Comparison of SAW and TOPSIS Method to Determine Road Handling Priority

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance results of SAW and TOPSIS method to determining road improvement/handling priority and to know which method is faster to solve the problem of road handling priority. Method used in this research is the waterfall method. Divided into four stages, namely a needs analysis aimed at obtaining information that a system needs and can serve a maximum accordance with the existing criteria. The design phase is to make the system design fit with the needs analysis that has been done previously before coding. Phase code represents the translation into the language design phases that can be recognized by computer. Testing stage is a stage that aims to find errors in the system to be fixed later. Measurement speed of response algorithm is performed to determine a faster method to make the order of priority road improvement. The results showed the first test, both of first alternative method obtaining the same results, but in the second testing and so on to show the different priority. TOPSIS method is faster in data processing that obtain results of 110.5 ms while the SAW method get the results of 116.5 ms in the measurement of the response speed of the algorithm