CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
On the use of HDR 60Co source with the MammoSite® radiation therapy system
Authors
D. Baltas Lymperopoulou, G. Zamboglou, N.
Publication date
1 January 2008
Publisher
Abstract
This work summarizes Monte Carlo results in order to evaluate the potential of using HDR Co60 sources in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with the MammoSite® applicator. Simulations have been performed using the MCNP5 Monte Carlo Code, in simple geometries comprised of two concentric spheres; the internal consisting of selected concentrations, C, of a radiographic contrast solution in water (Omnipaque 300™) to simulate the MammoSite balloon and the external consisting of water to simulate surrounding tissue. The magnitude of the perturbation of delivered dose due to the radiographic contrast medium used in the MammoSite® applicator is calculated. At the very close vicinity of the balloon surface, a dose build-up region is observed, which leads to a dose overestimation by the treatment planning system (TPS) which depends on Omnipaque™ 300 solution concentration (and is in order of 2.3%, 3.0%, and 4.5%, respectively, at 1 mm away from the balloon - water interface, for C=10%, 15%, and 20%). However, dose overestimation by the TPS is minimal for points lying at the prescription distance (d=1 cm) or beyond, for all simulated concentrations and radii of MammoSite® balloon. An analytical estimation of the integral dose outside the CTV in the simple geometries simulated shows that dose to the breast for MammoSite® applications is expected to be comparable using HDR Co60 and Ir192 sources, and higher than that for Yb169. The higher enegies of Co60 sources result to approximately twice radiation protection requirements as compared to Ir169 sources. However, they allow for more accurate dosimetry calculation with currently used treatment planning algorithms for Co60 sources, compared to Ir169. © 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Pergamos : Unified Institutional Repository / Digital Library Platform of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:lib.uoa.gr:uoadl:3095565
Last time updated on 10/02/2023