CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Catching up with wonderful women: The women-are-wonderful effect is smaller in more gender egalitarian societies
Authors
K. Krys Capaldi, C.A. van Tilburg, W. Lipp, O.V. Bond, M.H. Vauclair, C.-M. Manickam, L.S.S. Domínguez-Espinosa, A. Torres, C. Lun, V.M.-C. Teyssier, J. Miles, L.K. Hansen, K. Park, J. Wagner, W. Yu, A.A. Xing, C. Wise, R. Sun, C.-R. Siddiqui, R.S. Salem, R. Rizwan, M. Pavlopoulos, V. Nader, M. Maricchiolo, F. Malbran, M. Javangwe, G. Işık, İ. Igbokwe, D.O. Hur, T. Hassan, A. Gonzalez, A. Fülöp, M. Denoux, P. Cenko, E. Chkhaidze, A. Shmeleva, E. Antalíková, R. Ahmed, R.A.
Publication date
1 January 2018
Publisher
Abstract
Inequalities between men and women are common and well-documented. Objective indexes show that men are better positioned than women in societal hierarchies—there is no single country in the world without a gender gap. In contrast, researchers have found that the women-are-wonderful effect—that women are evaluated more positively than men overall—is also common. Cross-cultural studies on gender equality reveal that the more gender egalitarian the society is, the less prevalent explicit gender stereotypes are. Yet, because self-reported gender stereotypes may differ from implicit attitudes towards each gender, we reanalysed data collected across 44 cultures, and (a) confirmed that societal gender egalitarianism reduces the women-are-wonderful effect when it is measured more implicitly (i.e. rating the personality of men and women presented in images) and (b) documented that the social perception of men benefits more from gender egalitarianism than that of women. © 2017 International Union of Psychological Scienc
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Pergamos : Unified Institutional Repository / Digital Library Platform of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:lib.uoa.gr:uoadl:2983113
Last time updated on 10/02/2023