Nasilje u porodici se u savremenom društvu smatra jednim od najtežih oblika
nasilja jer se njegovim ispoljavanjem krše osnovna ljudska prava i slobode članova
porodice. Međutim, značenje nasilja u porodici može se konstruisati na različite načine
u različitim diskursima. Cilj ovog rada je istraživanje konstruisanja značenja nasilja u
porodici u pravnom i medijskom diksursu i u narativima žena žrtava partnerskog nasilja.
Teorijsko utemeljenje ovog istraživanja predstavlja socijalni konstrukcionizam,
Fukoovo razumevanje diskursa, odnosa moć/znanje i subjekta i feminističko
razumevanje nasilja nad ženama u porodici. Istraživački pristup problemu je
kvalitativan i podrazumeva upotrebu analize sadržaja, diskurzivnu analizu i narativnu
analizu.
Analiza pravnog diskursa ukazuje na konstrukcionističku prirodu fenomena
nasilja u porodici što se ilustruje praćenjem promena u definisanju značenja nasilja u
porodici u različitim pravnim dokumentima. Analizom su obuhvaćeni određeni članovi
zakona u kojima se definiše značenje nasilja u porodici (Zakon o javnom redu i miru iz
1994. godine, Zakon o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakona iz 2002. godine,
Krivični zakonik iz 2005. godine, Porodični zakon iz 2005. godine) i Nacionalna
strategija za sprečavanje i suzbijanje nasilja nad ženama u porodici i u partnerskim
odnosima, usvojena 2011. godine. Sprovedena analiza pokazuje promenu u značenju
nasilja u porodici tokom posmatranih godina. Promene u označavanju se konstruišu
promenom u značenju nasilnog postupka koji će se smatrati nasilnim, promenom
označavanja posledica koje takvo nasilje izaziva i promenom označavanja članova
porodice na koje se usvojeni zakoni odnose.
Analiza medijskog diskursa podrazumevala je analizu novinskih članaka u
dnevnim novinama Blic i Politika u 2003, 2007. i 2011. godini. Analizom je
obuhvaćeno 432 novinska članka o nasilju u porodici...In modern society domestic violence is considered as one of the worst forms of
violence because its manifestations violate basic human rights and freedom of family
members. However, the meaning of domestic violence can be constructed in different
ways through different discourses. The aim of this work is to explore constructing
meanings of domestic violence in legal and media discourses and in narratives of
women victims of partners’ violence.
The theoretical foundation of this research is social constructionism, Foucault's
understanding of discourse, his understanding of the relation between power /
knowledge and the subject, as well as the feminist understanding of domestic violence
against women. The research is based on the qualitative approach to the problem which
implies the use of content analysis, discourse analysis and narrative analysis.
The law discourse analysis indicates the constructionist nature of the
phenomenon of domestic violence, as it is illustrated by tracking the change in the
meaning of domestic violence in different legal documents. The analysis refers to some
articles of the Serbian national laws which define the meaning of domestic violence
(Law on Public Peace and Order – 1994; The Law on Amendments to the Criminal Law
– 2002; Criminal Code – 2005; Family Law - 2005) and to National Strategy for
preventing and combating domestic and partners’ violence against women, adopted
2011. The conducted analysis shows a change in the meaning of domestic violence
during these years. Changes in labeling of domestic violence are constructed by
changing the meaning of actions that would be considered as violent, by changing
labeling of consequences caused by such violence, as well as by changing labeling of
family members to which these laws apply.
The analysis of media discourse entailed an analysis of newspaper articles edited
in daily newspapers Blic and Politika during 2003, 2007 and 2011. The analysis
included 432 newspapers articles on domestic violence..
