CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Search results
>
Research work
United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on functional dyspepsia
Authors
L. Wauters Dickman, R. Drug, V. Mulak, A. Serra, J. Enck, P. Tack, J. Accarino, A. Barbara, G. Bor, S. Coffin, B. Corsetti, M. De Schepper, H. Dumitrascu, D. Farmer, A. Gourcerol, G. Hauser, G. Hausken, T. Karamanolis, G. Keszthelyi, D. Malagelada, C. Milosavljevic, T. Muris, J. O’Morain, C. Papathanasopoulos, A. Pohl, D. Rumyantseva, D. Sarnelli, G. Savarino, E. Schol, J. Sheptulin, A. Smet, A. Stengel, A. Storonova, O. Storr, M. Törnblom, H. Vanuytsel, T. Velosa, M. Waluga, M. Zarate, N. Zerbib, F. Accarino, A. Barbara, G. Bor, S. Coffin, B. Corsetti, M. De Schepper, H. Dumitrascu, D. Farmer, A. Gourcerol, G. Hauser, G. Hausken, T. Karamanolis, G. Kestzhelyi, D. Malagelada, C. Milosavljevic, T. Muris, J. O&apos
Publication date
1 January 2021
Publisher
Abstract
Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice. In spite of its prevalence, FD is associated with major uncertainties in terms of its definition, underlying pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Methods: A Delphi consensus was initiated with 41 experts from 22 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 87 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 36 statements. Results: The panel agreed with the definition in terms of its cardinal symptoms (early satiation, postprandial fullness, epigastric pain, and epigastric burning), its subdivision into epigastric pain syndrome and postprandial distress syndrome, and the presence of accessory symptoms (upper abdominal bloating, nausea, belching), and overlapping conditions. Also, well accepted are the female predominance of FD, its impact on quality of life and health costs, and acute gastrointestinal infections, and anxiety as risk factors. In terms of pathophysiological mechanisms, the consensus supports a role for impaired gastric accommodation, delayed gastric emptying, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, and altered central processing of signals from the gastroduodenal region. There is consensus that endoscopy is mandatory for establishing a firm diagnosis of FD, but that in primary care, patients without alarm symptoms or risk factors can be managed without endoscopy. There is consensus that H. pylori status should be determined in every patient with dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori positive patients should receive eradication therapy. Also, proton pump inhibitor therapy is considered an effective therapy for FD, but no other treatment approach reached a consensus. The long-term prognosis and life expectancy are favorable. Conclusions and Inferences: A multinational group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on the definition, diagnosis and management of FD. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Lt
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Pergamos : Unified Institutional Repository / Digital Library Platform of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:lib.uoa.gr:uoadl:2997048
Last time updated on 10/02/2023