In this paper we study the performance of four mapping algorithms. The four algorithms include two naiv

Debra Hensgen

Robert Armstrong

Taylor Kidd

In 7th IEEE Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW ’98)In this paper we study the performance of four mapping algorithms. The four algorithms include two naive ones: Opportunistic Load Balancing (OLB), and Limited Best Assignment (LBA), and two intelligent greedy algorithms: an O(nm) greedy algorithm, and an O(n 2 m) greedy algorithm. All of these algorithms, except OLB, use expected run-times to assign jobs to machines. As expected run-times are rarely deterministic in modern networked and server based systems, we first use experimentation to determine some plausible run-time distributions. Using these distributions, we next execute simulations to determine how the mapping algorithms perform. Performance comparisons show that the greedy algorithms produce schedules that, when executed, perform better than naive algorithms, even though the exact run-times are not available to the schedulers. We conclude that the use of intelligent mapping algorithms is beneficial, even when the expected time for completion of a job is not deterministic

Armstrong, Robert

Hensgen, Debra

Kidd, Taylor

Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School

The Relative Performance of Various Mapping Algorithms is Independent of Sizable Variances in Run-time Predictions

In this paper we study the performance of four mapping algorithms. The four algorithms include two naive ones: Opportunistic Load Balancing (OLB), and Limited Best Assignment (LBA), and two intelligent greedy algorithms: an O(nm) greedy algorithm, and an O(n  2  m) greedy algorithm. All of these algorithms, except OLB, use expected run-times to assign jobs to machines. As expected run-times are rarely deterministic in modern networked and server based systems, we first use experimentation to determine some plausible run-time distributions. Using these distributions, we next execute simulations to determine how the mapping algorithms perform. Performance comparisons show that the greedy algorithms produce schedules that, when executed, perform better than naive algorithms, even though the exact run-times are not available to the schedulers. We conclude that the use of intelligent mapping algorithms is beneficial, even when the expected time for completion of a job is not deterministic. ..

CiteSeerX

http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/35385/hcw98_2col.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

The relative performance of various mapping algorithms is independent of sizable variances in run-time predictions

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School

CiteSeerX