Beyond circular-arc graphs -- recognizing lollipop graphs and medusa graphs

Abstract

In 1992 Bir\'{o}, Hujter and Tuza introduced, for every fixed connected graph $H$, the class of $H$-graphs, defined as the intersection graphs of connected subgraphs of some subdivision of $H$. Recently, quite a lot of research has been devoted to understanding the tractability border for various computational problems, such as recognition or isomorphism testing, in classes of $H$-graphs for different graphs $H$. In this work we undertake this research topic, focusing on the recognition problem. Chaplick, T\"{o}pfer, Voborn\'{\i}k, and Zeman showed, for every fixed tree $T$, a polynomial-time algorithm recognizing $T$-graphs. Tucker showed a polynomial time algorithm recognizing $K_3$-graphs (circular-arc graphs). On the other hand, Chaplick at al. showed that recognition of $H$-graphs is $NP$-hard if $H$ contains two different cycles sharing an edge. The main two results of this work narrow the gap between the $NP$-hard and $P$ cases of $H$-graphs recognition. First, we show that recognition of $H$-graphs is $NP$-hard when $H$ contains two different cycles. On the other hand, we show a polynomial-time algorithm recognizing $L$-graphs, where $L$ is a graph containing a cycle and an edge attached to it ($L$-graphs are called lollipop graphs). Our work leaves open the recognition problems of $M$-graphs for every unicyclic graph $M$ different from a cycle and a lollipop. Other results of this work, which shed some light on the cases that remain open, are as follows. Firstly, the recognition of $M$-graphs, where $M$ is a fixed unicyclic graph, admits a polynomial time algorithm if we restrict the input to graphs containing particular holes (hence recognition of $M$-graphs is probably most difficult for chordal graphs). Secondly, the recognition of medusa graphs, which are defined as the union of $M$-graphs, where $M$ runs over all unicyclic graphs, is $NP$-complete