Gugerell, Katharina

Moen, Pelle L. R.

Neef, Mark Robin

Verweij, Stefan

English

Dissertations of the University of Groningen

   University of GroningenWegwijs in living labs in infrastructuur en ruimtelijke planning: Een theoretische en empirischeverkenningNeef, Mark Robin; Verweij, Stefan; Gugerell, Katharina; Moen, Pelle L. R.IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of recordPublication date:2017Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research databaseCitation for published version (APA):Neef, M. R., Verweij, S., Gugerell, K., & Moen, P. L. R. (2017). Wegwijs in living labs in infrastructuur enruimtelijke planning: Een theoretische en empirische verkenning. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license.More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne-amendment.Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.Download date: 12-10-202252 Referentielijst, Eind-noten en AppendicesAgenda Stad. (2016). Agenda stad: Steden maken het verschil: Samenwerken aan de toekomst van ste-delijk Nederland.Baltes, G., & Gard, J. (2010). Living labs as interme-diary in open innovation: On the role of entrepreneu-rial support. Presented at the International ICE Con-ference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Lugano.Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Eriksson, C. L., Ståhlbröst, A., -ning living labs. Presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York.Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Holst, M., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2009). Concept design with a living lab approach. Presented at the Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii In-ternational Conference on System Sciences.Bergvall-Kareborn, B., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2009). Living Lab: An open and citizen-centric approach for innova-tion. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 356–370.Bestuurlijk Platform Ruimtelijke Adaptatie. (2016). Eindnoten1 Synoniemen die vaak worden gebruikt zijn: urban labs, broedplaatsen en learning labs.2 In de literatuur over living labs wordt aangegeven dat er slechts enkele studies zijn over de uitkomsten van de inno-vatieprocessen in living labs (Leminen, 2015; Sauer, 2013; Schuurman, 2015).3 De literatuur schrijft niet voor met welke kwantitatieve (García-Guzmán, Fernández del Carpio, de Amescua, & Velasco, 2013) of kwalitatieve indicatoren (Nevens, Frant-zeskaki, Gorissen, & Loorbach, 2013) de uitkomsten van een living lab kunnen worden gemeten.4 Zonder plan van eisen worden creativiteit, multidiscipli-nariteit en co-creatie gestimuleerd (Bergvall-Kareborn & Ståhlbröst, 2009).5 Zie: http://www.rwsleefomgeving.nl/onderwerpen/bo-dem-ondergrond/grondwater/grondwater-ro/agendering/weten-willen-werken/.6 De scope van dit onderzoek was beperkt tot de living labs literatuur.53García-Guzmán, J., Fernández del Carpio, A., de Amescua, A., & Velasco, M. (2013). A process refe-rence model for managing living labs for ICT innova-tion: A proposal based on ISO/IEC 15504. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 36(1), 33–41.& Valenzuela, M. (2008). Living labs fostering open innovation and rural development: Methodology and results (pp. 1–8). Presented at the 2008 IEEE Inter-national Technology Management Conference (ICE).Holst, M. (2012). The living lab methodology hand-book.Hueskes, M., Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Verweij, S. (2016). Publiek-private samenwerking in Nederland en Vlaanderen: Een review van veertien proefschrif-ten. Bestuurskunde, 25(2), 90–104.Karré, P. M., Vanhommerig, I., & Bueren, E. (2015). De stad als lab voor sociale verandering. Bestuur-skunde, 24(1), 3–11.Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Abingdon: Routledge.Lehtonen, M. (2014). Evaluating megaprojects: From the “iron triangle” to network mapping. Evaluation, 20(3), 278–295.Leminen, S. (2015). Living labs as open innovation networks: Networks, roles and innovation outcomes. Espoo: Aalto University.Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A.-G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, September, 6–11.Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books.Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for -ty-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183.Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu. (2016). Vra-gen voor overmorgen: Strategische kennis- en inno-vatieagenda Infrastructuur en Milieu 2016-2020. Den Haag: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loor-bach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122.Niitamo, V. P., Kulkki, S., & Eriksson, M. (2006). Sta-labs. Presented at the Technology Management Con-ference.Nyström, A. G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Kor-Deltaprogramma ruimtelijke adaptatie: Werkplan 2016.Bulkeley, H., Breitfuss, M., Coenen, L., Frantzeskaki, N., Fuenfschilling, L., Grillitsch, M., … Voytenko, Y. (2015). Working paper on urban living labs and urban sustainability transitions. Governance of Urban Sus-tainability Transitions.Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new Boston: Harvard Business Press.Tracking transformations in urban governance. Urban Studies, 40(10), 1979–1999.Coalitie Stevige Stad op Slappe Bodem. (2016). Ste-vige stad op slappe bodem, tussentijdse update: 1 juli 2016.De Bruijn, H., ten Heuvelhof, E., & In’t Veld, R. (2002). Procesmanagement: Over procesontwerp en besluit-vorming. Den Haag: Academic Service.Dell’Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living lab: A metho-dology between user-centred design and participato-ry design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 137–154.DRIFT. (2011). Urban transition management manual: Navigator of the MUSIC project. Dutch Research ins-titute for Transitions.Dutilleul, B., Birrer, F. A. J., & Mensink, W. (2010). Un-packing European living labs: Analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European Journal of Pub-lic Policy, 4(1), 60–85.Engwall, M. (2003). No project is an island: linking 32(5), 789–808.Evans, J., & Karvonen, A. (2011). Living laboratories -logy of urban transition. In H. Bulkeley, V. C. Broto, M. Hodson, & S. Marvin (Eds.), Cities and low carbon transitions (pp. 26–141). London: Routledge.& Hongisto, P. (2007). Services of living labs and their networks. In P. Cunningham & M. Cunningham applications, case studies. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Følstad, A. (2008). Towards a living lab for the de-velopment of online community services. The Elec-tronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10, 47–58.Forrest, N., & Wiek, A. (2014). Learning from success - Toward evidence-informed sustainability transitions in communities. Environmental Innovation and Socie-tal Transitions, 12, 66–88.54-encing innovation in living labs. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 483–495.Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., & Scapin, D. (2010). Living lab research landscape: From user cocreation. Presented at the First European Summer School Living Labs, Paris.Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37(5), 461–483.Rijkswaterstaat. (2014). Innovatieagenda 2015-2020. Den Haag: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.Rijkswaterstaat. (2016). Samenwerken aan een bete-re doorstroming op de A58: Werken aan een slimme en duurzame snelweg. Rijkswaterstaat.Roorda, C., & Wittmayer, J. (2014). Transition ma--terdam: DRIFT.Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-cre-ation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. Sauer, S. (2013). User innovativeness in living labo-ratories: Everyday user improvisations with ICTs as a source of innovation. Enschede: University of Twente.Schuurman, D. (2015). Bridging the gap between living labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation. Ghent: Ghent University.Schuurman, D., & De Marez, L. (2012). Structuring user involvement in panel-based living labs. Tech-nology Innovation Management Review, September, 31–38.SmartwayZ.NL. (2015). Governance bereikbaarheid Zuid-Nederland: Samen slim robuust. SmartwayZ.NL.Ståhlbröst, A. (2012). A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs. International Journal of Pro-duct Development, 17(1–2), 60–75.Teisman, G. R., Van Buuren, A., & Gerrits, L. M. -tems: Dynamics, self-organization and coevolution in public investments. New York: Routledge.Teisman, G. R., Van der Voort, H., & Meijer, A. (2016). Overheden niet goed in innovatie? Empirische ver-kenningen van een “innovatiedilemma”. Bestuurskun-de, 25(4), 51–60.Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Van den Brink, M. (2013). Or-ganizational conditions for dealing with the unknown unknown. Public Management Review, 15(1), 43–62.Thiesen Winthereik, J. C., Malmborg, L., & Ander-sen, T. B. (2009). Living labs as a methodological approach to universal access in senior design. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in human-com-puter interaction: Addressing diversity (pp. 174–183). Berlin: Springer.Van Bueren, E. M., Karré, P. M., & Vanhommerig, I. (2015). Slotartikel: Het oplossend vermogen van living labs. Bestuurskunde, 24(1), 65–72.Van Wee, B. (2011). Transport and ethics: Ethics and the evaluation of Transport Policies and Projects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Verweij, S. (2015). Once the shovel hits the ground: -tation processes of public-private partnership infra-structure projects with qualitative comparative analy-sis. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Verweij, S. (2017). Addressing the evaluation-imple-mentation gap in infrastructure megaproject research with qualitative comparative analysis. In M. Lehto-nen, P. B. Joly, & L. Aparicio (Eds.), Socioeconomic Evaluation of Megaprojects: Dealing with Uncertain-ties (pp. 220–239). Abingdon: Routledge.Verweij, S., & Gerrits, L. M. (2012). Systematische kwalitatieve vergelijkende analyse. Kwalon, 17(3), 25–33.Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation compa--tion Management Review, 1(1), 19–25.

Wegwijs in living labs in infrastructuur en ruimtelijke planning: Een theoretische en empirische verkenning

https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/50274508/2017_Rijkswaterstaat_Neef_Verweij_Gugerell_Moen_References.pdf

Wegwijs in living labs in infrastructuur en ruimtelijke planning: Een theoretische en empirische verkenning

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Dissertations of the University of Groningen