusive digitally-enabled agro-advisories for risk managementLearning/ evaluation studyWhere? Research/ evaluation questionsNetwork analysis using monitoring + primary dataAll countries How has the number of actors and intensity of their collaboration changed because of the AgriLAC’sInitiative?WP1- Shaping nutrition-sensitive SET ‘best bets’CO2WP4INNOVAHUBSwww.cgiar.orgAgriLAC evaluation strategyWP1- Shaping nutrition-sensitive SET ‘best bets’WP3-AFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsWP4INNOVAHUBSCO2WP5-Science-informed policies, investments and institutionsI n te r ven t i ons Sca l i ng ImpactWP2-Inclusive digitally-enabled agro-advisories for risk managementLearning/ evaluation studyWhere? Research/ evaluation questionsTwo-stage evaluation of adoption of MTA outputs:1-Diagnosis2-Pilot evaluationGuatemala, and possibly Honduras and ColombiaWhat are the farmer's decision-making, preferences and knowledge about climatic information, and their preferred mechanism to receive such information?www.cgiar.orgAgriLAC evaluation strategyWP1- Shaping nutrition-sensitive SET ‘best bets’WP3-AFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsWP5-Science-informed policies, investments and institutionsI n te r ven t i ons Sca l i ng ImpactWP2-Inclusive digitally-enabled agro-advisories for risk managementLearning/ evaluation studyWhere? Research/ evaluation questionsTwo-stage evaluation of adoption of MTA outputs:1-Diagnosis2-Pilot evaluationGuatemala, and possibly Honduras and Colombia-What are the changes caused by the MTAs’“improved” outputs and their effects on farmers?-Which delivering mechanism is most effective?CO2WP4INNOVAHUBSwww.cgiar.orgAgriLAC evaluation strategyWP3-AFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsWP5-Science-informed policies, investments and institutionsI n te r ven t i ons Sca l i ng ImpactWP2-Inclusive digitally-enabled agro-advisories for risk managementEvaluation studyWhere? Research/ evaluation questionsImpact evaluation of AgriLAC’sinterventions thru the InnovaHubsGuatemala, then Honduras(baselines only)What is the adoption and impact of the Initiative’s SETs and services offered to farmers thru the InnovaHubs?WP1- Shaping nutrition-sensitive SET ‘best bets’CO2WP4INNOVAHUBSTogether with previousstudies will help us assessthe impact of AgriLACwww.cgiar.orgAgriLAC evaluation strategyWP4INNOVAHUBSCO2WP2-Inclusive digitally-enabled agro-advisories for risk managementWP1- Shaping nutrition-sensitive SET ‘best bets’WP3-AFS development to both mitigation and sustainable development goalsI n te r ven t i ons Sca l i ng ImpactLearning study Where? Research/ evaluation questionsGender study using focus group data to understand attitudes, perceptions and effects of migration on rural womenGuatemala, then HondurasWhat factors are associated with a woman's intention to migrate?WP5-Science-informed policies, investments and institutions+ GSIThanks a lot for your attention……and we welcome your questions and suggestions!

AgriLAC Resiliente: Planned Impact Assessment

https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/10568/126936/1/presentation.pdf

AgriLAC Resiliente: Planned Impact Assessment

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CGSpace