A brief retrospective on economic thought reveals that,
in the quest for the scientific status of their research, economists had to
refine not only their research methods, but even the economic language
itself. The use and, sometimes, the abuse of the “positive” concept in
present economic discourse are clear proofs that the constant changes of
economic language mark significantly economic science. Coined by
Auguste Comte, who denied the very existence of economic science, the
“positive” concept has become for a significant part of economists a keyterm
that guarantees and emphasizes the scientific status of their
research. Alternatively, an important body of scholars seems to provide a
different meaning for this concept and uses it in order to reveal economic
facts, more precisely, economic growth. One who is not very familiar
with the methodology of economics might be confused by these different
meanings hidden in a single term. In this context, the present paper aims
to bring more light into this issue by providing both an epistemological
analysis of “positive” term and a sketch of spreading patterns of this
concept via scientific publications. Consequently, the research follows
two major well-defined paths: 1) the epistemological analysis of various
meanings related to the “positive” term and 2) the quantitative study of
occurrences in which this concept is used and cited in economic journals
with high ISI citation index