Furch, A.

Kunert, G.

Paulmann, M.

van Bel, A.

Wegner, L.

Zimmermann, M.

English

MPG.PuRe

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 492 1 of 3 Supplemental Material 1 Table S1: Statistical values for the analysis of morphological traits of forisomes 2 according to several explanatory variables (corresponding to Figure 1). 3 Trait / Transformation Explanatory variables F-value P-valueForisome width Forisome length : Plant 0.726 0.537 Forisome length 896.620 < 0.001 Plant 16.890 < 0.001 SE diameter (sqrt transformed) Window distance : Plant 1.610 0.187 Window distance 783.500 < 0.001 Plant 222.800 < 0.001 Forisome surface area (sqrt transformed) SE diameter : Window distance : Plant 0.108 0.955 SE diameter : Plant 1.034 0.378 Window distance : Plant 1.452 0.228 SE diameter : Window distance 6.597 0.011 SE diameter 1459.418 < 0.001 Window distance 18.178 < 0.001 Plant 34.798 < 0.001 Significant P-values are given in bold. sqrt – square root; SE – sieve element; window 4 distance – the distance from the leaf tip to the observation window in the leaf. 5 6 Table S2: Statistical values for the analysis of the ratio between fully dispersed and not 7 fully dispersed forisomes in the target leaflet according to the distance to the stimulation 8 site (corresponding to Figure 2). 9 Plant F-value P-valueM. sativa 3.470 0.077 P. sativum 0.535 0.472 T. pratense 2.089 0.154 V. faba 16.695 < 0.001 The degrees of freedom were 1 in all cases. Significant P-values are given in bold. 10 11 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 492 2 of 3 Table S3: Statistical values for the analysis of the time elapsed from burning to the full 12 dispersion of forisomes and the duration of dispersion according to the traveling 13 distance, forisome surface area (AF) and plant species (corresponding to Figure 3). 14 Trait Explanatory variables L-ratio / F-value P-valueElapsed time until dispersion* Traveling distance* : AF*: Plant 7.212 0.066 Traveling distance* : AF* 0.259 0.611 Traveling distance* : Plant 5.189 0.158 AF*: Plant 15.263 0.002 Plant 3.718 0.294 AF* 1.096 0.295 Traveling distance* 46.949 < 0.001 Duration of dispersion* Traveling distance : AF: Plant 1.360 0.258 Traveling distance : AF 0.060 0.807 Traveling distance : Plant 1.507 0.216 AF: Plant 0.570 0.635 Plant 3.966 0.009 AF 0.913 0.341 Traveling distance 1.275 0.261 Significant P-values are given in bold. For the analysis of the elapsed time until dispersion 15 the varIdent variance structure was used to account for the variance heterogeneity of the 16 residuals introduced by the plant species. Depending which statistical test was used 17 Likelihood (L)-ratios or F-values are given. F-values are given in italics. * indicates the ln-18 transformation of the respective parameter. Traveling distance – distance from the burning 19 site to the observation window. 20 21 Table S4: Statistical values for the analyses of proportions of electrophysiological 22 reaction in different leaflets of T. pratense and V. faba (corresponding to Figure 5 D). 23 Electrophysiological reaction Trifolium pratense Vicia faba Chi² P-value Chi² P-valueEPW 4.583 0.032 41.539 < 0.001 AP + VP 3.616 0.057 17.455 < 0.001 AP n.a. n.a. 7.494 0.058 Only electrophysiological reactions which occurred more than 5 times were statistically 24 analysed. Significant P-values are given in bold. Degrees of freedom for T. pratense = 1, for 25 V. faba = 3. n.a. – not applicable.26 27 Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 492 3 of 3 Table S5: Statistical values for the analyses of dependence of the depolarization 28 parameters on the site of the stimulus (corresponding to Figure 5 E). 29 Depolarization parameter Plant Transformation W / F-value P-valueStart of depolarization T. pratense n.a. 110 < 0.001 V. faba ln 84.350 < 0.001 Duration T. pratense n.a. 24 0.029 V. faba ln 6.801 < 0.001 Velocity T. pratense n.a. ~ 0 < 0.001 V. faba ln 25.420 < 0.001 Significant P-values are given in bold. Depending which statistical test was used W- or F-30 values are given. W-values are given in italics. n.a. – not applicable. 31 32 33 

Species-specific and distance-dependent dispersive behaviour of forisomes in different legume species

http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-A3C1-6

Species-specific and distance-dependent dispersive behaviour of forisomes in different legume species

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

MPG.PuRe