TAB B SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM DCN 1253UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site Facility~Equipment Nomenclature or Title Aircraft maintenance. Performs intermediate maintenance in support of assigned and supported fleet aircraft and on associated support equipment. Provides non-organic maintenance support equipment and organizational maintenance facilities for tenant activities. 2 Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. IMRL Gear: $116,853,200 T-10 Test Cell: 7,000,000 T-14/15 Test Cell: 4,000,000 T-17 Test Cell: 2,300,000 T-24 Test Cell: 2,100,000 T-26 Test Cell: 1,100,000 T-6 Test Cell: 950,000 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Facility Engine Test Cell Maint. Fac. Battery Shop Jet Engine Maint. Bldg. Turbo Jet Engine Test Fac. GSE Satellite Station Engine Maint. Shop Airframe Shop AIC Spare Storage A/C GSE Shop Avionics Shop Avionics Armament Shop Wheel, Brake, Xray, Paint Shop TurbineIOxygen, Liquid Oxygen Shop General Storage Engine Test CelVFuel Pump House Ordnance Div Office General Storage Inspectors Office Gross Weight N/ A NIA N/A NIA N/A N/ A N/A N/A NIA N/A NIA N/ A NIA N/ A NIA N/ A NIA NIA Cube 1,695 2,152 15,677 2,686 1,600 23,826 16,242 22,958 28,058 30,709 1,506 7,693 1,848 3,815 121 640 544 300 UIC: NO0421 Facility Gross Weight Cube Power Plant Office A/C Maint. Storage GSE Satellite Shop GSE Holding Fac. Parachute Loft Engine Test Cell Storage Jet Engine Test Fac. F181AVSB Maint. Lab GSE Steam Bldg. Maint. Storage Plastic Media Blast Fac. IMRL Gear 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Facility "Special" Support T-10 Test Cell High Volume Water 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Facility Special Budg. Req. T-10 Test Cell T-14/15 Test Cell T-17 Test Cell T-24 Test Cell T-26 Test Cell T-6 Test Cell Cement Pad, Blast Deflectors Cement Pad, Blast Deflectors Cement Pad, Blast Deflectors Cement Pad, Blast Deflectors Cement Pad, Blast Deflectors Cement Pad, Blast Deflectors 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Facility Envir. Ctrl. Req. T-10 Test Cell T-14/15 Test Cell T-17 Test Cell T-24 Test Cell T-26 Test Cell T-6 Test Cell Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Containment, OiYwater separator Containment, Oillwater separator Containment, OiYwater separator Containment, OiYwater separator Containment, OiYwater separator Containment, OiYwater separator UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Facility Engine Test Cell Maint. Fac. Battery Shop Jet Engine Maint. Bldg. Turbo Jet Engine Test Fac. GSE Satellite Station Engine Maint. Shop Airframe Shop A/C Spare Storage A/C GSE Shop Avionics Shop Avionics Armament Shop Wheel, Brake, Xray, Paint Shop TurbineIOxygen, Liquid Oxygen Shop General Storage Engine Test CelVFuel Pump House Ordnance Div Office General Storage Inspectors Office Power Plant Office A/C Maint. Storage GSE Satellite Shop GSE Holding Fac. Parachute Loft Engine Test Cell Storage Jet Engine Test Fac, F18IAV8B Maint. Lab GSE Steam Bldg. Maint. Storage Plastic Media Blast Fac. IMRL Gear T-23 Test Cell T-10 Test Cell T-14/15 Test Cell T-17 Test Cell T-24 Test Cell T-26 Test Cell T-6 Test Cell Rep./Rel. Difficulty Impact to DON Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Can Replicate Mobile Stationary Stationary Mobile Mobile Mobile Stationary Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and De Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays Increased Cost and Delays UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility Howwhen Obtained Engine Test Cell Maint. Fac. Battery Shop Jet Engine Maint. Bldg. Turbo Jet Engine Test Fac. GSE Satellite Station Engine Maint. Shop Airframe Shop A/C Spare Storage A/C GSE Shop Avionics Shop Avionics Armament Shop Wheel, Brake, Xray, Paint Shop Turbine/Oxygen, Liquid Oxygen Shop General Storage Engine Test CelVFuel Pump House Ordnance Div Office General Storage Inspectors Office Power Plant Office A/C Maint. Storage GSE Satellite Shop GSE Holding Fac. Parachute Loft Engine Test Cell Storage Jet Engine Test Fac. F18lAVSB Maint. Lab GSE Steam Bldg. Maint. Storage Plastic Media Blast Fac. New Construction-1950 New Construction-1953 New Construction-1956 New Construction-1960 New Construction-1953 New Construction-1953 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1953 New Construction-1945 New Construction-1947 New Construction-1944 New Construction-1959 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1943 New Construction-1946 New Construction-1966 New Construction-1968 New Construction-1969 New Construction-1973 New Construction-1975 New Construction-1975 New Construction-1980 New Construction-1981 New Construction-1990 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 10.9 Activity Mission and Function Support 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Facility Historical Util. Avg. IMRL Gear T-23 Test Cell T-10 Test Cell T-14/15 Test Cell T-17 Test Cell T-24 Test Cell T-26 Test Cell T-6 Test Cell UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Facility Projected Util. IMRL Gear T-23 Test Cell T-10 Test Cell T-14/15 Test Cell T-17 Test Cell T-24 Test Cell T-26 Test Cell T-6 Test Cell 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Facility # Personnel Engine Test Cell Maint. Fac. Battery Shop Jet Engine Maint. Bldg. Turbo Jet Engine Test Fac. GSE Satellite Station Engine Maint. Shop Wheel, Brake, Xray, Paint Shop General Storage Engine Test CelYFuel Pump House Ordnance Div Office General Storage Inspectors Office Power Plant Office AIC Maint. Storage GSE Satellite Shop GSE Holding Facility Parachute Loft Engine Test Cell Storage Jet Engine Test Facility F18/AVSB Maint. Lab GSE Steam Bldg. Maint. Storage Plastic Media Blast Fac. IMRL Gear T-23 Test Cell T-10 Test Cell T-14/15 Test Cell T-17 Test Cell T-24 Test Cell T-26 Test Cell T-6 Test Cell 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Provides ground and aerial photographic and video services to NAVAIRWARCENACDIV, FTEG, NAS, and tenant activities. Services include acquisition of still, motion picture, video photography, and processing and reproduction of all film. Performs special photographic services in connection with aircraft testing, aircraft mishaps, fires, investigations, and technical or public information. Procures, stocks, issues, maintains custody, and disposes of photographic material other than research, development, test and evaluation equipment a t NAVAIRWARCENACDIV, FTEG, and NAS. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Technical Information Department Photographic Laboratory 2. Indicate whether the facilityiequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Fixed and moveable. All photographic, processing, and printing equipment would require disassembly to transport. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. Replacement value of equipment in a fixed position is $193,722. Replacement value of equipment in a moveable position is $156,676 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. Gross weight of equipment in a fixed position is 8,900 lb. 117 x 64 feet; 6,121 square feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. The photo lab requires excessive amounts of hot water. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Hazardous materials are consumed; waste water has been checked and cleared of any contaminates. Silver recovery is in operation. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The replacement and relocation of this facility equipment would prove to be extremely difficult, due to the fact that this is the only facility of its kind to support the Department of the Navy within the local area. No commercial operation exists in this area with duplicate capabilities. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Equipment was transported and installed by the vendor's technical personnel. The building was built in 1967. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Platforms - Aircraft 3.2 Combat Systems Integration - Air 10.9 Mission Support 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. No records exist prior to 1992. FY92 -- 5,700 work requests processed. FY93 -- 7,200 work requests processed. These records don't indicate the volume and workload of individual work requests. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FY94 -- 7,500 work requests projected. FY95 -- 7,800 work requests projected. FY96 -- 8,100 work requests projected. FY97 -- 8,500 work requests projected. These projections don't indicate the volume and workload of individual work requests. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM Technical Center Site Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Facility/Equipment Technical Information Department Nomenclature or Title Television Production Facilities 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Provides policy direction and functional control over all Visual Information (VI) services in the Patuxent River subregion. Maintains the Patuxent River Subregion AudioNisual Equipment Inventory System, providing inventory control and management of all designated VI equipment for all naval activities within the Patuxent River subregion. Provides mission-related VI technical documentation (video) and VI technical reports. Provides VI production services (videotape, 35mm slide and 35mm sound/slide, digital multi-media) to base activities. Oversees and provides policy direction, and subcustodies VI library materials to activity VI library collections. Provides temporary loan of the most popular types of VI presentation equipment to base activities. Provides corrective and preventive maintenance services on most types of VI equipment. Controls, manages, and schedules on-site and remote video teleconferencing facilities. Manages the Visions Television Network, which broadcasts noteworthy events, general information and training on base. Other services include broadcasting of live, on-camera events originating from the TID production studio or remote locations. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Portable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilityJequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. $965,626.25 AudioNisual Equipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Gross Weight: Total: 40,210 Lbs. Cubic Feet Control Room: 2,566 Studio: 5,638 Production: 13,238 Office Area: 39,562 Storage: 875 UIC: NO0421 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. None. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Low volume flow air conditioning units. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The facility would not be difficult or impossible to replicate a t another site. The impact to the Navy if this facility is lost is increased cost and schedule impacts of fleet assets. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. In 1980 the Technical Information Department developed and dedicated a video laboratory and control room to support the audiolvisual section. In 1981 (2) U-matic video editing suites were also incorporated into the system to expand the capabilities of the section. Concurrently, a duplication station and an electronic video graphics system were implemented to support the increase in the utilization of the audiolvisual section. In 1990 the Visions Television Network station was added to further expand the mission of the section. Continual upgrading has occurred to keep the system fully functional. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 10.9 General Mission Support 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average labor & materials costs: $441,788.80 Average total number of videotape productions per year: 43 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997 *Based on 7% growth rate per year. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title ACETEF is a fully integrated ground research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) facility which allows full spectrum evaluation of highly integrated aircraft and aircraft systems in a secure and controlled engineering environment. The facility uses state-of-the-art simulation and stimulation techniques to provide scenarios which reproduce the conditions approaching those of actual combat. In ACETEF, a fully integrated weapons system, incorporating vehicle, avionics, weapons, crew, other platforms, and critical elements of the operational command/control hierarchy are immersed in a simulated environment that deceives both the aircraft and flight crew into believing that they are in actual combat. Aircraft systems are deceived through a combination of simulation by digital computers and stimulation by computer controlled environment generators that provide radio frequency, electro-optical (future) and laser (future) stimuli which duplicate, as closely as possible, real signals. The flight crew is provided very high fidelity visual, aural and tactical workload conditions (threats, mission objectives and constraints, communications channels, etc.). Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF ACETEF adds value to existing NAVAIRWARCENACDIV RDT&E assets through the upgrade of several existing laboratories, the development of several new laboratories and the integration of all laboratories into an interoperable RDT&E complex. ACETEF is currently in its fifth year of funding by the OSD Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP). Additional funding is provided by Navy institutional sources and direct project support. As of FY-94, over $275111 have been invested in the ACETEF complex. The program is coordinated with the Army, Air Force and other Navy test and development activities. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. For responses to questions 2 through 14, refer to individual sheets for: ACETEF: EC Stimulation Department ACETEF: Simulation and Analysis Department ACETEF: Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Test Facility ACETEF: Navy Lightning and P-Static Test Facility ACETEF: TEMPESTICOMSEC Test Facility ACETEF: Manned Flight Simulator ACETEF: Naval Electromagnetic Radiation Facility (NERF) UIC: NO0421 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). 8. Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title This facility provides stimulation to federated and integrated electronic combat systems installed on DOD and FMS aircraft. The facility supports the test and evaluation of the following types of systems: radar warning receivers, defensive jamming systems, laser warning, missile approach warning, electronic support measures, CNIL, air to airlair to ground radar, IRST, FLIR, SIGINT, COMINT, GPS, and tactical data links. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF: EC Stimulation Department 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facilities: Anechoic Chamber: 100 x 60 x 40 Shielded hanger: 300 x 150 x 70 Equipment: Advanced Tactical EW Environmental Simulator (ATEWES) Enhanced Tactical EW Environmental Simulator (ETEWES) 1-15 Weapon System simulator EWIACQ Weapon System simulator J-Band Advanced Technology Simulator ARM Stimulator Radiated Billboard Arrays RISS GPS terminal simulator Communications Environment Simulator (CES) Radar Target Simulator (RTS) misc. multispectral stimulation equipment fixed fixed moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable moveable portable UIC: NO0421 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. Facility Replacement Cost Anechoic Chamber: Facility Replacement Cost Shielded Hanger Equipment Replacement Cost ATEWES Equipment Replacement Cost ETEWES Equipment Replacement Cost 1-15 Equipment Replacement Cost EWIACQ Equipment Replacement Cost RTS Equipment Replacement Cost CES Equipment Replacement Cost RTS Equipment Replacement Cost Misc. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Facility: 75570 ~ ~ 2 / 3 5 8 6 5 6 4 F T ~ Equipment: 57 Tons/59000 F T ~ 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. Aircraft support equipment: Electrical power, ground cooling air, hydraulic fluid, cooling oil. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). DIAM 50-3 construction for SCIFISAR Anechoic chamber shieldingtradar absorbing material Light absorbing wall material (IR) 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Humidityfl'emperature control 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The facility and equipment could be replicated a t other locations, however, MILCON would be required to reconstruct chamber/hanger/laboratory facilities. If this facility/equipment were lost the impact to the DON would be major. There is no equivalent to this facility in all of DOD. No other facility is as mature and provides the expert multi-spectral capability that the ACETEF EC Stimulation Department does. One of the most important issues for the potential loss of this facility is the loss of expertise. Most of the long term expertise belonging to this facility would not support a new or realigned facility. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Anechoic Chamber IOC 1983 Shielded Hanger IOC 1949 Stimulators (delivered from manufacturers) 1980 - 1994 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Aircraft 1 .3 Surface Ship 2 . 9 Fire Control 3.2 Air combat system integration 4 .2 CoastaUSpecial Warfare Support 5.2 Radar Systems 6 . 2 Aircraft Navigation Systems 7 . 2 C31 Airborne 7 . 8 Intelligence Information Systems 8 . 2 Countermeasures 8.3 Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 1989 Not Available 1990 2478 1991 4619 1992 2910 1993 2148 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. These figures are based on increased use of other (currently in development) stimulation assets in the out years. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 3 1 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 5 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESJEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 11 Technical Center Site I Flight Test and Engineering Group 1 11 Nomenclature or Title I ACETEF: Simulation & Analysis Dept. 11 Facility/Equipment 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. The Simulation & Analysis Dept. provides the cornerstone for total integrated multi-platform ground testing in ACETEF. This is done in the Operations and Control Center (OCC). The threat generation is provided by the Simulated Warfare Environment Generator (SWEG). SWEG is the core of the OCC, generating the threat scenarios and maintaining control of red and blue players. Test execution, data distribution, and test instrumentation are also controlled by the OCC. The Simulation & Analysis Dept. also includes the Aircrew Systems Evaluation Facility (ASEF) which provides the tools necessary to evaluate the man-machine interface and the crew workload during ACETEF testing. NAWCAD PAX 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. 1 The facilitylequiprnent is not a portable facility. ACETEF is a ground test facility, the purpose of which is to stimulate both pilot and aircraft with a full combat environment in a secure atmosphere, therefore it is a fixed facility. ACETEF is composed of several independent laboratories which can work either autonomously or in unison to test different facets of aircraft weapon systems. The Simulation & Analysis Dept. provides the central command and control for this inter-laboratory test execution via multiple elaborate communications networks which are embedded throughout the entire ACETEF complex. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. The replacement value of the Simulation & Analysis Dept. equipment is $11.8M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. The gross weight of the equipment is 17 tons. The square footage required to house the equipment is 22,834 square feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. There are no special utility support requirements for this facility/equipment other than electrical power. UIC: NO0421 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). There are no special budget requirements for the facility/equipment. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The environment control requirements of the facility/equipment is such that this facility is the control center for six laboratories, and an anechoic chamber, which is driven by many computers, instrumentation equipment, and audio/video equipment. The facility requires temperature control, humidity control, sprinkler system, and fire extinguishing capability. This facility is also a secure facility, which stipulates that the facility be alarmed. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. ACETEF has been developed by OSD as DOD's only Category I Installed Systems Test Facility (ISTF). ACETEF is a highly integrated groundtest facility consisting of multiple activities: Simulation & Analysis, EC Stimulation, Manned Flight Simulation, EMP, Lightning & P-Static, TEMPEST/COMSEC, and an Electromagnetic Radiation Facility. Each facility not only provides the environment required to test in its individual discipline, but also to test the contribution of that discipline to the total mission effectiveness of the system under test. ACETEF facilities also share assets (including the Anechoic Chamber and Shielded Hangar), expertise, personnel, instrumentation and tools. Relocating any portion of ACETEF nullifies the ISTF concept. Either ACETEF would have to recreate the capability, or the ability to test the contribution of that particular discipline to total mission effectiveness would be loss. Replication of ACETEF would require a large investment in a shielded space (shielded hangar), anechoic chamber, ground planes, pulsars, as well as labs, integration infrastructure (conduits, cabling, etc.), and equipment. I n particular, the Simulation and Analysis Department would be very difficult and costly to relocate to another site. Transportation and packaging of this sensitive equipment would cost approximately $800K, but the nature of this department makes relocation almost impossible. As the defining and integrating department of ACETEF networks, Simulation and Analysis Department is the key to our capability to pass collected data, both real time and post time, and to create inter-laboratory communication. Physical location of this department within the facility is paramount to ACETEF's success. Currently no like-facility exists anywhere. Creating this department took five years of effort - replication would be nearly another five year evolution of development and integration. Loss of this equipment/facility would eliminate DOD's ability to perform installed systems test. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The Simulation & Analysis Dept. mission has been a five year evolution, presently in its fifth year. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The functional support areas are: 3.0 Avionics 8.3 Electronic Combat Testing 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The historical utilization for the past five years is as follows: T&E Functional Area FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Air Vehicles Test Hours 4 0 567 630 Missions 3 0 1 2 5 8 7 Direct Labor 13000 14000 14000 Elec Combat Test Hours 200 Missions Direct Labor 4000 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. The project utilization for FY95 is 3600, for FY96 is 3700, and for FY97 is 3800. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? The approximate number of personnel required to operate the Simulation & Analysis Dept. equipment is 14. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The approximate number of personnel required to maintain the Simulation & Analysis Dept. equipment is 15. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. - Technical Center Site Facility/Equiprnent Nomenclature or Title This facility tests Navy and other DOD aircraft and weapons to the high altitude Electromagnetic Pulse. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF: Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Test Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Electromagnetic Pulse Facility is fixed. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment Replacement Cost: $23.1M Facility Replacement Cost: $1.9M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 100 tons, 100,000 cubic feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Aircraft COMMINAV Test Equipment Facility must be located adjacent to aircraft runways, taxiways etc. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Aircraft Pad and Tow way in an isolated area. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. ACETEF has been developed by OSD as DOD's only Category I Installed Systems Test Facility (ISTF). ACETEF is a highly integrated ground test facility consisting of multiple activities: Simulation &Analysis, EC Stimulation, Manned Flight Simulation, EMP, Lightning & P-Status, TEMPEST/COMSEC, and an Electromagnetic Radiation Facility. Each facility not only provides the environment required to test in its individual discipline, but also to test the contribution of that discipline to the total mission effectiveness of the system under test. ACETEF facilities also share assets (including the anechoic chamber and shielded hangar), expertise, personnel, instrumentation and tools. Relocating any portion of ACETEF nullifies the ISTF concept. Either ACETEF would have to recreate the capability, or the ability to test the contribution of that particular discipline to total mission effectiveness would be loss. Replication of ACETEF would require a large investment in a shielded space (shielded hangar), anechoic chamber,. ground planes, pulsars, as well as labs, integration infrastructure (conduits, cabling, etc.), and equipment. For the EMP facility in particular, there is no other DOD or commercial facility which can test to full threat electromagnetic pulse. Relocation of the facilities would be exacerbated by the requirement for aircraft support facilities, runways, taxiways, tow ways, and a dedicated aircraft pad. Removal of the electromagnetic pulse capability from Patuxent River would seriously affect the synergism of the combined ACETEF facilities a t NAWCAD. Loss of the facilitylequipment would preclude EMP testing of new aircraft and systems and would be severely detrimental to this vital requirement. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facilities were constructed in 1982 to provide Electromagnetic Pulse testing of aircraft. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Aircraft 3.2 Aircombat Systems Integration 9.2 Nuclear Weapons and Effects 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 89 - 1000 Test hours 90 - 1000 Test hours 91 - 1000 Test hours 92 - 1000 Test hours 93 - 1000 Test hours UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 94 - 800 Test hours 95 - 800 Test hours 96 - 800 Test hours 97 - 800 Test hours 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Ten 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Seven 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title This facility tests Navy and other DOD aircraft and weapons to Lightning and P-Static Threats. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF: Navy Lightning and P-Static Test Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. P-Static Facilities are portable, Lightning Facilities are moveable. These tests require a fixed shielded environment such as the shielded hangadanechoic chamber. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Facility Replacement Cost: $302K Equipment Replacement Cost: $9.7M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 40 tons, 20,000 cubic feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Aircraft COMM/NAV Test Equipment Facility must be located adjacent to aircraft runways, taxiways etc. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Proper Shielded Hangar environment. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Sheltered from precipitation. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. ACETEF has been developed by OSD as DOD's only Categroy I Installed Systems Test Facility (ISTF). ACETEF is a highly integrated ground test facility consisting of multiple activities: Simulation & Analysis, EC Stimulation, Manned Flight Simulation, EMP, Lightning & P-Static, TEMPEST/COMSEC, and an Electromagnetic Radiation Facility. Each facility not only provides the environment required to test in its individual discipline, but also to test the contribution of that discipline to the total mission effectiveness of the system under test. ACETEF facilities also share assets (including the anechoic chamber and shielded hangar), expertise, personnel, instrumentation and tools. Relocating any portion of ACETEF nullifies the ISTF concept. Either ACETEF would have to recreate the capability, or the ability to test the contribution of that particular discipline to total mission effectiveness would be loss. Replication of ACETEF would require a large investment in a shielded space (shielded hangar), anechoic chamber, ground planes, pulsars, as well as labs, integration infrastructure ( conduits, cabling, etc.), and equipment. For the Lightning lab in particular, no other DOD or commercial facility exists which can perform full threat lightning tests. These facility would be extremely difficult to relocate or replicate at another site considering the need for a shielded environment and access to aircraft facilities . Removal of the Lightning and P-static simulators from Patuxent River would adversely impact the synergism of the ACETEF facilities at NAWCAD. Loss of this equipment/facilities would be devastating to the testing of all DOD aircraft for lightning and P-statics (this facility just recently completed lightning tests on the AIR Force C-17 aircraft - no other activity in the world would have been able to accomplish this). 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Construction of Lightning and P-Static Facilities are a culmination of twenty-two years of construction and improvement. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 . 2 Aircraft 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 89 - 300 Test Hours 90 - 300 Test Hours 91 - 300 Test Hours 92 - 500 Test Hours 93 - 800 Test Hours 1 2 . Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 94 - 400 Test Hours 95 - 400 Test Hours 96 - 400 Test Hours 97 - 400 Test Hours 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? Five 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Two 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilityJequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The TEMPEST/COMSEC Test Facility is used to support the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard in the RDT&E and fleet support of airborne classified info processing systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF: TEMPESTICOMSEC Test Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitytequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is portable. A fixed shielded environment similar to the shielded hangar or anechoic chamber is required for some testing. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment Replacement Value = $7.6M Facility Replacement Value = $5.329111 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitytequipment. Equipment: 84,559 lbs 18,782 cu ft 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 28V DC +& 400 Hz Aircraft Power, Aircraft cooling - lab cooling, externavinternal antennas. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitytequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Requires shielded and anechoic facility. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Aircraft and lab cooling. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. ACETEF has been developed by OSD as DOD's only Category I Installed Systems Test Facility (ISTF). ACETEF is a highly integrated ground test facility consisting of multiple activities: Simulation & Analysis, EC Stimulation, Manned Flight Simulation, EMP, Lightning & P-Static, TEMPEST/COMSEC, and an Electromagnetic Radiation Facility. Each facility not only provides the environment required to test its individual discipline, but also to test the contribution of that discipline t the total mission effectiveness of the system under test. ACETEF facilities also share assets (including the anechoic chamber and shielded hangar), expertise, personnel, instrumentation and tools. Relocating any portion of ACETEF nullifies the ISTF concept. Either ACETEF would have to recreate the capability, or the ability to test the contribution of that particular discipline to total mission effectiveness would be loss. Replication of ACETEF would require a large investment in a shielded space (shielded hangar), anechoic chamber, ground planes, pulsars, as well as labs, integration infrastructure (conduits, cabling, etc.), and equipment. Although much of the equipment used of TEMPEST/COMSEC testing in particular is portable, many of the tests require an anechoic chamber or shielded hangar for security reasons. There is no other shielded hangar of this size in the world, and the anechoic chamber is a significant investment. Loss of this capability would preclude the Navy's ability to perform test which require a secure environment. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Shielded hangar built in 1949 and anechoic chamber built in 1983. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Aircraft 3.2 Combat System Integration 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Full utilization base on 8 hour day. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Full utilization base on 8 hour day. UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 20 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 20 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title Purpose is to provide an aircraft simulation facility for military aircraft with man-in-the-loop and hardware-in-the-loop test capabilities. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF: Manned Flight Simulator 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is not portable. This facility consists of computer hardware, roll around cockpits, and simulation stations. The computers and the cockpits along with the myriad of support equipment is portable, but the dome simulation station and the motion base are very large facilities and must be completely disassembled and reassembled with the moving costs probably exceeding the original procurement cost by an order of magnitude. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment Replacement Cost is $50M. Facility Replacement Cost is $2.3M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Gross weight of the equipment is 77 tons; gross volume is 40,000 ft3 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Equipment should be TEMPEST secure; facility is now operating a t the Secret level; if replaced the building should be constructed as a secret level facility. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal environmental requirements for handling cooling load for electronic equipment; requirement for oil sump in case of motion base pumps developing a leak. UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facilityJequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilityJequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Relocation would require construction of a special building which would cost $4M; loss of this facility would mean that the Navy would lose a simulation facility for T&E purposes. 9. Indicate how and when the facilityJequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility was constructed by a construction company in FY8S under a MILCON contract. The motion base and dome were each constructed under separate procurements with companies that specialized in the particular type of system. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilityJequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Aircraft 3.2 Combat System Integration 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The average utilization will be given in total hours of facility usage for each FY: 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Project utilization from now through FYI997 is projected as: 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilityJequipment? Approximately 8 personnel are required to operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Approximately 6 personnel are required to maintain the equipment. 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilityJequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityJEquipment Nomenclature or Title The NERF consists of a 1500 square foot lab building, vault, two ground planes (100' x 240' surface mounted steel deck and 200' x 400' imbedded grid under the hangar 144 apron) with all required electrical services and high powered transmitters required to generate simulated operational electromagnetic environment for purposes of conducting radiated susceptibility tests for the Navy, Army, Air Force, FAA, and commercial customers. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ACETEF: Naval Electromagnetic Radiation Facility (NERF) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. All of the transmitters are located in modified semi-trailers which are towable in and around hangar 144. As they stand, the trailers do not meet the requirements of the DOT for open road haulingltransportation. The ground planes are embedded in the apron and are fixed. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement Cost Integral Facilities: $2.7M Equipment Replacement Transmitters: $4.45M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Gross Weight: 43 tons estimated Volume: 3,600 cubic ft 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Electrical power: 400 amps, 3 phase, 480V delta service, 60 Hz 100 amps, 3 phase, 400 Hz, 115V service 28VDC, 50 amps UIC: NO0421 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Facility requires EM1 buffer zone to prevent EM1 to other adjacent facilities. Facility also requires frequency allocation and authorization for operation. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). All of the transmitters require a stable 25 degrees C temperature environment. Environmental needs have been integrated into the test vans used to house the transmitters. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Their are no other duplicates of this facility anywhere at any base or commercial facility in this country. We are the only organization setup adjacent to a major air field with a large enough imbedded ground plane, apron strength, and transmitter facilities to enable testing of verv large test articles. We are also the only site setup with alameda chocks to allow safe testing of jets with engines running. 9 . Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. All of the transmitters were received after custom development and then assembled on site. The Ground Plane #1 facilities were constructed in 1964, details unknown. The ground Plane #2 facilities were constructed during the Hangar 144 apron replacement (first time since 1946) in 1994. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional Support Areas: 1.2 Aircraft 3.2 Combat System Integration (Air) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FY: 1992 1993 1994 1995 Test Days: 9 4 326 545 228 50 weeks double shift UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected Utilization Data: Total (Davs) AV % AW % EC% 9 4 61.70 12.70 8.5 0 Other 17.00 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? S i x . 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Four. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. NAVAL ELECTROMAONETIC RADIATION FACILITY (NERF) UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 11 Nomenclature or Title I Airborne Instrumentation Suppon Facility 1 Technical Center Site FacilityJEquipment 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. < Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX The Airborne Instrumentation Support Facility is the major center for aircraft instrumentation and modification. The facility houses laboratories, office spaces, personnel and equipment necessary to fulfill that function. Aircraft Test Laboratories and Shop Support Facilities provide general purpose facilities for engineering, technical documentation, test instrument development and fabrication, verification tests, calibration support, maintenance of instrumentation/measurement s t andards , a n d instrumentation software and hardware development. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. All equipment is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. Equipment Replacement Value is $4M. Facility Replacement Value is $24.6M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Gross weight of equipment (approx. 1500 pieces) is 88 tons, Cube is 40,OO cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. Three (3) phase, 400 cycle power for aircraft and aircraft support equipment. Air compressors must be installed with ports located throughout hangar. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The physical plant and equipment could be relocated or replicated at another site. However, flight testing performed at FTEG would be seriously affected by the relocation of the facility that provides a large percentage of DON instrumentation support. This facility possesses the capacity and ability to design and install highly complex instrumentation systems. A large part of the design and installation process is the direct, real time relationship that it employs with its customers and FTEG departments that assist in the installation. It is imperative that this facility function with other facilities at FTEG such as the Telemetry Data Center, Laboratory Services Department's Design and Fabrication Section and other groups in order for instrumentation work to take place as expeditiously as possible. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility is approximately 51 years old. Built on site. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1. Platforms 10.7 Major Range Development & Operation 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Manpower utilization is 109%. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997 Manpower utilization is projected to be 100-110% per year out to FY97. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 68 civilians and 25 contractors both operate and maintain the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility~Equipment Nomenclature or Title The primary purpose of this facility is to provide precision optical scoring and high speed photo and optical support on missions conducted over the Hooper Target Complex in the Chesapeake Bay. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Theodolite Scoring and Tracking Facility 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility consists of five fixed cine-theodolite mounts and three high speed Photosonics tracking mounts. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. The replacement value for this facility: Buildings - $l.OM 5 cine-theodolites - $lO.OM 3 Photosonics mounts - $3.OM 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight and volume of: Weight Volume (tons) (cubic feet) 8 Systems 16.0 2000 Misc Support (test equipment, maintenance & storage areas, spare parts, domes) 20.0 4000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. These trackers require three phase electrical power and an unobstructed view with sufficient safety boundaries for laser operation. UIC: NO0421 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). These trackers require special tower construction to minimize thermal effects and support leveling of the system prior to calibration. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). This facility does not require any special environmental controls. Conventional HVAC systems are adequate for these systems. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. As these systems are fixed, relocation would be extremely difficult. These trackers communicate with Range control via an encrypted fiber optic network that is buried in the Chesapeake Bay. All data, voice and video is transmitted over this secure link. If this facility were lost, classified missions that require the precise realtime scoring of ballistics and weapons accuracy could not be accomplished by the Department of the Navy. Also, this facility is the only DOD facility that can accurately perform realtime TSPI video scoring of ballistics. Other DOD facilities have similar capabilities but would require extensive modification to perform the exact function of the Chesapeake Test Range. No known commercial facilities exist with this capability. Government facilities with similar capabilities are: Eglin AFB, NAWCWD China Lake, WSMR, Edwards AFB. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This theodolite network was built and installed utilizing conventional techniques. These trackers and associated equipment were procured over a period of 30 years using several procurement contracts. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports various aircraft platforms, weapons systems, sensor systems, navigation systems, electronic warfare systems as well as training in the support Range operations. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This equipment is key to precision data collection on certain project missions conducted by the Range. The five year statistical average for Missions supported by these trackers is 200 per year. UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997 Based on projected workload the number of missions per year this facility would be a part of is: 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? Ten people are required to operate this Theodolite Network. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Two people are required to maintain this Theodolite Network. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityfEquipment Nomenclature or Title The VANDAL Aerial Target (MQM-8G(ER)) launch and buildup facilities are located a t the National Aeronautic and Space Administration, Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, VA. The VANDAL program's primary purpose is to provide the east coast surface fleet a threat representative aerial target that corresponds closely with the actual threats realized in today's sea warfare environments. Targets are assembled, checked and prepared for flight, launched and controlled in support of both RDT&E programs as well fleet training exercises. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Target Support Facility East Coast VANDAL Launch Site, Wallops Flight Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Most equipment used to checkout - launch VANDAL targets is relatively portable with the exception of the VANDAL launcher. The VANDAL launcher is essentially an assembly that was intended as a semi-permanent structure. The launcher is removable, however, its' mass would require extensive equipment for intact removal for reuse. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of all equipment utilized for VANDAL buildup, launch and control is estimated at approximately $ISM. This figure is contingent upon replacement of the VANDAL launcher being supplied by disassembly - shipment - reassembly of an existing launcher at one of the other VANDAL launch sites. If redesign of a new launcher were required, then that effort alone is estimated a t $3M plus. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of all VANDAL peculiar equipment is estimated a t approximately 46.0 tons. Most equipment is crateable, however, the launcher is massive and must be transported in odd shaped pieces. Cube is estimated a t 2,200. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Power required for the VANDAL launcher is 440 VAC, 3 phase, 110 amp, all other power requirements are standard household type current. UIC: NO0421 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The launch control building at Wallops Flight Facility consists of a blockhouse structure designed for use with several NASA launch vehicles and is therefore adequate for VANDAL launches. A similar building would be required at an alternate location provided no similar structure existed. Concrete construction capable of withstanding a direct target impact (4 tons at approximately SM). 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Environmental conditions for buildup/checkout/storage of targets should include humidity control and/or air conditioned spaces. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Relocation of these equipments would be difficult and costly at best. If replication were required, the task would be extremely difficult or cost prohibitive depending on the pieces to be replicated. Impact to the Department of Navy if the capability on the East Coast were lost, would be great from a preparedness standpoint and therefore unmeasurable if an event were to take place in which lives were lost due to the state of non- preparedness. At this time, there are no other threat representative target capabilities on the East Coast either government wide or commercial. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The current capabilities at WFF was installed during the early 1980's (1982 - 1984) by the Pacific Missile Test Center. All equipments at that time were transported via surface means and assembled at Wallops. The current configuration, although basically the same, has had many modifications but would still require surface transport. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional Support Areas: 1.3 Surface Ship 3.2 Combat System Integration Air 5.2 Sensors 1 0. General Mission Support UIC: NO0421 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five years, there have been 48 VANDAL target launches to various NAVSEA users over 16 separate exercises. This equates to a little more than three exercises per year with three targets per exercise. I t should be noted that there were no exercises during FY91, 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. The tentative schedule for planned exercises over the next three years is scheduled to be 3+ exercises per year not including possible fleet training exercises. The number of targets to be allocated is unknown at this time. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? For support of a VANDAL exercise, it requires approximately 10 support personnel (combined Civil Service and contractor). This does not include the operational personnel required to conduct the exercise but only target buildup/checkout/launch/control of the targets. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Currently we a re utilizing two full-time personnel to maintain the equipment at WFF. There are periods where contractor support is required. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 11 Nomenclature or Title I Target Hulk preparation Facility I Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Target Support Facility The target hulk preparation facility prepares decommissioned ship hulks into target ships which are utilized to support anti-ship missile and anti- radiation missile test and evaluation and fleet training exercises. The facility supports the installation of towing and navigation packages and the environmental preparations required to prepare a decommissioned ship for at-sea live fire testing. The facility is the only facility on the east coast for outfitting full-scale ship targets and supports Navy, DOD test and evaluation and fleet training requirements. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility would be considered fixed as a requirement exists for deep water access and pier facilities for target platforms. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value is estimated at 3.OM. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Gross weight is estimated at 182 tons. Cube is estimated at 5,676. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 440V 3 phase power required. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The facility would be difficult to relocate given the existing requirements for deep water access, pier facilities and the building and lay-down storage areas required to support operations. If the facilityjsite were lost NavyIDOD weapon programs requiring full-scale ship targets would not be able to obtain needed support on the East Coast. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility was established at the Solomons Annex in 1983 after an extensive East Coast facilities site survey conducted by the Chesapeake Division of the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Other sites considered included: Norfolk, VA; Charleston, SC; and Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional Support Areas: 1.2 Aircraft 1.3 Surface Ship 3.2 Combat System Integration - Air 3.3 Combat System Integration - Surface 10.1.2 Aircraft Related Training Systems 10.1.3 Surface - Ship Related Training Systems 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical Utilization Average: FY # Ship's Prepared 8 9 4 9 0 4 9 1 3 9 2 2 9 3 2 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Out-year Utilization through FY97 # Ship's Prepared 3 # Operations Supported 12 # Operations Supported 17 UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 15 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 7 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The Target Support Facility provides for the management, design, operation and maintenance of all surface and aerial targets operated at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, MD. The facility is also tasked with providing ocean engineering services required to support test and evaluation projects conducted by the Aircraft Division's flight test directorates. The range of services provided covers diving support services to recover expended ordnance test items, range patrol services to ensure safety of operations and operation of scoring systems require to collect data and verify systems performance. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Target Support Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility would be considered fixed as proximity to the inner range operations area and the Hooper target complex is a primary requirement. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent is estimated at approximately $10M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The gross weight of the facility and equipment is estimated at 21 - 25 tons. Cube is estimated to be 4,306. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. The facility requires gasoline and number two diesel fuel dispensing systems for refueling target and range patrol surface craft. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Facility requires mooring pilings and dolphin standoffs for berthing of target and project support vessels. UIC: NO0421 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. 8 . Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Cost consideration and locating a suitable area to conduct operations would be the major factors if a relocation were to be contemplated. If the existing facilitylequipment were lost it would have a major impact on the ability of the DON to conduct its' mission of test and evaluation of naval aircraft systems. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility was established in 1975. The original building was constructed in 1943. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The facility functions as a support facility providing ocean engineering, target support and range clearance safety services to many different Navy, DOD, and Federal government agencies. 1 . 2 Aircraft 1 .3 Surface Ship 3 .2 Combat Systems Integration - Air 3.3 Combat Systems Integration - Surface 4.2 CoastaUSpecial Warfare Support 5 .1 Sonar Systems 5 . 2 Radar Systems 5.3 Special Sensors 5.5 Ocean Surveillance 6.2 Aircraft Navigation System 7.2 Airborne 8 . 2 Countermeasures 8 . 3 Electronic Warfare Systems 10.1 .2 Aircraft - Related Training Systems 10.1.4 Weapons - Related Training Systems 10.4 Diving, Salvage and Ocean Engineering 10.7 Major Range Development and Operation UIC: NO0421 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical Utilization: FY # of Missions Supported # of Hours of Operation 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected Utilization: FY # of Missions Supported # of Hours of Operation 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Thirty-eight (38) personnel are required to operate the facility/equipment. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Twelve (12) personnel are assigned to maintain the equipment. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The integrated range facilities of the Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) provides an extremely powerful tool to the research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) community for Naval Air Warfare and the Department of Defense (DOD). This, combined with the other RDT&E facilities (Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility, Carrier Suitability Test Facilities, Aircraft Electrical and Environmental Evaluation Facility, and the Aircraft Test and Evaluation Facility) located at Pax River provides a synergistic full-spectrum RDT&E center for aircraft systems technology, flying qualities and performance, propulsion, avionics, and aircraft-ship interfaces. The full range of capabilities available at this single site are unsurpassed anywhere in the DOD or the world. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) Avionics Flight Test Facility 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility equipment is Class I1 moveable. Most equipment can be moved but requires considerable time spent disassembling, packing, reassembling, installing, and testing. Twelve antenna pedestals foundation will need to be constructed and installation of each pedestal and antenna will be required. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. $18.6 Million. This includes EW, RCS and Corn equipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of equipment is 90 tons. The volume of the equipment is 29,000 cu. ft. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. None UIC: NO0421 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The Avionics Flight Test Facility requires special physical security considerations. The Facility is located in a government building where access is controlled by limited access electronic interior locks, locked exterior doors, alarm system, visitor clearance checking, visitor sign inlout procedures, employee badges, base gate security guard, base visitor control system, a fenced base perimeter and "island" security concept. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Laboratory equipment requires standard lab environment (i.e., temperature and humidity control). 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) of NAVAIRWARCENACDIV has been designated as the Reliance lead T&E facility in providing full scale dynamic RCS measurements. All other facilities agreed to stop making investments involving dynamic RCS measurement instrumentation. This facility would be extremely difficult to replicate or relocate due to the deep integration with other facilities at this location including, telemetry ground stations, TSPI tracking systems, air traffic control facilities, restricted airspace, airfield and hangar facilities. If the Navy lost CTR's dynamic RCS capability, not only the Navy, but also DOD RCS community would have a serious RCS measurement shortfall. Presently, CTR provides a baseline transfer of dynamic aircraft RCS data with other static RCS measurement facilities for comparison of computer modeling, indoor static testing, and outdoor static testing RCS measurements. Other open air ranges would have to quickly develop capability to address the shortfall. Also, no other government or contractor facilities duplicate this capability. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The avionics flight test facility has been continuously upgraded and expanded since 1970. Recent upgrades include the engineerin workstation, real-time RCS measurements, multiple complex emitter and C simulations. S UIC: NO0421 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 . 2 Aircraft 3 .2 Combat System Integration 5 . 2 Radar System 10.7 Major Range Development and Operation 1 1 . Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 1 5. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityJEquipment Nomenclature or Title The primary purpose for this facility is to provide communications support for Range instrumentation of the Chesapeake Test Range. This includes UHF, VHF, HF, Microwave and Fiber Optic transmission systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Communications Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility is a fixed location however, some elements of the equipment are portable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilityfequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Buildings and Towers $2.2M Communications Equipment $S.OM 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Weight Volume (tons) (cubic feet) Communications Equipment 10.0 2000 Test Equipment 0.5 500 Facility Support (UPS, Cable Sys, etc.) 6.0 1500 Misc Support (benches, desks, files, safes, storage cabinets, spare parts) 10.0 4000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. This facility requires generator and uninterruptible power system (UPS) backup to maintain communications and meet security requirements. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). This facility needs to meet special COMSEC requirements. This requires security fencing, generators and UPS for continuous power, and secured ductbanks for cables entering or leaving the facility. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). This facility does not require any special environmental controls. Conventional HVAC systems are adequate for this facility. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility would be difficult but not impossible to replicate or relocate. In addition to the conventional RF communications equipment, this facility has a fiber optic network buried in the Chesapeake Bay that provides a secure encrypted link for transporting all data, voice and video from remote test sites of the Chesapeake Test Range. The impact of the loss of this facility to the Department of the Navy would be the loss of the Chesapeake Test Range. Although this facility utilizes commercial communications equipment no known commercial organization performs the unique functions of this facility. Virtually all Government organizations have a communications facility although the exact capabilities vary across these organizations. Facilities such as: Eglin AFB, Edwards AFB, and NAWCAD China Lake all have similar methods for communicating with test aircraft and test sites. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility was constructed by several minor MILCONS over a period of 25 years. Equipment was transported by conventional trucking and assembled on site using conventional techniques. The major communications equipment employed in this facility has been procured over a period of 25 years using several procurement contracts. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports various aircraft platforms, weapons systems, sensor systems, navigation systems, electronic warfare systems as well as training in the support Range operations. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This facility is the key to communicating voice and data on every project conducted a t the Range. The five year statistical average for missions completed a t the Range is 900 per year. This equated to 3.5 missions per day. UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Based on projected workload the number of missions per year this facility would be a part of is: FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? Two (2) people are required to operate this facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Two (2) people are required to maintain this facility. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Primary purpose of equipment: Processing and display of test range engineering data from range instrumentation, generation and output of test data for customers (computer-generated media and video tapes), control of test vehicles on test range, range safety, range video processing, equipment support and maintenance. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Test Range Data Processing, Control, and Display Equipment, and Associated Support Equipment 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement Value of Equipment: Test range data processing, display, and control: $8,710,000 Test range video processing: $ 670,000 Range data communications: $1,590,000 Engineering supportlmaintenance: 910.000 Total: $11,880,000 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. Gross Weight of Equipment (in tons): Test range data processing, display, and control: Test range video processing: Range data communications: Engineering support/maintenance: Total: Cube of Facilities: 8,797 cu yds. 13.9 3.9 3.4 4.0 25.2 tons UIC: NO0421 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Power protection devices (surge protectors) must be installed; uninterruptible power source (UPS) is recommended. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Tempest, Access Control and Alarm systems. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). All equipment is electronic; all equipment locations must be environmentally controlled in temperaturelhumidity. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This equipment is required to perform dynamic, live test and evaluation of new and modified aircraftlweapon systems. Loss of the equipment would result in the inability to obtain quantitative flight test data from an open-air range environment in support of Navy aircraft weapon systems development programs requiring data for analysis of aircraft flying qualities, weapon separation, and avionics systems in a maritime environment. Since many flight test projects require these data, the Department of the Navy would be incapable of conducting complete flight testing. Although there are other sites within DOD with capabilities in the areas of test range data processing, control, and display, most of them support other specific test and evaluation functions, such as weapons testing, static tests, and post-flight data processing; the functions of the equipment located at CTR would be extremely difficult to duplicate at these sites. No known commercial facilities exist with this capability. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The majority of the equipment was installed in 1980 - 1984; 75% of the equipment and accompanying software was procured competitively and transported/installed by the contractor. The remaining 25% was installed by on-site government and contractor personnel. An upgrade of the test range data processing, display, and control equipment is currently underway, with replacement of computers, displays, peripherals, and software originally procured in 1980-84. The replacement equipment and software will be installed at CTR in late 1994. UIC: NO0421 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional Support Areas: 1 . 1 Submarine 1 . 2 Aircraft 1 . 3 Surface Ship 3 .2 Combat System Integration - Air 5 . 2 Radar System 6 . 2 Aircraft Navigation Systems 1 0.7 Major Range Development and Operation 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical utilization average (1989 - 1993): 1686 hrs/yr. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected utilization data: 1700 hrslyr. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Personnel for equipment operation: 16 civil service, 6 contractor. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Personnel for equipment maintenance: 3 civil service, 8 contractor. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The Digital Instrumentation Radar (DIR) provides Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) in support of NAWCAD and DOD aircraft avionics test and evaluation programs and provides aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range ANITPQ-39(V) Digital Instrumentation Radar 2 . Indicate whether the facility/equipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. The replacement value of the DIR equipment is $2M. The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to the MIR is $loOK. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of the DIR is 5.2 tons. The cube of the DIR is 1,243 cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. The DIR does not require any special utility support. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The DIR does not require any special budget requirements. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The DIR equipment shelter requires air-conditioning. UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The DIR would not be difficult to relocate a t another site. The capability provided by this equipment is critical to NAWCAD's operation. However, planned upgrades of other equipment will allow decommissioning of the equipment in 1997 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The DIR was transported to NAWCAD, Patuxent River, MD from RCA, Moorestown, NJ via trucking in 1974. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The DIR supports the following Functional Support Areas: 5. Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5.1 Radar Systems 1 0 . General Mission Support 10.7 Major Range Development and Operations 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The DIRts utilization average for the past five years (1989 - 1993) was 270 hours per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. The DIR's projected utilization out to 1997 is 180 hours per year. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The MPS-26 provides Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) and Electronic Warfare support to NAWCAD and DOD aircraft and avionics test and evaluation programs and provide aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range ANIMPS-26 Tracking Radar 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable, but would require construction of a concrete foundation for site installation. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. The replacement value of the MPS-26 equipment is $1M. The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to the MPS-26 is $loOK. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of the MPS-26 is 5.65 tons. The cube of the MSP-26 is 1,243 cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. The MPS-26 does not require any special utility support. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). If the MPS-26 radar is relocated, special budget requirements will be required to mount the radar antenna atop a shelter and house the electronics inside the shelter, otherwise no special budget requirements exist. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The MPS-26 equipment shelter requires air-conditioning. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The MPS-26 would not be difficult to relocate. The capability provided by this equipment is critical to NAWCAD's operations. However, planned upgrades (GPS) of other equipment will allow decommissioning of this equipment in 1997. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The MPS-26 was transported and constructed a t CTRINAWCAD, Patuxent River, MD via trucking in 1970. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The MPS-26 supports the following Function Support Areas: 5. Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5 . 1 Radar Systems 1 0 . General Mission Support 10.7 Major Range Development and Operations 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1 989- 1993). Define the unit of measure used. 270 hours per year 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to M1997. The projected utilization for 1994 and 1995 is 180 hours per year and will cease in 1996. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility Equipment Nomenclature or Title The M-33 provides Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) and Electronic Warfare support to NAWCAD and DOD aircraft and avionics test and evaluation programs and provide aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range M33 Tracking Radar 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6 , page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of the M33 equipment is $1M. The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to the MIR is $loOK. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of the M33 is 10 tons. The cube of the M33 is 1,243 cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. The M33 requires 400 Hz power utility support. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). If the M33 radar is relocated, special budget requirements will be required to mount the radar antenna atop a shelter and house the electronics inside the shelter, otherwise no special budget requirements exist. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The M33 equipment shelter requires air-conditioning. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The M33 would not be difficult to relocate. The capability provided by this equipment is critical to NAWCAD's operations. However, planned upgrades of other equipment will allow decommissioning of this equipment in 1997. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The M33 was transported to NAWCAD, Patuxent River, MD via trucking in 1970. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The M33 supports the following Functional Support Areas: 5 . Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5.1 Radar Systems 1 0. General Mission Support 10.7 Major Range Development and Operations 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The M33's utilization average for the past five years (1989 - 1993) is 450 hours per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FYI997 The M33's projected utilization out to 1997 is 270 hours per year. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 V SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The RIR-778lX radars provides Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) support to NAWCAD and DOD aircraft and avionics test and evaluation programs and provide aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. R Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range RIR-778/X Instrumentation Radar 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable, but requires concrete foundation for site installation. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utdities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of each RIR-7781x equipment is $3.5M (total replacement value for all 3 radars is $10.5M). The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to each RIR-778lX is $500 thousand (total replacement value of buildings and utilities for all 3 radars is $1.5M). fz 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of each RIR-778/X is 10 tons (total gross weight for all 3 radars is 30 tons). The cube of each RIR-778lX is 4,896 cubic feet (total cube for all 3 radars is 14,688 cubic feet). R, 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. "Special" utility support required by the RIR-778m consists of 208 volt, 3 phase, 400 Hz power. ri 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The RIR-778lX radars require concrete foundations be budgeted. 4 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The RIR-778/X equipment shelters require air-conditioning. r; UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT \ FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the pn ary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. a \ The RIR-77811 r Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) aircraft and avionics test and evaluation vectoring, and range safety at CTR. ical Center Site itle 2 . Indicate whether the fac itylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6 , page 12 of this dat call. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range RIR-778n Instrumentation Radar The equipment is moveable, but requires concrete foundation for site installation. 3. Provide the replacement value of th acilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and k utilities at may be integral to the facilitylequipment. \ The replacement value of each equipment is $3.5M (total replacement value for all 3 radars The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are each RIR-77811 is $500 thousand (total replacement value utilities for all 3 radars is $ISM). 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the fa~ i l i t~ /e~ \~ment . The gross weight of each RIR-778A is weight for all 3 radars is 30 tons). The cube of each cubic feet (total cube for all 3 radars is 14,688 cubic feet). 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this other than normal electrical power. "Special" utility support required by the RIR-778A phase, 400 Hz power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The RIR-778A radars require concrete foundations be budgeted. \ 7. State any environmental control requirements for the temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The RIR-77811 equipment shelters require air-conditioning. 1 &ldyi~d Qj UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The RIR-778/X radars would not be difficult to relocate at another site. This equipment is critical to NAWCAD's capability to support aircraft operationaVdevelopmental test and evaluation programs for the functional areas listed in question 10 below. g 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The RIR-778lX were transported to NAWCAD, Pax River, MD from f: VITRO, Ft. Walton Beach, FL via truck in 1984. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The RIR-778lX supports the following Functional Support Areas: 5 . Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5 .1 Radar Systems 1 0 . General Mission Support 10.7 Major Range Development and Operations 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Each of the RIR-778/X radars has been utilized an average of 900 hours per f?. year for the past five years (1989-1993) 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 720 hours per year 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 1 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to \ replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. radars would not be difficult to relocate at another site. is critical to NAWCAD's capability to support aircraft test and evaluation programs for the functional how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. transported to NAWCAD, Pax River, MD from FL via truck in 1984. support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The RIR-778D Functional Support Areas: 11. Provide the historical utilization for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Each of the RIR-778D radars has an average of 900 hours per year for the past five years 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to F 720 hours per year 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to rate the facilitylequiprnent? k 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to mai ain the equipment? t UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site FacilityEquipment Nomenclature or Title The MIR provides Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) support to NAWCAD and DOD aircraft and avionics test and evaluation programs and provide aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Multiple-Target Instrumentation Radar (MIR) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is fixed. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. The replacement value of the MIR equipment is $30M. The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to the MIR is $750K. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of the MIR is 38 tons. The cube of MIR excluding integral operations shelter and utilities is 21,632 cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. "Special" utility support required by the MIR consists of 208 volt, 3 phase, 400 Hz power. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). If the MIR was relocated, a special concrete foundation budgeted a t a minimum of $500K would be required. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The MIR equipment requires an air-conditioned shelter, the transmitter requires a heavy duty liquid cooler unit, and the antenna requires two 10 ton air conditioners. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Given the "one-of-a-kind", nature of the MIR and the highly specialized technical knowledge required to operate and maintain the equipment it would be extremely risky and difficult if not impossible to relocate a t another site. The MIR provides several unique capabilities including simultaneously tracking of up to 16 targets and simultaneous tracking of aircraft and weapon separation. The MIR is critical and is required to support DON aircraft weapons system listing, including FIA-18 E/F, AV- 8B, and various other programs. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The MIR was transported to NAWCAD, Pax River, MD from NAWCWD, Pt. Mugu, CA via truck in 1984. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The MIR supports the following Functional Support Areas: 5 . Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5.1 Radar Systems 1 0. General Mission Support 1 0.7 Major Range Development and Operations 8 . Defense Systems 8 . 3 Electronic Warfare 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 900 hours per year 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 720 hours per year 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityEquipment Nomenclature or Title The RIR-778lKa provides Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) and Electronic Warfare support to NAWCAD and DOD aircraft and avionics test and evaluation programs and provide aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range RIR-778lKa Instrumentation Radar 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable but requires a concrete foundation for site installation. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of the RIR-778lKa equipment is $6M. The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to the RIR- 778lKa is $500K. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The gross weight of the RIR-778lKa equipment is 16 tons. The cube of the RIR-778/Ka excluding integral operations shelter and utilities is 5,184 cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. "Special" utility support required by the RIR-778lKa consists of 208 volt, 3 phase, 400 Hz power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The RIR-778lKa requires a concrete foundation be budgeted. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The RIR-778lKa equipment shelter requires air-conditioning. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The RIR-778lKa would not be difficult to relocate. This equipment is unique in the DON and critical to NAWCAD1s capability to support aircraft operationaVdevelopmenta1 test and evaluation programs for the functional area listed in question 10 below. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The RIR-778lKa was transported to NAWCAD Pax River, MD from VITRO, Ft. Walton Beach, FL via truck in 1994. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The RIR-778lKa supports the following Functional Support Areas: 5 . Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5 . 1 Radar Systems 10. General Mission Support 10.7 Major Range Development and Operations 8 . Defense Systems 8.3 Electronic Warfare 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Not installed until 1994. Utilization not applicable. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 630 hours per year 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 1 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 1 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESfEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The three (3) Nike Hercules radars provide Time-Space-Position Information (TSPI) support to NAWCAD and DOD aircraft and avionics test and evaluation programs and provide aircraft control, vectoring, and range safety at CTR. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Nike Hercules Radars 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment is moveable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of each Nike Hercules radar is $l.OM (total replacement value for all 3 radars is $3M). The replacement value of buildings and utilities which are integral to each Nike Hercules radar is $500K (total replacement value of buildings and utilities for all 3 radars is $1.5M). 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The gross weight of each Nike Hercules radar is 16 tons (total gross eight for all 3 radars is 48 tons). The cube of each Nike Hercules radar is 4,896 cubic feet (total cube for all 3 radars is 14,688 cubic feet). 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. "Special" utility support required by the Nike Hercules radar consists of 208 volt, 3 phase, 400 Hz power. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The Nike Hercules Radar requires concrete foundations. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The Nike Hercules radar equipment shelter requires air-conditioning. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The Nike Hercules radar would not be difficult to relocate. The capability provided by this equipment is critical to NAWCAD's operations however, planned upgrades of other equipment will allow decommissioning of this equipment in 1997. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The Nike Hercules radars were transported to NAWCAD, Pax River, MD from Letterkenny, Chambersburg, PA via truck in 1989. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The Nike Hercules radar supports the following Function Support Areas: 5 . Sensors & Surveillance Systems 5 . 1 Radar Systems 1 0. General Mission Support 1 0.7 Major Range Development and Operations 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The Nike Hercules radar utilization average for the past five years (1989 - 1993) is 360 hours per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. The Nike Hercules radar projected utilization out to 1997 is 270 hours per year. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. The pictures illustrate the antenna and control shelter in a mobile configuration. The Nike Hercules radars are currently installed without the mobile trailers as shown in the pictures. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test Facility provides test, evaluation and system engineering functions for Navy Airborne Strategic Communications (ASC) aircraft, avionics, and mission systems in support of the NAWCAD mission for RDT&E of aircraft systems during all phases of the ASC system life cycle process. - Right Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test (ASCET) Facility 2. Indicate whether the facility/equipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is fixed, equipment is portable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Facility replacement cost: $720K Equipment replacement cost: $60M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. ASCET Facility 6,336 square feet TMSTF 1 4480 cubic feet 560 square feet TMSTF 2 4480 cubic feet 560 square feet Equipment: gross weight 210 tons cubic feet 29,551 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Motor generators to provide enough power to operate power amplifier to full power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Humidity & temperature. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Relocating or replicating this facility is not impossible, but it would be costly. Additionally, for at least six months while the relocation or replication occurs, NAWCAD Pax would be unable to provide In-Service engineering to NADEP Jacksonville thus resulting in no investigation of problems encountered in the fleet. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility was constructed on site, 1980. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platforms (Aircraft) 7.2 Command, Control, Communications & Intelligence (Airborne) 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 6,240 hrs, unit of measure = test hrslyr. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 6,240 hrs, unit of measure = test hrslyr. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and whlte photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment , Nomenclature or Title The P-3 Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Lab supports design, test and evaluation of operational software and hardware for S-3 and P-3 aircraft. The aircraft supported are the S-3A, S-3B, P-3B TACNAVMOD, P-3C Update 111, P-3C Update I11 AIP, and formerly, P-3C Update IV. Tests are conducted in a non-flight environment to save money in flight hours, improve safety of flight, control of test variables and repeatability of test conditions. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Lab 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is fixed. Racks and equipment could be moved but it would require a great deal of labor and time. The inertial pedestal in the Navy lab, however, is a 14 ton concrete pyramid that is not moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Equipment - $45.18M Facility - $1,81SK 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Lab Capability NAV Lab BMOD SSA S-3 ATL Gross Weight Cubic Ft. (tons) Equip PATL 7.5 8 8 5 TOTAL 35.75 2843 FACILITY 11,330 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than nonnal electrical power. 400Hz power and constant cooling. UIC: NO0421 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Raised floor, security access system, ground planes for antennas, ground and shields. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperatures must be maintained at 72 deg or lower, and humidity a t 40% or lower. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility would be extremely difficult to relocate because of its enormous size and the tremendous expense and manpower it would take to disassemble, move and reassemble. There are sets of S-3A, S-3B, P-3B and P-3C aircraft avionics, approximately 80 pieces of test equipment and over 22,000 feet of cables. The 14 ton concrete pedestal in the NAVLAB is permanent (fixed) and cannot be moved. The cost to replicate this entire facility would be extremely high. Without the Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Lab DON would not be able to support aircraft navigation system RDT&E. Current RDT&E activities include inertial navigation systems, Global Positioning System, LORAN, and Omega navigation systems. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The S-3 ATL capability was set up in 1981 with the equipment from a closed Lockheed facility in California. Cabling, racks, and layout were locally designed, manufactured and assembled. The PATL capability was never fully developed because of the P-3 Update IV program was canceled. The portion completed was the result of a contract awarded from government RFP. P-3 BMOD SSA was constructed in 1985 utilizing a procured VAX computer for the host and excess aircraft equipment. The Navigation capability was constructed in 1976. The inertial pedestal is a 14 ton (14 cubic yard) concrete pyramid buried down to 16 feet underground to provide a very stable and precise reference for inertial attitude measurements, used in conjunction with surveyed markers buried in the floor. There are also separate test benches for GPS, INS, and OMEGA. The original facility was built in 1943. UIC: NO0421 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft) 3.2 Combat System Integration (Air) 6.2 Aircraft Navigation Systems 7.0 C ~ I 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical utilization average for the past 5 years is unavailable due to lack of utilization records. However, estimates can be made for each of the capabilities within the lab that should be fairly close to actuals, as follows: S-3 ATL - 600 hrs per year BMOD SSA - 1440 hrs per year P ATL - 1570 hrs per year (primarily development NOT test) NAV Lab - 600 hrs per year Total - 3995 hrs per year Dividing this estimate of user time by the budgeted capacity (7920 hrs) results in a utilization rate average of 50%. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FY94 = 55 % * Projected hrs = 3350 FY95 = 55%" Projected hrs = 3350 FY96 = 73%** Projected hrs = 7350 FY97 = 73%"" Projected hrs = 7350 * Budgeted capacity decreases from 7920 hrs to 6000 hrs due to disestablishment of BMOD SSA at beginning of FY94. ** Budgeted capacity increases to 10,000 hrs due to establishment of P- 3/S-3 Transitional SSA. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 Technical Center Site I Flight Test and Engineering Group 1 1 Nomenclature or Title I Acoustic Test Facility (ATF) I FacilityIEquipment 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. NAWCAD PAX The Acoustic Test Facility supports laboratory and flight test evaluations of ASW acoustic sensor processing equipment and computer software programs that are to be used in fixed wing or rotary wing aircraft mission systems. In addition to T&E capabilities, the facility can provide training in ASW acoustic system operation and recognition of acoustic signals in varying ocean environments. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. PAPS is portable; MATVAN is moveable; and the A T F and AQL are fixed. I 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilityJequipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. 4 . Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. I Gross Weight - 40 tons Cube of equipment - 12,627 cubic ft Facility - 2,295 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 400 Hz electrical power and constant cooling. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Raised floor, security access system. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilityJequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperature must be maintained at 72 deg or lower and humidity at 40% or 1 lower. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facilitylequiprnent would not be extremely difficult o r impossible to replicate o r relocate at another site, The impact of losing this facility/ equipment would be increased costs and length of time of tests because tests would have to be performed in flight. Also, control factors of testing in a laboratory would be minimal in flight testing. Without the Mobile Acoustic Test Van (MATVAN), DON would not be able to continue supporting on-site contractor testing, special purpose remote-site stimulation and monitoring, and direct fleet T&E/Calibration for S-3 and P- 3 mission support. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The laboratory was established and made operational in 1975 - 1976. The government determined specification for the facility and issued a RFP. A contract was awarded to AAI Corporation for the design, construction and installation of the Acoustic Test Facility. The original structure was built in 1943. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 . 2 Platform (Aircraft) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical utilization average for the past 5 years in 47%. This was calculated by dividing the average test hours (1269) by the average budgeted capacity (2700). 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FY94 = 38% Projected hrs = 1026 FY95 = 44 % Projected hrs = 1188 FY96 = 47 % Projected hrs = 1269 FY97 = 43 % Projected hrs = 116 1 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Responsible for providing development engineering suppor t to NAVAIRSYSCOM in the areas of systems engineering, design, development, and integration/installation of avionics systems in fleet units assigned to CNO Project K-416 (Project Beartrap). Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Project Beartrap Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is fixed, the equipment is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. $893K for BEARTRAP laboratory. 4 . Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Gross Weight - 20,000 Ibs Cube of Equipment - 6,400 cubic feet Facility - 1,600 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Power filter, 400 Hz power converter, ground grid connected to deep well ground. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated a t another site, but would be very expensive. If the facility was lost, the DON would not be able to support fleet missions requiring BEARTRAP specific capabilities without a facility to support installation, calibration, and test. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The equipment was transported by truck, the facility was constructed on site in 1988. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.1 Platforms (Aircraft) 3.2 Combat System Integration (Air) 5.1 Sensors & Surveillance Systems (Sonar Systems and Special Sensors) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average utilization (1989 - 1993): Modified three aircraft per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Projected utilization (FY95 - 97): Modify two aircraft per year. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. 2 ' J 4 /y UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory performs test, evaluation, and system engineering on Navy Airborne Early Warning aircraft and mission systems in support of the NAWCAD mission for RDT&E of aircraft systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) The E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) consists of an E-2C L-304 computer, input/output hardware and indicator group simulated by real-time or simulated E-2C sensor tactical link information, and navigation data. The facility is required to support E-2C weapons systems performance T&E and hardware and software development. Stimulus is provided by E-2C recorded data, live Link 11 and Link 4 data, and the NAWCAD Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF). The facility function as an integration and hardware-in-the loop laboratory for E-2C computer group development and sensor and tactical communication T&E. This facility is an Integration Laboratory. 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is fixed. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment Replacement Cost - $5,70OK Facility Replacement Cost - 197K Antenna Farm: $50K 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. Gross Wt. - 31 tons, Cube of Equipment - 5000 cu ft. Facility - 2,000 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. Motor generators to provide enough power to operate power amplifier to full power. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). fz - - UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 Technical Center Site I Flight Test and Engineering Group 1. St e the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. ht \ Test and Evaluation Laboratory performs test, engineering on Navy Airborne Early Warning in support of the NAWCAD mission for The E-2C System aboratory (ESTEL) consists of an E-2C L-304 comp are and indicator group simulated by real-time or tactical link information, and navigation data. to support E-2C weapons systems performance T& tware development. Stimulus is provided by E-2 k 11 and Link 4 data, and the NAWCAD Air est and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF). Th tegration and hardware-in-the loop laborator development and sensor and tactical commun an Integration Laboratory. 2. Indicate whe ble, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page Facility/Equipment Facility is fixed. \ NAWCAD PAX E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory 3. Provide the replacement value of the Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and to the facility/equipment. Equipment Replacement Cost - $5,70OK Facility Replacement Cost - 197K Antenna Farm: $50K \ 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment\ > bomenclature or Title Gross Wt. - 31 tons, Cube of Equipment - 5000 cu ft. Facility - 2,000 square feet (ESTEL) 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this normal electrical power. Motor generators to provide enough power to operate power full power. \ Foundation pad for Antenna Farm raised floor required for cooling and equipment interconnection; and antenna farm required for HF Link 11 communications. R 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Computer room temperature and humidity control. High volume forced cooling air for E-2C computer group hardware. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Facility could be replicated or relocated using government and commercial means. If the E-2C computer group (aircraft hardware) were lost it could not be replaced due to current fleet asset utilization. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility was constructed by a commercial contractor and the equipment was transported to the site by both government and commercial carriers. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 . 2 Platform (Aircraft) 3 . 2 Combat System Integration 6 . 0 Navigation 7 . 0 C ~ I 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average 2120 test hours for the past 5 years. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 9 4 9 5 9 6 9 7 Air Vehicles Direct Labor 12 myrs 12 myrs 14 myrs 14 myrs Test Hours 2120 2120 2120 2120 Missions 140 150 160 180 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? 25 people operate and maintain the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. UIC: NO0421 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special \ foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). oundation pad for Antenna Farm raised floor. \k; State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., humidity, air scrubbing). temperature and humidity control. High volume forced computer group hardware. would be extremely difficult or impossible to impact to the Department of the Navy if this existing Government-wide and commercial are formulated. government and commercial hardware) were lost it could 9. Indicate how and when was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility was constructed by a contractor and the equipment was transported to the site by and commercial carriers. 10. List the functional support areas provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to list of functional support areas. 1 . 2 Platform (Aircraft) 3 . 2 Combat System Integration 6 . 0 Navigation 7 . 0 C ~ I \ 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the p fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average 2120 test hours for the past 5 years. \ 1 2 . Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. \ 94 95 Air Vehicles Direct Labor 12 myrs 12 myrs 14 yrs 14 myrs Test Hours 2120 2120 Missions 140 150 :$ 160 "20 180 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the faci /equipment? ? 25 people operate and maintain the facility. \ UIC: NO0421 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The primary purpose for this equipmentffacility is to provide precision tracking in support of Range missions. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Chesapeake Test Range Automatic Laser Tracking Facility 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility consists of three mobile instrumentation systems. Two are automatic Laser Tracking Systems, the other is a mobile cine-theodolite with laser ranging capability. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Buildings and pads 3 Precision Trackers 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Weight Volume (tons) (cubic feet) 3 Tracking Systems 15.0 9500 Misc Support (test equipment, storage cabinets, spare parts) 1 . O 500 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. These trackers require three phase electrical power and an unobstructed view with sufficient safety boundaries for laser operation. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). These trackers often require a concrete foundation to support leveling of the system prior to calibration. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). This facility does not require any special environmental controls. Conventional HVAC systems are incorporated with these systems. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. These systems are portable and easily relocated or replicated. These Laser Trackers a re the only precision mobile trackers of this type in the Navy. These trackers provide 0.1 milliradian angular accuracy and 1 foot range accuracy a t data rates up to 100 samples per second. The types of programs these systems support are numerous, and if we were to lose these assets the Department of the Navy would lose the capability to effectively test some aircraft systems. For example, the mobile cine-theodolite with laser ranger is the only such system in the DOD that has the ability to optically track difficult targets such as the Tomahawk Cruise Missile. No known commercial activity has the ability to perform the function of these trackers. Other Government activities have similar systems and equipment, and each would require modification to perform the exact functions as these systems. Government facilities with similar systems are WSMR and Edwards AFB. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. These trackers were transported by conventional trucking and positioned on site using conventional techniques. These trackers and associated equipment were procured over a period of 20 years using several procurement contracts. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports various aircraft platforms, weapons systems, sensor systems, navigation systems, electronic warfare systems as well as training in the support Range operations. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This equipment is key to precision data collection on certain project missions conducted by the Range. The five year statistical average for Missions supported by these trackers is 120 per year. UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Based on projected workload the number of missions per year this facility would be a part of is: FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 120 120 140 200 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Two people are required to operate each of these trackers. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The purpose of RTPS is to receive, record, process and display data telemetered from test vehicles; also to play back vehicle-borne tapes and/or telemetry(TM) tapes. The order of priority is for safety of flight, extracting optimal results from a flight and for expedited post-flight turnaround. Flight Test and engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Telemetry Data System Facility Real-Time Telemetry Processing System (RTPS) 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The system (RTPS) is fixed and not portable in whole or in part. Several smaller pc-based systems are available at the same facility/organization for remote site and portable applications. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment, Replacement Value: Estimated to be about $25 million for systems and $6 million for building, plus test equipment and portable systems. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Gross Weight and Cubic Volume: 370 tons and 74,000 cubic feet The facility consists of 35,717 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. Three phase power and high capacity air-conditioning. Also communications (both voice and data). 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Redlblack separation, personnel control, and COMSEC provisions for security purposes. Raised floor and deep air conditioning plenum are essential. Large tape and magnetic media library both classified and unclass. Heavy central and distributed system grounding to better than 0.2 ohm. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Environmental Control: Typical of mainframe computer facilities. (e.g., temperature, humidity, static electricity, etc.) 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. There are about four major similar facilities in the U.S. This particular facility has evolved (third generation) from the first and most successful real-time telemetry processing system ever delivered in DOD. No other facility of this type in industry or government has comparable capability for quick response to project needs without writing a single line of software code. In strictly hardware terms, any system can be moved. I t is a fact of life that such a system cannot function without an extensive infrastructure of people and connections that cannot be made over night and cannot necessarily be bought. Witness the fact that other organizations have spent in excess of twice the sum of $22 million invested in this system (more than once) and never achieved comparable user acceptance or utility in the test environment. At times, greater sums have been spent with no real time telemetry processing and display capability resulting. Certainly anything can be replicated given enough time, money and the will to accomplish it. Impact of loss: If this facility were "lost" at least 51% of the total capacity to test aircraft using telemetry in the U.S. Navy would be gone. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This capability encompasses 3 buildings, built in 1943 (300 square feet), 1975 (12,122 square feet) and 1989 (23,295 square feet). The system was built over a three year period and integrated on-site following an in-house prototype phase and a temporary relocation of 113 of the system across the base. Prototype was FY 84-86, contract in 87 majority of delivery in 89 and final relocation in 89. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional Support Areas that the Facility Supports: Platforms, Aircraft Weapons Systems, Gun Systems Weapons Systems, Guided Missiles Weapons Systems, Free Fall Weapons and Rockets Weapons Systems, Mines Weapons Systems, Launchers Weapons Systems, Fire Control Weapons Systems, Weapon Data Links Weapons Systems, Weapons Propulsion Weapons Systems, Other Ordnance UIC: NO0421 3.2 Combat System Integration, Air 3 .4 Combat System Integration, Multiplatform 5.2 Sensors & Surveillance Systems, Radar Systems 5 .3 Sensors & Surveillance Systems, Special Sensors 6 . 2 Navigation, Aircraft Navigation Systems 6.4 Navigation, Weapons Navigation Systems 7 . 2 Command Control, Communications and Intelligence ( c ~ I ) , Airborne 7 . 6 Command Control, Communications and Intelligence ( c ~ I ) , Non-Tactical Data Systems 8 . 2 Defense Systems, Countermeasures (CM) 8 . 3 Defense systems, Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems 10.6.2 General Mission Support, Aircraft 10.7 General Mission Support, Major Range Development and Operation 10 .9 General Mission Support, Activity Mission and Function Support 1 1.1 Generic Technology Base, Computers 1 1 . 2 Generic Technology Base, Software 1 1 . 3 Generic Technology Base, Communications Networking 11.10 Generic Technology Base, Other Technology Base Programs I1 Life Cycle Work Areas 5 RDT&E, RDT&E Management Support 8 Acquisition, Acceptance Testing 9 Acquisition, Modernization 10 Acquisition, Program Support 13 Life-Time Support, Testing 15 Life-Time Support, Program Support 18 General, Simulation, Modeling, and Analysis. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical Utilization Average for 1989-1993: For telemetry systems the unit of measure is test operations (consisting of both flights and playbacks.) The average in the 89-93 period was 2152 operations having handled 10761 total operations in 5 years. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected utilization data out to 1997: 94: 1900 ops 95: 1730 96: 2520 97: 3090 98: 3000 99: 2700 (Note that sustained capacity is considered to be 3150 ops per year with short term peaks in excess of that.) UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Number of personnel used to operate the facility: 37 civil service, 5 contractor and 8 applications software (which varies with workload.) 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Maintenance: 3 contract plus 4 civ. ser. included above. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 I black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title Real-time and Post-flight analysis and reduction of TM, TSPI, other data. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX T&E Data Processing (Software & Applications) 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement Value Equipment - $ISM. Replacement Value Facility - $251K. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment - 2.5 tons. Facility - 20,000 cubic feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Hardening for Classified/Requirements Lab. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Standard Environment for electrical systems and magneticloptical store. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. It would not be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate this facilitylequipment at another site. The impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost would be to affect the efficient and effective processing of data for test missions. The test missions which need the timely delivery of a post-event product such as reduced data results for flying qualities and performance would be severely harmed without this service. Without the post-event products, the follow-on testing for the test mission is severely degraded because of limited capability to process data necessary for flight envelope expansion. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. 35% constructed in 1983 and 65% constructed in 1994. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platforms (AIC) - 5.2 Radar Systems - 10.7 Software. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years is 81% direct labor. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected utilization out to FY1997 is 85%. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Si te Fac i l i tyEqu ipment Nomenclature or Title The Ship Ground Station supports test and evaluation of the integration and interoperability between ship and a i r mission elements of helicopters, fixed-wing maritime and unmanned air vehicles. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Ship Ground Station 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The Ship Ground Station is a fixed facility. The facility requires a direct over (salt) water transmission path for 30 miles and an overwater path with minimal obstruction for 90 miles. Antenna heights at the water's edge that replicate those of a FFG class ship, and a chilled water cooling plant. These environmental requirements are necessary to support littoral (brown water) undersea and surface warfare. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of the equipment is $63M. The replacement value of the facility is $1234K. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The gross weight of the equipment sited within the facility is 52 tons. The cubic volume is approximately 45,200 ft3. The facility is 3,704 square feet. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. The facility requires shipboard pierside power (440V 3 Phase) , (440V 3 Phase WYE Configuration), and a single point grounding system. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The facility requires soil of sufficient moisture so as to provide an adequate ground plane for the antennae. Soil of density so as to support a 70 foot radio tower and a 100 foot directional antenna tower capable of supporting 4,000 lbs of equipment. UIC: NO0421 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The facility requires 25 tons of air cooling capacity to sustain equipment at a normal office ternperaturelhumidity environment. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility would be impossible to replicate a t any non-coastal site. I t has been determined that it would cost 2.54 million dollars and require 17.8 thousand manhours not including crating and uncrating equipment to move this site to another location. The loss of the SGS, with its uniqueness of location on shallow salt water, with direct overwater transmission paths, collocated aircraft and adjacency and interconnectivity to the Chesapeake Test Range, Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility, and the Electronic Warfare Integrated Test Laboratory would represent a serious reduction in the Navy's capability to perform cost effective cradle to grave test and evaluation of maritime rotary, fixed- wing, and unmanned aircraft. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This Ship Ground Station was constructed a t Patuxent River in 1980 to permit the cost effective test and evaluation of the SH-60B LAMPS MK I11 Helicopter then undergoing full scale development. Its construction and transportation have been incremental from 1980 to the present. Transportation of equipment has occurred by semi-trailer truck. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Platform (Aircraft) Platform (Surface Ship) Combat System Integration (Air) Combat System Integration (Surface) Combat System Integration (Multiplatform) Coastal/Special Warfare Support Sensors and Surveillance (Sonar Systems) Sensors and Surveillance (Radar Systems) Sensors and Surveillance (Special Sensors) Aircraft Navigation Systems Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence ( ~ 3 1 ) (Airborne) Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence ( c ~ I ) (Shipboard) Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence ( c ~ I ) (Non-Tactical Data Systems) Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems UIC: NO0421 10 .1 Personnel and Training 10.1 .2 Aircraft-Related Training Systems 10.1 .2 Surface Ship-Related Training Systems 10.5 Environmental Description, Prediction, and Effects 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The historical utilization average is based on the number of laboratory, ground or flight test events per year. (Events can occur simultaneously). 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. The projected utilization is based on the number of laboratory, ground o r flight test events per year given current planning information. (Events can occur simultaneously.) 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilityjequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityEquipment , Nomenclature or Title The Helicopter Mission Systems Support Center (HMSSC) provides facilities within the helicopter test hanger for daily support of mission systems integration ground and flight testing of in-service and new acquisition maritime rotary wing and VTOL aircraft. Special testing equipment and secure facilities provide program sponsors with early-on Development and T&E phase engineering insight into integrated mission system problems, and allow engineering investigations to prototype potential fixes. The facilities also support special unique helicopter test installations needed for participation in technology demonstration development projects and foreign weapons system evaluation programs. For in-service Naval helicopters, proposed hardware and software updates are installed and tested on the ground and in flight, and DT/OT aircrews receive operator training in the HMSSC. For the Executive Transport Helicopters (VH-60N and VH-3D),an NVH-3A test bed helicopter works in direct harmony with the HMSSC for avionics/software testing. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Helicopter Mission Systems Support Center (HMSSC) 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The HMSSC is a fixed facility. The HMSSC must be collocated within (or in relative proximity to) the hangar which houses the test aircraft to permit ready access, and physical connectivity of laboratory test equipment and rooftop antennae, and data extract, as required to support ground/flight testing. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. Replacement Value of Equipment - $10.2 M Replacement Value of Facility - $898K 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Equipment - Approximately 20 ton/10,000 cubic feet (crated volume) Facility - 7,800 square feet UIC: NO0421 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. a . Facility must be collocated within (or in relative proximity to) the hangar that houses the test aircraft to permit ready access and physical connectivity of laboratory test equipment and rooftop antennae to the aircraft as required. b . 3-phase 115VAC 400 cycles c . 28 VDC d . Cable access to external antennas w/ sufficient rooftop area to support "antenna farm". e . Electric grounding/isolation sufficient to ensure electricallsystem power artifacts do not adversely effect acoustic analysis. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). a . Provisions for a secure vault and the barriers necessary to ensure increasing levels of security through the appropriate installation of "keyedlcontrolled" access doors to permit secure testing and data processing, collection, and analysis. Provisions must also be provided for secure conferences, meetings, and aircrew training. b . Tempest certified ADP computer terminalsJstorage. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The HMSSC requires controlled temperature and humidity. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The HMSSC cannot be relocated or replicated due to the need for proximity to the helicopters, unless it is moved along with the helicopters whenlif they are relocated to another hangadsite if necessary. Loss of this facility would resul t in loss of helicopter mission systems analysis capabilitieslfacilities within the helicopter test hanger for daily support of mission systems integration ground and flight testing of in-service and new acquisition maritime rotary wing and VTOL aircraft. Program sponsors would lose the special testing equipment and secure facilities required for early-on Development and T&E phase engineering insight into integrated mission system problems, which allow engineering investigations to prototype potential fixes. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The HMSSC was established in 1977 as a result of a requirement for the capability to provide laboratory and ground tests of stand-alone and partially integrated helicopter mission avionics. The original structure was built in 1944. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Platform (Aircraft) 3 . 2 Combat System Integration (Air) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 390 missions/yr. (missions = avionics installations, checkouts, ground tests, flight tests supported) 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? 4 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 1 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1) Technical Center Site 1 Flight Test and Engineering Group 11 1 Nomenclature or Title ( Aircraft Stores Certification Test Facility I Facility/Equipment 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. NAWCAD PAX Aircraft stores certification test facilities provide the capability to conduct test and evaluation of fixed and rotary wing aircraftlarmament compatibility including armamentlstores management systems; suspension and release equipment; physical fit; captive flight and separation characteristics; interface with loading and ship installation equipment; internal gun installations and external gun pods; towed and powered targets; and verification of technical manuals and procedures for fleet use. Major facilities include: MunitionsIStore Laboratories: These laboratories include an enclosed concrete structure 300 ft x 40 ft x 25 ft high which is used for internal and external gun firing tests. Measurements are made of muzzle velocity, cyclic rate of gun fire, projectile dispersion, boresight retention, boresight adjustment procedures, gun gas concentration and gun gas temperatures. Evaluations of ammunition feed and spent brass ejection systems are conducted. Mass Properties Laboratory: This facility is used to acquire accurate weight, center of gravity, and 3-axis moment of inertia determinations for air launched munitions and armament equipment. Indoor Ground Ejection Facility: This facility is used to evaluate bomb racks and aircraftlstore interfaces to determine ejection velocities, store pitch rates, arming wire and device system function and reliability. Ordnance Electrical Systems Laboratory: This laboratory provides the capability to simulate input and output for all weapon release system components including multiple ejector racks, intervalometers, arming and fuzing functions and other factors essential to aircraftlarmament compatibility tests. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The MunitionslStores Laboratories and Indoor Ground Ejection Facility are fixed. The Mass Properties Laboratory and Ordnance Electrical Systems Laboratory are moveable. UIC: NO0421 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Buildings - $4,628(K) Equipment: $4,406,700 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Equipment - 2,156,650 lbs Equipment - 23,960 cubic feet. Facility - 39,182 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 400 Hz, 30 electrical power 28 VDC 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Hardened concrete structure, sand, dynamic-load bearing wall, ceiling hoists. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The gun firing tunnels would be almost cost prohibitive to duplicate at another location. The other areas of the facility could be duplicated at reasonable expense or are already existing facility could accommodate the required tests. Facilities similar to the gun firing tunnels are not to be found in the tri-service or U.S. commercial areas. The impact to the Navy would be significant in view of the ongoing and future efforts to upgrade the gun capabilities of fixed and rotary wing aircraft. Additionally, much more expensive flight tests would have to be conducted to acquire the data now collected during relatively inexpensive ground-based tests in the enclosed, instrumented firing tunnels. The requirement for additional flight tests will increase the cost to the sponsors. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. MILCON in 1948, equipment was transported by truck. UIC: NO0421 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitytequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft) 2 .0 Weapons 4 .2 CoastaYSpecial Warfare 8 . 2 Countermeasures 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 77 % User Time Budgeted Capacity + Overtime 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitytequipment? 2 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 3 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The facility supports both aircraft landing systems avionics, engine performance and pilot displays for carrier and shorebase Air Traffic Control, Approach and Landing operations, as well as shipboard, shore based and satellite based landing system developments. The facility consists of a 12,784 sq ft electronically shielded laboratory building, a 528 sq ft remote radar building, a 100 ft diameter remote laser tracker concrete pad, a stabilization tilt table, and a Nimitz class night carrier deck runway lighting package embedded in runway 32. The facility consolidates Navy shipboard and shore based air traffic control and landing systems (ANITRN-28, ANISPN-42, ANISPN-46(V), TPX-42 radars and CATCC DAIR displays), Marine Air Traffic Control and Landing System (MATCALS) (TPN-22, TPN-30, TPS-73 radars; and TSQ-107 and UYK-3 displays), visual landing aids (FLOLS and carrier deck lighting system), precision laser, and photo-optical tracking station, all collocated in one centralized test site for approach and landing system test capability. The landing systems and air traffic control radar consoles, computers, and data reduction and processing systems are all housed in the electronically shielded laboratory building which provides a centralized test control station and integrated data processing center. The data reduction system merges, time correlates, and provides real-time automatic data recording and reduction of radar control data, laser track of aircraft space position data, and aircraft flight test data. The facility has a data tie-in capability via the central scientific computer communication network between the test facility, engineering office space work stations, manned flight simulator, telemetry data systems, and Chesapeake test range computation facilities. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Landing System Test Facility (LSTF) 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility is moveable, with the exception of the carrier night lighting package in the runway, the laser pad, and the SPN42/46/MATCALS Radar pads which are fixed and would have to rebuilt on site. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. $ 80.OM total ($2.2M for the facilitylbuilding and $ 77.8M for equipment). 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Gross weight: 692,000 lb. Cube: 29,670 cubic ft. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. A Carrier Arresting Gear Site is required. 400 cycle power is required. Additionally, a communications network is required for data transfer (telemetry, laser tracking, data base, and video). 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The building requires electromagnetic shielding from external radiation. It is a TEMPEST complex. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperature and humidity control is required in all equipment spaces. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The facility cannot be relocated. Loss of the equipmentlfacility would impact the Navy's ability to effectively develop, test, and evaluate future airborne and surface based portions of air traffic control and landing systems (ATC&LS's) and modifications to existing ATC&LS1s. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This capability consists of 5 buildings, constructed between 1943 and 1989. The laboratory was established in 1986. Hardware was transported by craneltruck. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Platform (Aircraft) Platform (Surface Ship) Special Operations Support (Landing Force Equipment and Systems) Sensors and Surveillance Systems (Radar Systems) Sensors and Surveillance Systems (Special Sensors) Navigation (Aircraft Navigation Systems) Navigation (Satellite Navigation Systems) C ~ I (Airborne) C ~ I (Shipboard) UIC: NO0421 7 . 4 C ~ I (Land Based) 7 .6 C ~ I (Non-Tactical Data Systems) 7.7 C ~ I (Air Traffic Control Systems) 1 1.2 Generic Technology Base (Software) 1 1 .4 Generic Technology Base (Electronic Devices) 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average for the past 5 years is 67 missions per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected utilization is 85 missions per year out to FY97. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 11 Technical Center Site I Flight Test and Engineering Group 1 11 ~omenclatu; or Title ( Aircraft Test and Evaluation Facility (ATEF) I I 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. ATEF provides the capability to ground test installed aircraft propulsion, mechanical, electrical, and pneumatic subsystems in a controlled environment, during static and engine operating conditions. The facility provides local water intrusion, solar heating and wind evaluation capabilities. The acoustic structure reduces the outside noise level to an 86 dba sound pressure level during full power engine operations. Thrust measuring facilities are available for fixed wind aircraft. A mobile engine analyzer test van is available for remote site evaluations and weight and balance facilities are available for both fixed and rotary wing aircraft. FacilityEquipment 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. NAWCAD PAX The structure of the facility is fixed. The scales, thrust stand, and fire suppression system are fixed. All other equipment and support equipment is movable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. $7.6 million for the facility structure, $4.2 million for equipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment - 60 ton Equipment - 24,000 cubic feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Special utilities include closed communications, 3-phase power, 400 cycle power, DC power, and a water source for the fire suppression system. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Control room needs to be shielded. Under platform ventilation system, control air cooling for cameras located in engine exhaust, special foundation due to vibration, noise transfer, thrust restraints, scales, excessive weights (doors), and nose gear elevator. UIC: NO0421 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Control room needs to be environmentally controlled; (i.., heat, ventilation, air conditioning and air scrubbing). The fuel oil separator and fume ventilating systems must be maintained to avoid environmental impact. 8. Indicate if this facilityfequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilityfequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The facility can not be relocated. No other single facility with the ATEF capabilities exists in the United States. The facility can be replicated. If this facility is lost, the Navy test community will lose its capability to accurately test high technology, fixed wing, fighter and attack aircraft. Testing safety will also be compromised. The close tolerances built into modern aircraft engines require real-time monitoring and precise control over external environments to insure accurate data and safety. ATEF provides a real-time data recording and processing system for up to 150 parameters plus an environment which protects the aircraft from external influences, such as the wind, during engine performance tests. The facility provides night vision testing for the Navy, Air Force, Army, and Coast Guard. Extra fire protection is provided for tests such as fuel calibrations and welding. In addition, small scale environmental testing of wind, rain, and heat can be conducted. Without a facility of this type, the Navy will not be able to completely test high technology aircraft. 9. Indicate how and when the facilityfequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility was transported in segments by truck. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilityfequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Platform (Aircraft) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 1989 - 560 events performed at 4 hours per event = 2240 hours divided by budgeted capacity of 4160 hours = 44% utilization. 1990 - 661 events performed at 4 hours per event = 2644 hours divided by budgeted capacity of 4160 hours = 63% utilization 1991 - 693 events performed a t 4 hours per event = 2772 hours divided by budgeted capacity of 4160 hours = 66% utilization 1992 - 455 events performed at 4 hours per event = 1820 hours divided by budgeted capacity of 4160 hours = 43% utilization 1993 - 460 events performed at 4 hours per event = 1840 hours divided by budgeted capacity of 4160 hours = 44% utilization UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FY94 - projected 470 events to be performed at 4 hours per event = 1880 hours divided by a budgeted capacity of 4160 = 45% utilization FY95 - projected 470 events to be performed at 4 hours per event = 1880 hours divided by a budgeted capacity of 4160 = 45% utilization FY96 - projected 470 events to be performed at 4 hours per event = 1880 hours divided by a budgeted capacity of 4160 = 45% utilization FY97 - projected 490 events to be performed at 4 hours per event = 1950 hours divided by a budgeted capacity of 4160 = 47% utilization 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilityfequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 0.2 man-years are needed to provide scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, in addition to the general maintenance provided by ATEF personnel. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The purpose of the facility is to support shore based tests to determine the structural and functional capabilities of aircraft and aircraft systems designed for operations aboard aircraft carriers. Catapult launches and arrested landings are conducted to the structural limits of the airplane. Tests are conducted on modifications to existing airplanes as well as on new airplanes. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX C7 Catapult, MK7 Arresting Gear and Take-Off Assist Facilities 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The catapult and arresting gear facility is installed underground and is fixed. The steam power plant for the catapult, which is also installed underground, is fixed. The remaining catapult, arresting gear, and take-off assist equipment is moveable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. $81 million (equipment 23.25111, facility $42.423M) R 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 1413.5 tons, 82,977 cu ft. 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. The steam power plant provides superheated steam (750 degrees F) at 650 psi to the catapult. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Underground construction is required for catapult and arresting gear equipment, as well as the steam power plant. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Waterloil separators for catapult facility. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. state T te itle The purpose shore based tests to determine the structural of aircraft and aircraft systems aircraft carriers. Catapult launches and structural limits of the airplane. to existing airplanes as well as on new airplanes. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX C7 Catapult, MK7 Arresting Gear and Take-Off Assist Facilities 2. Indicate whether the f ility/equipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this d a call. tThe catapult and is installed underground and is fixed. The steam catapult, which is also installed underground, is arresting gear, and take-off assist equipment 3 . Provide the replacement value of Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and to the facilitylequipment. $81 million (equipment 23.25M, facilit $44.975M) \ 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the fac /equipment. hC: 1413.5 tons, 82,977 cu ft. \ 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by other than normal electrical power. The steam power plant provides superheated steam degrees F) at 650 psi to the catapult. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilityle (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Underground construction is required for catapult and equipment, as well as the steam power plant. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Waterloil separators for catapult facility. \ UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The catapult and arresting gear portion of this facility will be extremely difficult to move or replicate at another site due to its installation under ground (catapult) and under a runway (arresting gear). The steam power plant is also installed underground. There is an absolute requirement for a shore based catapult and arrested landing test facility. There are comparable facilities a t NAWCAD Lakehurst which could be used to conduct carrier suitability tests. NAWCAD Lakehurst does not have the necessary aircraft support facilities which would require that the test airplanes, general support equipment, special test equipment, and personnel be transported to and from NAWCAD Lakehurst at considerable expense. If lost the Navy would lose its only test and evaluation catapult and arresting gear capability. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility equipment was transported and installed by the use of trucks and cranes. The catapult installation was completed in 1954, the arresting gear installation in 1961, and the take-off assist ramp in 1983. The arresting gear is installed under a runway and the catapult is installed underground next to and at an angle to a runway. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft) 3.2 Combat System Integration (Air) 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1 989- 1993). Define the unit of measure used. User Time = Budgeted Capacity + Overtime Utilization 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? UIC: NO0421 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 17 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 11 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment ! Nomenclature or Title The IATL provides a facility for the development, test , and evaluation of avionic systems during the integration process into tactical aircraft, and supports technology demonstrator aircraft. This laboratory has direct access to aircraft so that test equipment and aircraft Weapon Replaceable Assemblies (WRA) can be easily moved to/from the laboratory and aircraft. This laboratory provides the environment and assets to develop, test, and evaluate avionics systems during the integration process using common commercial instruments and automated test equipment. New or upgraded avionics equipment being developed or evaluated in this laboratory have their associated interfaces stimulated via either simulated or prerecorded data. Automated test equipment provides the tools necessary for assessing avionics subsystem integration performance and trouble shooting WRA interface problems. This laboratory also provides the capability to determine individual WRA performance and Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA) failure analysis, in addition to automating aircraft instrumentation and wiring checkout. Test equipment for this laboratory is generic, reconfigurable, and computer controlled. The laboratory supports current and future F-14, F/A-18, A-6, AV-8 avionics integration projects in addition to the future aircraft avionics integration tasks. This laboratory supplements the capabilities of the current Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF). Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Integrated Aircraft Test Laboratory A component of the IATL is the Radar System Test and Evaluation Roof- Top Laboratory (RASTERL). RASTERL is a ground test facility designed to support both ground and flight testing of current and future radar systems, and to demonstrate advanced radar system technologies. The laboratory facility is used to support programs in all acquisition phases including engineering and manufacturing development (EMD), follow-on operational test and evaluation (FOT&E) fleet support, and demonstration/validation of new radar systems and radar system technologies. One of the primary attributes of the laboratory is the ability to conduct actual RF transmission tests, which can be conducted into free- space with or without a radome. The laboratory utilizes free-space, open air test conditions for roof-top T&E of radar components, integrated radar system performance, and is capable of supporting multiple programs simultaneously. Similarly, the Avionics Systems Integration Laboratory (ASIL) is a component of the IATL. It supports the direct stimulation of avionics systems in the laboratory or, via umbilical connection, located in test bed aircraft. UIC: NO0421 These generic capabilities include: radomeslgarage door windows for free space RF transmissions; power and cooling; test equipment for systems integration and testing; tools and soldering capabilities to support systems integration efforts; technicians and engineers; and accessibility to other on- base resources. 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. 99.9% of the equipment in the IATL is portable - consisting of commercial equipment, storage shelves, and work benches. 0.1 % is movablelfixed assets which is primarily comprised of nose radomes mounted (but removable) to the laboratory wall, and garage door-type windows. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement cost = $5.1M (equipment 3.6M; facility 1,147K). The replacement cost of Hangar 115 is 17,694,000. The IATL area used originally was estimated to be a larger area which was to have a replacement value of 1,537,383. The laboratory manager re-estimated the lab size. Hence, the estimated lab replacement cost was reduced to 1,147,000 based on the Cobra model. R 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Equipment Gross weight - 12.95 tons Volume - 4653 cubic feet Facility - 6,458 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 28 VDC; 400 cycle 3-phase AC; and blue hose interface. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The RASTERL must be at least 33 ft Above Ground Level (AGL), and be situated such that it has an unobstructed field of view which includes various targets of opportunity. The facility must be sited where test aircraft can be located within 300 feet for data bus interconnection. A freight elevator is also required to transport heavylbulky equipment to the roof-top. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The facility must provide standard environmental conditions required for the proper storage and operation of all commercial ADP computer and test measurement equipment. Air conditioning must be capable of keeping room temperature with maximum equipment heat dissipation. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this UIC: NO0421 These generic capabilities include: radomeslgarage door windows for free space RF transmissions; power and cooling; test equipment for systems integration and testing; tools and soldering capabilities to support systems efforts; technicians and engineers; and accessibility to other on- se resources. whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by 12 of this data call. in the IATL is portable - consisting of commercial and work benches. 0.1% is movablelfixed comprised of nose radomes mounted (but wall, and garage door-type windows. 3 . Provide the value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement cost = $ 1M (equipment 3.6M; facility 1,147K) \ 4. Provide the gross weigh d cube of the facilitylequipment. 9 Equipment Gross weight - Volume - 4653 cubic feet Facility - 6,458 square feet 5. Indicate any "special" utility by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 28 VDC; 400 cycle 3-phase AC; and bbe hose interface. 6. Indicate any special budget requirement uipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, h The RASTERL must be a t least 33 ft 1 (AGL), and be situated such that it has an unobst which includes various targets of opportunity. The sited where test aircraft can be located within 300 fe terconnection. A freight elevator is also required to tra equipment to the roof-top. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the fa (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The facility must provide standard environmental condition required for the proper storage and operation of all commercial ADP comp ter and test measurement equipment. Air conditioning must be capable of k ping room temperature with maximum equipment heat dissipation. k UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facilitylcapability would not be difficult to relocate a t another site, but should be co-located with avionics DT&E engineering functions. The facilitylcapability is a generic asset used by project engineers to achieve the most cost-effective test approach, while minimizing program risks. The difficult part to replicate about the current facility is its ideal location whose unobstructed field-of-view includes many ground, ship, and air targets (commercial and military). Loss of this facility would impact special sensor programs such as the integration of a counter-drug radar in the P-3 aircraft, where there is no integration contractor with the capability to radiate in free space over a land-water interface. It would necessitate substantial additional flight test to ensure successful integration. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The IATL began by combining two laboratories within Mission Systems Department. The Avionics Integration Laboratory was established in approx. 1990 to support TACAIR avionics programs. The Radar System Test and Evaluation Roof-top Laboratory (RASTERL) was established early FYI992 to support projected near-term radar related projects. In FY94, these two laboratories were combined to form the Integrated Avionics Test Laboratory (IATL). These laboratories made use of available space in existing facilities. These spaces have recently been renovated. The initial radar projects funded the installation of an A-6 nose radome and garage door-type window. All other equipment which comprise the laboratories is portable. The original structure was built in 1943. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform: Aircraft 3.2 Airborne Combat System Integration - (Avionics Integration) 5.2 Radar Systems 6.2 Aircraft Navigation Systems 11.10 Other technology based programs: (i.e., GPWS development) UIC: NO0421 I 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. These figures will be divided up for the two laboratories: RASTERL and AIL. The unit of measure for the RASTERL utilization will be based on usage of the two available test stations. The AIL utilization will be based on usage of the MATS hardware. All utilization assumes a budgeted capacity of 8 hourslday, and 5 dayslweek. Note: During the time period from 9/93 to 1/94 the RASTERL capabilities were unavailable due to facility renovations. The AIL MATS hardware was temporarily relocated to support continued testing. Utilization estimates: RASTERL - - 25 % 70% AIL - - 100% 100% 100% 100% 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Utilization projection estimates: RASTERL AIL RASTERL projections do not include some other potential, yet uncommitted projects. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? There are no personnel dedicated to operation of the facility. Test project personnel operate the equipment on an as-needed basis for their specific projects. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The laboratory currently has one contractor which is responsible for equipment maintenance and tracking, facility maintenance, asset usage scheduling, and project support. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityfEquipment Nomenclature or Title This laboratory is used to analyze the compatibility of the interface between aircraft and stores; identify the functional requirements of all storelaircraft cables, break-out boxes, and interfaces cables; conduct pre-flight weapon systems evaluation and post-flight trouble-shooting; and determine the operational description of store functional sequences allowing for proper control release and use of store combinations. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Aircraft Armament System Simulation Engineering Test Station (AASSETS) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The Test Station is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. Building: $349,000 Equipment: $1,014,000 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment - 16,000 Ibs; 177 cubic feet Facility - 651 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 28VDC 400 Hz 30 electrical power 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperature and humidity must be maintained within tolerances of equipment. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The equipment is portable. The test equipment and software could be replicated, although integration of software updates are facilitated by proximity of the ACETEF, which develops the software. The impact of losing this capability is extensive lost time when weapons interface anomalies are found. This will necessitate reprogramming WSSA test bench assets on the West Coast to replicate the problems, which is an extremely inefficient use of critical resources, especially during EMD programs. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility was constructed in 1943. The laboratory was established in 1993. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft) 2. Weapons 3.2 Combat System Integration (Air) 8.2 Defense Systems (CM) 1 1 . Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. NIA. The laboratory has only been in operation since 1993. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. SO%, based on 15.7 hours per day operation. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? 1 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 1 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. & ~ ~ d f/j UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitjdequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The Manned Flight Simulator (MFS) is a full flight and avionics simulation facility used to support the acquisition process for all categories of Navy aircraft. The Simulation and Control Technology department maintains and operates high fidelity flight dynamics, flight control and avionics systems simulations for a variety of aircraft types at the MFS. The piloted simulation aspects of the facility are highlighted by four simulation stations, a 40 foot diameter dome, a six degree of freedom motion base and two fixed base lab stations. Facilities and most hardware are independent of aircraft type and are shared resources. Advanced flight control capability consist of state-of-the-art analysis and design computer programs and a FIA-18 flight control computer test station. - Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Flight Control Computer Test Facility The test facility will have four major components which consists of Flight Control Computer Test Stations (FCCTS), computational resources, flight control computer interfaces and piloted simulation stations. Major equipment components will include flight control computers, mission computers as well as the simulation resources (cockpit, visual system, aerodynamic models, etc.) Current capabilities include limited computer resources shared with other projects. One F-18 flight control computer test station fully functioning and two more test stations in development with limited space to locate them. Engineering analysis is being conducted using personal computers with limited capability. Project delays should be expected in a high work load environment due to shared resources scheduling. The engineering analysis capabilities include flight control laws, redundancy management, flying qualities, evaluation of fleet incidents, flight test planning, flight test data analysis and parameter identification. Flight control computer (FCC) hardware and software development support include operational flight program analysis, IV&V, fleet incident evaluation, configuration control, tracking of FCC and fleet problems and flight test planning. The Flight Controls Test Facility will provide the technical capabilities needed to test current and future advanced DFCS for programs such as F- 18, V-22, F-14, A-X, EA-6B, A-6, AV-8B, E-2C, T-45, and H-60. The phases of the acquisition process which will be supported are concept exploration, engineering manufacturing and development, production, fleet introduction and in-service use. These DFCS systems are increasing in complexity with an ever-increasing amount of code to test making it difficult if not impossible to test all logic paths. Advanced DFCS include new concepts for integrated DFCS-avionic-sensor architectures, thrust UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State e primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. '"\ echnical Center Site clature or Title r (MFS) is a full flight and avionics simulation acquisition process for all categories of Navy Control Technology department maintains and dynamics, flight control and avionics systems f aircraft types at the MFS. The piloted cility are highlighted by four simulation e, a six degree of freedom motion base and ilities and most hardware are independent ed resources. Advanced flight control r t analysis and design computer programs ter test station. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Flight Control Computer Test Facility The test facility will have components which consists of Flight Control Computer Test computational resources, flight simulation stations. Major equipment control computers, mission (cockpit, visual system, Current capabilities include limited s shared with other projects. One F-18 flight control c n fully functioning and two more test stations in dev ed space to locate them. Engineering analysis is bei ersonal computers with limited capability. Project d d in a high work load environment due to shared The engineering analysis capabilities include fligh ncy management, flying qualities, evaluation of fl planning, flight test data analysis and paramete (FCC) hardware and software flight program analysis, IV&V control, tracking of FCC and fle The Flight Controls Test Facility will provide the needed to test current and future advanced DFCS for 18, V-22, F-14, A-X, EA-6B, A-6, AV-8B, E-2C, T phases of the acquisition process which will be s exploration, engineering manufacturing and develop introduction and in-service use. These DFCS sys complexity with an ever-increasing amount of c difficult if not impossible to test all logic paths. new concepts for integrated DFCS-avionic-sens iQ~l idd pc UIC: NO0421 0 vectoring, canards, control surface allocation and integrated fire and flight control (IFFC) requiring an increased Navy capability to support development and provided IV&V. Since we cannot create in-flight test of the total environment needed to test the DFCS throughout its flight envelope, a simulation and stimulation capability are needed to create this environment in a laboratory setting. An increased technical capability is also needed to address significant flight test issues associated with testing these advanced control concepts. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment resources that directly support the capabilities of the Flight Control Computer Test Facility are considered Class 2 Installed Equipment and are as such considered moveable assets but do require additional utilities support and assembly of components. The Class 2 Installed equipment has a gross weight of 10,000 Ibs and a volume of 2000 square feet. The equipment resources that support personnel are considered Class 3 Personal Property items and are as such considered portable assets. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement cost of the facilitylequipment is $23.9111 (19.1M for equipment; 2.6M for facility). The 2.6M facility replacement cost is reflective of the portion of building 2035 which supports this function. PI64 lists the replacement value of building 2035 as 4,750M. R 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Equipment: over $500K, 10,000 Ibs, 2,000 cubic feet Facility: 116,600 lbs, 86,400 cubic feet, 20,197 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. Special utility support required include two high quality, low impedance ground systems, 60Hz three phase and 400 Hz three phase electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Special budget requirements include pass card security system, TEMPEST EMIIRFI shielding of the computer areas, and EMVRFI shielded power and telephone service to the facility. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Special environmental support required include a raised flooring in the computer areas, air conditioninglfiltration system for cooling computer areas, and overhead Halon or C02 fire protection system. UIC: NO0421 vectoring, canards, control surface allocation and integrated fire and flight control (IFFC) requiring an increased Navy capability to support provided IV&V. Since we cannot create in-flight test of environment needed to test the DFCS throughout its flight a simulation and stimulation capability are needed to create this in a laboratory setting. An increased technical capability is significant flight test issues associated with testing control concepts. 2 . Indi te whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph\age 12 of this data call. that directly support the capabilities of the Flight are considered Class 2 Installed Equipment assets but do require additional The Class 2 Installed of 2000 square are considered Class portable assets. Report the facility/equipment cost separate that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement cost of is $23.9M (19.1M for equipment; 2.6M for facility). 4. Provide the gross weight and cube ohhe facilitjdequiprnent. Equipment: over $500K, 10,000 Facility: 116,600 lbs, 86,400 5. Indicate any "special" utility support this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Special utility support required include two quality, low impedance ground systems, 60Hz three phase and 400 phase electrical power. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shrelding, hardening, Special budget requirements include pass card TEMPEST EMYRFI shielding of the computer areas, and telephone service to the facility. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Special environmental support required include a raised computer areas, air conditioning/filtration system for areas, and overhead Halon or C02 fire protection system. @ , ; a d P$ UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility would be extremely difficult to replicate a t another site because of the enormous investment that would have to be made to duplicate the capabilities which currently exist for supporting digital flight control systems. This investment includes the establishment of the Flight Control Computer Test Facility, Avionics test laboratories and the Manned Flight Simulator. The successful utilization of the Flight Control Computer Test Facility requires co-location with the Avionics test laboratories and the Manned Flight Simulator to provide Piloted simulation capability and avionics resources such as mission computers. No other existing DOD or non-DOD sites have the facilities to provide life cycle support for digital flight control systems effectively while integrating software and hardware tests with flight test methods as the Flight Control Computer Test Facility resources. Facility loss would result in reduced air warfare capabilities through limited developmental testing and technical evaluation of digital flight control systems during the acquisition process. With a limited technical capability available to test the complex architecture's of advanced DFCS there will be a reduced Navy ability to provide timely and adequate insight into technical development resulting in delays and insufficiently tested systems that are put into operational use. This situation will increase in the need for changes in the production and operational phases. Facility deferral will reduce our capability to support high risk flight test programs resulting in increased pilot safety issues. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility was constructed in 1985. The laboratory equipment has been procured since FY88 by various projects. The equipment was brought in by ground transportation such as trucks and vans or by air transportation carriers. The Manned Flight Simulator facility at which the Flight Control Computer Test Facility currently resides was constructed on site by a contractor for the Navy. MILCON# P-407. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Platform (Aircraft) 3 .2 Combat System Integration (Air) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 45% Utilization: User Time (5.400 hr) Budgeted Capacity (10,800 hrs) + overtime (1000 hrs) 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial as the replication and impact statements are formulated. cility would be extremely difficult to replicate a t another site ent that would have to be made to rrently exist for supporting digital flight includes the establishment of the Flight vionics test laboratories and the Manned utilization of the Flight Control Computer h the Avionics test laboratories and the vide Piloted simulation capability and on computers. No other existing DOD or s to provide life cycle support for digital while integrating software and hardware hods as the Flight Control Computer Test Facility resources. would result in reduced air warfare capabilities esting and technical evaluation of digital ring the acquisition process. With a limited est the complex architecture's of advanced vy ability to provide timely and adequate insight into technical ment resulting in delays and insufficiently tested systems that a into operational use. This situation will n the production and operational phases. pability to support high risk flight test t safety issues. 9. Indicate how and when the was transported and or constructed at the site. The facility was constructed in has been procured since FY88 by various was brought in by ground transportation such transportation carriers. The Manned Flight Flight Control Computer Test Facility on site by a contractor for the Navy. 10. List the functional support areas (previously in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft) 3.2 Combat System Integration (Air) 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 45% Utilization: User Time (5.400 hr) Budgeted Capacity (10,800 hrs) + overtim (1000 hrs) \ ,&L):,uJ 0 UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Approximately 83 persons operate the facility equipment. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Approximately 15 persons are required to maintain the facility equipment. 1 5. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. \ at is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 83 persons operate the facility equipment. 14. What is e approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? b\ Approximately to maintain the facility equipment. 1 5. Provide one oto of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title To perform test and evaluation on aircraft electrical systems in support of the NAWCAD mission for RDT&E of aircraft systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Aircraft Electrical Evaluation Facility (AEEF) Conducts T&E of aircraft electrical power systems and components of primary, secondary and emergency power generation systems. Includes test facilities for power conversion equipments, emergency and auxiliary power units, constant speed drives or transmissions, engine starters, battery chargers, power distribution and control equiprnents, electrical wiring and wiring installations, drive shafts and couplings, hydraulic motor-generators, hydraulic pumps, avionic cooling and environmental phenomena. T&E test facilities include: temperaturelaltitude, salt foglall salinities, vibration, shock, mechanical interface, sand and dust, accessory drive stands, electromagnetic interference, wind tunnel, jet engine simulator, and combined environment testing (CET) facilities. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Portable: A large amount of laboratory instrumentation plant property such as oscilloscopes and spectrum analyzers are portable. 8 - Temperature/Altitude Chambers Movable: 1 - EM1 Chamber Fixed: 5 - TemperaturelAltitude Chambers 1 - Shock facility 15 - Drive Stands 1 - Wind Tunnel 2 - Vibration Stands 1 - EM1 Chamber 2 - Combined Environment Test Chambers UIC: NO0421 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Building - $4.26111 Equipment - $30M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Gross weight - 388 tons Volume - 24,000 ft3 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. The AEEF is an environmental test laboratory which includes: temperaturelaltitude, salt foglall salinities, vibration, shock, mechanical interface, accessory drive stands, electromagnetic interference, wind tunnel, jet engine simulator, and combined environment testing (CET) facilities. These facilities require high power 115 volt, 220 and 440 single phase and three phase electrical power; special cooling (water) for environmental, drive stand and vibration chambers; high bay facilities for environmental chambers; special ventilation for cooling and venting test areas; and facilities for handling hazardous and hazardous waste materials. Large volume of compressed air required for operation of various test chambers and laboratory operations. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Special foundations are required for high weight load of environmental test equipment. Shielded rooms are required for EM1 testing. In addition, facilities need to be located in low EM1 noise area to facilitate EM1 testing. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Adequate cooling and ventilation required for high ambient heat load of environmental test facilities. Humidity control required to prevent deterioration of EM1 anechoic material. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. AEEF is the only facility within DON, DOD and industry having the capability of complete laboratory T&E of aircraft electrical power systems and components, and complete environmental testing of various aircraft, shipboard and ground support equipment systems and components. One of the unique features of this facility is the ability to test mechanically driven equipment while undergoing environmental testing. Other activities may have limited ability to mechanically drive equipment or limited environmental test facilities, but no activity has these capabilities UIC: NO0421 combined. In addition, no other activity has the variety of environmental test facilities located at AEEF. This facility has full capability of MIL- STD-810 temperature, altitude, humidity, fungus, salt fog, sand and dust, vibration, shock, and combined environmental testing. Also, no other DOD activity or industry has the facilities to conduct MIL-STD-461 EM1 testing of mechanically driven equipment. These capabilities couples with the NAWCAD Patuxent River flight test capabilities are unequaled anywhere in DOD or industry. AEEF would be extremely difficult to move or replicate because of the unique and extensive nature of the facilities. In addition, the facility consists of large environmental test chambers drive motors and EM1 chambers which would be difficult to move and re-calibrate. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The Aircraft Electrical Evaluation facility was constructed between FY69 and FY70, and was occupied in FY71. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Aircraft; 10.5 Environmental description, prediction, and effects; 10.8 other subsidiary systems and components; 11.7 propulsion and energy conversion. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Percentage of time is based on 2087 hrs per year (one 8 hr shift per day). 1 2. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FUNDING($M) ProgramIProject FY91 FY92 FY93 FY94 FY95FY96 FY97 (Actual) (Projected) Component Improvement Program .896 1.33 1.52 1.38 1.43 1.58 1 .63 Aircraft Programs .283 ,263 ,5901 .450 .SO0 .450 .550 GFE Production Support .775 .835 .825 1.1 1.15 1.20 1.25 Environmental Testing .622 .685 .770 ,840 .850 .920 1.30 Electrical Inspection .290 .275 ,275 .275 .305 ,320 .335 UIC: NO0421 Avionics Cooling .I30 .I42 .I55 .I65 .I85 .205 .2 0 0 Total 3.00 3.53 4.14 4.21 4.42 4.68 5.26 Utilization Trends: Workload is expected to increase in both the Component Improvement and Government Furnished Equipment Support Programs. This is anticipated because of the increased need to maintain and gain greater performance from existing electrical power systems. Also this need is anticipated to grow because of fewer new aircraft programs. Aircraft Program workload is in direct support of the various Aircraft PMAs and PEOs. The trend is for these programs to experience some reduction due to reduced budgets, but have some stability as a result of increased emphasis on maintaining existing assets. Some increase is anticipated as a result of the planned FIA-18EIF program. Environmental testing includes environmental, electromagnetic interference (EMI) and mechanical component testing. Workload requirements for environmental testing in support of Navy aircraft is expected to remain constant, except for EMI. EM1 workload is expected to grow because of the increased emphasis on high technology. Environmental workload is anticipated to grow from other DOD activities and private industry. Electrical Inspection and Avionics cooling workload is expected to remain constant because they support all aircraft platforms. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? AEEF Personnel Civil Service Supervisory - 4 Engineers - 15 Technicians - 14 Clerical - 1 Total - 34 Contractor Supervisory - 1 Technicians - 9 Tech. Assist - 3 Total - 13 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Civil Service - 3 Contractor - 8 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityEquipment Nomenclature or Title Conducts operational effectiveness, suitability and supportability test and evaluation (T&E) of fixed-wing and rotary wing common and peculiar support equipment (SE) including: airframe, avionics and propulsion SE; aircraft and armament handling, servicing, inspection, and maintenance SE and other equipment required to test, maintain, or operate aircraft, aircraft systems, or components ashore or at sea. The SE includes mechanical, pneumatic, hydraulic and electrical SE; avionics and electronic SE automatic test equipment (ATE); test program sets (TPS); uninstalled aircraft engine, intermediate level maintenance, test facilitieslequipment (fixed and mobile); aircraft engine tooling; and non-destructive test and inspection SE. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Aircraft Support Systems Test Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Portable: 47% Moveable: 47 % Fixed: 6% 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Equipment Replacement Value - $17,214M Facility Replacement Value - $1.087M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Equipment Gross weight and cube: 409,272 lbs Facilities - 17,281 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Electric Power: 2081220V 440V 440V, 3 Phase 277/480V, 50/60HZ, 3 Phase 115/110V, 400HZ 28V DC UIC: NO0421 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The Avionics SE Laboratory and the Consolidated Automated Support Systems (CASS) Test Facility hold computer equipment which must be maintained within temperature and humidity control bands. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. I t would not be too difficult to either move or replicate the existing facilitylequipment. However, the usefulness of the facility would be greatly degraded if it were not co-located with the large stable of Naval and Marine Corps aircraft and the operationslmaintenance enlisted personnel associated with them which is present at NAWCAD Patuxent River, MD. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility has been constructed over a period of years from 1963 to the present. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft). 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Based on "Direct Labor" manhours divided by "Annual Unconstrained Capacity". 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? UIC: NO0421 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 3 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title Electronic Systems Test Facility provides ground and flight test and evaluation for the full range of communications systems including data links systems, encrypted and unencrypted voice communications, antenna systems, satellite communications systems, present and future identification friend or foe (IFF) systems and sea-surveillance radar systems. The facility incorporates the necessary antennas, receiver and computational equipment to conduct inflight antenna pattern measurements, simulation and stimulation and antenna equipment to support communications, IFF and radar systems testing. The facility is unique for its location on the Chesapeake Bay allowing for unparalleled accuracy in lower frequency band antenna measurements. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS TEST FACILITY (ESTF) 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. For responses to questions 2 through 14, refer to individual sheets for: ESTF: Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System (ATLAS) ESTF: Ground Range Antenna Test Facility (GRAFT) ESTF: Data Link Analysis Systems Laboratory (DLAS) ESTF: Navy IFF Test and Evaluation (NIFFTE) Laboratory ESTF: Combat Identification Data Analysis Center ESTF: Communications Tests and Evaluation Laboratory (COMTEL) ESTF: Surveillance and Topographical Analysis Radar Systems (STARS) Laboratory 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. 9 . Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 11 Technical Center Site I Flight Test and Engineering Group 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title To conduct in-flight antenna measurements and analysis of antenna systems. NAWCAD PAX ESTF: Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated Svstem (ATLAS) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Fixed. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Equipment - $2.5M Facility - $153K 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Weight - 12 tons Volume - 3,000 cubic feet Facility - 550 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 3-Phase delta 50 Hz 120V AC. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Proper temperature (70-75 degrees) and humidity (40%-50%) for computer equipment. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. What makes ATLAS unique is its capability to measure in-flight antenna patterns from 2 MHz to 18 GHz referenced to an isotropic source. The location of the ATLAS facility on the Chesapeake Bay provides it's antennas with an unobstructed electromagnetic propagation path over a calm body of water which serves as a reflection surface for RF energy. The calmness of the Bay (less than 2 to 3 ft wave heights) allows accurate characterization of reflecting electromagnetic energy which is used to determine antenna gains relative to isotropic radiators. Restricted airspace is located over the Bay allowing a safe area to conduct the required maneuvers. An analytical model for predicting the reflected energy off the water has been perfected over 40 years of measurements. Loss of this capability will severely impact determination of systems performances. Additional system flight test would be required, however it would not completely replace the missing characterization data. 9 . Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. The ATLAS was constructed in 1982. In-flight antenna measurement have been conducted at the same site for nearly 50 years. The equipment has changed over the years. The last major upgrade automated the technique and this equipment was installed in a MILCON building first floor in 1984. Additional equipment has been added in increments since 1984. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Platform (Aircraft) 3.2 Combat System Integration 5 . Sensors & Surveillance 6 . Navigation 7 . c 3 1 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Test hours 438 450 435 363 351 Missions 6 5 69 47 3 8 35 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 1994 1995 1996 1997 Test hours 555 380 380 380 Missions 7 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 2 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 1 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The GRATF's primary purpose is to conduct ground range antenna radiation pattern measurements on aircraft system antennas to determine specification compliance, mission suitability, optimum locations, and to ensure antennas are operating properly prior to system flight tests. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ESTF: Ground Range Antenna Test Facility (GRATF) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The equipment at the GRATF is portable and the facility is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Equipment - $1.4M Facility - $0.6M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. The gross weight of the GRATF is approximately 4 tons. The volume of the equipment is approximately 1,000 sq ft. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No "special" utility support required. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Facility must be located on a 100' by 600' electromagnetically quiet area which is flat, unobstructed and landscaped to provide predictable RF propagation properties. A non-metallic 500' test track is required. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Highly sensitive test equipment and computer equipment requires temperature and humidity control to operate properly. UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility is not unique and can be replicated or relocated. However, this facility provides an essential service to the flight test community a t Patuxent River. This facility is used to perform component antenna tests on air vehicle antenna systems prior to flight tests to ensure faulty equipment is not installed on the vehicles for testing. The money saved in flight hour costs easily offsets the low operation/maintenance costs of this facility. Also, this facility is used in conjunction with the in-flight antenna test laboratory (Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System (ATLAS) to fully characterize aircraft antenna systems performance, identify performance problems, and identify solutions to performance problems and determine flight test suitability. This would have considerable impact on the antenna test capabilities at Pax River. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The GRATF was constructed in 1955 and the equipment was transported to the site by truck. The facility was constructed in 1982. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 .2 Platform (Aircraft) 3.2 Combat system Integration 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Unit of measure - test days: 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 2 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title To conduct in-flight and ground data link measurements and analysis of data link systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ESTF: Data Link Analysis Systems Laboratory (DLAS) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Fixed. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Weight: 3 Tons Volume: 1000 Cubic Feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitytequipment other than normal electrical power. None. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Proper temperature (70-75 degrees) and humidity (40%-50%) for computer equipment. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. What makes DLAS unique is its capability to measure secure in-flight data referenced to a known data input source. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The last major upgrade added increased processing and storage capability and a major software upgrade. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilityJequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Electronic Combat and Air Vehicles. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FISCAL YEAR FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Dir. Labor (hrs) 10,800 15,000 20,200 16,800 6 ,000 Test hours: 520 910 1200 1035 400 Missions: 4 19 28 2 5 1 2 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FISCAL YEAR FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Dir. Labor (hrs) 4,000 4,500 9,000 9,000 Test hours: 200 200 285 285 Missions: 6 6 10 1 0 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Systems Engineering and Test and Evaluation of Identification Systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ESTF: Navy IFF Test and Evaluation (NIFFTE) Laboratory 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Replacement value is $3M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. None. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Facility requires raised flooring and an antenna pedestal approximately 65- 70 ft above the ground in close proximity to Military Warning areas to provide for line of sight flight testing to 250 NM. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperature and humidity requirements for multiple computer systems is approximately 30,000 BTU/hour. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This is a one of a kind facility in DoD. Expertise and capability would take years to replicate. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility come into existence in 1984 and has evolved over the years to current capabilities. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platforms - Aircraft 2.9 Weapons Systems - Fire control 3.2 Combat System Integration - Air 7.2 Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence - Airborne 7.7 Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence - Air Traffic Control Systems 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FISCAL YEAR FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Dir. Labor (hrs) 5,052 5,052 5,052 5,052 5,052 Test hours: 110 80 40 120 80 Missions: 40 29 2 3 1 2 29 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to EY1997. FISCAL YEAR FY94 FY 95 FY96 FY97 Dir. Labor (hrs) 5,052 5,052 5,052 5,052 Test hours: 100 100 100 100 Missions: 37 38 3 7 37 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? 2 Civilian and 1 Contractor. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Approximately 1 person and JUW, S/W maintenance contracts. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. - UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Systems Engineering and Test and Evaluation of Identification Systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX ESTF: Combat Identification Data Analysis Center - 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is moveable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value is $6M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 12 Tons1 1950 cu. ft. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. None. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Facility requires certified strong room and raised flooring. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperature and humidity requirements for multiple computer systems is approximately 160,500 BTUfhour 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This is a one of a kind facility in DoD. Expertise and capability would take years to replicate. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility came into existence in 1986 and has evolved over the years to current capabilities. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platforms - Aircraft 2.9 Weapons Systems - Fire control 3.2 Combat System Integration - Air 7.2 Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence - Airborne 7.7 Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence - Air Traffic Control Systems 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FISCAL YEAR FYS9 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY 93 Dir. Labor (hrs) 24,366 24,366 24,366 24,366 24,366 Test hours: 300 200 100 300 200 Missions: 75 50 25 75 5 0 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. FISCAL YEAR FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Dir. Labor (hrs) 24,366 24,366 24,366 24,366 Test hours: 150 150 150 200 Missions: 6 5 60 60 60 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 3 Civilian and 10 Contractors. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Approximately 1 person and HIW, S/W maintenance contracts. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. C UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESiEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM ) Technical Center Site I Flight Test and Engineering Group 1 11 I NAWCAD PAX 11 1) Facility~Equipment i ESTF: Communications Tests and Evaluation (1 11 Nomenclature or Title ( Laboratory (COMTEL) 11 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. The purpose of this facility is to provide assets to evaluate High Frequency (HF), Very High Frequency. (VHF), Ultra High Frequency (UHF), Electronic Counter-counter Measures communications, Satellite communications (SATCOM), Radio Frequency (RF) information data links and their antenna systems integrated in fixed and rotary wing aircraft. The facility provides the unique capability for testing airborne communications over the HF, VHF, and L frequency bands in an unobstructed over the water test environment limited only by line sight propagation conditions. 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility is moveable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Replacement value of the facility is 3.OM (equipment and antennas, does not include facility replacement cost) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. 3.0 tons and cube volume is 1000 cubic feet (antennas disassemble) 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. This facility requires 28 Volts DC and 400Hz AC three phase power along with normal electric power. The facility also requires environment control air conditioning. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilityiequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Communication antennas will require special foundations with specified elevation above ground level and with unobstructed field of view. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). UIC: NO0421 Facility equipment will require environmental control temperature, humidity and free of dust. 8. Indicate if this facility/equipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facilitylequipment would not be extremely difficult o r impossible to replicate or relocate at another site with an unobstructed field of view. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The existing facility construction was completed in 1984. The present facility was constructed in the middle of an antenna farm of a previous communication site which was established in Mid-1950's. Exist equipment was transported from previous facility to present facility. Equipments upgrades and increase capabilities have continue to present date. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional support areas include Air Vehicle and Electronic Combat. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FISCAL YEAR FY89 FY90 FY91 FY92 FY93 Dir. Labor (hrs) 2,800 7,000 7,000 4,500 6,300 Test hours: 390 1200 1200 600 1050 Missions: 6 1 124 124 8 2 9 5 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FISCAL YEAR FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Dir. Labor (hrs) 5,800 5,000 5,500 5,500 Test hours: 910 875 900 950 Missions: 7 9 7 2 7 2 72 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? UIC: NO0421 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 Technical Center Site 1 Flight Test and Engineering Group I[ Nomenclature or Title ( Analysis Radar Systems (STARS) Laboratory 11 FacilityIEquipment 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. NAWCAD PAX ESTF: Surveillance and Topographical To conduct test and evaluation of airborne radar surveillance, weather, topographical analysis, and black radar systems. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Fixed. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Weight: 5.0 Tons Volume: 300 Cubic Feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 400 Hz 3-phase AC 28 VDC 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. It would be extremely difficult to replicate or relocate this facility to another site. This facility provides a unique capability for testing X-band UIC: NO0421 airborne radar systems over the frequency range of 8.0 to 12.0 GHz. A 360-degree unobstructed field of view limited only by line of sight propagation conditions allows surface and subsurface testing in a brownlblue water environment. Were this capability to be lost to the Department of Navy, no testing of this type would be possible. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. MILCON funding was used to construct a new facility in 1984. Equipment for the facility was transported by truck from the old facility. Cranes and other heavy equipment were used to hoist the equipment into the new facility, including the roof mounted radome. All radar and IFF antennas are permanently installed in the radome, with the corresponding equipment permanently installed in the laboratory. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Electronic Combat, Air Vehicle, and ArmamentIWeapons. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FISCAL YEAR FY89 FY90 FY91 FY 92 FY93 Dir. Labor (hrs) 2,000 2,000 2,100 2,400 2,400 Test hours: 500 500 550 600 600 Missions: 30 25 30 40 3 5 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FISCAL YEAR FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Dir. Labor (hrs) 2,400 2,500 2,500 2,100 Test hours: 600 625 625 550 Missions: 3 0 35 35 40 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM -- - - 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title To perform test and evaluation of aircraft installed weapon systems on electro-optic (EO) and reconnaissance (REECE) systems. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX Electro-Optical & RECCE System Test Facility 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. All laboratory equipment which includes radiometers, collimators, photometric devices, optical components, cameras, stimulators and general laboratory devices are portable. Electro-optical Test Target (EOTT) and Reconnaissance targets are fixed. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The facility and equipment and target replacement cost would be approximately $19M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. Facility square feet - 19,646 Equipment weight - 4 tons; Cube - 18840 ft3 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. None. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). A Night Combat Test Laboratory facility requires operationally secure, light tight, environmentally stable, temperature controlled, and laser safe. UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. It would not be difficult or impossible to replicate this EOIRECCE facility, however, impacts of not being able to leveraging off of existing EW capabilities/laboratories would be detrimental to testing aircraft weapon systems. The capabilities of the EOIRECCE facility are necessary to safely and efficiently test current and emerging EOIRECCE systems installations in current and near term weapons systems. Declining budgets require more effective and efficient ways to validate specification compliance and to insure operational suitability. This increased efficiency would reduce overall program cost; establish a capability for early investigation, analyze and fix. Without this facility, integrated EOJRECCE systems will require multiple tests to validate individual sensors and their components. Sensor testing capabilities will not be technically acceptable to keep up with sensor state of the a r t technology developments. Higher cost and the potential of unacceptable performance will result to the DON. Fleet readiness will be severely effected by delays in programs due to expanded test schedules and having to utilize other DODIcontractor equipment or ranges which have marginal test capabilities. Certain tests that could be accomplished with simulation/stimulation might not be flight tested or fully evaluated because of the high cost of providing targets and stringent operational security requirements of the program. Movement of the EOTT/RECCE targets would not be practical. Advanced programs would be required to develop highly specialized test assets for one time use. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. EO capabilities and EOTTIRECCE targets were developed in the 1960's. The facility was built in 1990. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1.2 Platform (Aircraft) 2 . Weapons 3.2 Combat System Integration 5.3 Special Sensors 6.2 Navigation 8.2 CM 8.3 EW 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average test hours is 1,968 for the past 5 years. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected utilization is 2,400 out to FY97. UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 2 to 3 14 What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 2 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. ATARS Test Di spl ay St 1 Mi ss i on Oat a Mi ss i on ---. T2 Dat e ------: 081 01 ~j me ------. 13:14: Sensor ----: N FOV ------. . 022 FODA/SODA -: 092 L a t i t ude --: 038. 09 Longi t ude -: 076.26 Headi ng ---: 256. 0 Vet oci t y --: 0476.1 Hei ght ----. 24464 ~~l I ------: 000.5 Pi t ch -----. 881. 4 Yaw -------: 000. 2 Enhancement Hi s t or Sobel -----: 0 Hi s t o g r a m -: 0 Li n e a r ----• 0 R o t a t e ----: 0 I a g X ------: 100.0X Fi l e: T2 Targe t # --: I I R S ------: I n t e r p r e t e r : H. Wi l a t i 01 FFOV son ATARS Test Di s p l ay S t a t i on @ I Mi ssi on D a t a Mi s s i on ---: D a t e ------: Ti me ------: Sensor ----: FOV ------: FODA/SODA -: L a t i t ude --: Long i t ude -: Headi ng ---: Vel oc i t y --: Hei g h t ----: Rol I ------: Pi t c h -----: Yaw -------: Enhancement Hi s t o r y Sobel -----. 0Hi s t ogram -: 0 L i n e a r ----• 0 R o t a t e ----: 0 MagX ------. 8.5% FFOV Fi l e: N450053614411 1XR5C24 T a r g e t # --: IIRS ------: I n t e r p r e t e r : H. W I LSON ATARS Test Di spl ay S t a t i on @ Mi ss i on Data Mi ss i on ---: Dat ------: Ti me ------: Sensor ----: FOV ------: FODA/SODA -: L a t i t ude --: Lonqi t ude -: Headi n g ---: Vel oci t y --: Hei qht ----: Rol I ------: Pi t c h -----: Yaw -------: Enhancement Hi s t o r y Sobel -----. 0 Hi s t ogram -: 0 Li n e a r ----. 0 Rot a t e ----• 0 I a g X ------* . 10.5% FFOV Fi I e: N46005371441W10Xi o4f Targe t # --: 11 RS ------: I n t e r p r e t er : NO ENTRY UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The primary purpose of the facility/equipment (8 separate laboratories) is to provide capabilities for test and evaluation of life support systems, environmental control systems, escape and environmental control systems, escape and survival systems, Night Vision systems, internal and external lighting and human factorslman-machine interface attendant to the integration of all the mechanical, avionic and environmental subsystems of the total aircraft. Flight Test and Engineering Group NAWCAD PAX - Aircrew Svstems Test Facilitv Laboratories 2. Indicate whether the facility/equipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility is fixed which houses the laboratories. However some of the test equipment and fixtures are portable to allow testing i d o n an actual aircraft. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Equipment - $8.985M excluding buildings and fixed test sites Facility - $1.831M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The gross weight is 58 tons and the cube is 24,657 cubic feet. The facility has 16,348 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. Special utilities: 400 cycle power, water pumped quality compressed air sources a t 250 P.S.I.. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Stabilized flooring for optical benches. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal environmental requirements. UIC: NO0421 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Although not impossible to replicate it would be difficult. Much of the portable test equipment and capabilities were designed around specific unique building and test sites. For instance, the Night Attack Facility uses a special light sealed aircraft hanger. All the starlight and moonlight test fixtures and targeting were designed specifically for this building. This facility is used by the Coast Guard, Army, Air Force, FAA, and NavyIMarine Corps. The downwash test facility requires unique Vertical Take Off Landing (VTOL) helicopter equipment built into the runway to accommodate tethered hover testing. If equipment and facilities were lost most could be replicated. However, they are all site specific and the movement of the function requires many support facilities not specifically a part of the Crew Systems Test Facility. The facilities have evolved based on DOD needs and requirements. There are no commercial laboratories nor other government-wide test facilities to do the in-aircraft full system testing for DOD. If the Night Attack Test Capability were lost there would be no way to quantify Night Vision System (NVS) aircraft compatible problems nor define mission performance degradation. These tests are critical to the correction of safety problems, and define the environmental limits on safe use of the aircraft during mission planning. I t also has a critical role in maximizing the performance of night bombing attacks. This capability has solved and continues to solve night attack and night vision system fleet problems. Without this facility, we will return to frequent occurrences of NVS related accidents. 9 . Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. The laboratory facility is part of a 1985 MILCON completed in 1990. Approximately half the equipment was trucked to the labs, The remaining equipment has been moved in or replaced since 1990 also transported by truck. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports (using Appendix A): 1. Platforms, 1.2 Aircraft 10.0 General Mission Support, 10.6 Crew Equipment and Life Support, 10.6.2 Aircraft. UIC: NO0421 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical Utilization: These labs have been routinely used for aircraft cockpit testing by the Army, Airforce, Coast Guard, FAA and the Navy/Marine Corps since 1987. First the lab tests are run, then the actual tests onboard the aircraft are conducted. The following utilization average is based on "Test Hours" in both the labs and onboard the aircraft: Historical Workload (Test Hours) - HoursNear 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Projected laboratory utilization is based on current plans to modify or upgrade existing aircraft cockpits by the Navy, Marine Corps, Army, Air Force, FAA and Coast Guard. Projected Workload (Test Hours) - HoursNear 1994 1995 1996 1997 15,425 14,352 12,862 11,275 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 24 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 11 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The academic center, building 2168, provides classroom facilities, computer laboratories, study area, and flightlbrieflplanning areas for staff personnel and students in support of Test Pilot School's training program. Hangar 110 houses the school's 40 aircraft, and provides maintenance officelshops for maintenance personnel to perform aircraft organizational repairs. NAWCAD PAX Test Pilot School 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The buildings are fixed, but aircraft support equipment, peculiar tools, ADPIaudio-visual equipment, test equipment, and office furniture a re movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Facility - $14.744M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. 480.3 tons, excluding IMRL equipment. Facility - 123,773 square feet 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. - EPA approved aircraft wash facilities and OSA approved emergency showers and eye wash equipment. - Overhead hoists (rail type) for helicopterlfixed-wing maintenance. - Shops require compressed air and 12012401400 electrical outlets. - EPA approved hazardous material waste collection/storage facility (60' x 60'). - OSHA approved LOX102 storage site. - EPA approved paved berm for fueYoil bowsers. - OSHAINavy approved ready service ordnance locker. UIC: NO0421 - EPA approved outside aircraft wash rack with adequate low ph water supply. - 18 station FLEDS system (deck edge electrical power for fixed- wing and rotary-wing aircraft). - 10 station wells system (engine air start system). - Engine "Hush House" facility and high power tune-up area, Compass Rose. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Network system valued at $350K has some relocatable and non-relocatable items. Relocatable equipment may be incompatible with existing systems a t other bases1locations. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). No special environmental control requirements are needed. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The USNTPS facilitylequiprnent would not be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate, or to relocated to another site. However, relocation to a site remote from Patuxent would risk the loss of most of the specialized civil service instructional staff, and experienced curriculum support personnel. If USNTPS facility/equiprnent were lost, the impact on the Department of the Navy would be: Loss of Navy-oriented curricula Loss helicopter curriculum Loss of specialized Naval flight officer curriculum Loss of Navy-oriented center of test and evaluation expertise Interruption to flow of trained pilots, flight officers, and engineers 9 . Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. TPS consists of 10 buildings, constructed from 1943 to 1994. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 0 . 1 Personnel and Training UIC: NO0421 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Facilities are being used, on the average, 301 days each fiscal year, Aircraft hangar has 3 maintenance shifts working 24 hours each day, 6 days per week. Staff instructors' and students' work in building 2168 averages to 10 hours per day, 6.5 days per week. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Projected utilization data out to FY1997: there are no anticipated decrease in TPS workload through FY1999. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 165 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Integration of AEGIS Exterior Communication Systems NAWCAD PAX, Webster Field Annex AEGIS 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is not portable, permanent construction. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Special Shipboard (400 HZ) Power 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility is unique and no other integration facility similar exists in the Navy or private industry that we know of. Funding for construction was provided through the Productivity Investment Fund program and the facility had a payback in less than two years. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 1 1 Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This facility has been fully utilized during the past five years integrating communication systems for the CG-47 and DDG-51 class ships. The building has six integration bays and the number of systems that have been integrated from FY 89 - 93 are 6, 8, 6, 9, and 9 respectively. There has been full utilization and occupancy during the normal eight hour work day with additional workforce effort during the time of shipout. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to W1997. Full utilization. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Provide an integrated computer RDT&E facility to support the U.S. Navy Command, Control and Communication (c3) systems. Includes 10,000 SF SCIF area. NAWCAD PAX, Webster Field Annex NCCS 2. Indicate whether the facility/equipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is not portable, permanent construction. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) provides emergency power for the controlled shut-down of the computer equipment. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The facility contains a 10,000 SF Secure Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) designed in accordance with Defense Intelligence Agency Manual (DIAM) 50-3, secure area specifications. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Location is critical (antenna transmit and receive capability) and proximity to aircraft providing data, as well as SCIF area make this facility extremely difficult to replicate. This facility is also used to support a reserves training unit. 9 . Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility was constructed in 1988. Permanent masonry construction with a pile supported foundation. Computer decking in all lab vault spaces. Facility constructed in accordance with DIAM 50-3. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This facility has been utilized nearly around the clock since it was constructed for development, testing and training purposed. Initially the facility was used three shiftslday but has been reduced to two shiftslday with occasional three shiftslday. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Full utilization. This function is scheduled to transfer to Charleston in 1997-98. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. - ~ UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facilit y/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Test and evaluation of antennas which are associated with assigned command, control, and communication systems, surveillance systems, and systems which over-arch multi-platforms. Projects include Air Traffic Control, Programmable Air Landing systems, Identification Friend-or-Foe, AEGIS, LAMPS, Special Warfare, and SATCOM. Services also provided which support research and development projects for NRL, NAWCAD Patuxent River, etc. NAWCAD PAX, Webster Field Annex Antenna Range 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Facility is not portable, but is a fixed asset. The range source unit is housed in a portable trailer to provide flexibility for distance and height adjustments. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Facility and equipment = $700K. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. 36,500 Ibs. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. None. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Temperature and humidity control is required for the computer systems needed to run the range; an area clearance of 1750 ft. wide and 4350 ft. long is the optimal required operational area; growth height in the operational area is not to exceed 3 ft. with a relatively smooth terrain between the source and antenna under test. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The location and design of the NAWCAD PAX, Webster Field Annex antenna range ensures that error inducing extraneous reflections a re negligible. The range surface, mounting fixtures, and adjacent obstacles must be controlled. This rural location offers virtually no radio frequency interference to o r from other sources such as airports, television, telephones repeaters, etc. through the frequency of spectrum of 30 Mhz to 40 Ghz and expandable to 140 Ghz which would have to be maintained at another location. The 1000 ft. outdoor range permits the testing of antennas in a far field state with antenna diameters of up to 70 ft. and weight of 2,000 pounds a t 100 Mhz to 3.5 ft. at 40 Ghz. Some of the impacts if this range is closed are: no quick access to range services that ensure large shipboard antenna(s) are combat ready. no timely access to range services that ensure first article antenna(s) meet specification. no quick access to range services for trouble-shooting antenna problems delaying test programs. increased costs and test time because of travel and antenna shipments to the Baltimore/Washington area. increased cost for utilizing commercial range services. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Buildinglrange was constructed in 1961, equipment was upgraded in FY 9 2. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. UIC: NO0421 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. FY 89 - 792 hours* FY 90 - 736 hours* FY 91 - 588 hours* FY 92 - 792 hours* FY 93 - 280 hours** * test hours only, doesn't include time for equipment upgrades, maintenance, and calibration. ** hours reduced because of system equipment upgrade to new state of the a r t hardwarelsoftware system and faster test time capability because of the new system. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. FY 94 - 638 hours* FY 95 - 638 hours FY 96 - 638 hours FY 97 - 638 hours * current hours for FY 94 approximately 400. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The Center Computer Facility is a large-scale scientific and engineering computing facility accessed remotely by personnel located throughout the Center, at other DOD activities, and at contractor sites throughout the United States. This facility is used in support of research, development, testing, and evaluation of weapons, command control, warning surveillance, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare systems. The equipment to be moved consists of approximately 48 major items including mainframe, workstation, and desk-top computers, disk drives, tape drives, equipment racks, main line printers, network interfaces, control panels, and a broad assortment of associated hardware and peripherals. NAWCAD Warminster influx Central Computer Facility 2 . Indicate whether the facilityfequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Replacement value of facility: $5.4M (18,000 sq ft x $300/sq ft) Replacement value of equipment: $2.9M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 630,000 Cube (cu ft): 54,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. The Central Computer facility requires special power conditioning equipment, an uninterruptable power supply, and other accessories required by any major computer facility. UIC: NO0421 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). The Central Computer facility has a significant portion of the operating areas mounted on raised deck, and where required electrical isolation and shielding. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The facility requires a controlled environment to regulate the temperature and humidity within the complex. Special fire protection systems are also required. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated if totally lost but it would advisable to procure current state-of-the-art equipment. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 10 .9 Activity Mission and Function Support 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Historical utilization of the facility for the past twenty years has been 7 days per week124 hours per day. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. It is expected that the facility will continue on a 7 day124 hour schedule until the facility is transitions to the Patuxent River Site. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? There are 25 personnel (5 Government, & 20 Contractor) associated with the day to day operation of the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Maintenance of the facility requires 8 people. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. , ( UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 11 Technical Center Site I NAWCAD Warminster influx 11 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. FacilitytEquipment Nomenclature or Title The VS Facility provides development and life cycle support for the S-3A/B Weapon System software. The facility is also used for integrating and testing hardware improvements prior to aircraft installation. The equipment to be moved includes 14 racks of equipment, an acoustic interface system, 2 spectrum analyzers, 11 computerlworkstations, 10 simulation cabinets, an S-3B trainer cabinet, an AHU, an SRF enhancement system, a disk drive, 10 workbench/simulators, 6 printers, 2 displays, a file server, 2 tape drives, an ANIALR-76 stimulator, a GPS antenna, and other associated items of equipment. VS Labs - 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of this facility, including sponsor owned equipment is estimated to be approximately $80M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 420,000 Cube (cu ft): 36,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. This facility requires electrical power normally associated with a Laboratory environment. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Portions of the laboratory require raised deck to accommodate wiring associated with computers and complex electronic equipment. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Facility requires an environment normally associated with a complex electronic laboratory which includes computers. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated if lost but it would require a considerable effort and expense. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is associated with the Functional Support Area 3.2, Combat System Integration, Air. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This facility was utilized an average of 3,500 hours per year during the period from 1989 through 1993 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Projected utilization data for the facility until the transition to the Patuxent River site is FY-94 4,300hrs.; FY-95 4,500hrs.; FY-96 4,500hrs. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? The facility utilizes 6 full time operators. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? There are 6 full time maintenance personnel. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The Vertical Flight Laboratory consists of five major facilities that currently support the development and integration of fleet avionics and software products for seven primary projects. These facilities provide a secure environment for processing SECRET material. Vertical Flight programs are sponsored by NAVAIR PMA-205, NAVAIR PMA (F) 225, NAVAIR PMA-299, NAVAIR AIR-546, and SPAWAR. NAWCAD Warminster influx Vertical Flight 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement cost of Equipment is estimated at $16M, cost of Buildings and utilities is estimated at $20M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 315,000 Cube (cu ft): 27,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. This facility requires electrical power normally associated with a complex laboratory environment. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Portions of the laboratory requires raised deck to accommodate wiring associated with computers and complex electronic equipment. UIC: NO0421 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The facility requires an environment normally associated with a complex electronic laboratory which includes computers. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated if lost but it would require a considerable effort, time and expense. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. The facility is associated with the Functional Support Area 3.2, Combat System Integration-Air. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The facility is utilized from 4 to 16 hours each day 5-6 days per week. Utilization depends upon the phase of the various programs supported by the laboratory. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Future utilization of the facility will follow the historical data in item 11 above until the facility transitions to the Patuxent River Site. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? Facility operations requires an average of 2.5 Work Years. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? One work year is dedicated to the maintenance of the facility. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESfEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The VP Program Hardware Integration Center (PHIC) provides hardware support for the P-3C aircraft through the use of simulation, stimulation and actual hardware in-the-loop development and test operations. The equipment to be moved includes six tape drives, three AQA-7 units, nine computers, three SASP-A/B consoles, an acoustic maintenance unit, nine equipment racks, two software input racks, a teleprinter rack, an MTB console rack, four operator stations, a computer rack, an IR detection system, two navigation/communication racks, an ordnance simulation rack, a simulation control rack, a pilot station rack, five logic racks, ten switch racks, nine workbenches, three MG sets, a display control unit, a maintenance panel and two power supplies. Also included a r e approximately 500 subassemblies. NAWCAD Warminster influx VP FACILITY - PHIC - 2 . Indicate whether the facility/equipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Technical organization estimates that the total replacement cost of this facility/equipment(avionics, simulation, switching matrix, cabling, etc.) is approximately $125M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facility/equipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 455,000 Cube (cu ft): 39,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. This facility requires electrical power normally associated with a complex laboratory environment. UIC: NO0421 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Portions of the facility requires raised deck to accommodate wiring associated with computers and complex electronic equipment. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). The facility requires an environment normally associated with a complex electronic laboratory which includes computers. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be almost impossible to replicate if totally lost but it could be done with considerable effort and expense. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is associated with the Functional Support Area 3.2, Combat System Integration-Air. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. During the period FY-89 to FY-92 the facility operated three shifts per day, 7 days each week. During FY-93 the facility operated two shifts each day, 5 days per week. 1 2. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. During FY-94 & FY-95 the workload is projected to be 2 shifts per day, 5 days per week. The facility will transition during FY-96 to Pax River. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? Three people operate the laboratory. A large number(l0-35) of users use the laboratory daily doing development work. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Six people maintain the facility. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM I . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. r The VP Facility - SPF is a computer program generation facility that supports the development and maintenance of mission software used by the CP-901 and ANIASQ 212 tactical computers on P-3C aircraft. I t produces aircraft loadable tapes and cassettes for all P-3C operational and system test programs from Non-Update to Update I11 P-3C aircraft. The equipment to be moved includes tape drives, disk drives, printers, PDUs, cabinets, and various computers. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title This facility is considered to be movable. NAWCAD Warminster influx VP FACILITY - SPF 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. I t is estimated that the total replacement cost of the facility/equipment(SUN servers, work stations, peripherals, network, cabling, etc.) is approximately $10M. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 175,000 Cube (cu ft): 15,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. This facility requires electrical power normally associated with a complex laboratory environment. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Portions of the facility requires raised deck to accommodate wiring associated with computers and complex electronic equipment. -- - UIC: NO0421 UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e,, temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). This facility requires an environment normally associated with a complex electronic laboratory which includes computers. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be almost impossible to replicate if totally lost but it could be done with considerable effort and expense. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is associated with the Functional Support Area 3.2, Combat System Integration-Air. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. During FY-89 to FY-92 the facility was used three shifts per day, 7 days per week. During FY-93 the facility was operated three shifts per day, 5 days per week. 1 2. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Projected utilization for FY-94 and FY-95 is three shifts per day, 5 days per week. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Nine full time people operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Five work years are required to maintain the facility. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facility/equipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The 40' x 20' x 20' Anechoic Chamber, lined with special high grain, low sidelobe horn absorbers to optimize performance for radar cross section measurements, is utilized for the research and development of low observable technology to increase aircraft survivability. I t is equipped with a Scientific-Atlanta Radar Cross Section Analyzer System to acquire, process and store data. NAWC AD WAR influx Anechoic Chamber #2 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of this facility is approximately $1M. (Chamber - $700K; RADAR and Positioner - $300K) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 200,000 Cube (cu ft): 8,100 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirements are needed. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Location of the facility must be such that there is isolation from high power RF sources. Design of chambers of this type have shielding designed into the basic facility. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment required. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated if lost. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports functional support areas 1.2 Platforms-Aircraft, 3.2 Combat Systems Integration -Air, and 5.2 Sensors and Surv. Syst.-Radar Sys. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five fiscal years the facility was utilized 220 days per year and 30 days were used for set up and calibration. 1 2. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997 The schedule in item 11 is expected to be continued until the transition to Patuxent River in FY-96. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Two people operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? A service contract is in place to calibrate the instrumentation. Level of effort is 0.1 workyears, approximately $10K/yr. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title Building 120 is a 90' x 30' x 30' pyramidal chamber with 12' spherical quiet zone. The tapered design of this chamber creates an environment favorable for low frequency testing. The chamber is equipped to perform standard antenna measurements of partial full scale mock-ups and reduced scale model mock-ups. The chamber is utilized to measure and optimize installed antenna system performance. The chamber is equipped with a two axis positioner with a model tower mounted on top to provide the capability for standard antenna measurements. NAWCAD Warminster influx Anechoic Chamber (Bldg 120) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facility/equipment. The estimated value to this facility is $1.7M. (Building and Chamber - $1.2M, Instrumentation - $500M) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 80,000 Cube (cu ft): 3,240 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirements are needed. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Location of facility must be such that there is isolation from high power RF sources. Design of chambers of this type have shielding integrated into the basic facility. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment required. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated if totally lost. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports Functional Support Areas 1.2 Platforms-Aircraft, 3.2 Combat Systems Integration-Air, and 5.2 Sensors and Surveillance Sys.- RADAR sys. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five fiscal years the facility was utilized 220 days each year and 30 days were used for set up and calibration. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. The schedule in item 11 is expected to continue until the transition to Patuxent River in FY-96. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? Two people operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Five people are used part time to maintain the facility and equipment. 1 5. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. - UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title Structure 144 is a 100' x 40' x 40' shielded anechoic chamber which is uniquely designed for multi-purpose operation. The design permits the acquisition of antenna pattern measurements and Radar Cross Section (RCS) measurements in frequency range from 100 MHz to 100 GHZ. The chamber has a 12' cylindrical quiet zone and is fitted with a three axis positioner which is controlled by an AntennaIRCS measurement system. The positioner can be prepared to accommodate a model tower (SA58000B) for standard antenna measurements or a low profile pylon for RCS measurements. NAWCAD Warminster influx Anechoic Chamber ( B l d ~ 144) 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. The replacement value of the facility is approximately $4.7M. (Chamber and Building-$3.0M, Instrumentation and Positioners-$1.7M) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 120,000 Cube (cu ft): 4,860 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirements are required. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Location of the facility must be such that there is isolation from high power RF sources. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment required. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports Functional Support Areas 1.2, Platforms-Aircraft, 3.2 Combat Systems Integration-Air, and 5.2, Sensors and Surveillance Sys.-RADAR sys. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Since June 1991 the facility has been used 180 operational days and has been used 50 days for maintenance, set-up, and calibration. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Projected utilization rate until the FY-96 transition is expected to be 220 operational days and 30 maintenance, calibration, and setup days. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Three people operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Service contract for instrumentation calibration @ $16K/yr. Three people for maintenance and setup(as required) 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1 . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. The Structure 745 Full Scale Aircraft Facility permits mounting aircraft either right side up or upside down, in an electromagnetic free space environment. The facility consists of an aircraft tower that supports the aircraft 40 feet above ground on an azimuth over elevation over azimuth positioner and a small control building adjacent to the tower. A mobile RF source tower can be positioned and operated from any one of three locations 416', 875', or 1363' distant. In addition there is a mobile van, with power, that allows signal generation at almost any azimuth position relative to the aircraft and the other sources. The aircraft towerlcontrol building houses pedestal control equipment, RF receivers, computers, and equipment peculiar to the tests in progress. Major programs supported in the last three years include data link antenna system for NAWC-AD-PAX (FOlS), ALQ-1261165 (F-18), L-Band Pod (F-IS), TASD Plyon (F-18), WALLEYE (F-18), F-18 EIF, JTIDS, and FLEET SATCOM. b Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. NAWCAD Warminster influx Aircraft Test Tower (Bldg 745) This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of this facility is estimated to be $ISM. Modifications to A/C (F-14, A-6, EA-6B, F-18) $1.6M (Assumes A/C are acquired free.) AIC mod cost are also reported in A/C Test Tower(B1dg 367) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 81,610 Cube (cu ft): 4,612 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirements. UIC: NO0421 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Location of the facility should be isolated from high power RF emitters. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment required. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated but some of the components may require long lead times. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. - - - 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports Functional Support Areas 1.2, Platforms-Aircraft, 3.2, Combat Systems Integration-Air, and 5.2 Sensors and Surv. Systems- RADAR Systems. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five fiscal years the facility has been used 180 days of operations and 50 days of maintenance, change over, and calibration. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Utilization rate of the facility until the transition in FY-96 is expected to remain at the same level as stated in 11 above. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? The facility is operated by three people. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Five part time personnel maintain the facility. Crane contracted for change over of AIC @ $7Klchange. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM I( Nomenclature or Title 1 115) Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. NAWCAD Warminster influx Antenna Test Tower (Bldg The long range antenna test facility utilizes an azimuth over elevation pedestal (which can also hold a model tower) mounted on the rooftop. Control is from the third floor. The transmit site can be: a portable tower or a moveable tower placed on the transmit pads (SOO', 10001, 1500') described in PSC Report 9.5.25. This is a standard configuration outdoor range that is multipurpose. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of this facility is $4.4M. (Building and Tower-$200K, Instrumentation for Antenna Test-$1.2M, Rain Erosion Facility-$3M) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 38,875 Cube (cu ft): 6,553 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirements. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Location of facility should be isolated from high power RF emitters. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment required. ;+*$F~ w - 9 ~ '=m ** a i r *.r*inr- --**-- *- - " UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facility/equipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated but it would take considerable time and resources. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports Functional Support Areas 1.2, Platforms-Aircraft, 3.2, Combat Systems Integration-Air, and 5.2 Sensors and Surveillance Systems-RADAR systems. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five fiscal years the facilities have averaged 170 days of operations and 35 days of maintenance. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to N 1997. Projected workload is expected to be similar to the level indicated in item 11 up until the time of transition in FY-96. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Four workyears are used each year to operate the facility 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Six part time individuals are utilized to maintain the facilities. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquiprnent Nomenclature or Title The Ejection Tower produces dynamic ejection conditions which simulate the catapult phase of an ejection from an aircraft. The Tower is 150 feet high and inclined at an angle of 20 degrees from the vertical. It can provide ejection seat accelerations of up to 30 G's with onset rates of up to 500 Glsec with a payload of 600 pounds. The principle components of the facility are the catapult gun; rails; ejectable mass composed of the seat occupant, ejection seat, seat adapter, and cradle; and a "bogie" system and winch which is used to position the seat for cartridge loading and recovery of the test article after the test. Other ancillary equipment includes data recording instrumentation, photographic equipment, anthropomorphic manikins, accelerometers, pressure pickups, strobes and tools required for cartridge modification. Two high intensity, flicker-free portable lighting banks are also available for testing during overcast weather conditions. The Ejection Tower is used to test the operability of ejection seats, restraint systems, g-valve and wiring disconnects, cockpit clearance, or the injury potential of any man-mounted equipment that is worn during the ejection sequence. NAWCAD Warminster influx Ejection Tower The Ejection Tower has its upper end attached to the Vertical Drop Tower. The Vertical Drop Tower is a free standing structure 150 feet high. A 10 x 10 ft. drop cart located within the framework is used for mounting the test specimen. This cart is raised to a predetermined height, released, and free falls onto an array of expandable metal bending arrestment straps where it is abruptly stopped. This facility can produce a variety of deceleration pulses depending on the drop height, weight of the loaded cart and configuration of the arrestment straps. A maximum free fall velocity of 85 fps can be obtained imposing deceleration levels from 2 to 100 G's on test objects weighing up to 800 Ibs. The Vertical Drop Tower has been primarily used to test and evaluate crashworthy seating systems, restraints, energy absorbing devices and other equipment that may be exposed to a rapid deceleration environment. The Ejection TowerNertical Drop Tower facility is approximately 50 years old and has been relocated twice over its life span. It is inspected quarterly and annually for visible signs of deterioration and is maintained properly to ensure safe operation. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. UIC: NO0421 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of this facility complex follows: Cost of tower and bunker ($2M) for similar structure and ordnance propulsion but 80 feet tall.(Current tower is 150 feet tall). Cost of tower and bunker capable of supporting ejection seat qualification capability (30 G's) 120ft tall ($3M). Instrumentation and medical facilities (approx. $loOK). Manikins($300K), Cameras, illuminators, etc.($400K) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 183,666 Cube (cu ft): 26,085 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. No specid power requirements 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Tower will require a robust base capable of supporting the tower itself and other factors such as wind loading over the range of environmental conditions it is expected to encounter at its location. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Environmental needs are consistent with a laboratory facility. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated. Long lead time are expected on some components. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is associated with Functional Support Area 10.6.2, General Mission Support, Crew Equipment and Life Support, Aircraft. - M -.- -- . * , " =- .*-+ " --*,$$"--- r ' r v -4 ?*&-%A) UIC: NO0421 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past 5 Fiscal Years the tower has averaged 118 "Shots" per year. (Actual count FY-89 to FY-93: 81-218-86-144-60). 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Future utilization is expected to be between 80-130 shots per year until the facility transitions to Patuxent River in FY-96. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? Seven people including engineers, technicians and photographers are needed for unmanned shots. Human test shots requires 13 people. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Two people are used to service and maintain the mechanical equipment and electronic instrumentation. 15. Provide one 8 1/2 x 11 black and white photo of the facility/equipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIEStEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The Horizontal Accelerator is used for development, test and evaluation of Aircrew Lift Support Equipment, including crash resistant seats, ejection seats, clothing, helicopter seating, energy attenuation devices, restraints and other crashworthiness product lines. The facility produces acceleration profiles which duplicate the shock environment to which the crewman and his equipment are exposed. Its control system permits precise, repeatable testing of systems and components, under laboratory conditions. The accelerator produces essentially the same effect as a crash impact by simply reversing the orientation of the test article. NAWCAD Warminster influx Horizontal Accelerator The Horizontal Accelerator Facility consists of a pneumatically driven/hydraulically-controlled crash simulator, a 100-foot rail system, a control center, photographic high-intensity lighting and a data acquisition system. The facility contains a mechanical preparation area, test fixture storage room, electronic preparation areas and controlldata acquisition room. Currently, it is being utilized on a number of crew systems programs and is a vital "tool" used in the development process, As required by military specifications, it is also used for the verification and validation of equipment performance as part of their qualification before fleet introduction. It is a versatile facility capable of producing accelerations which simulate those produced during a crash or abrupt acceleration. Because of its versatility it is being used by other DOD agencies, Dept. of Transportation and private industry. 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement cost for foundation, rails, piston, accumulator, instrumentation is $3.6M. A building to house the facility not included in this cost. Manikins ($300K), Cameras ($250). UIC: NO0421 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 264,870 Cube (cu ft): 17,826 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirement. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). A substantial foundation is needed to provide a stable base capable of sustaining the loads placed on it by the operation of the accelerator. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facility/equipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment is adequate. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated but long lead times on some components are anticipated. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is associated with Functional Support Area 10.6.2, General Mission Support, Crew Equipment and Life Support, Aircraft. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The facility has conducted an average of 150 "shots" per year over the period FY-90 to FY-93. A "shot" is defined as one piston activation. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Until the planned transition in FY-96 it is expected that the utilization will be between 100-150 shots per year. UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Six people are required to operate the facility, including photographers. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Two people maintain the mechanical equipment and electronic instrumentation. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM Technical Center Site NAWCAD Warminster influx FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title Structural Test Facility Note: The Structural Test Facility is composed of a complex of five components: Test Floor Test Control Room Fatigue Laboratory Pump Room Test Machine Laboratory The above components of the facility are interrelated and should be considered as a single facility for purposes of workload and personnel analyses. 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. The Structural Test Facility performs structural tests, both static and fatigue, on aircraft structural specimens ranging in size and complexity from small coupons and structural elements through major subassemblies to full scale aircraft. Test loads are normally applied by electronically- programmed, servo-controlled, electro-hydraulic actuators that may be used singly or in several separately-programmed groups. The equipment to be moved includes four hydraulic pumps, three dust collectors, five drill presses, three hydraulic presses, seven power saws, two environmental chambers and miscellaneous other machine shop tools and supplies. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. The replacement value of the Structural Test Facility Complex is estimated to be between $3.5M and $5M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Test Flr Control Rm. Fatigue Lab. P u m ~ Rm. Machine Lab Gross weight (Ibs): 1,365,000 175,000 175,000 17,500 105,000 Cube (cu ft): 91,500 15,000 13,500 1,500 9,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Normal electrical requirements consistent with an industrial laboratory. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Special consideration is necessary for the layout of the units of this complex, and adequate floor loading.(e.g., pump room should not be adjacent to control room for acoustic isolation purposes, and control room should look out onto the test areas.) is required. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory requirements for this facility. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated but long lead time may be encountered. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports Functional Support Area 1.2, Platforms-Aircraft. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. The facility supports multiple sponsors at a funding level of approximately $ lM per year over the past five fiscal years. Approximately 8 work years of effort is supported. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. It is expected that until the transition in FY-96 this facility will require approximately 8 work years of effort. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Eight man years of effort are utilized in this complex. UIC: NO0421 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Approximately two work years of various skills are required to maintain this facility. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title This lead laboratory provides developmental testing of Naval Aircraft hydraulic components including pumps, filters, fittings and hoses a t pressures to 30,000 PSI and flow rates to 50 GPM. Environmental and functional tests are performed on aircraft hydraulic equipment including pressure surge, flexure fatigue, vibration and low and high temperature functioning. NAWCAD Warminster influx Hydraulics Research Lab - 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement cost of the facility is estimated to be $2.2M 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 200,000 Cube (cu ft): 8,100 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No special power requirements. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Floor loading must be taken into consideration when the facility is relocated and reinstalled. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment is adequate. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated but long lead times are anticipated. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is primarily associated with Functional Support Area 1.2, Platforms, Aircraft. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. A workload of 5 work years has been sustained over the past five fiscal years. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. A workload of 5 work years is expected to be required up until the facility is transitioned in FY-96. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Eight personnel operate the facility. Different mixes of people participate at various times for the equivalent 5 work years stated in items 11 and 12 above. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Four people, 2 engineers and 2 technicians, provide maintenance support on a part time basis. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - .. - - - -. - - . . - . . . -. .- . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . ., ,,:. .., >+;e"., -,.-.. "*..*. . . ' Y . -"I . . .* :ii . . - . . - UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The Code 60724 Machine Shop provides a wide range of machinery and equipment capable of producing high quality, close tolerance parts required to support research and development activities a t NAWCADWAR. The equipment to be moved includes 6 grinders, 12 lathes, an optical comparator, a metal disintegrator, 3 drill presses, 3 gear shapers, a honing machine, 2 band saws, a jig borer, 10 milling machines, a control projector, and miscellaneous smaller tools and material. This machine shop will be combined with the NAWCADWAR Code 60725 Machine Shop at Patuxent River. The equipment included in these two facilities will be installed in Building 104, rooms 16, 19, and 22 and Building 2186, room 112. - - - NAWCAD Warminster influx Code 60724 Machine Shop 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Replacement value of the equipment in this facility is $856,000. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (lbs): 350,000 Cube (cu ft): 19,500 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. Standard electrical requirements for a commercial machine shop. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). No special requirements except adequate floor loading for the machinery. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Standard machine shop environment is adequate. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This is a general purpose facility supporting all Function Support Areas in which the site is involved. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This machine shop is used to produce one of a kind parts and assemblies. Not all equipment is utilized all of the time. In order to complete the shop mission it is necessary to have all of the equipment available. Average utilization time over the past five years is Mills 60% and Lathes 25%. The remainder of the equipment is used approximately 15% of the time. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Until the transition of the facility FY-96 it is expected that the workload will be consistent with the utilization of the past five years as stated in item 11. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequiprnent? Eight people operate this facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The eight people in the facility do first level maintenance on the equipment. Repair contracts are used as needed to repair the equipment. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequiprnent. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The Code 60725 Machine Shop provides a wide range of machinery and equipment capable of producing high quality, close tolerance parts required to support research and development activities at NAWCADWAR. The equipment to be moved includes 16 lathes, 9 grinders, 22 milling machines, 7 drill presses, 3 band saws, 3 vertical shapers, 2 EDM machines, a jig borer, a cutter, a sander, a power hack saw and miscellaneous smaller tools and materials. This machine shop will be combined with the NAWCADWAR Code 60724 Machine Shop a t Patuxent River. The equipment included in these two facilities will be installed in Building 104, rooms 16, 19, and 22 and Building 2186, room 112. - NAWCAD Warminster influx Code 60725 Machine Shop 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Replacement value of this facility is $985,700. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 595,000 Cube (cu ft): 30,000 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. Standard electrical requirements for a commercial machine shop. 6. Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). No special requirements except adequate floor loading capability for the machinery. UIC: NO0421 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Standard machine shop environment is adequate. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated. 9. Indicate how and when the facility/equipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facility/equipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This is a general purpose facility supporting all Functional Support Areas in which the site is involved. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. This facility is used to produce prototype parts and assemblies. Not all equipment is used all of the time. In order to complete the shop mission it is necessary to have all of the equipment available. Average utilization rate over the past five years is Mills 60% and Lathes 25%. The remainder of the equipment is used approximately 15% of the time. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Until the transition of the facility in FY-96 it is expected that the workload will be consistent with the utilization of the past five years as stated in item 11. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Eight people operate this facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The eight people in the facility do first level maintenance on the equipment. Repair contracts are used as needed to repair the equipment in the facility. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM Technical Center Site NAWCAD Warminster influx Facilit y/Equipment Nomenclature or Title VH Facility (HIS-2) 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. The VH Facility (HIS-2) verifies and validates VH avionics hardware and software. Tasks supported include avionics integration, software development, and operational simulation. The equipment to be moved includes instrument racks, workbenches, computers and peripherals, crew stations, power supplies, test racks, and a full-scale mock-up helicopter. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3 . PrSvidE the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequiprnent - cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement cost of this facility is $S.SM. (SUN based equipment-$SOOK, Aircraft Hardware-$2M, AIS Development Cost $1M, SDS Development Cost $1M, Special Purpose Test Equipment $lM.) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 175,000 Cube (cu ft): 13,500 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. This facility requires electrical power normally associated with a complex laboratory environment. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Portions of the facility required raised deck to accommodate wiring associated with computers and complex electronic equipment. UIC: NO0421 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). This facility requires an environment normally associated with a complex electronic laboratory which includes computers. 8. Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated if lost but it would require a considerable effort and expense. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequiprnent was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility is associated with Functional Support Area 3.2, Combat System Integration-Air. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989- 1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five fiscal years the facility has been utilized an average of 64 hours per week, 50 weeks per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY1997. Projected utilization rate until the scheduled transition in FY-96 is expected to be similar to item 11. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Approximately 40 full time personnel operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Six full time personnel maintain the facility. A SUN based equipment service contract provides additional support on an on call basis. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 11 black and white photo of the facilitylequiprnent. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESIEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the Primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site Facility/Equipment Nomenclature or Title The Human Centrifuge located at the NAWCADWAR is the largest and most capable man-rated centrifuge in the world. It has a 50-foot arm, a 16,000 horsepower direct-drive motor, and is able to reach a maximum of 40 G's with a 1000 pound payload. Between 1.5 G and 15 G's, the centrifuge can produce an average g-onset rate of 10 Glsecond with an maximum instantaneous G-onset of 13 Glsecond. The crewstation for the centrifuge is enclosed in a 10-foot spherical gondola mounted in a high speed dual- gimbal system. The movable gimbal system enables multi-directional G forces (Gx, Gy, Gz) to be applied on the pilotlsubject and is responsive enough to permit closed-loop pilot control. This feature has enabled the development of a unique real-time sustained-G flight simulation capability known as the Dynamic Flight Simulator (DFS). NAWCAD WAR influx Human CentrifugeIDynamic Flight Simulator (DFS) The DFS consists of a full-scale aircraft cockpit with active instruments and controls which is mounted inside the centrifuge gondola along with a computer generated outside visual scene. The control system for the DFS incorporates a high fidelity 6 degree-of-freedom aircraft model which drives the cockpit instruments and displays as well as the centrifuge motion system. The DFS has been used successfully for manned testing of new crew equipment, advanced cockpit configurations, and to assess the performance of current and future high performance aircraft designs. The facility is a unique national asset which enables human performance testing in a realistic, high-G-flight environment, with the safety and repeatability of a ground-based laboratory. 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be immovable. A detachment of operator1 maintenance personnel will be retained at Warminter to support the facility. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility /equipment. Report the facility /equipment costs separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of the equipment: Centrifuge, computers, cockpits $50M Replacement value of the building only: $3M (10,000 sq. ft x $300/sq. ft.) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. NIA. Since this facility is not scheduled to move, no A&E estimate for moving gross weight (Ibs) or cubes (cu. ft.) was obtained. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequiprnent other than normal electrical power. The DFS requires a maximum of 20,000 amps, 600 VDC power. This power is generated by a dedicated powerhouse which draws electricity from the local power grid. A 13.8 KV transformer with substation supplies the powerhouse generators. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc. The DFS is anchored into bedrock at the Warminster site. Approximately 8,700 cu ft (1,253,000 pounds)of concrete form the foundation. The centrifuge chamber is completely shielded with copper plates. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e. temperature, humidity, air scrubbings). The facility requires an independent, redundant environmental control system separate from the building HVAC for the computer room and control center. 8. Indicate if this facility would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. The DFS at Warminster, PA, is a national asset. It has been in operation for 40 years and still has no equal in the world. The DFS out performs all other centrifuge devices, such as the Dynamic Environment Simulator (DES) a t Wright-Patterson, AFB and the centrifuges at Brooks AFB, Holloman AFB and NAS LeMoore as well as those in other countries. All these centrifuges are acceleration application devices, and none are capable of the high G-onset rate (10-15 Glsec) and multi-axis G capability so significant in evaluating pilot performance in FIA-18, F-14, F-15, F-16, F- 22, or future generations of military and civilian aircraft. The DFS is the only flight simulator in the world capable of duplicating the flight dynamics and flying qualities of the aforementioned aircraft and realistically imparting the cockpit dynamics of Navy X-31, NASA FIA-18 HARV and other high angle of attack or thrust vectored aircraft. The DFS should be considered as a valued adjunct to the ACETEF (Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility) at NAWCADPAX. UIC: NO0421 9. Indicate how and when the facility /equipment was transported and or constructed at this site. Construction begain at the Warminster site in 1946 and was completed in 1950. The DFS underwent major upgrades in 1960-62 (new arm, gondola, analog computer control) and 1980-84 (visual display, F-14 cockpit, digital computer control) 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Acceleration Research, human performance/medical evaluations, G- Tolerance Improvement training for TACAIR aircrewmen, crew systems RDT&E, out-of-control flightlspin simulation, thrust vectored aircraft simulation, full environment mission simulation. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five years fiscal years (1989- 1993) define the unit of measure used. Historical utilization is 67% of available days. Remaining 33% of time is used for maintenance, repairs and upgrades. (Assumes - 260 days available per year.) 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Utilization should remain constant through 1997. New programs anticipated: Female Pilot accommodation, Cockpit Performance Metrics, Full Mission Environment Simulation. 1 3. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facility/equipment? BRAC 91 identified a requirement of 30 people (including medical support) to operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of people needed to maintain the equipment.? 10 people are needed to maintain machinery, computers and software. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. Attached. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title The Structure 367 Full Scale Aircraft Facility permits mounting aircraft either right side up or upside down, in an electromagnetic free space environment. The facility consists of an aircraft tower/control building that supports the aircraft 40 feet above ground on an azimuth over elevation positioner. A mobile RF source tower can be positioned and operated from any one of three locations 5001, 833', or 1280' distant. In addition there is a mobile van, with power that allows signal generation a t almost any azimuth, tower/control building that houses pedestal control equipment, RF receivers, computers, and equipment peculiar to the tests in progress - such as Direction Finding systems, adaptive nulling processors, radar warning receive^, etc. There are currently three full scale aircraft that have been prepared @tripped of non-essential componentslweight) for the range; the FIA-18, EA-6A, and A-7. The EA-6A can also be reconfigured as an EA- 6B. In addition an F-14 awaits restoration. There are various stores available for each aircraft. Major programs supported in the last three years include ALR-67 (F-18), ALQ-99 (EA-6B), ALQ-149 (EA-6B), ALQ- 1261165 (F-IS), ALQ-162 (F-18 Plyon), WALLEYE (A-6E). NAWCAD Warminster influx Aircraft Test Tower (Bldg 367) 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. This facility is considered to be movable. 3 . Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequipment. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. Replacement value of this facility is estimated at $ISM. Modifications to A/C (F-14, A-6, EA-6B, F-18) $1.6M. (Assumes A/C are acquired free) 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. The following estimates were made by an A&E firm for the move to PAX River: Gross weight (Ibs): 138,550 Cube (cu ft): 7,898 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. No extraordinary power requirements needed. UIC: NO0421 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). Location of the facility should be isolated from high power RF sources. 7. State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). Normal laboratory environment required. 8 . Indicate if this facilitylequiprnent would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. This facility could be replicated but some of the components may require long lead times. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. This facility is scheduled to move to PAX River in 1996 under BRAC 91. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. This facility supports Functional Support Areas 1.2, Platforms-Aircraft, 3.2, Combat Systems Integration-Air, and 5.2, Sensors and Surv. Syst.- RADAR sys. 1 1. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Over the past five Fiscal Years the facility has been used 180 days of operations and 50 days of maintenance, change over, and calibration. 1 2. Provide the projected utilization data out to FY 1997. Schedule is expected to remain the same until the transition in FY-96. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Three people operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? Five part time personnel maintain the facility. Crane contracted for change over of AIC @ $7Wchange. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. - . . - - - - - - . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIESJEQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM - - - I . State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title Under the BRAC '91 realignment of NAWCAD Warminster with NAWCAD Patuxent River, 20,000 sq.ft. of Special Access Program Space is being constructed. These spaces, which are all on raised deck, are split between the South Technology Complex (15,500 sq. ft.) and the North Technology Complex (4,500 sq.ft.). NAWCAD WAR influx Special Access Program Spaces 2. Indicate whether the facilitylequipment is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. No further information is available for questions 2 through 15. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facility/equipment. Report the facility/equipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequipment. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequipment. 5 . Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facilitylequipment other than normal electrical power. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequiprnent (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequipment were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequipment support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to N 1997. UIC: NO0421 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. UIC: NO0421 SPECIAL FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY FORM NOTE: This facility is being constructed at Patuxent River, MD as a result of the BRAC- 93 closure of NAWC AD Trenton and the transfer of its test facilities. (Reference MILCON P-953T) NO PHOTO AVAILABLE. Technical Center Site FacilityIEquipment Nomenclature or Title 1. State the primary purpose(s) of the facilitylequipment. NAWCAD TRENTON Propulsion System Evaluation Facility The Propulsion System Evaluation Facility is to perform research, development, test and evaluation of aircraft propulsion systems and their components and accessories. 2 . Indicate whether the facilitylequiprnent is portable, moveable or fixed as defined by paragraph 6, page 12 of this data call. The facility and its associated equipment is FIXED. 3. Provide the replacement value of the facilitylequiprnent. Report the facilitylequipment cost separate from any building and utilities that may be integral to the facilitylequiprnent. Construction cost to build the facility at Patuxent River is estimated to be $25,750,000. Replacement cost of test equipment is estimated to exceed $25,000,000. 4. Provide the gross weight and cube of the facilitylequiprnent. Gross Weight Estimate = 560 tons. Volume Estimate = 400,000 cubic feet. 5. Indicate any "special" utility support required by this facility/equipment other than normal electrical power. Requires industrial waterlcooling tower system, liquid air tank and support systems, fuel storage and delivery systems, and an 10,000 KVA electrical sub-station and distribution system. 6 . Indicate any special budget requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., special foundations, non-ferrous materials, shielding, hardening, etc.). None. 7 . State any environmental control requirements for the facilitylequipment (i.e., temperature, humidity, air scrubbing). None. UIC: NO0421 8. Indicate if this facilitylequipment would be extremely difficult or impossible to replicate or relocate at another site and the impact to the Department of the Navy if this facilitylequiprnent were lost. Consider existing Government-wide and commercial capabilities as the replication and impact statements are formulated. Facility is being relocated from Trenton, NJ to Patuxent River, MD as a result of BRAC-93. 9. Indicate how and when the facilitylequipment was transported and or constructed at the site. Facility is being constructed at Patuxent River, MD under project P-953T. 10. List the functional support areas (previously provided in Tab A) that this facilitylequiprnent support. Refer to Appendix A for the list of functional support areas. Functional Support Area: 1.2 Platforms: Aircraft 11. Provide the historical utilization average for the past five fiscal years (1989-1993). Define the unit of measure used. Average Utilization (1989-1993) = 48% i Calculation : 27 Test Facilities, each can operate a maximum of 12 hrslday, 5 dayslweek for a total of 84,240 hrs. Actual average usage is 40,425 test hours per year. 12. Provide the projected utilization data out to EY 1997. Budget projections indicate a continued facility usage at historical average rates. 13. What is the approximate number of personnel used to operate the facilitylequipment? Approximately 120 people are required to operate the facility. 14. What is the approximate number of personnel needed to maintain the equipment? The equipment is maintained by the operators as depicted in question 13. 15. Provide one 8 112 x 1 1 black and white photo of the facilitylequipment. Construction of this facility a t Pax River will combine a number of independent facilities and equipment currently at Trenton. Therefore, no composite photos are currently available. TAB C RANGE RESOURCES RANGE CAPABILITY FORM - - - - . - . . - - - . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . UIC: NO0421 RANGE RESOURCES RANGE CAPABILITY FORM 1 . List all the ranges that your activity maintains and operates. Provide the following information on each range: Technical Center Site Range Nomenclature or Title a. A brief statement of what the range is used for. NAWCAD PAX . Chesapeake Test Range Test range facilities located in Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean operating areas provide aircraft tracking, data acquisition & relay, range surveillance, targets and communication/contro1 of multiple aircraft test events. An integrated network of phototheodolites, laser,, and radar trackers along the western Chesapeake shore are linked to computation and control facilities at FTEG. A microwave data link with NASA Wallops Island facilities permits utilization of NASA precision radar's in Atlantic operating areas and relay of telemetry to FTEG. Multi-object trilateration tracking permits multiple airlsurface test vehicles with time space position information to plus/minus 3 ft. Special purpose instrumentation includes ' radar's for EW system stimulation, videographic and photographic instrumentation, and mobile instrumentation for shipboard tests of aircraft. Airlsurface seaborne targets, short range missile fire areas, direct fire areas, and sonobuoy droplrecovery areas are integrated with range facilities. Range tracking and target data are integrated in the range computation and control center which then provides real-time processed space position, EW data link, and meterological data to the Real-time Telemetry Processing System for correlation with aircraft telemetry data. Frequency coordination is managed for the Mid-Atlantic Area. This includes coordination/scheduling of frequency assignments for EW test operations and shared radio frequency usage in the 3MHz to 18GHz spectrum. Major testing capabilities include surface targets, aerial targets, subsonic and supersonic air space, and ocean operating areas to support a wide variety of aircraft weapon systems testing. Major test functions include flying qualities and performance, weapon separation and delivery system performance, aircraft and mission system performance, aircraft propulsion system flight tests, aircraft carrier suitability and ship dynamic interface testing. b . Geographic location of the range. The Chesapeake Test Range Headquarters is located on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay about sixty miles southeast of Washington, DC. c. Distance from the range to the activity's headquarters facility (main site). Headquarters facility is located within the range. d. Range size in square miles. UIC: NO0421 Approximately 50,000 square miles. e. Scheduling authority. Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, f . Air space available/restrictions. Airspace is available 24 hours a day. Alt restrictions are as follows: R4005 Surface to FL85O R4006 3500' to FL850 R4007A Surface up to but not including 5000" R4007B 5000' to 17,000' g . Maximum water depth available/restrictions. Approximately 90' h . Instrumentation capability. CTR operates 5 "I1'-band and 4 "C1'-band radar's, including one Multiple-Target Instrumentation Radar which can track up to 16 aircraft. All of these radar's are located at CTR and provide complete tracking ' coverage of the range. Two mobile Automatic Laser Tracking Systems (ALTS) are used by CTR for precision aircraft tracking. Five cinetheodolite stations are spaced along the western boundary of the range to provide film, video and digital time-space-position information (TSPI), especially for weapons delivery accuracy and air-launched ballistics tests. High-speed film and video tracking mounts are co-located with three cinetheodolite stations to provide visual documentation of weapons separations. The Mid-Atlantic Tracking System (MATS) is a multiple- target tracking system integrated with the Global Positioning System (GPS), providing additional tracking coverage for air and surface platforms. Telemetry (TM) data from project aircraft of test items is received by the Real-Time Telemetry Processing System (RTPS), which is co-located with CTR. Target support services are available within the operating area for weapons system evaluations. i. Accuracy of tracking. Typical CTR radar accuracy's vary from .1 to .5 milliradians in azimuth and elevation and from 2 to 10 yards in range, depending on the radar(s) assigned. The ALTS provide absolute accuracy's of .1 milliradian in azimuth and elevation at all tracking ranges and plus or minus 1 to 3 feet in range accuracy, depending on the cinetheodolite accuracy is 10 to 15 feet in position, but post-flight film processing improves the position accuracy to 2 to 3 feet. MATS provides position tracking accuracy's to 12 feet in x and y and 15 feet in z. UIC: NO0421 j . Data collectiodreplay capability. All tracking data is collected, displayed and recorded in real-time in the CTR control room. TM data is received, monitored and recorded in real time a t RTPS. All data can be replayed for post-mission analysis. k. What are the maximum hours per year that this range is available to support activities? Provide the actual hours that the range was up and capable of providing services. Do not count "down time" due to maintenance, reconfiguration, or administrative activities (i.e., Holiday shutdowns). 8,760 hours (365 days x 24 hours) 1. What were the actual hours this range was utilized per year for the last five years (FYs 1989- 1993)? FY89 Not Available FY90 3,703 Hours FY91 3,599 Hours FY92 3,781 Hours FY93 3,377 Hours m. What were the actual hours that this range was utilized in FY1993? 3,377 Hours n. Who are the customers of the range? Naval Air Warfare Center - AD Fighter Wings Attack Wings Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadrons Marine Air Reserve Training Squadrons Air Test and Evaluation Squadrons Maryland Air National Guard Naval Research Laboratory National Aeronautics and Space Administration McDonnell Douglas Grumman Aerospace Westinghouse Corporation o. Of the actual hours utilized what percentage of utilization time was provided to which customers? Not Available. p. Provide a sketch, drawing or map of the range. 2. Are any of your ranges part of the DoD Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB)? (yesfno) If yes, which ones? Yes: NAWCAD Patuxent River, formerly Naval Air Test Center NAWCAD Trenton, formerly Naval Air Propulsion Center UIC: NO0421 3 . Are there any limiting (current or future) environmental and/or encroachment characteristics that are associated with this range. N 0 . UIC: NO0421 RANGE RESOURCES RANGE CAPABILITY FORM 11 or Title 1 Bombardment and Bombing Range 11 Technical Center Site Range Nomenclature 1 . List all the ranges that your activity maintains and operates. Provide the following information on each range: NAWCAD PAX . Bloodsworth Island Shore a. A brief statement of what the range is used for. Shore bombardment training of gunfire support ships, air-to- ground firing and bombing exercises. b . Geographic location of the range. Bloodsworth Island Shore Bombardment and Bombing Range is located in the Chesapeake Bay within the State of Maryland. c . Distance from the range to the activity's headquarters facility (main site). d. Range size in square miles. 35 square miles e. Scheduling authority. NAS Patuxent River f. Air space available/restrictions. Airspace is contained within R4002, Surface to 20,000 ft. The range is open Monday through Saturday from 0700 to 2200 and 1200 to 2200 on Sundays (local time). During daylight savings time, the range will be available from 0700 to 2300 (local). If circumstances require additional time, extension of range time may be granted on an individual basis. The range is closed from mid-October to early-February annually in consonance with the migratory water fowl season and Maryland State water fowl hunting season. g . Maximum water depth available/restrictions. Maximum water depth is 33 feet. All projectiles, bombs, and rockets will be fired to impact on either Bloodsworth or Pone Island. /&y- UIC: NO0421 h. Instrumentation capability. Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) operates 5 "1"-band and 4 "C"- band radar's, including one Multiple-Target Instrumentation Radar which can track up to 16 aircraft. All radar's provide p,recision tracking coverage of R4002 and Bloodsworth Island. Mid-Atlantic Tracking System (MATS), is a multiple target tracking system, which is fully integrated with the Global Positioning System (GPS). The system can process tracking data on over 200 GPS equipped vehicles, including aircraft and surface vessels, and can provide attitude data on selected targets. A mobile Automatic Laser Tracking System (ALTS) can be positioned on the northern boundary of R4002 to collect data and provide video coverage of test activity on Bloodsworth Island. CTR has a mobile tracking mount which can be moved to the Bloodsworth Island area to provide high-speed film and video documentation. If the project aircraft or test item is telemetry equipped, the telemetry data can be received. and displayed by the Real-Time Telemetry Processing System (RTPS). For weapons system evaluations, a variety of fabricated targets can be deployed on the island by CTR Target Support personnel. i. Accuracy of tracking. Typical CTR radar accuracy's vary from .1 to .5 milliradians in azimuth and elevation and from 2 to 10 yards in range, depending on the ? radar(s) assigned. The ALTS provide absolute accuracy's of .I milliradian in azimuth and elevation at all tracking ranges and plus or minus 1 to 3 feet in range accuracy, depending on the distance between tracker and target. When deployed to the Bloodsworth Island area, the ALTS provides an absolute accuracy of .1 milliradian in azimuth and elevation and plus or minus 1 foot in range. MATS provides position tracking accuracy's to 12 feet in x and y and 15 feet in z. j . Data collection/replay capability. All tracking data from test activity in R4002 and Bloodsworth Island, is collected, displayed and recorded in real-time in the CTR control room. TM data is received, monitored and recorded in real time at RTPS. All data can be replayed for post-mission analysis. k. What are the maximum hours per year that this range is available to support activities? Provide the actual hours that the range was up and capable of providing services. Do not count "down time" due to maintenance, reconfiguration, or administrative activities (i.e., Holiday shutdowns). Hours available: FY92 - 3,641 FY93 - 3,734 1. What were the actual hours this range was utilized per year for the last five years (FYs 1989-1993)? Hours utilized: FY92 - 239 FY93 - 166 Data not available before FY92 - Range transferred from NAVPHIB SCOL Little Creek to NAS Patuxent River in FY92. UIC: NO042 1 h . Instrumentation capability. Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) operates 5 "IW-band and 4 "C"- band radar's, including one Multiple-Target Instrumentation Radar which can track up to 16 aircraft. All ra of R4002 and Bloodsworth Island. is a multiple target tracking system, which is fully in Global Positioning System (GPS). The system can pro on over 200 GPS equipped vehicles, including aircraft and can provide attitude data on selected targets. A Tracking System (ALTS) can be positi ern boundary of R4002 to collect data and provide Bloodsworth Island. CTR has a mobile moved to the Bloodsworth Island a r documentation. If the project aircra the telemetry data can be recei Telemetry Processing System (RTP variety of fabricated targets can be Support personnel. i . Accuracy of tracking. / Typical CTR vary from .1 to .5 milliradians in azimuth and 10 yards in range, depending on the ' and target. the ALTS provides an elevation and plus or accuracy's to 12 j . Data collectiod$dplay capability. from test activity in R4002 and Bloodsworth Island, and recorded in real-time in the CTR control room. and recorded in real time at RTPS. All data the maximum hours per year that this range is available to support actual hours that the range was up and capable of providing "down time" due to maintenance, reconfiguration, or administrative ~ o l j ( s available: FY92 - 3,641 FY93 - 3,734 d What were the actual hours this range was utilized per year for the last five years Ys 1989-1993)? / Hours utilized: FY92 - 239 FY93 - 216 Data not available before FY92 - Range transferred from NAVPHIB SCOL Little Creek to NAS Patuxent River in FY92. UIC: NO0421 m. What were the actual hours that this range was utilized in FY 1993? 2 1 6 n. Who are the customers of the range? Navy: NAWCAD; SPECBOATU 24; SDV TEAM 2; LFTLANT; VF-14 Air National Guard CHESNAVFACENGCOM o . Of the actual hours utilized what percentage of utilization time was provided to which customers? Navy = 25% Air National Guard = 72% CHESNAVFACENGCOM = 3# p. Provide a sketch, drawing or map of the range. 2. Are any of your ranges part of the DoD Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB)? (yeslno) If yes, which ones? Yes: NAWCAD Patuxent River, formerly Naval Air Test Center NAWCAD Trenton, formerly Naval Air Propulsion Center 3. Are there any limiting (current or future) environmental and/or encroachment characteristics that are associated with this range. Docuillellt Separator D a t a C a l l #5 , T a b C , P a g e 7 A u d i t C h a n g e P a x River I c e m e rhat the lntbrmation conwea herem IS accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and bel~ef. NEST ECHELON LEVEL ( ~ f applicable) W. E. NEWMAN, RADM, USN NAME (Please type or pmt) COMMANDER Title Date ' ' / NAVAL A I R WARFARE CENTER .Acuvlty I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of mv knowledse and belief. NEXT ECI-ELON LEVEL (if applicable) NAME (Please type or pnnt) Signature Title Date I ce- that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the bm of my howledge and belief. .- MAJOR CLAIMANT LEWL d W . C. BOWES, VADM, USN - NAME (Please type or pnnt) COMMANDER Title si"jd~w Date NAVAL A I R SYSTEMS COMMAND Activity I amty that th W o n contained herein is aawUe and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF ONS & LOGISTICS) ?u- .L !k~d+Ld //J NAME (Please type or print) A Z5il.l Title Date BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION Audit Change Data Call Five, Tab C, Page 7 Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 8 December 1993 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief . " The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or ( 2 ) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COMMANDER A CAPTAIN JOHN B. PATTERSON - NAME (Please type or print) Title Date ' NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION Document Separatol* DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Activity Identification: Please complete the following table, identifying the activity for which this response is being submitted. General Instructions/Background: Activity Name: UIC: Major Claimant: Information requested in this data call is required for use by the Base Structure Evaluation Committee (BSEC), in concert with information from other data calls, to analyze both the impact that potential closure or realignment actions would have on a local community and the impact that relocations of personnel would have on communities surrounding receiving activities. In addition to Cost of Base Realignment Actions (COBRA) analyses which incorporate standard Department of the Navy (DON) average cost factors, the BSEC will also be conducting more sophisticated economic and community infrastructure analyses requiring more precise, activity-specific data. For example, activity-specific salary rates are required to reflect d i f v y costs for activities with large concentrations of scientists a n u l e e r s and to address geographic differencec i s g r a d e salary rates. Questions relating to "Community Infrastructure" are required to assist the BSEC in evaluating the ability of a community to absorb additional employees and functions as the result of relocation from a closing or realigning DON activity. NAVAIRWARCENACDIV PATUXENT RIVER NO0421 Naval Air Systems Command Due to the varied nature of potential sources which could be used to respond to the questions contained in this data call, a block appears after each question, requesting the identification of the source of data used to respond to the question. To complete this block, identify the source of the data provided, including the appropriate references for source documents, names and organizational titles of individuals providing information, etc. Completion of this "Source of Data" block is critical since some of the information requested may be available from a non-DoD source such as a published document from the local chamber of commerce, school board, etc. Certification of data obtained from a non-DoD source is then limited to certifying that the information contained in the data call response is an accurate and complete representation of the information obtained from the source. Records must be retained by the certifying official to clearly document the source of any non-DoD information submitted for this data call. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 1 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA General Instructions/Background (Continued): The following notes are provided to further define terms and methodologies used in this data call. Please ensure that responses consistently follow this guidance: Note 1: Throughout this data call, the term "activity" is used to refer to the DON installation that is the addressee for the data call. Note 2: Periodically throughout this data call, questions will include the statement that the response should refer to the "area defined in response to question l.b., (page 3)". Recognizing that in some large metropolitan areas employee residences may be scattered among many counties or states, the scope of the "area defined1' may be limited to the sum of: - those counties that contain government (DoD) housing units (as identified in l.b.2)), and, - those counties closest to the activity which, in the aggregate, include the residences of 80% or more of the activity's employees. Note 3: Responses to questions referring to "civilians" in this data call should reflect federal civil service appropriated fund employees. 1. Workforce Data a . Average Federal Civilian Salary Rate. Provide the projected FY 1996 average gross annual appropriated fund civil service salary rate for the activity identified as the addressee in this data call. This rate should include all cash payments to employees, and exclude non-cash personnel benefits such as employer retirement contributions, payments to former employees, etc. Based on Amendment One to DC #65, those activities scheduled to move because of previous BRAC decisions were requested to base l a on current workforce. NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER NAWCAD TRENTON NAWCAD WARMINSTER (Less the Dynamic Flight Simulator) ( Average Appropriated Fund Civilian Salary Rate: 1 48,407 11 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 2 - DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE OFFICE, UIC: 68626 Avenge Appropriated Fund Civilian Salary Rate: 1 60,422 1 .- NAVAL AVIATION DEPOT OPERATIONS CENTER, UIC: 68560 Average Appropriated Fund Civilian Salary Rate: 1 50,155.55 1 Note: In addition to appropriated funding, a portion of the NADOC is under reimbursable funding. That avenge is $50,205.13. Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (NAMO) and Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (NADOC) are EOB activities. ( DCPDS, NISE EAST; 199611997 NAVCOMPT BUDGET, NAMO AND NADOC I UIC: NO0421 FOR OFF'ICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 3 - DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRAWRUCI"l'RlJCRE DATA b. Location of Residence. Complete the following table to identfi where employees live. Data should reflect current workforce. 1) Residency Table. IdentQ residency data, by county, for both military and civilian (civil service) employees working at the installation (including, for example, operational units that are homeported or stationed at the installation). For each county listed, also provide the estimated average distance fiom the activity, in miles, of employee residences and the estimated average length of time to commute one-way to work. For the purposes of displaying data in the table, any county(s) in which 1% or fewer of the activity's employees reside may be consolidated as a single line entry in the table, titled "Other". NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) County of State No. of Employees P-mF Average *=age Residence Residing in of Distance Dura th county Total From d E ~ P ~ v Base Commute I (Mila) (Mirmtes) I I I I I Military C-- I I I I I I I St. Mary's I M D ( 2155 I 2294 I 79.6 I 15.5 I 20 County I Other '474 289 13.7 NIA I NIA NOTE: Civilian Totah direr from totab in Tables d, e, f, and g because the NCPDS Data System does not retain historical a d d m information. The as of date for the other Tables is 31 Mar 94. I Source of DCPDS Geographic Bachdon (military members assigned to Pax River, but have elected to maintain their midence of record at another location). UIC: NO0421 FOR 0FE"ICIAL USE ONLY PREDECLTIONAL rn0RMA'nON 4 - DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Patuxent River Current Workforce with BRAC 91 and 93 realignments (Includes BRAC Influx from Trenton and Warminster. NISE EAST is based on Current Workforce) NOTE: Civilian Total differs from Totals in Tables d, e, f, and g, due to Amendment One to Data Call #65 which states that cumnt workforce be used if planned move is less than fifty miles. Therefore, cumnt data was used for NISE East. If planned move is further than 50 miles, assume that the planned BRAC move has taken place. BRAC 91 and BRAC 93 influx was used for NAWCAD Trenton and Warminster. NAVMR Influx not included * Note: Assumed that these personnd will relocate to the listed counties in the same proportions as our current personnel. Swrce of Dat.: DCPDS 1 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 5 = loo?? Percentage of Total EmployeCS 5.5 1.2 . 79.6 13.7 Average Distana From Base (Miles) 21 39 153 NIA County of Residence Calvert cmty Chules County St. Mary's County *Other Average Duration d Co- Wm-) 30 45 20 NIA State MD MD MD No. of Employees Residing in county Military 163 35 2,352 405 Civilian 282 i 62 44m 702 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NOTE: OTHER MAJOR TENANTS ARE NOT LISTED HERE DUE TO BEING REPORTED BY THEIR MAJOR CLAIMANT. NAMO IS A MAJOR TENANT LOCATED ON THE PATUXENT RIVER BASE AND IS INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMISSION BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT ON DISTRIBUTION FOR THIS DATA CALL AND TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE ECONOMIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACT OF THE ENTIRE BASE ON THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 6 NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE OFFICE (NAMO), UIC: 68526 (based on current workforce) County of Residence State No. of Employees Residing in County Military Civilian Percentage of Total Employees Calvert County Charles County St. Mary's County Other Average Distance From Base (Miles) MD MD MD FL Average Duration of Commute (Minutes) 6 0 115 0 14 4 121 1 7.7 1.5 90.4 . 4 2 1 39 15.5 N/A 30 4 5 2 0 N/ A - DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NADOC IS A MAJOR TENANT LOCATED ON THE PATUXENT RIVER BASE AND IS INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMISSION ONLY TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE ECONOMIC AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACT OF THE ENTIRE BASE ON THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES. NAVAL AVIATION DEPOT OPERATIONS CENTER (NADOC). UIC: 68520 r , (based on current workforce) County of State No. of Employees Percentage Average Average Residence Residing in of Distance Duration County Total From of Employees Base Commute (Miles) (Minutes) Military Civilian Calvert MD 0 1 5 5 2 1 30 Charles MD 0 6 2 39 4 5 County St. Mary's MD 24 257 9 1 15.5 2 0 County Other MD 1 5 2 N/ A N/ A = 100% UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 7 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA As discussed in Note 2.on Page 2, subsequent questions in the data call refer to the "area defined in response to question l.b., (page 3)". In responding to these questions, the scope of the "area defined" may be limited to the sum of: a) those counties that contain government (DoD) housing units (as identified below), and, b) those counties closest to the activity which, in the aggregate, include the residences of 80% or more of the activity's employees. 2 ) Location of Government (DoD) Housing. If some employees of the base live in government housing, identify the county(s) where government housing is located: St. Mary's County, MD Calvert County, MD Source of Data (1.b. 1) & 2) Residence Data): Personnel Support Detachment (PSD) Source Data System; Navy Civilian Personnel Data System (NCPDS); and Rand McNally Road Atlas, 67th Edition. c . Nearest Metropolitan Area(s). Identify all major metropolitan area(s) (i.e., population concentrations of 100,000 or more people) which are within 50 miles of the installation. If no major metropolitan area is within 50 miles of the base, then identify the nearest major metropolitan area(s) (100,000 or more people) and its distance(s) from the base. Source of Data (1.c. Metro Areas): Official Table of Distance 11-1-87; HRO Travel Office; and Rand McNally Bus Travel Road Atlas 1993. City Washington, D.C. Baltimore, MD Richmond, VA UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 8 County District of Columbia Baltimore Richmond Distance from base (miles) 6 7 7 9 111 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA d . Age of Civilian Workforce. Complete the following table, identifying the age of the activity's civil service workforce. NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) II I I 65 or Older 7 0.2 % Age Category 16 - 19 year^ 20 - 24 Years 35 - 44 Years 45 - 54 Years 55 - 64 Years TOTAL 2,852 -1 100 % NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCAD TRENTON AND NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES (BASED ON CURRENT WORKFORCE AS REQUESTED IN AMENDMENT ONE TO DC65.) Number of Employees 0 10 7 864 694 183 N A ~ A I R IS NOT INCLUDED - Percentage of Employees 0% 3.8% 30.2 % 24.30 % 6.40% UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 9 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) Age Category Number of Employees Percentage of Employees 16 - 19 Years 0 0% 20 - 24 Years 2 1.4% 25 - 34 Years 2 2 15.7% 35 - 44 Years 3 3 23.6% 45 - 54 Years 6 2 44.3 % 55 - 64 year^ 2 0 14.3 % 65 or Older 1 0.7% TOTAL 140 100 % I I I I Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) I Age Category I Number of Employees I Percentage of Employees II I I 35 - 44 Years 9 2 32.5 % 45 - 54 Years 109 38.5 % UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 10 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA e . Education. Level of Civilian Workforce 1 ) Education Level Table. Complete the following table, identifying the education level of the activity's civil service workforce. NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) I Last School Year Number of Employees I Percentage of Employies I 8th Grade or less 4 0.2 I 1 9th through 1 1 th Grade I I 43 1.5% 12th Grade or High School 1,190 41.7% Equivalency I I 1-3 Years of College 360 12.6% I I 4 Years of College (Bachelors 1,023 35.9% Df%r=) 5 or More Years of College 232 8.1% (Graduate Work) TOTAL 2,852 100 % I UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 1 1 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCAD TRENTON, NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES (BASED ON CURRENT WORKFORCE NAVAIR IS NOT INCLUDED II Last School Year ComDleted I Number of Employees I Percentage of Employees 11 8th Grade or less 13 0.2 9th through 1 1 th Grade 7 3 1.3 12th Grade or High School 2062 36.8 Equivalency 1-3 Years of College 549 9.8 4 Years of College (Bachelors 1919 34.2 Jh?ree) 5 or More Years of College 993 17.7 (Graduate Work) UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 12 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) I I 9th through 1 1 th Grade I 0 I 0% Last School Year Qmpk&l I 8th Grade or less I I 1-3 Years of College I 2 8 I 20.0% Number of Employees 0 I 0% 12th Grade or High School Equivalency Percentage of Employees 5 6 4 Years of College (Bachelors D%=) I I TOTAL I 140 1 100 % 40 % 5 or More Years of College (Graduate Work) 4 1 8th Grade or less I 0 I 0% 29.3 % 15 Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) 10.7% Last School Year I Number of Employees Percentage of Employees 9th through 1 1 th Grade I I 1-3 Years of College I 5 5 I 19.4 % 12th Grade or High School Equivalency A 2 0.7 % 12 1 4 Years of College (Bachelors Degree) 42.8% 5 or More Years of College (Graduate Work) UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFlCIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 13 77 TOTAL 27.2 % 2 8 9.9% 283 100 % DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 2 ) Degrees Achieved. Complete the following table for the activity's civil service workforce. Identify the number of employees with each of the following degrees, etc. To avoid double counting, only identify the highest degree obtained by a worker (e.g., if an employee has both a Master's Degree and a Doctorate, only include the employee under the category "Doctorate"). NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) I Degree I Number of Civilian Employees 11 I Bachelor Degree I 1,013 H Terminal Occupation Program - Certificate of Completion, Diploma or Equivalent (for areas such as technicians, craftsmen, artisans, skilled operators, etc.) Associate Degree I Masters Degree I 227 I1 61 96 I Doctorate I 8 NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCAD TRENTON AND NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES (BASED ON CURRENT WORKFORCE) NAVAIR IS NOT INCLUDED Degree I Number of Civilian Employees R Terminal Occupation Program - Certificate of Completion, Diploma or Equivalent (for areas such as technicians, craftsmen, artisans, skilled operators, I Bachelor Degree I 2065 114 etc.) Associate Degree 148 I Doctorate I 8 6 R Masters Degree UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 14 74 1 I DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) 11 Degree I Number of Civilian Employees 11 Terminal Occupation Program - Certificate of 0 Completion, Diploma or Equivalent (for areas such as technicians, craftsmen, artisans, skilled operators, etc.) A I Associate Degree I 1 1 Bachelor Degree 39 I I I Masters Degree I 1 3 I Doctorate I 2 H Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) b[ Number of Civilian Employees Terminal Occupation Program - Certificate of 5 Completion, Diploma or Equivalent (for areas such I )I as technicians, craftsmen, artisans, skilled operators, 1 11 etc.) Associate Degree 2 1 It Bachelor Degree I 7 5 R I - Masters Degree 27 I II Doctorate I 1 I I(Source of Data (1.e.l) and 2) Education Level Data): Defense Civilian Personnel ata all UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 15 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA f . "industry" this table Civilian Employment By Industry. Complete the following table to identify by the type of work performed by civil service employees at the activity. The intent of is to attempt to stratify the activity civilian workforce using the same categories of industries used to identify private sector employment. Employees should be categorized based on their primary duties. Additional information on categorization of private sector employment by industry can be found in the Office of Management and Budget Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Manual. However, you do not need to obtain a copy of this publication to provide the data requested in this table. Note the following s~ecific midance regarding the "Industrv Tvpe" codes in the first column of the table: Even though categories listed may not perfectly match the type of work performed by civilian employees, please attempt to assign each civilian employee to one of the "Industry Types" identified in the table. However, only use the Category 6, "Public Administration" sub-categories when none of the other categories apply. Retain s u ~ ~ o r t i n ~ data used to construct this table at the activitv-level. in case auestions arise or additional information is reauired at some future time. Leave shaded areas blank. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 16 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) I 1 Industry I SIC I No. of I % of I1 I I Civilians I Civilians I 1. Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing 01-09 2 < 1 I 2. Construction (includes facility maintenance and 15-17 1 7 < 1 level maintenance 11 ammo, etc.) I I I II I I I 3b. Aircraft (includes engines and missiles) 1 3721 et I 3 0 1 a1 3c. Ships 373 1 0 0 . 3d. Other Transportation (includes ground various 2 < 1 vehicles) 3e. Other Manufacturing not included in 3a. various 2 2 < 1 through 3d. Sub-Total 3a. through 3e. 20-39 7 4 3 4b. Motor Freight Transportation & 42 142 5 Warehousing (includes supply services) 4c. Water Transportation (includes organizational 44 0 0 level maintenance) 4d. Air Transportation (includes organizational level maintenance) 4e. Other Transportation Services (includes organizational level maintenance) II I 1 I 4g. Utilities I 49 I 6 1 < 1 45 4f. Communications UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 17 47 0 48 0 0 0 9 < 1 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) (Cont'd) Industry SIC No. of % of Codes Civilians Civilians I Sub-Total 4a. through 4g. 40-49 15 7 6 5b. Personal Services (includes laundry and 72 0 0 funeral services) 5c. Business Services (includes mail, security 73 182 6 guards, pest control, photography, janitorial and ADP services) 5d. Automotive Repair and Services 75 1 < 1 (1 5e. Other Misc. Repair Services I I I I 76 I 0 I 0 (1 Sf. Motion Pictures I I I I 78 I 0 I 0 I 5g. Amusement and Recreation Services 79 7 < 1 I( 5 h. Health Services I I I I 80 1 I < 1 11 Si. Legal Services I I I I 8 1 5 I < 1 I( 5j. Educational Services I I I I 82 I 5 5 I 2 I 5k. Social Services 83 8 < 1 II I I I 51. Museums I 84 I 0 I 0 1 5m. Engineering, Accounting, Research & 87 1,638 57 Related Services (includes RDT&E, ISE, etc.) It 5n. Other Mix. Services I I 89 1 567 I 19 Sub-Total 5a. through 5n.: 70-89 2,473 8 6 I 6a. Executive and General Government, Except 9 1 0 0 Finance UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 18 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) (Cont'd) 11 6c. Public Finance I I I I 93 I 0 I Industry L 6b. Justice, Public Order & Safety (includes police, firefighting and emergency management) 11 M. Environmental Quality and Housing I 1 I I 95 I 10 I < 1 II SIC Codes 92 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 19 Programs Sub-Total 6a. through 6d. No. of Civilians 119 % of Civilians 4 129 5 . . . . DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCAD TRENTON AND NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES NAVAIR IS NOT INCLUDED (Per Amendment One to Data Call 65 - based on current workforce) Industry SIC No. of % of Codes Civilians Civilians It I I 1 1. Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing I 01-09 I 2 I < 1 2. Construction (includes facility maintenance and 15-17 1 7 < 1 repair) level maintenance 11 ammo. etc.) 3b. Aircraft (includes engines and missiles) 3721 et 30 < 1 a1 11 3c. Ships I I I I 373 1 I 0 I < 1 I 3d. Other Transportation (includes ground various 2 < 1 vehicles) 11 3e. Other Manufacturing not included in 3a. I I I I various 1 2 2 < 1 I( Sub-Total 3.. through 3e. I I I 20-39 1 7 4 1 1.4 )I 4a. Railroad Transportation 1 4o 1 0 4b. Motor Freight Transportation & 42 142 3 Warehousing (includes supply services) 4c. Water Transportation (includes organizational 44 0 0 level maintenance) I 4d. Air Transportation (includes organizational 45 0 0 level maintenance) 4e. Other Transportation Services (includes 47 0 0 organizational level maintenance) UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 20 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCADTRENTON AND NISE EAST. ST. INIGOES (based on current workforce) ( ~ o n t ' d ) Industry SIC No. of % of Codes Civilians Civilians I I I 4f. Communications I 48 I 9 I < 1 4g. Utilities 49 6 < 1 Sub-Total 4a. through 4g. 40-49 157 3 5. Services 70-89 11 5a. Lodging Services 1 7 0 ) 9 1 < 1 5b. Personal Services (includes laundry and 72 0 0 funeral services) 5c. Business Services (includes mail, security 73 2 16 3 .9 guards, pest control, photography, janitorial and ADP services) I - 5d. Automotive Repair and Services 75 1 c 1 5e. Other Misc. Repair Services 76 4 < 1 5f. Motion Pictures 78 0 0 5g. Amusement and Recreation Services 79 7 < 1 5h. Health Services 80 1 < 1 5i. Legal Services 8 1 5 < 1 5j. Educational Services 82 55 1 5k. Social Services 83 8 < 1 51. Museums 84 0 5m. Engineering, Accounting, Research & 87 4334 77.3 Related Services (includes RDT&E, ISE, etc.) 11 5n. Other Misc. Services I I I I 89 I 590 I 10.6 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 21 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCADTRENTON AND NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES (based on current UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 2 2 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) Industry SIC No. of % of Codes Civilians Civilians I 1. Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing 01-09 0 0 2. Construction (includes facility maintenance and 15-17 0 0 I I I 3c. Ships I 373 1 0 I 0 I 3d. Other Transportation (includes ground various 0 0 vehicles) 3e. Other Manufacturing not included in 3a. various 0 0 through 3d. Sub-Total 3a. through 3e. 20-39 0 0 ( 4a. Railroad Transportation I 40 I 0 I 4b. Motor Freight Transportation & 42 0 0 Warehousing (includes supply services) I 4c. Water Transportation (includes organizational 44 0 0 level maintenance) 4d. Air Transportation (includes organizational 45 0 0 level maintenance) 4e. Other Transportation Services (includes 47 0 0 organizational level maintenance) I 4f. Communications 48 0 0 I I 4g. Utilities 49 0 0 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 23 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) (Cont'd) 11 - . II Industry SIC No. of % of I civilians I civilians I Sub-Total 4a. through 4g. 40-49 0 0 5b. Personal Services (includes laundry and 72 0 0 funeral services) I 5c. Business Services (includes mail, security 73 8 5.7 guards, pest control, photography, janitorial and ADP 11 services) 11 M. Automotive Repair and Services I I I I 75 I 0 I 0 I 5e. Other Misc. Repair Services 76 1 . 7 I I I Sf. Motion Pictures I 78 I 0 I 0 (1 5g. Amusement and Recreation Services I I I I 79 I 0 I 0 11 5h. Health Services I I I I 80 I 0 I 0 1 5i. Legal Services I I I I 8 1 I 0 I 0 1) 5j. Educational Services I I I I 82 I 0 I 0 1 5k. Social Services I I I I 83 I 0 I 0 I 51. Museums 84 0 0 5m. Engineering, Accounting, Research & 87 123 87.9 Related Services (includes RDT&E, ISE, etc.) 11 5n. Other Misc. Services I I I I 89 1 8 I 5.7 Sub-Total Sa. through 5n.: 70-89 14 0 100 6a. Executive and General Government, Except 11 Finance I O I 0 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 24 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 1 M. Environmental Quality and Housing I I I I 95 I 0 I 0 I1 Naval Aviation. Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) (Cont'd) I I I Sub-Total 6a. through 6d. I I 0 I Industry 6b. Justice, Public Order & Safety (includes police, firefighting and emergency management) 6c. Public Finance UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 25 SIC Codes 92 93 No. of Civilians 0 0 % of Civilians 0 0 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) (Cont'd 11 Industry I SIC I No. of I % of II I codes I civilians I Civilians 4b. Motor Freight Transportation & 42 0 0 Warehousing (includes supply services) 4c. Water Transportation (includes organizational 44 0 0 level maintenance) I 4d. Air Transportation (includes organizational 45 0 0 level maintenance) I 4e. Other Transportation Services (includes 47 0 0 organizational level maintenance) I( 4f. Communications I I I I 48 I 0 I 0 I 4g. Utilities 49 0 0 11 Sub-Total 4. through 41. I I I I 40-49 0 0 5b. Personal Services (includes laundry and 72 0 0 funeral services) 5c. Business Services (includes mail, security 73 32 1 1 guards, pest control, photography, janitorial and ADP 1, services) I 5d. Automotive Repair and Services 75 0 0 I( 5e. Other Misc. Repair Services 1 I I I 76 I 0 I 0 I 5f. Motion Pictures I I I 78 0 0 I 5g. Amusement and Recreation Services 79 0 0 I 5h. Health Services I I I 1 80 1 0 I 0 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 26 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) (Cont'd Industry SIC No. of % of Codes Civilians Civilians I - I 5i. Legal Services 8 1 3 1 I 11 5j. Educational Services I I I 82 I 0 I 0 (1 5k. social Services I I I I 83 I 0 I 0 51. Museums 84 0 0 5m. Engineering, Accounting, Research & 87 232 8 2 Related Services (includes RDT&E, ISE, etc.) 11 5n. Other Misc. Services I I I I 89 I 13 I 5 I I Sub-Total 5a. through 5n.: 70-89 280 99 I 6c. Public Finance 93 0 0 11 6d. Environmental Quality and Housing I I I I 95 I 0 I 0 11 Sub-Total 6.. through 6d. I I I I I 3 I g . Civilian Employment by Occupation. Complete the following table to identify the types of "occupations" performed by civil service employees at the activity. Employees should be categorized based on their primary duties. Additional information on categorization of employment by occupation can be found in the Department of Labor Occupational Outlook Handbook. However, you do not need to obtain a copy of this publication to provide the data requested in this table. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 27 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Note the follow& specific guidance regardin? the "Occu~ation T v ~ e " codes in the first column of the table: Even though categories listed may not perfectly match the type of work performed by civilian employees, please attempt to assign each civilian employee to one of the "Occupation Types" identified in the table. Refer to the descriptions immediately followine: this table for more information on the various occupational categories. Retain su~~or t i ng data used to construct this table at the activity-level. in case auestions arise or additional information is reauired at some future time. Leave shaded areas blank. 1 . Executive, Administrative and Management 5 19 18.197 NAWCAD Patuxent River (based on current workforce) II I I 26. Life Scientists I 12 I .420 1 Occupation I I 2f. Lawyers and Judges I 3 .lo5 11 Number of Civilian Employees 2e. Physical Scientists I I 2g. Social Scientists & Urban Planners 4 .I40 II Percent of Civilian Employees I I 2h. Social & Recreation Workers I 1 0 I I 2i. Religious Workers I 0 I 0 0 I I 2j. Teachers, Librarians & Counselors I 4 .I40 2k. Health Diagnosing Practitioners (Doctors) 0 0 21. Health Assessment & Treating(Nurses, Therapists, 1 .035 Pharmacists, Nutritionists, etc.) 2m. Communications I 8 1 .28 2n. Visual Arts 12 .420 Sub-Total 2a. through 2n.: 1,080 37.868 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 28 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD .Patuxent River (based on current workforce) (Cont'd) Number of Percent of Civilian Civilian Occupation Employees Employees I 3a. Health Technologists and Technicians 0 I 0 # 3b. Other Technologists I I I 452 I 15.84 I Sub-Total 3n. and 3b.: I I I 452 I 15.84 11 4. Administrative Support & Clerical I I I 506 I 17.741 H I I 5b. Food Preparation & Service 0 I 0 5d. Personal Service & Building & Grounds Services 3 7 1.297 (includes janitorial, grounds maintenance, child care workers) I Sub-Total 5a. through 5d. 145 5 .08 11 6. Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing I I 2 I .070 I 7. Mechanics, Installers and Repairers 5 2 1.823 H I I 8. Construction Trades I 1 3 I .4558 I 10. Transportation & Material Moving 2 .070 I 1 1. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (not 39 1.367 included elsewhere) 1 TOTAL I 2 ,852 I 100 % UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 29 -. . . DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCAD TRENTON, NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES (BASED ON CURRENT WORKFORCE) NAVAIR IS NOT INCLUDED It I I I . Executive, Administrative and Management 887 - - - Occupation Number of Civilian Employees 2b. Architects and Surveyors 2c. Computer, Mathematical & Operations Research II I 2e. Physical Scientists I 4 3 I 1 Percent of Civilian Employees I I 7 253 2d. Life Scientists It Zg. Social Scientists & Urban Planners I I 4 I < 1 5 1 2 I < 1 11 2 t Lawyers and ~ u d g s I I 11 2h. Social & Recreation Workers I 1 7 < 1 I It 2i. Religious Workers I I 0 1 I I I I 2m. Communications I 10 I < 1 a < 1 2j. Teachers, Librarians & Counselors 21. Health Assessment & Treating(Nurses, Therapists. Pharmacists, Nutritionists, etc.) 2n. Visual ~ r t s ! 12 I < I II 5 0 2k. Health Diagnosing Practitioners (Doctors) 11 Sub-Total 2a. through 2n.: 1 2486 1 4 4 11 0 1 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 30 < 1 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA NAWCAD PATUXENT RIVER WITH NAWCAD WARMINSTER, NAWCAD TRENTON AND NISE EAST, ST. INIGOES (based on current workforce) - - -, (Cont 'd) Number of Percent of Civilian Civilian Occupation Employees Employees I I Sub-Total 3a. and 3b.: 799 1 4 I I Administrative Support & Clerical I 711 I 1 3 5b. Food Preparation & Service 0 0 5c. DentaYMedical AssistanWAides 0 0 5d. Personal Service & Building & Grounds Services 39 1 (includes janitorial, grounds maintenance, child care workers) 1 Sub-Total 5a. through 5d. I I I 214 I 4 I 6. Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing 2 < 1 11 7. Mechanics, Installers and Repairers I I I 311 I 6 1 8. Construction Trades I I 113 2 9. Production Occupations 4 5 1 H I I 10. Transportation & Material Moving I 2 I < 1 I 1 1. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (not 39 1 included elsewhere) UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 3 1 -. DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) Number of Percent of Civilian Civilian Occupation - Employees Employees 1. Executive, Administrative and Management 9 4 67.1 2b. Architects and Surveyors 2c. Computer, Mathematical & Operations Research 6 4.3 2d. Life Scientists 2e. Physical Scientists It I I 2f. Lawyers and Judges I I 2g. Social Scientists & Urban Planners 2h. Social & Recreation Workers I I 2i. Religious Workers I I 11 2j. Teachers. Librarians & Counselors I I I I I 2k. Health Diagnosing Practitioners (Doctors) I 21. Health Assessment & Treating(Nurses. Therapists, Pharmacists, Nutritionists, etc.) I I 2m. Communications (I 2n. Visual Arts I Sub-Total 2.. through 2n.: I I I 2 4 I 17.2 I 3b. Other Technologists UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 32 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation. Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) (Cont'd) Number of Percent of Civilian Civilian Occupation Employees Employees I' Sub-Total 3a. and 3b.: 11 4. Administrative Support & Clerical I I 2 1 1 5 I 5b. Food Preparation & Service I I I I L 5d. Personal Service & Building & Grounds Services (includes janitorial, grounds maintenance, child care workers) 11 Sub-Total 5s. through 5d. I I I I 6. Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing ( 7. Mechanics, Installers and Repairm I I I I 8. Construction Trades I I 9. Production Occupations I 11 10. Transportation & Material Moving I I 1 1. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (not 1 0 . 7 included elsewhere) 1- TOTAL 140 1 0 0 % UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 33 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA b. Education. 1) Information is required on the current capacity and enrollment levels of school systems serving employees of the activity. Information should be keyed to the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3). a: There are 2 special education centers, these are integrated with elementary schools. b: There is also a technical center not counted here. c: Public school counts are of full time equivalents. d: 7 are PreK or K-8; 1 is 1-8; 1 is 5-11; 1 is 8-12; and 1 is K-12. There is a Mennonite School not counted. (Enrollment is 101). e: Individual schools may set lower limits. f: One special education center and 1 technical education center not counted. g: One Technical Education Center not counted. h: One is K-8 and 1 is PreK-12. i: Counts do not include: 1 alternative school, 1 special education center, 1 vocationaYtechnica1 school, and 1 adult center. j: One is PreK-4; 3 are Prek-5, 1 is PreK-8, 1 is PreK-12, 5 are K-8, 2 are PreK and K. School Di~t r ic l st MYJ'S cGoltr Private Cnlvert Cantr Private mule3 Cantr Private * Answer "Yes" in this column if the school district in question enrolls students who reside in government housing. Source of Data (3.b.l) Education Table): Survey of Tri-County Public & privatef Schools, hrchdiocese c=Washington VOS, Indian Head by St. Mary's County Department of Economic & Community Development. County st ~ a r y , ~ St. Mary's Cdvert Cdvert c h h Chde3 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 45 Number of Schools Ele- men- lary rd d d h IS j Enrollment Middle 4 d 4 h e j C u m n t 1 3 p a ~ ' 1,987 11,698 430 9 . 7 7 ~ ~ 2,183 School Dog District Serve Gov't Housing Units? Y- Ya Ya Ya Ya Yea High 3b d 2' h 5' J M u . Cap. 13,342 2J80 12,403 SU 21,426 2 9 5 Pupil-lo-Teacher Ratio Current PWK I:% 1-2 1:U 3-12 l:U 1:16 1:U 1:12 K 1:M 1-12 1:25 1:14 M u . Ratio PWK I:M 1 3 1Q.6 3-12 199 PK/K I:M 1-8 1:30e 6:U P W K I:M 1-8 1:3Oe 1:3o 1:20e DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 2) Are there any on-base "Section 6" Schools? If so, identify number of schools and current enrollment. 3) For the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3), in the aggregate, list the names of undergraduate and graduate colleges and universities which offer certificates, Associate, Bachelor or Graduate degrees : 4) For the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3), in the aggregate, list the names and major curriculums of vocationaVtechnica1 training schools: COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY Capitol College Charles County Community College Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Florida Institute of Technology St. Mary's College of Maryland University of Maryland University College Each county supports a vocationaVtechnical training school. St. Mary's County Technical Center offers four Tech Prep clusters: Applied BusinessIManagement Technologies, Applied EngineeringIMechanical Technologies, Applied HealtWHuman Services Technologies, and a Four-Year College University cluster. DEGREES OFFERED Bachelors Degrees Associate Degrees and Certificates Associate, Bachelor, and Graduate Degrees Graduate Degrees Bachelors Degrees Bachelors and Graduate Degrees - In Calvert County, Calvert Career Centers offer two major pathways: Occupational Technology pathway or Advanced Tech Prep pathways comprised of three areas: Engineering Technology, Health and Human Services and Business Technology. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 46 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Charles County offers vocational education through Business and Home Economics programs in all high schools, a graphics arts program at McDonough High School and a full range of 18 technical and industrial programs at the Vocation-Technical Center. Source of Data (3.b.4) Vo-tech Training): Tri-County Public Schools. VOCATIONALfTECHNICAL SCHOOL Calvert County Vocational-Technical Center Charles County Vocational-Technical Center St. Mary's County Vocational-Technical Center H&R Block (various locations) Melwood Farm Training Center UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY MAJOR CURRICULUMS Air conditioning, plumbing and heating, automotive mechanics, carpentry, child care, clerical office worker, clothing and textiles, c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m m i n g , cosmetology, electricity, food production and management, geriatric care, graphic arts, masonry, medical assisting, secretary and welding. Full range of Vocational-Technical subjects (grades 9-12) Full range of Vocational-Technical subjects Income Tax Preparation Training Vocational training for mentally and physically disabled individuals PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 47 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA c. Transportation. 1) Is the activity served by public transportation? Yes - - No Bus: Rail: Subway: Ferry: Source of Data (3.c.l) Transportation): St. Mary's County Department of Economic and Community Development 2) Identify the location of the nearest passenger railroad station (long distance rail service, not commuter service within a city) and the distance from the activity to the station. 66 miles to AMTRAKINew Carrollton 65 miles to AMTRAK/Washington, D.C. [source of Data (3.c.2) Transportation): Maryland Department of Transportation Map 11 3) Identify the name and location of the nearest commercial airport (with public carriers, e.g., USAIR, United, etc.) and the distance from the activity to the airport. St. Mary's County Airport Washington National Airport 7 miles 69 miles Additional airports in the area include: Dulles International Airport 92 miles Baltimore Washington International Airport 90 miles UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 48 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 4) How many carriers are available at this airport? Charter service is available at St. Mary's County Airport. The chart below details carriers at adjacent metro area airports. - - Commercial Commuter Washington National Airport 11 9 Baltimore Washington International 1 6 2 Dulles International Airport 2 3 9 5) What is the Interstate route number and distance, in miles, from the activity to the nearest Interstate highway? Interstate Highway 951495 54 miles UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 4 9 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 6) Access to Base: a) Describe the quality and capacity of the road systems providing access to the base, specifically during peak periods. (Include both information on the area surrounding the base and information on access to the base, e.g., numbers of gates, congestion problems, etc.) Quality (conditions) of all roads is very good. The level of service on Route 235, north of NAWCADPAX, ranges from very good to poor during a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Route 235, south of NAWCADPAX, is excellent. Route 246 service ranges from excellent to fair. Service has improved with recently completed construction of rear North Gate. Completion of Pegg Road is expected summer 1995; completion of additional lanes on Route 246 is underway. Widening Chancellors Run Road to four lanes is being studied; widening Route 235 to six lanes is also being studied. Hewitt Road is being straightened and modified as thoroughfare to align with crossover at Rue's Purchase Road. This will provide better access to Routes 235 and 237." * Definitions: Excellent - free unobstructed flow, all signal phases sufficient Very Good - stable flow, a few phase unable to handle all vehicles Good - conditions of stable flow, delays are low to moderate, full use of peak direction signal phase Fair - approaching unstable flow, moderate to heavy delays Poor - approaching unstable flow, significant delays, signal phase timing is generally insufficient; congestion exists for extended duration throughout peak b) Do access roads transit residential neighborhoods? No. c) Are there any easements that preclude expansion of the access road system? d) Are there any man-made barriers that inhibit traffic flow (e.g., draw bridges, etc.)? No. Source of Data (3.c.6) Transportation): * Per Mike Lenhart, SHA; Walter Wise, DPW UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 50 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA d. Fire Protection/Hazardous Materials Incidents. Does the activity have an agreement with the local community for fire protection or hazardous materials incidents? Explain the nature of the agreement and identify the provider of the service. Yes. 1) Agreement between Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Patuxent River and the Bay District Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., Lexington Park, Maryland. Agreement provides mutual assistance for fire fighting and hazardous materials incidents and is used to augment the existing fire protection of each participant. 2 ) Agreement between the Commanding Officer, Naval Electronics Systems Engineering Activity (NESEA), St. Inigoes, Maryland and the Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, Ridge Maryland. Agreement provides mutual fire fighting assistance to augment fire protection available in participant's respective areas. NAS Patuxent River provides fire fighters and equipment that comprises the NESEA Fire Department. 3 ) Agreement between the Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, the Calvert County Board of County Commissioners, and the Solomons Volunteer Rescue Squad and Fire Department, Solomons, Maryland. Agreement provides mutual assistance for fire fighting and hazardous materials incidents and is used to augment the existing fire protection of each participant. Source of Data (3.d. FireIHazmat): 1 ) Mutual Aid Fire Fighting Assistance Agreement between the Bay District Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., and the Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland dated 14 August 1990; 2 ) Mutual Aid Fire Fighting Assistance Agreement between the Ridge Volunteer Fire Department, Ridge Maryland, and the Commanding Officer, Naval Electronic Systems Engineering Activity, St. Inigoes, Maryland dated 13 January 1990; 3) Mutual Aid Fire Fighting Assistance Agreement between the Calvert County Board of County Commissioners, the Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, and the Solomons Volunteer Rescue Squad and Fire Department, Inc., dated 1 November 1990. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 5 1 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA e. Police Protection. 1) What is the level of legislative jurisdiction held by the installation? The Patuxent River Naval Air Station, covering approximately 6,500 acres and approximately 15 miles of shoreline area, is under exclusive jurisdiction. The Naval Air Station has an off base housing area approximately 1 mile out the main gate called Glenn Forest. This area has 250 housing units on 139.97 acres with an adjacent parcel of land that is approximately 200 acres +- and is under concurrent jurisdiction. The Naval Air Station Solomons Annex houses the Naval Recreation Center and an industrial area that covers 285.81 acres of land that is under concurrent jurisdiction. The Naval Air Station (effective 3 Oct 94) assumes control of Webster Field located approximately 13 miles south of the base in St. Inigoes area of the county. This base is 852.8 acres of land with water front area. This area is used by the Coast Guard as a base port, and used by the Navy for light aircraft. This area has numerous buildings, none of which are used for housing. Jurisdiction at this location is concurrent. The Naval Air Station has several small areas located in the county such as a testing site at Point Lookout in the far south end of the county, and several small areas used for tracking stations. All these sites are under concurrent jurisdiction. The total amount of land if added together is approximately 75 acres +-. 2) If there is more than one level of legislative jurisdiction for installation property, provide a brief narrative description of the areas covered by each level of legislative jurisdiction and whether there are separate agreements for local law enforcement protection. No location identified above has more than one level of jurisdiction. 3) Does the activity have a specific written agreement with local law enforcement concerning the provision of local police protection? None. 4) If agreements exist with more than one local law enforcement entity, provide a brief narrative description of whom the agreement is with and what services are covered. None. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 52 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 5) If military law enforcement officials are routinely augmented by officials of other federal agencies (BLM, Forest Service, etc.), identlfjl any written agreements covering such services and briefly describe the level of support received. None. Source of Data (3.e 1) - 5) - Police): Mr. John Batcs, Department Head, Security Department, Naval Air Station, Patusent River, Maryland f. Utilities. 1) Does the activity have q agreement with the local community for water, refuse disposal, power or any other utility requirements? Explain the nature of the agreement and identitjl the provider of the service. Agreement between the Commanding Oflicer, Naval Air Station, Patuxcnt River, Maryland, and the Metropolitan Commission, St. Mary's County, Maryland, for processing of raw sewage effluent from the Naval Air Station, Patuxent River. Charge is $1.14 per 1,000 gallons. Average flow is 655,000 gallons per day with a total capacity of *1.2 million gallons per day. 2) Has the activity been subject to water rationing or interruption of delivery during the last five years? If so, idente time period during which rationing existed and the restrictions imposed. Were activity operations affected by these situations? If so, explain extent of impact. 3) Has the activity been subject to any other significant disruptions in utility service, e.g., electrical "brown outsn, "rolling black outs", etc., during the last five years? If so, identify time period(s) covered and extent/nature of restrictioddisruption. Were activity operations affected by these situations? If so, explain extent of impact. Source of Data (3.f. 1) - 3) Utilities): Bobby Bun, Public Work Environmmtd Division, Naval Air Station, Patrumt River, Maryland UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 5 3 - DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 4. Business Profde. List the top ten employers in the geographic area defined by your response to question 1 .b. (page 3), taken in the aggregate, (include your activity, if appropriate): Source of Data (4. Businua Profile): 'Calvtrt, Charles, and St Mary's Countien' Department of Economic Development UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 5 4 - DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 5. Other Socio-Economic Impacts. For each of the following areas, describe other recent (past 5 years), on-going or projected economic impacts (both positive and negative) on the geographic region defined by your response to question 1 .b. (page 3), in the aggregate: . -- a. Loss of Major Employers: There has been no loss of private major (over 100 workers) employers. b. Introduction of New BusinesseslTechnologies: The Retail sector continues to dominate new business growth in the Tri-County area due to population gains seen over the past d m d e . In St. Mary's The Services sector, fueled by hi-tech employment support Navy activities, is expanding rapidly. The relocation of NAWCAD Warminster and NAVAHWQ to Patuxent River, MD win greatly expand the range of technology employment in the area. c. Natural Disasters: The ice storm of 1994 hampered commerce for 1-7 days. d. Overall Economic Trends: Between 1980 and 1990 population in the Southern Maryland region grew faster than any in the state. Increases in Charles and C h e r t counties were due in large part to their proximity to metropolitan areas. In St. Mary's County the majority of growth was prompted by expansion a t Patuxent River Naval Air Station. Maryland Oflice of Planning predicts Southern Maryland will continue as Maryland's fastest growing region through the year 2020. Unemployment in Southern Maryland is below state and national lev& Approximately half of the jobs in Southern Maryland, and the stat-, am found in the retail and service sectors. Southern Maryland is more dependent on federal jobs and much less involved in manufacturing than the state avenge. Growth in the service sector is expected to continue. Retail will remain strong in Calvert and Charles counties. Source of Data (5. Other SocWEmu): St Muy's County Department of Economic & CormapnitJ Development UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 5 5 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 6 . Other. Identify any contributions of your activity to the local community not discussed elsewhere in this response. NAWCAD Pax has opened a new era of communications with its St. Mary's County neighbors. NAWCAD Patuxent River Personal Excellence Program conducts Annual Career Fairs, Career Work Shops, and Employee Shadowing Day. Military and civilian personnel volunteer to provide tutoring services to middle and high school students in a wide variety of academic fields. In co-ordination with the County-wide Optimist Clubs, the Naval Air Station provides the Drill Hall for "Project Graduation" which is Alcohol Free celebration for graduates. Pax River has over 100 volunteers to take part in the Christmas in April program. The volunteers toiled side by side throughout the day to repair and rehabilitate homes belonging to the elderly and handicapped. We have recently been approved to provide the St. Mary's County School Board with government computers and computer software that are obsolete. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 56 DATA CALL 65 BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable) WILLIAM E. NEWMAN NAME (Please type or print) NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEI, ( if applicable) NAME (Please type or print) Title Signature Date - -- Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT WILLIAM C. BOWES NAME (Please type or print) Signature COMMANDER Title Date z & / Q ~ d w NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS c o w n Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) YV. A EARNER ,w NAME (Please type or print) Title DATA CALL 65 BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 8 December 1993 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who p-rovide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief." The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or ( 2 ) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COMMANDER BARTON D. STRONG NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION PATUXENT RIVER, MD Activity Docuillellt Separator DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES \ Table 3: Family Housing Construction Projects 1996 PATUXENT RIVER MD AWCACDV NAVAIR Project Cost Avoid Description A P P ~ H332 ($ooo) TY CENTER FHSG USING WAREHOUSE/SELF HELP \ 1,410 18410 28300 \ (Page 21) FHSG 890 890 I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. MAJOR CLAIMANT LEVEL J. E. BUFFINGTON, RADM, CEC, USN NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMRIAhl Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) NAME (Please type or print) Title Signature Date BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION I certify that the information contained complete to the best of my knowledge and MARK E. DONALDSON NAME (Please type or print) CDR, CEC, USN Title 1 L 1Jl1 (47 4 Date MILCON PROGRAMMING DIVISION Division FACILITIES PROGRAMMING AND CONSTRUCTION DIRECTORATE Department 3 NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING C O W ,c6 Activity Enclosure (1) BRAC DATA CALL NUMBER 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCE Information on cost avoidance which could be realized as the result of cancellation of on- going or programmed construction projects is provided in Tables 1 (MILCON) and 2 (FAMILY HOUSING). These tables list MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects which fall within the following categories: I . all programmed construction projects included in the FY 1996 - 2001 MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING Project List, 2. all programmed projects from FY 1995 or earlier for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995, and, 3. all programmed BRAC MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995. Projects listed in Tables 1 and 2 with potential cost avoidance were determined as meeting any one of the following criteria: Projects with projected Work in Place (WIP) less than 75% of the Current Working Estimate (CWE) as of 1 OCT 1995 . Projects with projected completion dates or Beneficial Occupancy Dates subsequent to 3 1 March 1996. Projects with projected CWE amount greater than $15M. The estimated cost avoidance for projects terminated after construction award would be approximately one-half of the CWE for the remaining work. Close-out, claims and other termination costs can consume the other half. Document Sepal-atol- DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Projects) ~nstahation ~ a m e : I I PATUXENT RIVER MD A WCACDV ' Unit ~d&rfication Code WC): I I NO0421 * t 6 3 NAVAIR Proj ect Cost Avoid Description APPn ($ooo) 1993 389 MCON 9,328 INTEGRATION 9 8 328 . 1994 389A ED SYSTEM INTEGRATION MCON 9,328 1994 426 MCON 8 6 5 . 10 8 193 1995 951T BRAC 24,395 Sub-Total - 19 24,395 1996 95311 25,75C Sub-Total - 1996 25,750 1997 516 WASTEWTR TRMT PLNT UPGRD 2,500 sub-~otal - 1997 28soa 1999 001 2, OOC Sub-Total - 1999 2 8 0 ~ ( 1 2001 481 AIR ASW INTROP CENTER MCON DATA CALL 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCES Table 1 : Military Construction (MILCON) Projects (Excluding Family Housing Construction Projects) (Page 189) Installation Name: PATUXENT RIVER MD AWCACDV Unit Identification Code (UIC): Major Project FY Claimant: Project No. NAVAIR Description Sub-Total - 2001 Grand Total A P P ~ Project Cost Avoid ($ooo) 7,700 81,866 1 certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. J. E. BUFTINGTON, RADM, CEC, USN NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) NAME (Please type or print) Title Signature Date I BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION I certify that the information contained complete to the best of my knowledge and beli MARK E. DONALDSON NAME (Please type or print) CDR, CEC, USN Title MILCON PROGRAMMING DIVISION Division IL 3^dl, lsq4 Date FACILITIES PROGRAMMING AND CONSTRUCTION DIRECTORATE Department .3 NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND o Activity Enclosure (1) BRAC DATA CALL NUMBER 64 CONSTRUCTION COST AVOIDANCE Information on cost avoidance which could be realized as the result of cancellation of on- going or programmed construction projects is provided in Tables 1 (MILCON) and 2 (FAMILY HOUSING). These tables list MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects which fall within the following categories: 1. all programmed construction projects included in the N1996 - 200 1 MILCONEAMILY HOUSING Project List, 2. all programmed projects fiom N1995 or earlier for which cost avoidance could still be obtained ifthe project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995, and, 3. all programmed BRAC MILCON/FAMILY HOUSING projects for which cost avoidance could still be obtained if the project were to be canceled by 1 OCT 1995. Projects listed in Tables 1 and 2 with potential cost avoidance were determined as meeting any one of the following criteria: Projects with projected Work in Place (WP) less than 75% of the Current Working Estimate (CWE) as of 1 OCT 1995 . Projects with projected completion dates or Beneficial Occupancy Dates subsequent to 3 1 March 1996. Projects with projected CWE amount greater than $15M. The estimated cost avoidance for projects terminated after construction award would be approximately one-half of the CWE for the remaining work. Close-out, claims and other termination costs can consume the other half. Document S epal-ator . . . . DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND C F M U N I T Y INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) Number of Percent of Civilian Civilian Occupation Employees - - Employees 1. Executive, Administrative and Management 206 72.8% 2. Professional Specialty 2a. Engineers I 2b. Architects and Surveyors 1 I 2d. Life Scientists I I I I I 2e. Physical Scientists I I 2c. Computer, Mathematical & Operations Research I I 2g. Social Scientists & Urban Planners I I 2 I I I I 2h. Social & Recreation Workers . 7 2f. Lawyers and Judges I I 2i. Religious Workers I 2 I . 7 I 2j. Teachers. Librarians & Counselors 21. Health Assessment & Treating(Nurses, Therapists, Pharmacists, Nutritionists, etc.) I ' 2k. Health Diagnosing Practitioners (Doctors) 2m. Communications 1 3a Health Technologists and Technicians I I I 3b. Other Technologists 10 3.5 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Sub-Total 2% through 2n.: PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 19 6.8 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 11 4. Administrative Support & Clerical I I I 4 6 I 16.3 Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) (Cont'd 5a. Protective Services (includes guards, firefighters, I I Occupation 5b. Food Preparation & Service 5d. Personal Service & Building & Grounds Services (includes janitorial, grounds maintenance, child care workers) Number of Civilian Employees I I Sub-Total 5a. through 5d. Percent of Civilian Employees I I 6. Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing I I 7. Mechanics, Installers and Repairers I (1 8. Construction Trades 9. Production Occupations I I 10. Transportation & Material Moving 1 1 . Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (not included elsewhere) TOTAL 283 1 0 0 % Description of Occupational Categories used in Table 1.p. The following list identifies public and private sector occupations included in each of the major occupational categories used in the table. Refer to these examples as a guide in determining where to allocate a~propriated fund civil service iobs at the activity. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 35 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 1 . Executive, Administrative and Management. Accountants and auditors; administrative services managers; budget analysts; construction and building inspectors; construction contractors and managers; cost estimators; education administrators; employment interviewers; engineering, science and data processing managers; financial managers; general managers and top executives; chief executives and legislators; health services managers; hotel managers and assistants; industrial production managers; inspectors and compliance officers, except construction; management analysts and consultants; marketing, advertising and public relations managers; personnel, training and labor relations specialists and managers; property and real estate managers; purchasing agents and managers; restaurant and food service managers; underwriters; wholesale and retail buyers and merchandise managers. 2 . Professional Specialty. Use sub-headings provided. 3 . Technicians and Related Support. Health Technolo~ists and Technicians sub-category - self-explanatory. Other Technologists sub-category includes aircraft pilots; air traffic controllers; broadcast technicians; computer programmers; drafters; engineering technicians; library technicians; paralegals; science technicians; numerical control tool programmers. 4 . Administrative Support & Clerical. Adjusters, investigators and collectors; bank tellers; clerical supervisors and managers; computer and peripheral equipment operators; credit clerks and authorizers; general office clerks; information clerks; mail clerks and messengers; material recording, scheduling, dispatching and distributing; postal clerks and mail carriers; records clerks; secretaries; stenographers and court reporters; teacher aides; telephone, telegraph and teletype operators; typists, word processors and data entry keyers. 5 . Services. Use sub-headings provided. 6 . Agricultural, Forestry & Fishing. Self explanatory. 7 . Mechanics, Installers and Repairers. Aircraft mechanics and engine specialists; automotive body repairers; automotive mechanics; diesel mechanics; electronic equipment repairers; elevator installers and repairers; farm equipment mechanics; general maintenance mechanics; heating, air conditioning and refrigeration technicians; home appliance and power tool repairers, industrial machinery repairers; line installers and cable splicers; millwrights; mobile heavy equipment mechanics; motorcycle, boat and small engine mechanics; musical instrument repairers and tuners; vending machine servicers and repairers. 8 . Construction Trades. Bricklayers and stonemasons; carpenters; carpet installers; concrete masons and terrazzo workers; drywall workers and lathers; electricians; glaziers; highway maintenance; insulation workers; painters and paperhangers; plasterers; plumbers and pipefitters; roofers; sheet metal workers; structural and reinforcing ironworkers; tilesetters. 9 . Production Occupations. Assemblers; food processing occupations; inspectors, testers and graders; metalworking and plastics-working occupations; plant and systems operators, printing occupations; textile, apparel and furnishings occupations; woodworking occupations; miscellaneous production operations. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 36 . . DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 10. Transportation & Material Moving. Busdnvers; material moving equipment operators: rail transportation occupations; truckdrivers; water transportation occupations. 11. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (not included elsewhere). Entry level jobs not requiring sigmficant training. h. Employment of Military Spouses. Complete the following table to provide estimated information concerning militarv sDouses who are also employed in the area defined in response to question l.b., above. Do not fill in shaded area 11 2. Percentage of Military Spouses Who Work Outside of the Home: I I 61% H 3. Break out of Spouses' Location of Employment (Total of rows 3a. through 3d. should equal 100% and reflect the number of spouses used in the calculation of the "Percentage of Swuses Who Work Outside of the Home". I 3b. Employed "On-Base" - Non-Appropriated Fund: 1 7% It 3c. Employed "Off-Base" - Federal Employment: I 4% 3d. Employed "Off-Base" - Other Than Federal Employment 73 % NOTE: THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS BASED ON A RANDOM SAMPLE SURVEY OF 555 MILITARY MEMBERS. OF THE 555,338 OF THE SPOUSES WORK OUTSIDE OF THE HOME. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL ORM MAT ION 3 7 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Maintenance Office (based on current workforce) 1. Percentage of Military Employees Who Are Married: I 80.1 % n I 2. Percentage of Military Spouses Who Work Outside of the Home: I I 3b. Employed "On-Base" - Non-Appropriated Fund: (5 spouses) I 8.6 % I - 3c. Employed "Off-Base" - Federal Employment: (1 spouse) 1.7% I ) 3d. Employed "Off-Basef' - Other Than Federal Employment (39 spouses) I I 67.3 UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 38 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Naval Aviation Depot Operations Center (based on current workforce) 1. Percentage of Military Employees Who Are Married: I 92 % I1 I 2. Percentage of Military Spouses Who Work Outside of the Home: I I 3. Break out of Spouses' Location of Employment (Total of rows 3a. through 3d. . should equal 100% and reflect the number of spouses used in the calculation of the "Percentage of Spouses Who Work Outside of the Home". 3a. Employed "On-Base" - Appropriated Fund: 30 % 11 3b. Employed "On-Base" - Non-Appropriated Fund: I 15% 11 I 3c. Employed "Off-Base" - Federal Employment: I 1 3d. Employed "Off-Base*' - Other Than Federal Employment I I UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 39 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 2 . Infrastructure Data. For each element of community infrastructure identified in the two tables below, rate the community's ability to accommodate the relocation of additional functions and personnel to your activity. Please complete each of the three columns listed in the table, reflecting the impact of various levels of increase (20%, 50% and 100%) in the number of personnel working at the activity (and their associated families). In ranking each category, use one of the following three ratings: A - Growth can be accommodated with little or no adverse impact to existing community infrastructure and at little or no additional expense. B - Growth can be accommodated, but will require some investment to improve and/or expand existing community infrastructure. C - Growth either cannot be accommodated due to physical/environmental limitations or would require substantial investment in community infrastructure improvements. Table 2.a, "Local Communities": This first table refers to the local community (i.e., the community in which the base is located) and its ability to meet the increased requirements of the installation. Table 2.b., "Economic Region": This second table asks for an assessment of the infrastructure of the economic region (those counties identified in response to question 1 .b., (page 3) - taken in the aggregate) and its ability to meet the needs of additional employees and their families moving into the area. For both tables, annotate with an asterisk (*) any categories which are wholly supported on-base, i.e., are not provided by the local community. These categories should also receive an A-B-C rating. Answers for these "wholly supported on-base" categories should refer to base infrastructure rather than community infrastructure. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 40 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA a . Table A: Ability of the local community to meet the expanded needs of the base. 1) Using the A - B - C rating system described above, complete the table below. 20% 50% 100% Category Increase Increase Increase Off-Base Housing A A A Schools - Public A A A Schools - Private A A A Public Transportation - Roadways A A A Public Transportation - Buses/Subways N/A N/A N/ A - -- Public Transportation - Rail NIA N/A N/A Fire Protection A A A Police A A A Health Care Facilities A A A Utilities: A A A Water Supply A A A Water Distribution A A A Energy Supply A A A UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 4 1 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA 20% 50% 100% Category Increase Increase Increase Energy Distribution A A A Wastewater Collection A A A Wastewater Treatment A A A Storm Water Collection A A A Solid Waste Collection and Disposal A A A Hazardous/Tbxic Waste Disposal A A A Recreational Activities A A A Remember to mark with an asterisk any categories which are wholly supported on-base. 2) For each rating of "C" identified in the table on the preceding page, attach a brief narrative explanation of the types and magnitude of improvements required and/or the nature of any barriers that preclude expansion. Source of Data (2.a. 1) & 2) - Local Community Table): St. Mary's County Economic Development Div. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 4 2 DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA b . Table B: . Ability of the region described in the response to auestion 1.b. (page 31 (taken in the aggregate) to meet the needs of additional employees and their families relocating into the area. 1) Using the A - B - C rating system described above, complete the table below. UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 4 3 Category Off-Base Housing Schools - Public Schools - Private Public Transportation - Roadways Public Transportation - Buses/Subways Public Transportation - Rail Fire Protection Police Health Care Facilities Utilities: Water Supply Water Distribution A Energy Supply Energy Distribution Wastewater Collection Wastewater Treatment Storm Water Collection 20% 50% 100% Increase Increase Increase A A A A A A A A A A A A N/A N/ A N/ A N/A N/A N/ A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A DATA CALL 65 ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE DATA Remember to mark with an asterisk any categories which are wholly supported on-base. 2) For each rating of "C" identified in the table on the preceding page, attach a brief narrative explanation of the types and magnitude of improvements required andlor the nature of any barriers that preclude expansion. Source of Data (2.b. 1) & 2) - Regional Table): St. Mary's County ~conomi; Development Div. 3 . Public Facilities Data: a. Off-Base Housing Availability. For the counties identified in the response to question 1.b. (page 3), in the aggregate, estimate the current average vacancy rate for community housing. Use current data or information identified on the latest family housing market analysis. For each of the categories listed (rental units and units for sale), combine single family homes, condominiums, townhouses, mobile homes, etc., into a single rate: Rental Units: 8% Units for Sale: 5% UIC: NO0421 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PREDECISIONAL INFORMATION 44 DETERMINATION OF UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY f , 'A(:I 1,ITY /CAPABILITY TITLE : Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Lab APJPJUAL IIOURS OF DOWNTIME AVERAGE DOWNTIME PER DAY (LINE 1 + 365) AVERAGE HOURS AVAILABLE PER DAY (24 - LINE 2) This page cannot be completed due to the lack of utilization data and direct labor hour data. I- TEST TYPES 4 S-3 ATL Navigation P3/S3 TSSA BMOD SSA PATL/ASG "'I'YPICAL" FOR 0 F F : Z I !. I-GZ OVlY PREDEc~': ', v,, ' 4. ,L I* i i - 3 E?y'iATION TESTS AT ONE TIME 5 3 1 2 1 1 WORKLOAD PER TEST PER FACILITY HOUR 6 TOTAL WORKLOAD PER FACILITY HOIJR 7 UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY PER DAY (LINE 3 X TOTAL x ) 8 ANNUAL UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY 9 HISTORICAL WORKLOAD F ' A ( ' I 1 ~ l T Y /CAPABILITY TITLE: Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Labs * NO utilization data was available for these years. Also, the data shown for PY89-93 is only for the 8 - 3 ATL; no data was available for the other capabilities. Note - Includes civilian, military, and contractor direct labor hours. FACILITY CONDITION F~Ac ' l1 , I ' l 'Y / c : A P A B I L,Ir1'Y TI'I'L,E : Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Labs A G E : Multiple Buildings : 50 Years R E P L A C E M E N T VALUE: $47M (Building and ~quipment) Equipment : 1-18 Years M A 1 NTEPJANCE AND R E P A I R BACKLOG : IJA'I 'E OF' L A S T U P G R A D E : March 1994 IIA' l ' l lUE O F L A S T U P G R A D E : Acoustic rack for sonobuoy simulation. MAtJOR U P G R A D E S PROGRAMMED 1 . 0 f 1 G f i A l ) E ' I ' IT1,E: None 7'OTAL. PROGRAMMED AMOUNT : SIIMMARY D E S C R I P T I O N : TOTAL, PROGRAMMED AMOUNT : SUMMARY D E S C R I P T I O N : FOR OFF1'ii,'.l. U:2 ONLY PREDECISIC;: 4b.i I , irC)RhIAT13N ADDITIONAL INFORMATION b'acility/Capability Title: Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Labs Facility ' I ' o t , ~ l Scll iale Foo t aye : 'I'e:,I A r ed Squa r e Footage: ' l ' l ~ l l l l a c ~ ~ of E < ~ l l i [ > ~ l l < ~ r l t : ( ? ~ l r l ~ ~ i l 1 Mainter1anc.e Cost : PERSONNEL Office Space Square Footage: Volume of Equi pnlent : Estimated Moving Cost: Officer Enlisted Civilian Contractor Total 4. 6 4 5 2,842 cu. ft. 9 6 K CAPITAL EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT ($K) FY93 3 5 8 11 FY93 I FY94 I FY95 I FY96 I FY97 I FY98 I FY99 Sponsor Funded 1 3 0 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 5 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 - FY94 3 5 0 FY95 3 5 8 FY96 6 11 1 7 FY97 7 1 0 1 7 FY98 4 5 9 FY99 4 5 9 TECHNICAL INFORMATION F'acility/Capability Title: Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Lab Facility Description; Inc lud ing mission statement: Facility engineering and aircraft assets provide development, test and evaluation capabilities for ASUW/ASW aircraft. The facility includes a generic simulation architecture which provides correlated environmental and platform sensors simulation/stimulation of ASUW/ASW aircraft. The generic architecture is flexible in order to incorporate other target platforms without major changes to software and hardware configurations. The facility provides simulation and simulations for the ASQ-212/SASP version of the P-3 airplane and the S-3A/B airplane. The fixed wing ASUW & ASW Labs are comprised of the following components: P3/S3 Transitional Software Support Activity (SSA)/, B-MOD SSA, S-3 ATL, Patrol Avionic8 Test Laboratory/Acoustic Signal Generator (PATL/ASG) and the Navigation Lab. Iriterconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: None 'I'ype of Test Supported : Anti-surface warfare and antisubmarine warfare aircraft and mission system testing. Sr~nurlary of Techriical Capabilities: Capabilities provide for development support of the P-3 TACNAVMOD airplane (ending FY94) and for simulation/stimulation test support for the P-3 and S-3 airplanes as well as navigation system RDTLE support for all Navy aircraft. Specific capabilities include full SSA functionality for the P-3 TACNAVMOD (ending FY94) and the P-3 and S-3 platforms (starting late FY95), software development support, data extract/reduction, and generic miseion systems simulation capability. Keywords : Anti-submarine, ASW, Maritime, Ocean, P-3, S-3 A FOI? OFFICI.41. US? ONLY PREDECISiOrUiiL I: liORf,.\ATl,W 1 WASHINGTON POST /Arms Flows ITo Rwandans /Raise Alarms 1 ear of New Fighting IExtends to Burundi By William Branigin WadIbgmuacFmiflsavicr Secret arms deliveries to the exiled perpetrators of last year's massacres in Rwanda are raising fears among human rights groups, U.S. officials and the United Nations of renewed warfare in the turbulent central Afri- can region. Reports of the arms shipments and an upsurge of military activity by the forces of the former Hutu-led Rwan- dan government, quartered in refu- gee camps primarily in eastern Zaire, pmnpted the U.N. Security Council last montb to call for the stationing of UN. observers in the area to monitor an mteroational arms embargo. How- ever, central African countries have rebuEfed the U.N. bid, iiuther fueling the concern about an escalation in fighting between rival tribes in both Rwanda and neighboring Burundi. Tbe rebuffs from Rwanda's neigh- -- ----- - ---- ABM ... f r o m ~ g . 11 I - .- 1 , tual circumvention of the treaty," I the note said. "Thus it cannot be j used in working out an accord on demarcation." 1 Instead, Russian arms negoti- ! ators proposed "to return to dis- ! cussion of our proposal on condi- tions for tesring high-velocity interceptors," the note said. I I hloscow's plan would allow each j side to "develop effective tactical / ABM systems" but would "pre- / clude testing" that the Russians say would give them capabilities j against ICBMs, the note said. i The note also said the admin- : istration's approval of tests for I new regional anti-missile systems j was iilegal under the ABM treaty. i "We cannot regard the testing of.: mobile systems to counter ballistic: 1 missiles, being conducted by the ! United States, a s consistent with the ABM treaty:' it said. Some 1J.S. officials see the diplo- matic note as an effort by Moscow to extend the ABM treaty to re- gional systems, a position the ad- ministration has rejected. Administration officials told congressional staff in June that if the Russians continue to obstruct the missile-defense talks, the United States would break off ne- gotiations. WEDNESDAY, July 19,1995 J u l y bors. particukrly Zaire and Tanzania. represent another setback for the United Nations and. concerned gov- ernments in efforts to maintain peace in a troubled part of the world. The bloodshed in Rwanda in a threemonth period kst year claimed an estimated half-million lives- far 59, 1995 ,stmting to work together," a senior ton administration official said. fIncursions across the border are on the increase, becoming more fre- i w n t and more organized," said a B.N. OM who monitors Rwanda. sbviously they [the Hutus] have p s . What is less clear is where more than the death toll of the entire the%? arms come from." war in Bosnia to &&and resulted ; The escalation of Hutu military ac- in a refugee exodus -bed as un- &ity is "highly dangerous," a U.S. in- precedented in its combination of teIligence source said. "It could create speed and scale. Yet the continuing :another humanitarian disaster." precarious situation in Rwanda has ; h e d by reports of secret arms commanded much less attention than deliveries to the Rwandan Hutus, the the Bosnian quagmire. Wty h c i l last month expanded According to the United Natiom, a &I arms embargo on Rwanda to in- measure of stabiity has returned to alude Hutu camps in neighboring Rwanda since the spring of 1994, kxu~tries and called for the stationing when government forces and militias U.N. military observers, notably at of tbe maprity Hutu t n i slaughtered %Ids in eastern Zaire. minority Tutsis and moderate Hutus :- In meetings last month with lead- 'in what U.N. reports have called a ers of Burundi, Rwanda. Uganda. "campaign of genocide." Tanzania and Zaire, U.N. envoy Aldo ; But human rights groups, U.S. in- iApllo of Italy "emphasized the Senui telligaxe somce5 and U.N. o m s ty ~oundl's great concern over m- say that Hutu leaders, who fled with creasing reports of military activities .m &hated 2 million Hutu cjvilians &at threatened to destab~lize Rwan- ia the face of defeat by the Tutsi-led da," k t r ~ s G h a l i sad in his report. Rwandan Patriotic Front insurgency, It said the "uncontrolled circulation bave formed a force of up to 50,000 of arms" in the area was "a major qghters in their exile camps, a w e d cause of destabilization, especially in hew weapons and ammunition and Rwanda and Burundi." However, Ajel- ;Stepped up d r d e r raids in prep lo encountered "strong opposition to aration for a violent return to Rwan- the deployment of United Nations o b ib. Fdost of mps are h a t e d in- servers as proposed in the Security #& eastern Zaire, near the Rwandan Council resolution," the report said. border. I U.S. officia~s also m e s s concern WASHI?!GTON TIMES JU 'about the prospect of fighting in Bu- ' bdi, where Hutu-Tufsi discord is / to Rwanda's. %e Hutus are - WASHINGTON TIMES July 19, 1995 Pg. Slr Speedy A Pentagon official leaked us the semiannual status report 1 from the Department of Defense to the National Performance Re- 1 view,,led by Vice President A1 1 Gore. An item in the report notes where efforts are under way by a defense official named Jack Speedy to eliminate, by Dec. 31, 1999, all bonuses to the Penta- gon's inspector general, "to avoid the possible appearance of im- propriety." Said the official who sent us i the report: "The enclosed ex- I ceryt of the init~ative to eliminate I bonuses with Jack Speedy as the point of contact, and the end of the rnillenium as the forecast date, says more about the Na- I lional Performance Review than tons of dry academic anal~sis ever rould." I i U.N. arms said stolen, Serbian rebels have used stolen U.N. arms in their offensive against U.N. "safe areas" in Bos- nia and Croatia, according to the countries' ambassadors here. In a letter to all members of Conaress. Sven Alkalaj of Bosnia and Peter Sarcevic of Croatia called the "alarming and danger- ous" theft another example of weakness in the 1J.N. Protection Force.(Unprofor). The two ambassadors also said that American-made TOW 2 and TOW 3 anti-tank missles and launchers were recently stolen from a Danish U.N. contingent in Croatia, but they were later re- turned. They said the stolen U.N. weap- ons are enough to "support one mechanized battalion, two strong air-defense batteries and provide full anti-tank capability to one in- fantry company:' "Such ongoing weaknesses in Unprofor's performance oniy serve to protract Serb aggression and to further complicate an al- Pg. 18 Tanzania refused the deployment out- right, Uganda argued that the Securi- ty Council's concerns were misplaced, and Zaire rejected the premise for the observers: that it was aiding the for- mer Rwandan government forces with arms and training. The U.S.-based group Human Rights Watch recently charged that the U.N. arms embargo, imposed in May 1994, has not been actively en- forced and that weapons shipments have reached the former Rwandan government forces, mostly through !he airport at Goma, Zaire. A report by the Human Rights Watch Arms Project said four months of field investigation in cential Africa had turned up evidence that several countries, including France, Zaire, South Africa, the Seychelles and Chi- na, have assisted the Hutu effort. France and Zaire strongly supported the government of Rwandan presi- dent Juvenal Habyarimana, whose death in an unexplained airplane crash on April 6.1994. sparked the slayings in Rwanda. "Zairian forces close to President Mobutu Sese Seko have played a piv- otal role" in the rearming by giving "shelter and protection" to the former armed forces and militias and allowing the use of Zairian territoly and facili- RWANDA:..^^. 13 -- ly 19, 1995 Pg. 16 ready difficult diplomatic and vastly unbalanced military situa- tion in the region," they said. I 'Unpmfor is bankruptp A committee of former diplo- mats and statesmen has urged President Clinton to make a stand in the Balkans and "stop hoplng that something will turn up." The Action Council for Peace in the Balkans, in a letter to the White House, urged Mr. Clinton to lift the arms embargo, call for a withdrawal of U.N. peace- keepers and launch a "strategic and sustained" NATO air cam- paign against Serbian military targets. Calling the fall of Srebrenica a "new low" for the Western allies, the council wrote, "It is abun- dantly clear that Unprofor is bankrupt.. . . "?b continue it is to perpetuate a massive and expensive hoax, to doom this peacekeeping opera- tion to a slow, humiliating death, to compromise future UN. oper- ations and to erode the founda- tion of European security." The letter was signed by for- mer Ambassadors Morton Abra- mowitz, lMax Kampelman and Jeane Kirkpatrick, former De- fense Secretary Frank Carlucci, former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Bnezinski and former State Department spokesman Hodding Carter. WEDNESDAY; July 19, ..1995 . - . , WALL STREET JOU~FJAL July 199 1995 pg- 10 with a debacle like President Carter's Clinton's Hostage Crisis Desert One. AS Newt Gingrich re- cently said, "I've stopped trying to On present course, the Serbs will weapons. Withdrawal, in short, would give this administration any foreign probably release their hostages dur- almost certainly be a protracted and policy advice for fear they'll follow it ing the inauguration ceremonies of messy military operation. and wind up discrediting it." So we the next president. Against its every Toward this project, President will slide toward the hostage crisis. fiber, the Clinton Administration is Clinton has promised 25,000 American the great irony being that finally dis- being sucked into the Balkan War step ground troops. Under the current playing some leadership over Bosnia after indecisive step. As we learned in command structure, with a U.N. veto is probably the only way President Vietnam, using military power incre- of the use of air power, this would Clinton can be re-elected. mentally rather than decisively is a merely be providing another 25,000 It's time for the next president to path to disaster. hostages. In the air strikes now being be pondering this; the geopolitical With the rape of Srebrenica and contemplated in Washington, simi- consequences of Western humiliation with Zepa now defenseless, we may larly. U.S. airmen cannot be expected in the Balkans will be enormous. Bul- as well face the reality that the worst to repeat Capt. Scctt O'Grady's spec- lies and thieves the world over will be is yet to come. At least it is no longer tacular escape. Any withdrawal oper- encouraged. Moderate Muslim gov- possible to blink dt the fact that "eth- ation, in short, would put American ernments in Turkey and Egypt will be nic cleansing" is a genocidal war of forces at risk. endangered. Whoever succeeds an ail- aggression, and scarcely possible to The safest course for the "peace- ing Boris Yeltsin will be tempted to re- blink at the fact that it proceeds with keepers," and the safest use of U.S. peat Mr. Milosevic's tactic of using the support of Slobodan Milosevic ~n military power. is not the small and chauvinism to establish his domestic Belgrade. The purpose of this war, as incremental mission but the large political power and ethnic excuses to Bosnian Serb leader Radovan and decisive one: Drop the pretenses. recover Russia's near abroad. The Karadzic has declared, is to establish Drop the U.N. command.,Throw in Serbs are not about to bomb Pearl a Serbian state with its capital in with the Bosnians defending their Harbor, but their success would be a Sarajevo. They see less and less im- hbmes and families, and set out to signal of instability ahead, like Mus- pediment to their enterprise; their destroy the threatening military ' solini's conquest of otherwise inconse- top general says. "The Western coun- forces. American airpbwer has the quential Ethiopia. hies have learned they cannot re- capability of destroying military tar- There is the saving grace of some @t their own children to realize gets, including those in Serbia itself, intellectual ferment in the Republican goals outside their homelands." So and of interdicting Serbian supply Congress. Senator Dole is advocating - we will watch as the genocide pro- routes in difficult terrain. With the unilaterally lifting the arms embargo, ceeds to its final solution. proper preparation-isolating the which a t least has the virtue of ac- Theclimate of unreality that got us battlefield, in military parlance-the knowledging the original blunder that to this point continues with the idle numerically superior Bosnian force left the Serbs armed and the Muslims chatter about "withdrawing" the U.N. could likely prevail even without . unarmed. Foreign Relations Chair- peacekeepers." While no longer 25.000 American troops on the man Jesse Helms recently wrote here chained to lampposts, the "peacekeep- ground. Why not, by the way, 25,000 advocating the Reagan doctrine of ers" remain hostages. The mere logis- NATO troops from Turkey-if only as arming those willing to defend them- tics of withdrawing them and their a sign of real seriousness? selves, which did allow the Afghanis equipment with no opposition is a 22- But of course, the Clinton Adminis- to turn back the Red Army: But this is week operation. Even if the Serbs de- tration will do no such thing. It will try only a start toward the rethinking cided to desist, the Bosnian Muslims its best to look the other way. And necessary to a new post-Cold War for- would have every incentive (and every even if it set out on some more deci- eign policy. moral justification) to seize U.N. sive course, it would be likely to end up HOSTAGE. ..Pg. 14 RWANDA ... from PE. lz dagoamMa. with 2,500 F r d soldiers in Opera- the state-owned Air Zaire flew in Zaire has denied any invoIv-t . T u f s ~ ~ , a U.N--amroved h* weapons from the Seychelles that had a conduit.* the said It in rearming the Hutus. Instead of ai t - manrtanan mission in Rwanda been codkated in 1993 from a sbip officials ha,,e profited idao, the Zairian government told 'he l a m t de- route to ! b d i a in violaim d an from the arms shipments through the.United Nab* it should receive nies that any arms were delivered af- arms embargo, Humm RightP Watch ter the embargo. said. It said a Zairian affi;cial and a for- -& frnm p h t e dealers ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ Present and former U.S. i n t e G mer h t b w t i a l * to be used for, where they will be mti0ne.d and what assurances there are that they will remain un- armed 'The sooner these questions a re -wered by KIT - openly and candidly - the less chance there will be that the public's skepticism will grow," he said . + u ~ r e not returned last night. Pettv Officer Meinhold was dls- charged after reWdng on natlonal television in 1992 that he is gay. The regulations under which he was dis- charged were replaced in 1994, and under a court order, he was reinstat- ed last August. refugees and assistance in coping gence. officials said some French helped arrange the sale and Zaire pro- $& the resulting ecological, s o d weapom were indeed flown in after vided false en* certificates. and security budens. the embargo under previous con- American - dealer Fred zeller The Human Rights Watch report -* but that the arms to became mvolved in the trade, but a said France supplied at least five arms the Hutus in g d were smaller deal to ship anns to Goma in &y Ship-& that &ed at the Goma than 1994 fell through when be and three &prt after the embargo took effect. One quantified the Europeans were at-rested in Belgium It said the weapons; including artil- as "fewer than hundreds of on charges d tying to cash travelers lery machine guns, assault rifles and tmr than "pkneloadsw $e- checks stolen from the Rwandan - -*tjon, were taken into Rwanda &bed in some re- Some of the M bank, the re* said by members of the zairian military arms were flown in on chartered Human ~ights watch china a- and delivered to the fleeing Rwandan donat- so has sold weapons reportedty worth army in Cinyi . ed by private charities, he said. several million dollars to the former The French consul in Goma said Human Righb Watch said some of Rwandan government forces via the arms were supplied under prior the phnes arms for the Hu- Zaire, a practice it argued was not contracts with the Rwandan govern- were registered in Zaire* Nigeria* covered by the arms embargo. Last -t, the report Later, a Paris Liberia and Lebanon. In one case, it month's Security Council resolutisn quoted a French cabinet "id, a Liberian-registered aircraft induded such sales in the ban. flown by a Belgian crew landed in as Wing the weapofls Goma with arms from Libya. Stoff writer Thomas K Lippmun lor African SeMng In another instance, two planes of conttibukd to thirrnport. 13 WEDNESDAY, July 19,1995 WASHINGTON POST J u l y 19, 1995 dent Jacques Chiiac said it is neces- sary "to place the Americans square- Set to Prod UeS and ly in to front make of it their cl ar that responsibdties u less theSerb offensive against the enclaves Into Role in Bosnia is stopped now, the United States will ultimately become more deeply engaged once the arms embargo is lifted, U.N. troops pull out and the Serbs try to slaughter the Muslims By W i m Drozdiak Senior French officials said that before they get more weapons." w ~ R ~ F u ~ s ~ ~ ~ Paris is Brit- British Foreign Secretary Mal- ish COllcernS about getting drawn in- ,I,, Rifkind agreed that Paris and PARIS, J U I ~ l&France and Brit- to fighting situations with the Bosni- London %re w o r h g very closely to- 4 at American efforts to an Serbs The debate, these officials gether on a common view," but offi- lqoid military involvement in Bosnia, said, now centers on how best to for- ds bndon said some &ifferen- determined to send a dear signal tify Gorazde, where 300 U.N. ces remain between the two b. the United States that delay in trooPs, m m t b British, are holed UP. European allies. Last w e k , Britain halting Serb aggression now will The French said they are w e - r e s t e d ~ ~ ~ m c * ~ a l l for tough mih- tW to collapse of the U.N. peace- pared to send UP to 1.000 of their t q action against the Serbs. hdepqg mission and require greater troops into the enclave, down from Chirac spoke out after Srebrenica, U;S. involvement in the future, the 3,000 French and British sol- o m of si, U.N.designated "safe ar- Fx&& officials reparted today. dlers suggested by Paris last week. easn--enclaves where Bosnian Mus- Freoch and British officials said But they insisted that only heavy lims were supposed to be protected a y bave resolved earfier different- h'nerican Chinook helicopters have by U.N. forces-fell to Bosnian Serb q over where to draw the line the capacity to ferry their t r o o p in- fo rce July 11, despite the presence the Bosnian Serbs, and now to the area. The Clinton x h n i s t r a - of Dutch U.N. peacekeepers, and q p e that the Muslim enclave of tion and congressional leaders. how- the s r b s swiftly Zepa, a GcmzrJe should be reserved. There ever, are extremely wary of that nearby enclave thinly defended by Rmans some disagreement, howev- task. Ukrainians. Although Chirac first a, about how to save Gorazde, a Senior French officials said they ,ggeted pint military action to re- UN.-designated 'safe area." intend to delivex a message cover Srebrenica, French proposals But both governments, officials President Clinton: Either you pro- bve been s]laved ba& then to a are intent OII winning assuranc- vide up to 100 helicopters to help the idea of letting Gpa fall but rein- es &an the Clinton administration transport French reinforcements to forcing Corazde, the other of three that it win live up to earlier commit- Gorazde, or you should prepare to i, eastem bsnia. amts to support their forces with send 25,000 American soldiers to ifk kind*^ mission is designed to air a d logistical backing--or come help extricate all U.N. peacekeepers secure a with the united to their rescue if they need to be from Bosnia. States before a Friday meeting in evacuated. A senior adviser to French Presi- ~ ~ ~ , j ~ ~ of foreign and defense minis- A DEFENSE NEWS . NEW YORK TIMES July 19, 1995 1 Geman Transports Fly to Italy 1 Asian voice Amplifies I In Support of NA TO in Bosnia Transport planes carrying air &uss security issues. The German Parliament ap- Other countries in the region, includ- mg Australia and New Zealand, repeat- series of nuclear tests from September edly have protested French President through April of 1996 a t the French- Jacques Chirac's decision to conduct a administered Mururoa Atoll. after a fiery debate that reflected worries that the German mili!ary, which has not been deployed in tom- bat in 50 years. could be drawn into the fray h a part of the world still seized with memories of Nazi atroci- ties in World War 11. The Parliament vote, however, was made before the fall of Srebreni- ca and the latest defiance of both NATO and United Nations soldiers by the Bosnian Serb forces. The German warplanes include specially-equipped Tornados that, unlike other NATO aircraft flying , over Bosnia. can both pinpoint hos- I tile missile batteries and fire mis- siles down the same radar beam as the batteries use to lock their anti- Pg. 1 / 1 7 ters from the five powers that form the 'contact groupw working to find a solution to Bosnia's 40-month-old war: the United States, France, Brit- ain, Germany and Russia. Failure to reach agreement on a new course of action could trigger activation of plans to withdraw the 22,500.man U.N. mission in Bosnia, French offi- cials said. Any refusal by the Clinton admin- istration to live up to its promises to bail out the allies, French and British officials said, would call into question the basis of the Atlantic alliance and the future existence of NATO. Now that the Serbs have captured Srebrenica and appear poised to take &pa. Chirac has declared that, at a minimum, t h e Western powers should do everything possible to open a land supply route to Sarajevo, the besieged Bosnian capital, 'and to prevent the fall of Gorazde, which is defended by about 300 British and 100 Ukrainian troops. At a meeting of French, British and American military chiefs in Lon- don on Sunday, France's Adm. Jacques Lanxade pressed the chair- man of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Shff, Gen. John Shalhshvili, for a com- mitment of up to 100 helicopters, with accompanying gunships, to transport the soldiers into the en- clave. But Shalikashvili contended that aircraft missiles onto target. In Paris, Germany's Foreign Min- ister, Klaus Kinkel, warned against military operations that would only make matters worse. a possible ref- erence to French proposals for re- inforcing the United Nations-desig- nated "safe areas" with European troops and reported United States consideration of aggressive air at- tacks in Bosnia. "It is not so easy to resolve this situation and so we must above all keep calm," Mr. Kinkel said. When complete, the German de- ployment will involve some 1,500 personnel, including ground and headquarters staff in Italy and a medical unit to run a military hospi- tal in Croatia. No German ground troops are being sent to Bosnia. I HOSTAGE.. . from Pg. 13 main in power? (Because it was power, but the West and the U.S. have spooked by video pictures of "the high- instead been conducting "peacekeep- The new president will have to way of death".) And why did it sign on ing" premised on good will that does question a great many unarticulated to the Balkan embargo? (Because if not exist. If a new president and new premises. Clearly, for example, the Yugoslavia broke up, it thought, the foreign policy team draw the lessons Y.N. is no monument to idealism, but Soviet Union might break up, and then correctly, they will be trying to forge a useful only as an excuse for inaction. there'd be no one with which to nego- new foreign policy, activist but realis- And why, in the wake of its C;ulf War tiate arms control treaties.) tic, motivated by moral purpose but success, did a good Republican ad- The key to peace in the Balkans without moralistic illusions. ministration let Saddam Hussein re- was -and is a regional balance of BRAC Data Call Thirteen Table of Contents Book One: I. Introduction Section 1: Guidance, Standards, and Assumptions Table 1: Test and Evaluation Facility List 11. ' Total Installation Section 2: Capacity and Technical Resources Section 3: Measures of Merit 111. Digital Modeling and Simulation (DMS) IV. Integration Laboratories o Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test Facility (ASCET) [Appendix A, Tab 11 o E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) Facility [Appendix A, Tab 21 o Helicopter Mission Systems Support Center (HMSSC) [Appendix A, Tab 31 o Fixed Wing ASUW & ASW Lab [Appendix A, Tab 41 o Project Beartrap [Appendix A, Tab 51 V. Measurement Facilities o Catapult, Arresting Gear, and Take-Off Assist Facilities [Appendix A, Tab 61 o Landing System Test Facility (LSTF) [Appendix A, Tab 71 o Propulsion System Evaluation Facility [Appendix A, Tab 81 o Ship Ground Station [Appendix A, Tab 91 o Aircraft Armament Systems Simulation Engineering Test Station (AASSETS) [Appendix A, Tab 101 o Electronic WarfareIAvionics Flight Test Facility [Appendix A, Tab 111 o Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System (ATLAS) in-flight antenna measurement capability [Appendix A, Tab 121 o Aircraft Test and Evaluation Facility (ATEF) [Appendix A, Tab 131 o Electro-Optical & Reconnaissance System Test Facility [Appendix A, Tab 141 o Combat Identification Systems [Appendix A, Tab 151 o Ground Range Antenna Test Facility (GRAFT) [Appendix A, Tab 161 o Acoustic Test Facility (ATF) [Appendix A, Tab 171 o Communications Test and Evaluation Laboratory (COMTEL) [Appendix A, Tab IS] o Surveillance and Topographical Analysis Radar Systems Laboratory (STARS) [Appendix A, Tab 191 VI. Hardware-in-the-Loop Facilities o Aircraft Electrical Evaluation Facility (AEEF) [Appendix A, Tab 201 o Aircrew Systems Test Facility [Appendix A, Tab 211 o Aircraft Stores Certification Test Facility [Appendix A, Tab 221 o Flight Control Computer Test Facility [Appendix A, Tab 231 o Integrated Aircraft Test Laboratory (IATL) [Appendix A, Tab 241 o Aircraft Support Systems Test Facility [Appendix A, Tab 251 VII. Installed Systems Test Facilities o Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) [Appendix A, Tab 261 VIII. Open Air Range Facilities o Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) [Appendix A, Tab 271 o Telemetry Data System Facility [Appendix A, Tab 281 o Airborne Instrumentation Support Facility [Appendix A, Tab 291 o Target Support Facility [Appendix A, Tab 301 o Test and Evaluation Data Processing (Software & Applications) [Appendix A, Tab 311 Books Two and Three: I. Appendix A, Book 1 of 2 Tabs 1-26 Appendix A, Book 2 of 2 Tabs 27-36 NAWCAD Patuxent River T&E Facility Forms: General Information Technical Information Additional Information Facility Condition Historical Workload Determination of Unconstrained Capacity 11. Appendix A Annex (Book 2 of 2) NAWCAD Research and Development Facilities, Warminster Site: General Information Technical Information TECHNICAL INFORMATION F~icllity/Capability Title: Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test Facility (ASCET) Facility Description; Including mission statement: To provide test, evaluation and system engineering functions for Navy Airborne Strategic Communications (ASC) aircraft, avionics, and mission systeme in support of the NAWCAD mission for RDThE of aircraft systeme during all phases of the ASC system life cycle process. The ASCET Facility provides the capability to perform RDT&E and to support OT&E/FOT&E and product improvement efforts on E-6 airborne strategic and tactical communications systems. The ASCET Facility is configured with a Tactical Message Proceseing System (TMPS), Enhanced VERDIN receiver and transmitter terminals, TMPS message simulator and HF/UHF transceivers. The Ground based test site replicates the aircraft mission system thus allowing significant amounts of T&E on both hardware and software to be conducted without a dedicated aircraft asset. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The ASCET Facility supports the E-6's Airborne Communication and avionic systems. It is primarily an Integration Laboratory Test Facility unique to the strategic communication mission. In addition to integration, this facility supports the Cognizant Field Activity (CFA) as a Participating Field Activity (PPA) responsible for any and all support for Engineering Investigations (EI), Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), Avionic Changes (AVC), and Airframe Changes (AFC) for the Airborne Strategic Communication System. Provides operational and technical expertise as needed for fleet subsystem fault isolation, mission training requirements, and special monitoring needs. The ASCET Facility communication system can aleo be utilized with other Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) World Wide Military Command and Control System communication sources using compatible down links. Type of Test Supported: Software Mission Avionics Integration Special Monitoring In-service Engineering TECHNICAL INFORMATION Fac.ility/Capability Title: Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test Facility (ASCET) - Summary of Technical Capabilities: The ASCET Facility provides the capability to perform RDT&E and to support OT&E/FOT&E and product improvement efforts on E-6 airborne strategic and tactical communication syeteme. This facility also supports the CFA as a Participating Field Activity (PFA) responsible for any and all support for Engineering Investigations (EI), Engineering Change Proposals (ECP), Avionic Changes (AVC), and Airframe Changee (AFC) for the Airborne Strategic Communication System. Keywords: TACAMO, Strategic, WMCCS, E-6A, Command & Control. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Fdcility/Capability Title: Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test Facility (ASCET) PERSONNEL ' I ' o t . c ~ l Square Footage: 'I'est Area Squar e Footage : '1'1)rlnage of Equ ipment : Zlrlr111a1 Maintenance Cost : Officer Enlisted Civi 1 ian Contractor Total , Off ice Space Square Footage: Vo 1 ume of Equ I prnen t : Estimated Moving C O S L : CAPITAL EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT (SKI FY93 4 4 7 1 5 n FY93 I FY94 I FY95 I FY96 I FY97 I FY98 I FY99 Sponsor Funded 11720 ) 1 , 4 0 0 I ~ , O O O I ~ , O O O 1 5 0 0 1 3 8 s ( 2 1 5 FY94 4 4 7 1 5 FY95 4 4 7 1 5 FY96 4 6 7 , I 7 FY97 4 6 1 0 2 0 FY98 4 6 1 0 2 0 FY99 4 5 7 1 6 FACILITY CONDITION E ' A C I L I T Y / C A P A B I I , I T Y T I T L E : Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Test Facility (ASCET) AGE: 13 Yeare REPLACEMEN'I' VALIJE: $3. OM (Building and Equipment) MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR BACKLOG: DA'I'E O F LAST UPGRADE: April 1994 PJATIIRE O F LAST UPGRADE: E-6A Mieelon Avionics System installation and upgrade. MAJOR UPGRADES PROGRAMMED 1 . UPGRADE T I T L E : High Power Transmit Set (HPTS) installation TOTAL PROGRAMMED AMOUNT: $4.5M SUMMARY D E S C R I P T I O N : To install HPTS system into the ASCET Facility and procure ancillary equipment needed to effectively utilize system. TOTAL PROGRAMMED AMOUNT: SUMMARY DESCRIPTION: 'Blnoq zoqe1 aaaxyp ZoaJezauoJ pue 'dxeay1~rn 'uey~yays sapnTJu1 - e a o ~ DETERMINATION OF UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY F A ( : l L . l T Y / C A P A B I L I T Y T I T L E : Airborne Strategic Communication Engineering and Teet Facility (ASCET) AIINUAL 11OURS O F DOWNTIME AVERAGE DOWNTIME P E R DAY ( L I N E 1 + 3 6 5 ) AVERAGE HOURS A V A I L A B L E PER DAY ( 2 4 - L I N E 2 ) T E S T T Y P E S 4 Software Mieeion Avionics Integration Special Monitoring In-Service Engineering " T Y P I C A L " T E S T S AT ONE T I M E 5 2 2 1 3 WORKLOAD P E R T E S T P E R F A C I L I T Y HOIJR 6 3 4 4 3 TOTAL WORKLOAD PER FAC I I , I TY f IOUR 7 6 8 4 9 2 7 UNCONSTRAINED C A P A C I T Y PER DAY ( 1 , I N E 3 X 'I'(Yl'A1. 1) 8 6 0 4 . 8 ANNUAL [JNCONSTRAINEII C A P A C I T Y 9 2 2 0 , 7 5 2 - GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: E-2C Syetems Test and Evaluation O r i g i n Date: May 9, 1994 Laboratory (ESTEL) Facility Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T & E Functional Area: Air Vehicle 1 = 00421 ?'&E Test Facility Category: Integration laboratory TI& S&?' w LE OTHER 1 0 0 % PERCENTAGE USE: 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( $ 1 Air Vehicles: 100% Arrnarnent/Weapons: EC : Other : Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" Or1 First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION k'ac:ility/Capability Title: E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) Facility Facl llty Descrlpt ion; I n c l u d i n g mlssion statement : ESTEL's major components are a mobile Joint Tactical Information Display System (JTIDS) data reformat and reduction facility, E-2C tactical computer group (L-304, I/O's, displays, etc), Link 11 (HF and UHF) system, Link-4A system, Link-11 analyzer, mission simulator, and multiple engineering work stations for data analysis. This facility is an essential and integral component in the continuing T&E of E-2C weapons systems upgrades and replacements. ESTEL provides the means to evaluate or assess collected sensor and communications data for an entire outer battle group scenario. ESTEL is government owned and designed to support airborne early warning T&E requirements. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: LINK I1 - UHF and HF receive and transmit; 2250 bits/second LINK 4 - UHF receive and transmit; 5000 bite/second ACETEF - STU Phone Link; 76,800 bits/second ESTEL provides a backup capability to NRAD, San Diego's E-2C computer group stimulate by computer simulation for software life cycle support and Grummanqs Facility for basic R&D. Type of Test Supported: Airborne early warning aircraft, radar, IFF, Passive Detection System, and tactical data link test and evaluation. Sununary of Technical Capabllltles: E-2C data reduction and analysis, Realtime Link 11 and 14, E-2C Mission Reconstruction. Keywords : E-2C. Airborne, Radar, Tracking, Surveillance ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) Facility PERSONNEL l'otal Square Footage: 2,000 '1 '~:; t Area Square Footage: 1,500 Ar~rlual Maintenance Cost : $30K Office Space S q i ~ a ~ t. Footage: Volume of Equl proerit : Estimated Moving Co:;t : CAPITAL EQUIPMENT INVESTMENT ($K) I FY93 I FY94 I FY95 I FY96 I FY97 I FY98 I FY99 Sponsor Funded 1$200 )$250 Is300 ( $400 )$400 1$300 FACILITY CONDITION F A C I L I T Y / C A P A B I L I T Y T I T L E : E-2C Syetems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) Facility Ac;l.:: 9 Years REPLACEMFJN'I' VA1,IIE : $5.9M (Building and Equipment) l l t Z 1NTENANCE AND R E P A I R BACKLOG: DA'I'E OF L A S T UPGRADE: May 1992 PJATURE O F L A S T U P G R A D E : Facility central processor system replacement. M A t l O R IJPGRAIIES PROGRAMMED I . UPGRADE T I T L E : E-2C Group I1 TOTAL PROGRAMMED AMOUNT : $200K SUMMARY D E S C R I P T I O N : Integrate E-2C Group I1 Indicator Group Hardware 2 . UPGRADE T I T L E : Link-16 TOTAL PROGRAMMED AMOUNT: $150K SUMMARY D E S C R I P T I O N : Provide live Link-16 capability. HISTORICAL WORKLOAD t'ACILITY/CAPABILITY TITLE: E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) Facility - - No records Mission - Number of flights supported does not include lab-tests. Note - Includes civilian, military, and contractor direct labor hours. DETERMINATION OF UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY F ' A C I L I T Y / C A P A B I L I T Y T I T L E : E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Laboratory (ESTEL) ArJNUAL HOURS O F DOWNTIME AVERAGE DOWNTIME PER DAY ( L I N E 1 + 3 6 5 ) AVERAGE HOURS AVAILABLE PER DAY ( 2 4 - LINE 2 ) ,- T E S T TYPES 4 Plight Test Data Reduction/Analysis Mission Reconstruction "TYPICAL" T E S T S AT ONE TIME 5 1 3 1 WORKLOAD PER T E S T PER F A C I L I T Y HOUR 6 5 3 5 TOTAL WORKLOAD PER FACII , ITY HOUR 7 5 9 5 1 9 UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY PER DAY ( L I N E 3 x < ; [ ~ o r l : ; :I,'( ' . , . Ot !let : T o t a l i r l B r e a k o ~ ~ t P411st E q u a l "Pe rcen tage U s e " Or1 F i r s t L ine TECHNICAL INFORMATION 1 1 1 1 Y I 1 1 t } I t 1 : Helicopter Mission Systems Support Center (HMSSC) iHll .I , () 51~9~1, >I::III,I,( ) SNO,IVZM/ , I J N ~ ~ E J V I . J ~ l i $ .X.l S 3 ' I ; ) I t I Z A H I V V 3 H V ' 1 V N O l ,Ls:)N1 1:I :.I '? .I , DETERMINATION OF UNCONSTRAINED CAPACITY I I l ' l / A f J t l l l l ' I I I ' I ' I : : Helicopter Mission Systems Support Center (HMSSC) ,' l l l l l I A I ~ l l O l l I { ! ; 0 1 , I~OWPJ ' I ' IMI:~ i\'!l.:l* - Y e , 2@$+gs *:"T*p w'JL c, *' "a; , "#& 2e csbG,,du ' ,, a " -.h i:r GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Electronic Warfare/Avionice Flight Test Facility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 0 0 4 2 1 T&E Test Facility Category: Measurement Facility ThE ShT T&D OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 8 0 % 2 0 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 6 0 % 15% Armament/Weapons: EC : 2 0% 5 % Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentage Use' On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: ~lectronic Warfare/Avionics Flight Test Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Avionics Flight Test Facility provides a real-time test tool to evaluate aircraft avionics weapon syeteme. Aircraft avionics systems include: navigation, communication, Identification Friend or Foe (IFF), radar, Electronic Support Measurements (ESM) , Electronic Counter Measures (ECM), and Electronic Counter Counter Measures (ECCM). The facility is primarily designed to provide multiple signal characteristic emiseions through the utilization of programmable parameter synthesizing for Electronic Warfare (EW) testing. Emitter simulation capabilitiee include multiple continuous wave, pulse, and synthetic antenna scan patterns covering a frequency range of 7 to 35 Ghz. Measurements include warning receiver sensitivity and bearing accuracy and aircraft antenna patterns. The avionics workstation provides for integration of airborne avionics bus data received via real-time telemetry with the ground inetrumentation data. The Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) Dynamic In-flight RCS facility performs high quality dynamic RCS measurements, Jam to signal ratio versus angle, chaff bloom rates, and chaff cloud characteristics. Both HH and VV polarization' s are supported. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The pulse-to-pulse data capture capability is unique at CTR and is essential in providing the Probability Distribution Function (PDF). All Radar Cross Section (RCS) Transmission equipment is shared with the EW test facility to support ESM and Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) testing. The RCS facility takes advantage of the controlled airspace, Time Space Position Information (TSPI), telemetry and control room facilities of the multi-role CTR. The emitter simulations capability can replicate 150 RF and 16 c3 simulations. The engineering Flight Test System integrates and correlates avionics test data, TSPI, and emitter simulations in real-time, creating a "cause and effectw flight testing scenario. Type of Test Supported: This facility is primarily designed to obtain in-flight dynamic RCS data in support of air vehicle and EW syetem development, specification compliance, life cycle analysis and RCS data base entry. Additional avionics testing supporting navigation, communication, and IFF are also supported. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Electronic Warfare/Avionics Flight Test Facility Summary of Technical Capabilities: Eight non coherent RCS measurement systems operating from 1 to 35 Ghz and one wideband coherent system operating over the 8 to 12 Ghz range. Precision Vitro RIR 778 precieion tracking radars for TSPI, Telemetry etation for precision target attitude information all integrated into a real-time engineering workstation. Keywords : Radar Cross Section (RCS), Jam to Signal Ration ( J / S ) , Chaff, Radar Signature, Emitter Simulations and c3 Simulation. GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System Origin Date: May 9, 1994 (ATLAS) in-flight antenna measurement capability Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD TLE Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Meaeurement Facility IT& S&T D&E - IE - T&D QTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 9 0% 5% 5% BREAKOIIT RY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 75% 3% 3% Armament/Weapons: 5% EC : 10% 2 % 2% Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Usea On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System (ATLAS) in-flight antenna measurement capability Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System (ATLAS) test facility provides the unique capability to measure the in-flight antenna radiation patterns of airborne antennas with accuracy normally obtainable only under laboratory conditions for frequency ranges between 2 MHz and 18 GHz. This capability ensures reliable and functional antenna systems are sent to or installed in fleet aircraft with the ATLAS laboratory used as a specification range for aircraft antenna systems and for verification of data obtained at other DOD antenna ground ranges and/or contractor antenna test facilities. The ATLAS facility's capability to measure free-space in-flight antenna patterns and reference them to an isotropic source is unique. The location of the ATLAS facility on the Chesapeake Bay provides its antennas with an unobstructed electromagnetic propagation path over a calm body of water which serves as a reflection surface for RF energy. The calmness of the Bay allows accurate characterization of reflecting electromagnetic energy which is used to determine antenna gains relative to isotropic radiators. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The ATLAS facility is interfaced with the Chesapeake Test Range Facilities for radar tracking support during in-flight antenna radiation pattern testing. The interface uses a Synchronoua Data Link Control (SDLC) protocol with a data rate of 50 Kbits. Space position data or other data can be exchanged in both directions between the two facilities. Reduced data can be exported in a variety of digital media ( 9 track & 8 mm tapes, floppy disks) and over the INTERNET system. Patterns measured at the SYlOO antenna ground range can be put into ATLAS'S graphical analysis tools for comparison to the in- flight patterns on the same antenna. Type of Test Supported: In-flight antenna patterns on airborne platforms is the primary measurement conducted with ATLAS. Ship board antenna patterns, Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) and minimal detected signal measurements can also be measured. ATLAS also provides the antenna engineer with various analytical tools to supplement the antenna pattern data to fully evaluate the antenna performance. These tools include computer antenna modeling programs used to analytically predict characteristics of antenna's mounted on complex structures. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircrew Systems Test Facility Environmental/Electronics Laboratorv The laboratory contains equipment to measure aircraft induced environmental effects on pereonnel such as radiation hazards; acoustical noise; VSTOL downwash flowfields; cockpit/cabin temperatures, pressure, toxic gas; physiological performance; and epeech intelligibility. The facility also supports instrumentation build up, calibration of test equipment, and reduction of acoustic data. Fife Su~~ort/Fluid Ploy sad Gas Lab This lab is used to test aircraft life support (oxygen) systems as well as their integration with other aircraft or personal systems. Complete aircraft oxygen systems are prototyped or mocked-up for testing syetem modifications or preliminary system design. Compressed air sources are available to eimulate aircraft engine bleed air and two mechanical breathing machines simulate a wide range of aircrew breathing profiles. microcomputer, with special analog 1/0 circuitry, provides data storage and analysis capability. The laboratory is also certified to perform trace contaminant analysis of aviator breathing oxygen and ie used to calibrate all types of fluid flow equipment used in airborne flight testing. Mobile VSTOL Downwash Laboratory This is a portable facility/capability that provides test fixtures, a remote control survey vehicle, portable flight director station/measurement/data analysis capability to measure the wind characteristics and flowfield of vertical takeoff aircraft. This is the only such facility in the U.S. and performs work for DOD, FAA, and NASA. Equipment is also available to mag engine exhaust plumes. Crewstation Lishtinu and Niaht Vision Goaale Laboratory This laboratory is used to test aircraft display lighting and night vision systems, aircraft transparencies, and aircraft exterior lighting. The lab contains a large variety of automatic and manual photometric equipment for use both in the lab and in the aircraft. The lab also contains specialized photometers for evaluating night lighting which effect night vision systems. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircrew Systems Test Facility Facility Description; ~ncluding mission statement: Aircrew Systems Test Facility ( 8 labs) provide the capabilities required for test and evaluation of life Support Systems, Environmental Control Systems, Escape and Survival Systems, Internal and External Lighting, Night Vision Systems and Human Pactors/Man- Machine Interface Factore resulting from the integration of all the mechanical, avionic, and environmental sub-systems of the total aircraft. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Chemical intrusion testing with Dugway Army Proving Grounds. Mobile Vertical/Short Take Off and Landing (VSTOL) Downwash Lab supports all DOD branches, NASA, and FAA test requirements. Type of Test Supported: Aircraft Life Support Systems, Environmental Control System, Escape and Survival Systems, Internal and External Lighting, Night Vision, Human Factors Test and Evaluation, and aircraft Cockpit Crewstation Integration. Summary of Technical Capabilities: Eight different laboratories contain fixed lab teat equipment as well as portable test fixtures to allow lab tests, aircraft ground tests and flight tests. Aircrew ESCaDe and Survival Svetems Laboratory This lab is used to test aircraft escape systems, survival equipment (helmets, protective clothing, etc.), helicopter emergency flotation systems, chemical defense ensembles, fixed/crashworthy seating systems, negative-% restraint systems and aircrew inflight physiological responses. The laboratory has specialized test fixtures, equipment, and instrumentation to perform the specialized tests. The lab also support8 Navy aircraft chemical intrusion tests. - GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Electro-Optical & Reconnaieeance System Test Facility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N 0rganizationIActivity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicle UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Measurement Facility (MF) T&E S&T Qk!2 - IE T&D OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 100% Arrnament/Weapons: EC : Other : Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentaqe Use" On First Line I TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Electro-Optical & Reconnaissance System Test Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement : MISSION: To provide testing expertise on aircraft EO/RECCE systems during all phases of aircraft weapon syetem test and evaluation. DESCRIPTION: The EO/RECCE System Test facility extensively utilizes Open Air Ranges to support data collection of critical information regarding integrated system performance. This facility provide8 ground and airborne etimulus test capability to support sensor T&E for EO, Electronic Warfare (EW), night combat, and RECCE missions. The facility comprised of flight crew, engineere, and laboratory technicians provide the capabilities to support the development, integration, and T&E of electro-optic, infrared (IR), laser and RECCE systems as stand alone systems and as fully integrated aircraft systems. Test and evaluation is conducted using special optical test equipment, and unique laboratory and target assets. Laboratory and ground test assets are available which provide project/facility support for laser safety measurements and analysis, a test equipment development environment, and laboratory syetem measurement and evaluation capability. The majority of the ground tests are conducted in hangars or on the aircraft flight line. The majority of the EO/RECCE flight tests are conducted on either the Chesapeake Test Range, Patuxent River or at Webster Field located in nearby St. Inigoes, MD. Tnterconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Integration and interface with other unique NAWCAD PAX laboratories and the Chesapeake Test Range supports aircraft installed sensors and integrated aircraft weapon systems tests. The compilation of these unique laboratories, test equipment, optical targets and ranges provide a unique DOD test capability for integrated aircraft weapon systems, to support the Navy, other government agencies, private sector, and foreign governments. ~nterconnectivity is established through computer networks, microwave links. and by physical linkage through cables. The majority of the EO/RECCE equipment can be moved to link with other EW equipment, simulation or stimulation equipment, and aircraft or laboratory data buses as required. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Electro-Optical & Reconnaissance System Test Facility . Type of Test Supported: The primary type of tests supported are EO/RECCE system performance and platform integration. Specifically, system performance includes: resolution, probability of detection, sensitivity, dynamic range, false alarm susceptibility, signal output, effectiveness, pointing accuracy, tracking capability, and eyetem hand-off. Platform Integration includes: EO/EW/RECCE interface, field of regard and field of view measurements, and foresight. The types of systems evaluated include: Warning Receivers (IR, UV, laser), Laser Systems (Rangefinders, Target Designators, Spot Trackers, Radar, RECCE, Anti-collision systems, Altimeters, Velocimetere), Countermeasures (IR, EO, laser vulnerability) and RBCCE Sensors (Cameras, FLIR, Down Looking IR (DLIR), IR Search and Track, Low Light Level TV, Direct View Optics, Line Scanners) and associated processors, detectors, optics, libraries, controls and displays. Summary of T'ectlrlical Capabilities: The EO/RECCE laboratory provides an array of test equipment including radiometers, collimators, photometric devices, optical componente, cameras, lenses, computers, tables and benches, lasers, stimulators and standard laboratory instrumentation. This equipment is used to conduct performance and platform integration tests. A 20 ft x 30 ft Electro-Optic Test Target (EOTT) consisting of rotatable, vertical three-sided panels provides active and passive bar array targets and the capability to acquire quantitative data on the dynamic performance of FLIR devices, televisions and laser sensor systems. The three sides of the panel8 may be selectively heated t o provide precise differential temperatures. Photographic resolution target6 utilizing four standard "Aw type resolution targets symmetrically located at NISE East, St. ~ndigoes for testing RECCE systems are also available as are portable test targets for use in off site flight testing. Tests of laser warning devices are routinely supported by the Chesapeake Test Range using the Range Directorate LRY-1000 laser rangefinder/designator which provides very accurate Time, Space, Position Information (TSPI) data and an excellent means of testing an onboard laser warning system in an actual maritime environment. Flight test assets located at NISE East, St. Indigoes also provide a location to test onboard laser system performance during air to ground encounters, as well as host the above mentioned EOTT and resolution targets. ATARS I Test Di spl ay S t a t i on I Hi ss i on Dat a Mi ss i on ---: Date ------* . 245 93 Ti me ------• . 14: 41: 11 Sensor ----• . L FOV ------* . 140 FODA/SODA -: 090 L a t i t ude --: 038.08.005 N Longi t ude -: 076.25.021 11 Headi ng ---: 244.2 Vel oci t y --: 0367.1 Hei gh t ----• . 00552 ~~l I ------- -00.4 Pi t c h -----* . 002.0 Yaw ------- . 001. 0 Enhancement Hi s t o r y Sobel -----: 0 Hi s t ogram -: 0 L i nea r ----: 0 R o t a t e ----: 0 MagX . 8.52 FFOV Fi I e: H450053614411 1XR5C244 Targe t # --: 1 IRS ------: I n t e r p r e t e r : H. WILSON I ATARS I Test Di spl aq St - a t i a ( Ni ss i on Dat a Hi ssi on ---: T2 Date ------a . 081 01 Ti me ------* + 13:14:1 Sensor ----• . N FOV ------* . 022 FODA/SODA -: 092 Lat i t ude --: 038.09. Longi t ude -: 076.26. Headi n g ---: 256.0 Vel oci t y --: 0476.1 Hei ght ----• . 24464 ~ o l I ------* . 000.5 Pi t ch -----* . 001.4 Yaw ------- . 000.2 Enhancement Hi s t o r Sobel -----. . 0 Hi s t ogram -: 0 L i near ----• . 0 Rot at e ----• . 0 HagX ------. 100.0X 1 Fi l e: T2 Target # --: I I R S ------: I n t e r p r e t e r : H. M i l : ............................ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C @ I I I I I I I I I O a J 7 J I I I I S l I I 0 - 0 3 C F c I I I 0 I I L I f n 3 + ! z . - c r I . - o \ + . - . - G i - I I U ) ( U ( U W a . - m o o m - u U ) - E S > O c r S m - . - - c r K .- a . - w o o a o w w w 0.- a z = O k m L L L L J J I > x E a > GRNRRAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Combat Identification Syeteme origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicle UIC = 0 0 4 2 1 T&E Test Facility Category: Measurement Facilities S&T EL!^ 2 x 2 OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 5 5 % 30% 5 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 50% 28% 5 % Armament/Weapons: EC : 5% 2 % Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Combat Identification Systems Supports the engineering development and other technical life cycle support, including Test and Evaluation (TQE) and Systems Engineering (S&E), of airborne and ground direct and indirect Identification (ID) Systems from concept definition to full integration in battle force environment Developmental Tests. The facility supports development operational requirements and specifications, contractor selection, system integration, and provides DoD/NATO test capabilities for the conduct of Developmental Test and Evaluation (DT&E) and support of Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E). The facility is also ueed to A DoD/Allied Nations ID test and evaluation facility (NIFFTE) and data analysis facility (CISDAC) for joint and interoperable use. Supports other NAVAIRWARCENACDIV directorates, NAVAIRSYSCOM, SPAWARSYSCOM, Department of the Navy, ~ i r Force, Army and Allied government a. (Type of Test Supported: Identification Systems performance parameters such as ID range, Range Accuracy, Range Resolution Azimuth Accuracy, Azimuth Reeolutlon, Probability of ID, System Integrity/Jamming, Exploitation, Spoofing, Multipath Effects, Capacity, Interrogation Volume, Mode Prioritization, and Diversity. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The NAWCAD Combat Identification Systems test facilities consists of the Navy IFF Test and Evaluation Laboratory (NIFFTE) and Combat Identification Systems Data Analysis Center (CISDAC). The test facilities evaluate air, surface, ground identification, and data link systems. The present NIFFTE lab provides automated, instrumented Interrogator and Transponder Systems. The lab is adaptable t o incorporate various developmental Repeatability and Test Data Integrity for test systems. The CISDAC is a Multiple Source Data Fusion/Reduction system for Performance Prediction and Analysis. Also test facilities exist to support laboratory closed loop, parametric, anti-jam, vulnerability and interference testing. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Combat Identification Systems Keywords : A I Air Interrogator AIMS ATCRBS IFF Mark XI1 Syetem ATC Air Traffic Control ATCALS Air Traffic Control and Landing Systems ATCRBS Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System AWACS Airborne Warning and Control System B V R Beyond Visual Range CAI Cooperative Aircraft Identification C I Combat Identification CI/CAI Combat Identification/Cooperative Aircraft Identification CISDAC Combat Identification Syetems Data Analyeie Center CIT Combined Interrogator/Traneponder FRUIT False Replies Unsynchronized in Time I D Identification IFF Identification Friend or Foe PID Probability of ID X P Traneponder GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Ground Range Antenna Teat Facility (GRATF) Origin Date: May 9 , 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Locat ion : Patuxent River, MI) T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicle UIC = 0 0 4 2 1 T&E Test Facility Category: Meaeurement Facility TkE PERCENTAGE USE : 7 0 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 50% 15% T6LD OTHER = l o o % Other : Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentaqe Use' On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION ~acility/~apability Title: Ground Range Antenna Test Facility (GRATF) Facility Description; Including mission statement: The GRATF utilizes an automated measurement system to perform antenna measurements in the 500 MHz to 18 OH2 frequency range. The facility has a 22 it fiberglass tower which can be slewed in azimuth and/or elevation and which can accommodate antennas and models weighing up to 400 lbs. The tower is movable and can traverse a 500 ft track to obtain far-field antenna radiation patterns on antennas of various physical and aperture sizes. The GRATF functions as a specification range for aircraft antennas and is used for verification of data obtained at other DOD antenna ground ranges and contractor antenna test facilities. The GRATF is ale0 used to perform antenna performance tests prior to flight tests to ensure valid flight tests are performed. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: GRATF is linked to the Antenna Testing Laboratory Automated System (ATLAS). Data can be transferred from one facility to the other to enhance aircraft antenna system testing. Type of Test Supported: Antenna radiation patterns; Antenna gain; Antenna beamwidth/beam shape; Effective radiated power; Radome Transmissivity; Pointing Accuracy; Antenna isolation; Full-scale UAV antenna radiation patterns. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The GRATF utilizes a Scientific-Atlanta SA2012 positioner/controller and a Hewlett-Packard 85108 RF Network Analyzer. The positioner/controller and network analyzer are controlled by an HP9000 series computer to automate antenna radiation pattern measurements. In addition, the HP8510 can maintain phase lock from 45 MHz to 26.5 GHz which speeds up data acquisition significantly. The Scientific-Atlanta 5323-7-B-M azimuth-over-elevation positioner supports the SA5362A 22 it fiberglass tower to support 3-dimensional measurements for antennas, radomes, UAV's and aircraft mock-ups weighing up to 400 lbs. Keywords : Antenna, Radome, Network Analyzer, Ground Range, Antenna Radiation Patterns, Transmissivity, Gain, Beamwidth TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Acoustic Test Facility (ATF) he Acoustic Test Facility (ATF) consiets of three separate capabilities; laboratory and obile Acoustic Test Facilities and the Automated Quick Look (AQL) Land Programmable coustip Proceseor Stimulator (PAPS). The ATF providee realistic and controllable imulation of sonobuoye, ocean acoustic conditions and submarine targets. The facility upports laboratory and flight test evaluations of ASW acoustic sensor processing quipment and computer eoftware programs that are to be ueed in fixed wing and/or rotary ing aircraft mission systems. he facility also provides training in ASW acoustic system operat ion and recognition of pplications include tests on acoustic syetems, subsystems, and components to establish design specifications, determine performance in various simulated acoustic conditions using varioue ocean target models, verify and validate ASW acoustic system software acoustic data processor simulations for ASW syetem-aircraft platform integration, verify, and validate the acoustic eignature library and auto detect software routines, evaluate aircrew performance and system human factor aspects. Sununary of Technical Capabilities: The Acoustic Test Facility provides simulation and stimulation to support testing of all acoustic sensor processing equipment and computer software programs ueed in aircraft mission systems. Keywords : ASW, Acoustic Sensor, Sonobuoy I GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/capability Title: Communications Test and Evaluation Origin Date: May 9 , 1 9 9 4 Laboratory (COMTEL) Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCM Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Measurement Facilities TfiiE rn !&!3 rn OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 8 5 % 5 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 8 0 % 3 % Armament/Weapons: EC : 5 % 2 % 2 % Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line .A TECHNICAL INFORMATION ~acility/~apability Title: Communications Test and Evaluation Laboratory (COMTEL) Facility Description; Including mission statement: The purpose of this facility is to provide assets for evaluation of High Frequency (HF), Very High Frequency (VHP), Ultra High Frequency (UHF), Electronic Counter-counter Meaeures (ECCM) communications, Satellite communicatione (SATCOM), Radio Frequency (RF) information data links and their antenna systems integrated in fixed and rotary wing aircraft. The facility provides the unique capability for testing airborne communications over the HP, VHF, and L frequency bands in an unobstructed over-the-water test environment limited only by line of eight propagation conditions. The facility has capabilities to conduct tests in secure (COMSEC), SATCOM and SATCOM DAMA nodes, and to test susceptibility of communication syetems to Electronic Counter Meaeuree (ECM) systeme. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The test facility can provide interconnectivity with other SATCOM TLE facilities such as Naval Underwater Warfare Center (NUWC), New toudon, CT., Naval Command, Control and Ocean Surveillance Center In-service Engineering and RDTLE Division. The facility also can provide normal and ECCM communication signals to evaluate ECM and ESM syetems as well as conduct joint interoperability tests with Air Force and Army ECCM communications systems such as SINOGARS, JTIDS, HAVE QUICK I and 11. Type of Test Supported: Communications performance tests such as normal and COMSEC communication mode verification, ECCM communications interoperability verification, voice intelligibility, message throughout, message error rate, Bit Error rate, SATCOM carrier to noise (C/No) measurement, SATCOM Non-DAMA and DAMA interoperability verification, maximum communication ranges and coverage tests. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility /Capability Title: Communications Test and Evaluation Laboratory (COMTEL) The facility provides capabilities and aeeete to evaluate HF, VHF, UHF, ESCM, SATCOM, RF information data lank communication syeteme and their antenna systems ae integrated in fixed and rotary wing aircraft. Instrumentation/Aesetst Facility aseete include transceiver test benches (Signal generators, audio analyzer, modulation analyzer, audio power meter, RF power meters), ARC- 182/ARC-120 test bench, H?, VHF, and UHF Transceivere, HAVE QUICK radio sets (ARC-164, ARC- 182 and ARC-2101, SINOGARS radio sets (PRC-119 and ABC-2101, Non-DAMA UHF SATCOM ground etation, and DAMA SATCOM (WSC-3/TDl27 1) ground station, audio recorder, BER analyzers spectrum analyzers, BCM RF sources, REPEAT Data recorder, MIL-STD-1553 Mux Bus analyzer COMSEC equipment, data link analysis system, HF, VHF, UHF, and SATCON antenna systems. HF, VHF. UHF, SATCOM, ECCM, HAVE QUICK, SINOGARS, JTIDS, COMSEC, ARC-182/ARC-210, DAMA aircraft communicatione, and flight test. GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Surveillance and Topographical Analysis Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Rad Systems Laboratory (STARS) Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicle UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Meaeurement Facilitiee ThrE ShT P6LE Th9 OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 80% 10% 5 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 7 5% 5 % 5% Armament/Weapons: EC: 5% 5 % Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentage Use" On First Line - 2 TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Surveillance and Topographical Analysis Radar Systems Laboratory (STARS) The STARS Laboratory ie a 400 square foot facility which provides the capability to conduct Test and Evaluation of airborne radar surveillance, weather detection, topographical analysis, and classified radar systems. A 360 degree unobstructed field of iew limited only by line of sight propagation conditions allows surface and subsurfac eating in a brown/blue water environment. The STARS Laboratory is the only Navy test site with Tri-service capabilities for radar- ode IFF operations eat and Evaluation of airborne radar surveillance, weather detection, surface and ubsurface target detection, parametric measurements, and radar-mode IFF flight testing. Technical capabilities include parametric measuremente, transmission line (loss, waveguide integrity, exploitation, fleet support, ground station support for flight testing, assessment of weather detection capability, and Radar Cross Section (RCS) measurements. This facility provides a unique capability for testing x-band airborne radar systems over the frequency range of 8 . 0 to 12.0 GHz. Radar, Ocean Surveillance, Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar, Weather Detection, IFF GSNERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: A i r c r a f t E l e c t r i c a l E v a l u a t i o n F a c i l i t y (AEEF) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 T&E Functional Area: A i r V e h i c l e s UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Hardware In the L o o p PERCENTAGE USE : 9 0% 5% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( 3 ) Air Vehicles: 90% 5% Armanent/Weapons: I Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Electrical Evaluation Facility (AEEF) To perform test and evaluation on aircraft electrical systems in support of the NAWCAD mission for RDTLE of aixcraft systems. Conducts ThE of aircraft electrical systems and components of primary, secondary and emergency power generation systems. Includes test facilities for power conversion equipments, emergency and auxiliary power unite, constant speed drives or transmissions, engine starters, battery chargers, power distribution and control equipments, electrical wiring and wiring inetallations, drive shaft8 and couplings, hydraulic motor-generators, hydraulic pumps, avionic cooling and environmental phenomena. The AEEF's environmental chambers can and are used to conduct tests of non-electrical omponents on an as needed basis. Type of Test Supported: Aircraft electrical power generating system performance, MIL-STD-810 Environmental. MIL- STD-461 EMI, and aircraft electrical wiring testing, Salt /Fog, Fungus Sunmlary of Technical Capabilities: Temverature/~ltitude Facilities - Ten chambers with work space from 1 cubic foot to 343 cubic feet, altitude capability from sea level to 150,000 ft, and temperature ranges from -73 deg to 177 deg C. Large walk in chamber (343 cubic feet) provisions for up to 40 lbs/min of conditioned equipment cooling air. Environmental Facilities - Salt fog/all salinities and 80 cu. ft. sulfur dioxide, Sand, Dust, Fungus and relative humidity (20 to 100 percent) chamber. Dvnamic Test Facilities - 4,500 to 24,000 lb force sine and random vibration from 10 to 2,000 Hz. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Electrical Evaluation Facility (AEEF) Shock Facilitiea - Half-sine or saw tooth shock pulses of 3 ma to 30 me duration on test articles up to 350 lb. mchanical Interface Teat Facilities - Capability to perform fatigue and wear testing of drive couplings up to 1.525 inch pitch diameter at torques to 500 lb it, at misalignment to 0.5 degree and at 28,000 RPM. A & a . g & ~ - 13 test stands, loads to 150 KVA, speed to 30,000 RPM, accelerations/deceleratione to 1800 RPM/sec, power to 300 HP, oil or air cooling interface, programmable operations. glectromacrnetic Interference Facility - MIL-STD-461/462 narrowband and broadband emissions and susceptibility testing. Two shielded encloeures, one interfaced with a 200 HP drive, filtered power, load sources and CSS-750 computer controlled spectrum surveillance system to analyze and record data from 10 KHz to 18 GHz. RS03 to 200 V/meter. Wind Tunnel - open circuit aubeonic wind tunnel with a 3 ft dia by 6 ft long cylindrical test section capable of testing various component equipment including emergency electrical /hydraulic power packages at speeds ranging from 12 to 230 KTS. Jet Enaine Simulato~ - Provides jet engine simulation of various engine drag torque vs speed prof iles for testing electric starter and starter generators. Combined Environment Testina (CET) Facility - Consists of two 64 cubic feet chambers capable of providing programmable temperature, humidity, cooling air and vibration conditions. - Keywords : Electrical, Mechanical, Environmental, Temperature, Altitude, ~lectromagnetic Interference (EMI), Salt/Fog, Fungus TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Stores Certification Test Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Aircraft stores certification test facility provides the capability to conduct test and evaluation of fixed and rotary wing aircraft/armament compatibility including armament/stores management systems; suspension and release equipment; physical fit; store captive carriage and separation test build up; interface with loading and ship installation equipment; internal gun installations and external gun pods; towed and powered targets; and verification of technical manuals and procedures for fleet use. Ballistic characteristics of rocket, gun and bomb ordnance are determined and weapon delivery, fuzing and safe escape data provided for fleet use in tactical manual format. Major facilities include: Munition/Store Laboratories: These laboratories include 2 enclosed concrete structures (Firing Tunnels) 300 ft X 40 ft X 25 ft high which are used for internal and external gun firing tests. Measurements can be made of muzzle velocity, cyclic rate of gun fire, projectile dispersion, boresight retention, boreeight adjustment procedures, gun gas concentration and gun gas temperatures. Evaluations of ammunition feed and spent case ejection systems are conducted. Totally enclosed construction allows for live ground firing of all fixed aircraft guns as well as all crew served systems. Data can be collected via 96 real-time channels from a remote control room allowing instant review and correlation with closed circuit TV. Mass Properties Laboratory: This facility is used to acquire accurate weight, center of gravity, and 3-axis moment of inertia measurement8 for air launched munitions armament equipment. It is new facility capable of fast turn around store measurements of missiles, bombs, pods, or any other external weapon/store unit. Data are recorded by a stand-alone suite of electronic recording equipment with rapid data retrieval and correlation capability. Indoor Ground Ejection Facility: This facility is used to evaluate bomb racks to determine ejection velocities, store pitch rates, arming wire and device system function and reliability. Repeated store ejections may be conducted in a short time frame in order to evaluate store or rack characteristics. Ordnance Electrical Systems Laboratory: This laboratory provides the capability to simulate input and output for all weapon release system components including multiple ejector racks, intervalometers, arming and fuzing functions and other factors essential to aircraft/armament compatibility tests. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Stores Certification Test Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: (continued) The Rocket Test Stand allows direct observation of the test range and the capability to fire all rockets up to 5 inch diameter with inert or non-explosive warheads at safe angles into the test range area. It is linked to Chesapeake Test Range personnel and safety craft via radio to ensure safe operations. The facility provides for the recording of instrumentation output and interface with the real-time telemetry processing system. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The Mass Properties Laboratory resource provides complete mass properties for 100% of the stores used by NAWCAD aircraft. Data are also provided for instrumentation packages, electronic equipment, and flight helmets, all of which serve the needs of engineers throughout NAWC and the tri-service. Type of Test Supported: Aircraft stores certification testing including guns, rockets, missiles, and droppable external stores. Additional teats include weapon systeme electrical compatibility and mass property measurements. Summary of Technical Capabilities: Aircraft stores certification test facilities provide the capability to conduct test and evaluation of fixed and rotary wing aircraft/armament compatibility including armament/stores management systems; suspension and release equipment; physical fit; captive flight and separation characteristics; interface with loading and ship installation equipment; internal gun installations and external gun pods; towed and powered targets; and verification of technical manual8 and procedure8 for fleet use. INSTRUMENTATION ASSETS: HP data recording system (96 channel). Continuous wave doppler radar ballistics system. Two 300 ft firing tunnels. KGR 3500 + KGR 350 mass properties instruments. Floor and crane scalea. Center of gravity positioners. Related computers for data recording and record keeping. - TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Stores Certification Test Facility Summary of Technical Capabilities: (continued) Protective blast walle and screens. Hardened control and observation room. Azimuth and elevation adjustable rocket firing stand. Test stand with 4000 lb capacity, adjustable height from 4-14 ft. Full array of data recording and retrieval equipment. Keywords : Stores Certification, Weapon Separation, Firing Tunnel Aircraft Interface, Electrical Compatibility, Stores, Guns, Rockets, Mass Propertiee GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Stores Certification Teat Facility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category : Hardware-in-the-Loop E l 2 S6.a PhE J 3 OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 10 0% Armament/Weapons: EC : Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentage Use" On First Line A TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Support Systems Test Facility hie facility provibl behe necessary integrated teat facilities to develop, test, an valuate all aviation common and peculiar Support Equipment (SE) within its eimulated o ighly dependent on the uee of Naval and Marine Corps aircraft and enlisted military ereonnel assigned to other unite at Patuxent River. Utilize electromagnetic teat and valuation capabilities of the Systems Test Directorate at NAWCAD-Patuxent River and AVSURFWPNSCEN, Dahlgren, VA. perational Suitability and Supportability of sE. Consolidated Automated Support Systems (CASS) Laboratory containing five ( 5 ) CASS stat ions. Uninstalled Engine Test Facility containing two (2) test pads, holdback Support Equipment (SE), Supportability Evaluation (SUPEVAL), Coneolidated Automated Support System (CASS), Peculiar SE (PSE). common SE (CSE), Avionice SE (ASE), Automatic Test Equipment (ATE), Test Program Set (TPS), Propulsion SE, Aircraft Engine Test System8 (AETS), Armament and Weapons SE (AWSE) . fl & ! rl Pg U u Q) 3 o m PI a, rl c (Y .rl ;I U -4 0 # # (I] U m k a . rl U 11 h 0 4 U H 3 0" * a, [I) $1 3 JJ Z a, Z E ' m a u rl U v c 4 L a, U 0 k u a, : # d a rl W U w (I] 2 # U -4 4 7 ? 0 .-f B d x U d Z - m U v a, < . F l u cv - k ' A H m C 0 B 2 c .rl .4 . . 0: C l k 2 J 4 U 4 a ; 0 a -4 C tn Q) # g : # * * @ o(D 5l u E l : 8 w k ( ; ; U " E (Y 0 a, U E 0) 2 2 Cr, C .r( 0 d d .. a " W m m a -4 c U W d a J W E d g Z .: g 3 .d U \ JJ U w m s c .. u a, a, 4 E > E 3 k 8 3 a, a, -,-, -I Crr I . . , > Z B - r ( k U U k W W U < < < W O a) d 4 r r : W W @ e w P; a m TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Air Combat Environment Test & Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) is a fully integrated ground test facility that allows full spectrum test & evaluation of highly integrated aircraft and aircraft systems in a secure and controlled engineering environment. The facility uses state-of-the-art simulation and stimulation technologies to provide test scenarios that reproduce the conditions of actual combat. ACETEF facilities are divided into Simulation & Analysis, Electronic Combat Stimulation, Manned Flight Simulation, and Electromagnetic Environmental Effects departments which support "bench" tests of simulations & uninstalled systems as well as tests of fully installed systems in a shielded hangar, anechoic chamber and/or other local and remote sites. ACETEF is a one of a kind facility which provides an integration of wargaming, man-in-the-loop, hardware-in-the-loop, and electromagnetic environmental effects test capabilities. Simulation & Analvsis DeDartment Operations & Control Center (OCC) The Operations & Control Center provides the cornerstone for total integrated multi- platform ground testing in the ACETEF. Threat generation is provided by the Simulated Warfare Environment Generator (SWEG). SWEG is the core of the OCC, generating the threat scenarios and maintaining control of red and blue players. Test execution, data distribution, and test instrumentation are also controlled by the OCC. Aircrew Svstems Evaluation Facilitv (ASEF I The Aircrew Systems Evaluation Facility provides the tools necessary to evaluate the man- machine interface and crew workload during ACETEF testing. Controls, displays, and cockpit layouts are rapidly prototyped and evaluated early in the development process to reduce the cost of correcting design errors. In addition. ASEF provides a low fidelity man-in-the- loop capability through multiple desktop crewstations to support tests in other ACETEF labs. EC Stimulation DeQartment The ACETEF Electronic Combat Stimulation Department consists of four separate functional laboratories. These labs can work independently or as integrated systems to provide an RF/EO signal rich environment to aircraft located in test areas at Patuxent River or off site. Blectronic warfare Intearated Svstems Test Laboratorv (EWISTLI The Electronic Warfare Integrated Systems Test Laboratory (EWISTL) provides multispectral open loop stimulation to aircraft EW systems. These systems consist of radar warning receivers, jamming systems, electronic support measures, laser warning, and passive missile approach warning. EWISTL provides this stimulation to bench and installed systems at RF through direct injection, close coupled hats, or free space radiation. -- TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Facility Description; Including mission statement: (continued) The Threat Air Defense Laboratory (TADLI The Threat Air Defense Laboratory (TADL) provides closed loop radar/missile stimulation to aircraft EW systems. TADL currently has one surface to air weapon system and one early warning/acquisition radar. Connecting TADL to aircraft jamming systems provides test engineers with jamming effectiveness data such as missile miss distance, tracking break lock errors, burn through, and sector coverage. Communications. Naviuation. Identification Laboratory iCNIL1 The Communications, Navigation, Identification Laboratory (CNIL) provides open and closed loop stimulation of DoD CNI systems and EW surveillance systems. CNIL has a GPS simulator, a multi-emitter open loop simulator, several closed loop radio systems, a PROFORMA simulator, a Link 16 simulator and other data link equipment. Offensive Sensors Laboratory (OSL) The Offensive Sensors Laboratory (OSL) provides RF target generation and IR scene generation to Navy aircraft offensive sensor systems. These include air to air radar, air to ground radar, forward looking infrared (FLIR), infrared search and track (IRST), and active missile approach warning systems. OSL currently has an air to air radar target simulator (RTS) that can generate sixteen simultaneous targets to an aircraft fire control radar. Manned Fliaht Simulator MFS is a full flight and avionics systems laboratory used to support the development and test of all categories of aircraft including support for vehicle management and mission managegment systems, mission critical computer resources, man-machine interface and performance, sof tware development and test, and T&E methodology development. It features a six-degree-of-freedom motion base, a 40 foot diameter dome, and two medium fidelity lab station. Out the window visuals are provided by a Compuscene IVA and a Compuscen IV and a stand-alone Silicon Graphics System. Roll-in/roll-out cockpits permit rapid reconfiguration of all simulation stations. Cockpits presently in the MFS inventory include V-22, F/A-18A, F/A- 18C/D/E/F, F-14D front seat, AH-1W procedures trainer, and Multiple Reconfigurable cockpits with touch sensitive front displays for rapid reconfiguration of cockpit instruments. MFS is used independently to support flying qualities and performance and high fidelity MWI evaluation tasks and integrated with other labs to provide a high fidelity man-in-the-loop capability. Electromaanetic Environmental Effects DeDartment Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Test Facility: This facility subjects Navy and other DoD aircraft and weapons to the High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse Threat. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Integrated Aircraft Test Laboratory (IATL) Summary of Technical Capabilities: The laboratory facility can radiate actual RF transmissions allowing full end-to-end radar system testing. The facility is approximately 33 ft above ground level situated looking out over the Chesapeake Bay, providing an excellent field-of-view including various types of air and surface targets of opportunity (military and commercial). The location also allows for cooperative testing with controlled surface and air targets. This laboratory has direct access to aircraft so that test equipment and aircraft Weapon Replaceable Assemblies (WRA) can be easily moved to/from the laboratory and aircraft. The laboratory provides the environment and aasete to develop, test, and evaluate avionics systems during the integration process using common commercial instruments and automated test equipment. New or upgraded avionics equipment being developed or evaluated in this laboratory have their associated interfaces stimulated via either simulated or prerecorded data. Automated test equipment provides the tools necessary for assessing avionics subsystem integration performance and trouble shooting WRA interface problems. This laboratory also provides the capability to determine individual WRA performance with Shop Replaceable Aseembly (SRA) failure analyeis, in addition t o automating aircraft instrumentation and wiring checkout. Teet equipment for this laboratory is generic, reconfigurable, and computer controlled. This lab supplements the capabilities of the current ~ i r Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF). Instrumentation Assets: - Various test measurement equipment (up to 18 GHz) - HP70000 multi-measurement system - ALR computer with IEEE 488 and 1553 interface - HP90000 computer system with VXI chasis - Mainframe VXI chasis (HP E1401A) - Signal generators (programmable) - Analog and digital 0-scopes - Power meters - Signal analyzer (HP35660A) - Reflectometer (TK1502) - Microgotomer system (EG&G Gamma Science DRZ) - Range source (DBA System Inc 202A) - Logic Analyzer (HP1651B) Keywords : Radar, ~vionics, Roof-Top, Lab, RASTERL, ASIL, Open-Air, Integration pp - - TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Integrated Aircraft Test Laboratory (IATL) An important laboratory characteristics is ite flexibility to eupport multiple and various types of projecte (radar and avionics) and project requirementa. The facility includes generic capabilities which it adapte and utilizes to eupport each project, as required. These generic capabilitiee include: radomes/garage door windows for free epace RF transmieeions; power and cooling; test equipment for syetems integration and testing; toola and soldering capabilitiee to support eyeteme integration efforte; technicians and engineers; and acceseibility to other on base resources. he lab ie linked with the Aircraft Armament System6 Simulation Engineering Test Station. ear term plans include the incorporation of data/voice link to Chesapeake Teet Range (CTR) o support cooperative testing. Long term plans include data links with the Air Combat nvironment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACBTEF). adar and Avionic6 System Testing: - System Integration Testing - Syetem Performance Testing - Hardware and Software Design, Development, ~ntegration, and Test - Life Cycle Support - Fleet Training - Software Verification and Validation (V&V) - Technology Demonstration TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability ~itle: Integrated Aircraft Test Laboratory (IATL) he IATL provides a facility for the development, test and evaluation of avionics systems during the integration process into tactical aircraft, and supports technology demonstrator aircraft. The laboratory provides the environment and assets to develop, test, and evaluate new or upgraded avionice systems during the integration process using common commercial inetruments and automated teat equipment by having their associated interfaces stimulated via either simulated or prerecorded inpute. Automated test equipment allows avionice eubeystem integration performance asaessment and trouble shooting of Weapon Replaceable Aesemblies (WRA) interface problems. Individual WRA performance can also be determined and Shop Replaceable Aeeembly (SRA) failure analysis conducted, in addition to automated aircraft instrumentation and wiring checkout. The laboratory support8 current and future F-14, F/A-18, A - 6 , AV-8 avionics integration projects in addition to the future aircraft avionics integration tasks. One of the two IATL component8 is the Radar System Test and Evaluation Roof-Tog Laboratory (RASTERL). RASTERL is a ground test facility designed to support both ground and flight testing of current and future radar systems, and to demonstrate advanced radar system technologies. The laboratory facility ie used to support programs in all acquisition phases including engineering demonstration/validation of new radar systems and radar syetem technologies. One of the primary attributes of the laboratory is the ability to conduct actual RF transmission teats, which can be radiated into free space with or without a radome. The laboratory utilizes free space, open air test conditions for roof- top TLE of radar components, integrated radar system performance and is capable of supporting multiple programs simultaneously. The second IATL component, the Avionics Systems Integration Laboratory (ASIL), like the RASTERL, is located in an aircraft hangar, which allows either to eupport direct stimulation of avionics systems either in the laboratory, in test aircraft via umbilical connection, or a through mix of both. - GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Integrated Aircraft Test Laboratory (IATL) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service : NAVY Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Hardware-in-the-Loop w ShT.. LE m OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 100% Armament/Weapons: EC : Other : Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line GENERAL INFORMATION FacilityICapability Title: Hydraulics Research Lab Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX I T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Measurement Facility 'I'&E S&T D&E - IE T&D OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 5 % 3 0% 35% 30% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 5% Armanent /Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION F a c i l i t y / ~ a p a b i l i t y T i t l e : Hydraulics Research Lab F a c i l i t y Descr ipt ion; Including mission s ta tement: This laboratory provides developmental testing of Naval Aircraft hydraulic components including pumps, filters, fittings and hoses at pressures to 30,000 PSI and flow rates to 50 GPM. Environmental and functional tests are performed on aircraft hydraulic equipment including pressure surge, flexure fatigue, vibration and low and high temperature functioning. I n t e r c o n n e c t i v i t y / M u ~ U s e of T&E F a c i l i t y : Type of Test Supported: Environmental and functional measurement and tests on aircraft hydraulic equipment (surge, fatigue, vibration, and temperature tests). Summary of Technical Capab i l i t i e s : The facility has capabilities at pressures up to 30,000 PSI and flow rates to 50 GPM. Keywords : Hydraulic Measurements GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Flight Control Computer Test Facility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 - Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area : Hardware-in-the-Loop UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Air Vehicle T&F ShT. OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 100% Armament/Weapons: EC : Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Flight Control Computer Test Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Flight Control Teat facility provide8 the capability to support the acquisition process for all modern digital flight control systems (DPCS). The test facility utilizes a generic architecture that can support any aircraft using a digital flight control system and shared resources among different project8 to increase efficiency and cost effectivenees. The laboratory is interfaced with the Manned Flight Simulator (MFS) for high fidelity man-in-the-loop simulations and with the Air Combat and Environmental Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) for full flight systems simulations. The Manned Flight Simulator (MFS) is a full flight and avionics simulation facility used to support the acquisition process for all categories of Navy aircraft. The Simulation and Control Technology department maintains and operates high fidelity flight dynamics, flight control and avionics systems simulations for a wide spectrum of aircraft types at the MFS. The piloted simulation aspects are highlighted by four simulation stations: a 40 feet diameter dome, a six degree of freedom motion base and two fixed base lab stations. Facilities and most hardware are independent of aircraft type and are shared resources. Advanced flight control capability consists of state-of-the-art analysis and design computer programs and a F/A-18 flight control computer test station. The test facility has four major components: Flight Control Computer Test Stations (FCCTS), computational resources, flight control computer interfaces and piloted simulation stations. Major equipment components include flight control computers, and mission computers as well as the simulation resources (cockpit, visual system, aerodynamic models, etc . ) . Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: All piloted simulations make use of roll in/roll out cockpits and can be reconfigured for different aircraft types in minimal time. Type of Test Supported: Flight Control System Testing TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Flight Control Computer Test Facility Summary of Technical Capabilities: Current capabilities include: one fully functional F-18 flight control computer test station and two teat etations in development. The engineering analysis capabilities include flight control laws. redundancy management, flying qualities, evaluation of fleet incidents, flight test planning, flight test data analysis and parameter identification. Flight control computer (FCC) hardware and software development support include operational flight program analyeie, IV&V, fleet incident evaluation, configuration control, tracking of FCC and fleet problems and flight test planning using personal computers for selected engineering analysis. The Flight Control8 teat Facility provide8 the technical capabilities needed to test current and future advanced DFCS for program8 such as F-18, V-22, F-14, EA-6B, A-6. AV-8B. E-2C, T-45, and H-60. The phaees of the acquisition process which are supported are concept exploration, engineering manufacturing and development, production, fleet introduction and in-service use. These DFCS eysteme are increasing in complexity with an ever increasing amount of code to test making it difficult if not impossible to test all logic paths. Advanced DFCS include new concepts for integrated DFCS-avionic-sensor architecture's, thrust vectoring, canards, control surface allocation and integrated fire and flight control (IFFC) requiring an increased Navy capability to support development and provided IVhV. Since we cannot create in flight test the total environment needed to test the DFCS throughout its flight envelope, a simulation and etimulation capability are needed to create this environment in a laboratory setting. An increased technical capability is also needed to address significant flight test issues associated with testing these advanced control concepts. INSTRUMENTATION ASSETS: The assets of the Flight Controls Test Facility include the F/A-18 FCCTS, V-22 FCCTS, F-14 DFCS Engineering Tests Station (ETS) and the EA-6B Standard Automatic Flight Control System (SAFACS) Development Test Equipment (DTE). FCC assets for each platform include two F/A-18 FCCs, three V-22 FCCs, three F-14 DFCS computers, and one EA-6B SAFCS computer. Each test station shares generic lab equipment and instrumentation among the different platforms which include AD100, AD10, and Real-Time Station parallel processor computers. The stations utilize a set of strip chart recorders, multi-meter and oscilloscope electronics cart, IOCP input/output rack, two SUN SPARC Station, and two DEC VAX stations. Keywords : Simulation, Digital light Control Systeme, Manned Flight Simulator, Flight Control Computer GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Structural Test Facility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Measurement Facility T&E - S&T D&E OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 20% 30% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( 8 ) Air Vehicles 20% Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Structural Test Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Structural Test Facility performs structural tests, both static and fatigue, on aircraft structural specimens ranging in size and complexity from small coupons and structural elements through major subassemblies to full scale aircraft. Test loads are normally applied by electronically-programmed, servo-controlled, electro-hydraulic actuators that may be used singly or in several separately-programmed groups. The equipment to be moved includes four hydraulic pumps, three dust collectors, five drill presses, three hydraulic presses, seven power saws, two environmental chambers and miscellaneous other machine shop tools and supplies. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: N/A Type of Test Supported: Static and Fatigue Tests on Aircraft Structural Specimens Summary of Technical Capabilities: Test loads are normally applied by electronically-programmed, servo-controlled, electro- hydraulic actuators that may be used singly or in several separately-programmed groups. The equipment includes four hydraulic pumps, three dust collectors, five drill presses, three hydraulic presses, seven power saws, two environmental chambers and miscellaneous other machine shop tools and supplies. Keywords : Structural Testing GENERAL INFORMATION Facility /Capability Title: Antenna Test Tower (Bldg 115) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/~ctivity : NAWC-AD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area : Electronic Combat UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Open Air Range T&E - S&'r OTHER =loo% PERCENTAGE USE: 15% 20% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles Armanent/Weapons EC 15% Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Antenna Test Tower (Bldg 115) - Facility Description; ~ncluding mission statement: I This is a standard configuration outdoor range that is multipurpose. Standard antenna measurements and rain erosion tests are conducted in thist facility. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: N/A Type of Test Supported: Antenna and Radome Tests Summary of Technical Capabilities : The long range antenna test facility utilizes an azimuth over elevation pedestal (which can also hold a model tower) mounted on the rooftop. Control is from the third floor. The transmit site can be: a portable tower or a moveable tower placed on the transmit pads (500m, 1000'. 1500') described in PSC Report 9.5.25. Keywords : Antenna Measurements, Rain Erosion Meaeurements GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Ejection Tower Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test ~acility Category: Hardware-In-The-Loop T&E - S&T D&E - I E T&D OTHER = l o 0 8 PERCENTAGE USE: 20% 40% 4 0% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 20% 40% 40% Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentaqe Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Ejection Tower Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Ejection Tower produces dynamic ejection conditions which simulate the catapult phase of an ejection from an aircraft. The Ejection Tower has its upper end attached to the Vertical Drop Tower. The Vertical Drop Tower has been primarily used to test and evaluate crashworthy seating systems, restraints, energy absorbing devices and other equipment that may be exposed to a rapid deceleration environment. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Operability of Ejection Seats, Restraint Systems, Cockpit Clearance, Injury Potential, Crashworthy Seating Systems, Energy Absorbing Devices and other equipment exposed to rapid deceleration environment. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The Tower is 150 feet high and inclined at an angle of 20 degrees from the vertical. It can provide ejection seat accelerations of up to 30 GIs with onset rates of up to 500 G/sec with a payload of 600 pounds. The principle components of the facility are the catapult gun; rails; ejectable mass composed of the seat occupant, ejection seat, seat adapter, and cradle; and a "bogie" system and winch which is used to position the seat for cartridge loading and recovery of the test article after the test. Other ancillary equipment includes data recording instrumentation, photographic equipment, anthropomorphic manikins, accelerometers, pressure pickups, strobes and tools required for cartridge modification. Two high intensity, flicker-free portable lighting banks are also available for testing during overcast weather conditions. The Ejection Tower is used to test the operability of ejection seats, restraint systeme, g-valve and wiring disconnects, cockpit clearance, or the injury potential of any man-mounted equipment that is worn during the ejection sequence. The Ejection Tower has its upper end attached to the Vertical Drop Tower. The Vertical Drop Tower is a free standing structure 150 feet high. A 10 x 10 ft. drop cart located within the framework is used for mounting the test specimen. This cart is raised to a predetermined height, released, and free falls onto an array of expandable metal bending arrestment straps where it is abruptly stopped. This facility can produce a variety of deceleration pulses depending on the drop height, weight of the loaded cart and configuration of the arrestment straps. A maximum free fall velocity of 85 fps can be obtained imposing deceleration levels from 2 to 100 G's on test objects weighing up to 800 lbs. - TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility /Capabili ty Title : Horizontal Accelerator r- Facility Description; rncluding mission statement: The Horizontal Accelerator is used for development, test and evaluation of Aircrew Lift Support Equipment, including crash resistant seats, ejection seats, clothing, helicopter seating, energy attenuation devices, restraints and other crashworthiness product lines. Interconnectivity/Mulit-Use of T&E Facility: N/A Type of Test Supported: The facility permits precise, repeatable testing of systems and components, under laboratory conditions. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The facility produces acceleration profiles which duplicate the shock environment to which the crewman and his equipment are exposed. Its control system permits precise, repeatable testing of systems and components, under laboratory conditions. The accelerator produces essentially the same effect as a crash impact by simply reversing the orientation of the test article. The Horizontal Accelerator Facility consists of a pneumatically driven/hydraulically- controlled crash simulator, a 100-foot rail system, a control center, photographic high- intensity lighting and a data acquisition system. The facility contains a mechanical preparation area, test fixture storage room, electronic preparation areas and control/data acquisition room. Currently, it is being utilized on a number of crew systems programs and is a vital "tool" used in the development process. As required by military specifications, it is also used for the verification and validation of equipment performance as part of their qualification before fleet introduction. It is a versatile facility capable of producing accelerations which simulate those produced during a crash or abrupt acceleration. Because of its versatility it is being used by other DoD agencies, Dept. of Transportation and private industry. Keywords : Aircrew Life Support Equipment, Aircraft Seats, Horizontal Accelerator TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability ~itle: Anechoic Chamber ( ~ l d g 144) - Facility Description; Including mission statement: Structure 144 is a 100' x 40' x 40' shielded anechoic chamber which is uniquely designed for multi-purpose operation. The design permits the acquisition of antenna pattern measurements and Radar Cross Section (RCS) meaeurements in frequency range from 100 MHz to 100 GHZ. measurements. Inter cvrir~ectivity/Mulit -Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Antenna Pattern Measurements and Radar Cross Section (RCS) Measurements in frequency range from 100 MHz to 100 GHZ. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The chamber has a 12' cylindrical quiet zone and is fitted with a three axis positioner which is controlled by an Antenna/RCS measurement system. The positioner can be prepared to accommodate a model tower (SA58000B) for standard antenna 'measurements or a low profile pylon for RCS Keywords : Radar Cross Section, Anechoic Chamber GENERAL INFORMATION F a c i l i t y / C a p a b i l i t y T i t l e : Aircraft Test Tower (Bldg 367) O r i g i n D a t e : 0 5 / 1 1 / 9 4 S e r v i c e : N O r g a n i z a t i o n / A c t i v i t y L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : A R M I N S T E R : NAWCAD INFLUX T&E F u n c t i o n a l Area : Electronic Combat UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E T e s t F a c i l i t y C a t e g o r y Open A i r Range T&E S&T - I E - T&D OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 10% 20% 3 0 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) A i r V e h i c l e s Arrnanent/Weapons EC 10% O t h e r T o t a l i n B r e a k o u t Must E q u a l " P e r c e n t a g e Use" O n F i r s t L i n e TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Aircraft Test Tower (Bldg 367) Facility Description; Including mission statement: 1 The Structure 367 Full Scale Aircraft Facility pedmits mounting aircraft either right side up or upside down, in an electromagnetic free space environment. The facility consists of an aircraft tower/control building that supports the aircraft 40 feet above ground on an azimuth over elevation positioner. A mobile RE' source tower can be positioned and operated from any one of three locations 5 0 0 1 , 833', or 1280' distant. In addition there is a mobile van, with power that allows signal generation at almost any azimuth, tower/control building that houses pedestal control equipment, RF receivers, computers, and equipment peculiar to the tests in progress - such as Direction Finding systems, adaptive nulling processors, radar warning receivers, etc. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility:N/A Type of Test Supported: Measurement of the characteristics of Direction Finding systems, adaptive nulling arrays, radar warning receivers, etc. Summary of Technical Capabilities: There are currently three full scale aircraft that have been prepared (stripped of non- essential components/weight) for the range; the F/A-18, EA-6A, and A-7. The EA-6A can also be reconfigured as an EA-6B. In addition an F-14 awaits restoration. There are various stores available for each aircraft. Major programs supported in the last three years include ALR-67 (F-18). ALQ-99 (EA-6B), ALQ-149 (EA-6B), ALQ-126/165 (F-18), ALQ-162 (F-18 Plyon), WALLEYE (A-6E). Keywords : Electromagnetic Measurements, Electronic Warfare, Direction Finding, Radar Warning Receivers GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: ~ircraft Test Tower (Bldg 745) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Locat ion : WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Electronic Combat UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Open Air Range rn S&T D&E - T&D OTHER = l o 0 8 PERCENTAGE USE: 10% 20% 30% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles Armanent/Weapons EC 10% 20% 3 0% 40% Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentaqe Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Aircraft Test Tower (Bldg 745) Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Structure 745 Full Scale Aircraft Facility permits mounting aircraft either right side up or upside down, in an electromagnetic free space environment for the purpose of conducting electromagnetic measurements on electronic warfare and communications systems. I n t e r c o r i n e c t i v i t y / M u l i t - U s e of T&E Facility: N / A Type of Test Supported: Measurements of the characteristics of electronic warfare and communications systems. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The facility consists of an aircraft tower that supports the aircraft 40 feet above ground on an azimuth over elevation over azimuth positioner and a small control building adjacent to the tower. A mobile RF source tower can be positioned and operated from any one of three locations 416', 875', or 1363' distant. In addition there is a mobile van, with power, that allows signal generation at almost any azimuth position relative to the aircraft and the other sources. The aircraft tower/control building houses pedestal control equipment, RF receivers, computers, and equipment peculiar to the tests in progress. Major programs supported in the last three years include data link antenna system for NAWC-AD-PAX (F0181, ALQ-126/165 (F-la), L-Band Pod (F-la), TASD Plyon (F-la), WALLEYE (F-181, F-18 E/F, JTIDS, and FLEET SATCOM. Keywords : Electromagnetic Measurements, Electronic Warfare GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VP Facility - PHIC Origin Date: May 9, 1994 - Service: N OrganizationIActivity: NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category Integration Lab T&E S&T D&E - IE T&D OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 10% 40% 50% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 10% 40% 50% Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VP Facility - PHIC he VP Program Hardware Integration Center (PHIC) provides hardware support for the P-3C ircraft through the use of simulation, stimulation and actual hardware in-the-loop evelopment and test operations. Hardware and Software Design, Development and Integration; Technology Demonstration; Systems Integration and Life Cycle Support The equipment consists of six tape drives, three AQA-7 units, nine computers, three SASP- A/B consoles, an acoustic maintenance unit, nine equipment racks, two software input racks, a teleprinter rack, an MTB console rack, four operator stations, a computer rack, an IR detection system, two navigation/communication racks, an ordnance simulation rack, a simulation control rack, a pilot station rack, five logic racks, ten switch racks, nine workbenches, three MG sets, a display control unit, a maintenance panel and two power Also included are approximately 500 subassemblies. ntegration Laboratory, Systems Engineering, Software V&V GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VP Facility - SPF Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Act ivity : NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 6 2 2 6 9 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Integration Lab T&E S&T - D& E - IE -PERCENTAGE USE: 2 0 % 5 0 % 3 0 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 2 0 % 5 0 % 3 0 % Armanent/Weapons OTHER = l o o % Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VP Facility - SPF Facility Description; ~ncluding mission statement: I The VP Facility - SPP is a computer program' generation facility that supports the development and maintenance of mission software used by the CP-901 and AN/ASQ 212 tactical computers on P-3C aircraft. It produces aircraft loadable tapes and cassettes for all P- 3C operational and system test programs from Non-Update to Update I11 P-3C aircraft. Interconnectivity/Mulit-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Hardware and Software Design, Development and Integration; Technology Demonstration; Systems Integration and Life Cycle Support Summary of Technical Capabilities: The equipment includes tape drives, disk drives, printers, PDUs, cabinets, and various computers. Keywords : Integration Laboratory, Systems Engineering, Software V&V TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Anechoic Chamber #2 Facility Description; Including mission statement: The 40' x 20' x 2 0 ' Anechoic Chamber, lined with special high grain, low sidelobe horn absorbers to optimize performance for radar cross section measurements, is utilized for the research and development of low observable technology to increase aircraft survivability. It is equipped with a Scientific-Atlanta Radar Cross Section Analyzer System to acquire, process and store data. Interconnectivity/MuIti-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Radar Cross Section Measurements on a variety of materials. Summary of Technical Capabilities: It is equipped with a Scientific-Atlanta Radar Cross Section Analyzer System to acquire, process and store data. Keywords : Radar Cross Section, Low Observable Technology TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Anechoic Chamber (Bldg 120) Facility Description; Including mission statement: I Building 120 is a 90' x 30' x 30' pyramidal chamber with 12' spherical quiet zone. The tapered design of this chamber creates an environment favorable for low frequency testing. The chamber is equipped to perform standard antenna measurements of partial full scale mock-ups and reduced scale model mock-ups. The chamber is utilized to measure and optimize installed antenna system performance. Interconnectivity/Mulit-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Low Frequency RF Antenna Testing Summary of Technical Capabilities: The chamber is equipped with a two axis positioner with a model tower mounted on top to provide the capability for standard antenna measurements. Keywords : Anechoic Chamber, Antenna Measurements A GENERAL INFORMATION Facility /Capability Title: Vertical Flight Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category Integration Lab T&E - S&T OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 15% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 15% Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility /capability ~itle: Vertical Flight Facility Description; Including mission statement: I I The Vertical Flight Laboratory consists of five major facilities that currently support the development and integration of fleet avionics and software products for seven primary projects. Vertical Flight programs are sponsored by NAVAIR PMA-205, NAVAIR PMA (F) 225, NAVAIR PMA-29 9, NAVAIR AIR- 54 6, and SPAWAR. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Hardware and Software Design, Development and Integration; Technology Demonstration; Systems Integration and Life Cycle Support Summary of Technical Capabilities: These facilities provide a secure environment for processing SECRET material. Keywords : Integration Laboratory, Systems Engineering, Software V&V TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VS Labs - Facility Description; Including mission statement: The VS Facility provides development and life cycle support for the S-3A/B Weapon System software. The facility is also used for integrating and testing hardware improvements prior to aircraft installation. Interconnectivity/Mulit-Use of T&E Facility: N/A Type of Test Supported: Hardware and Software Design, Development and Integration; Technology Demonstration; Systems Integration and Life Cycle Support Summary of Technical Capabilities: The equipment consists of 14 racks of equipment, an acoustic interface system, 2 spectrum analyzers, 11 computer/workstations, 10 simulation cabinets, an S-3B trainer cabinet, an AHU, an SRF enhancement system, a disk drive, 10 workbench/simulators, 6 printers, 2 displays, a file server, 2 tape drives, an AN/ALR-76 stimulator, a GPS antenna, and other associated items of equipment. Keywords : Integration Laboratory, Systems Engineering, Software V&V - GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Central Computer Facilility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/~ctivity: NAWCAD Loca t ion : WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Other (General ) UIC = 62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category DMS T&E S&T OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 3 0% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 3 0% Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line I + TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Central Computer Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: I The Center Computer Facility is a large-scale' scientific and engineering computing facility accessed remotely by personnel located throughout the Center, at other DOD activities, and at contractor sites throughout the United States. his facility is used in support of research, development, testing, and evaluation of weapons, command control, warning surveillance, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare syst ems. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The Center Computer Facility is inter-connected to personnel located throughout the Center, other DOD activities, and contractor sites throughout the United States. Type of Test Supported: Software V&V and Simulation Summary of Technical Capabilities: The equipment consists of approximately 48 major items including mainframe, workstation, and desk-top computers, disk drives, tape drives, equipment racks, main line printers, network interfaces, control panels, and a broad assortment of associated hardware and peripherals. Keywords : Computer Facility, Simulation Support, Software i TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Special Operating Forces Facility Facility Description; I n c l w n g mission statement: To provide administration and laboratory space for Navy SPECWAR, Joint SPECWAR and other Agencies communications eystems. Laboratories support design, development, prototyping, and testing of new communications systems for Special Operations and rapid development forces. The associated antenna systems provide over-air testing capability. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Software, in-service engineering, hardware, integration, installation verification Summary of Technical Capabilities: This facility provides the capability to perform developmental test and evaluation support for Navy SPECWAR, Joint SPECWAR and other Agencies communication-electronic syeteme. Capabilities include design analysis, prototyping, integration, installation and life- cycle support for these communication/electronic systems. Keywords : Special Forces, Communication Systems - TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Mobile Communications Integration Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: Provides open bay laboratory space for design, integration, and installation of communication electronic systems in vans, boats and other vehicles. Tasking supports SPECWAR boats, White House Communication Agency vehicles, etc. This facility is used to accomplish the integration of systems designed and developed in the Special Operating Forces Facility laboratories. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Software, in-service engineering, hardware, integration, installation verification Summary of Technical Capabilities: This facility provides the capability to perform developmental test and evaluation support for Navy SPECWAR, Joint SPECWAR and other Agencies communication/electronic systems. Capabilities include design analysis, prototyping, integration, installation and life- cycle support for these communication/electronic systems. Keywords : Communication Systems TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility (FACSFAC) - - - This facility eupporte all aspects of Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility (FACSFAC) life cycle eupport. This syetem provide8 the air epace control for all Navy test rangee and interfaces with the FAA range control systems. Hardware, software, in-service engineering, configuration control Full range of developmental engineering, test and evaluation, integration, installation, training, life-cycle maintenance, logistics eupport and repair. Analyzing system upgrades that will allow continued operation with Navy and FAA range controllers systems. Rangee, Air Space Control GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: T e s t & E v a l u a t i o n H a n g a r S p a c e Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N ~rganization/~ctivity: NAWCAD Location: P a t u x e n t R i v e r , MD T&E Functional Area: A i r V e h i c l e UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: M i s s i o n S u p p o r t ThE ShT DfdS LE OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE : 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 100% Armament/Weapons: EC : Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Test and Evaluation Hangar Space Facility Description; Including mission statement: NAWCAD Patuxent River maintains and operates approximately 130 project test aircraft including 42 aircraft arraigned to the U. 5 . Naval Test Pilot School. The present aircraft inventory is comprised of 40 types (Fighter, Attack, Electronic Warfare, ASW, Trainer, Strategic Communications, etc. ) . The inventory consists of 30 models and 37 series of fixed and rotary wing aircraft which covers almost all aircraft currently in operational USN and USMC Air Wings. Most aircraft are instrumented for air vehicle and/or mission system evaluations. Specially configured aircraft are obtained from fleet units on a temporary basis for specific test requirements. Eleven large hangare provide over 1.2 million square feet of hangar space and associated shop areaa for maintenance and instrumentation activities. The hangars provide required environmental protection and condition for all aircraft and subsystem work. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The proximity of individual hangars to TLE laboratories and office spaces promotes synergistic operations by technical and aircraft maintenance/operations personnel. Type of Test Supported: Aircraft and Aircraft System Flight and Ground Tests. Summary of Technical Capabilities: 1.2 Million square foot of hangar space and shop areas. Keywords : Hangars TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Engineering Offices/Shops Facility Description; Including mission statement: NAWCAD is the Navy's principal air platform flight test and evaluation activity providing active test and evaluation participation in all phases of the aircraft system's life cycle process including support of technology demonstration and validation; engineering and manufacturing development (EMD); production and deployment, fleet operations and fleet in- service engineering. Facilities and capabilities include provision of a principal site for development test and evaluation during EMD and providing range facilities, flight and ground test support, technical and engineering support, and base support for Navy users and other DOD and government agencies. Engineering office and shop support Facilities provide general purpose facilities for engineering, technical documentation, data processing, equipment maintenance and operations, and miscellaneous technical support. Facilities include general office space capable of supporting technical personnel and their collateral equipment aa well ae integral shop spaces accommodating specific functions. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: These offices/shops are linked internally and externally via local area networks, high- speed broadband coax, fiber optics, 7.1 and 56KB data linke, NAVNET links, Defense Research and Engineering Network, Defense Simulation Internet and others. Video teleconferencing facilities, fiber optic links, microwave links, high-speed data transfer and network interconnectivity provide maximum capability and flexibility for technical personnel to process data and to communicate all forma of information to internal and external customers. Type of Test Supported: All ground and flight test related to aircraft RDThE and associated acquisition support. Summary of Technical Capabilities: Patuxent River Information Computing Environment (PRICE) Desktop Computing Resources Fiber Optic Backbone High-capacity Telephone System Aircraft Weight and Balance Facility Keywords : Engineering Offices, Shops TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Target Support Facility Resource Capability/Facility Description: Target Support Facilities provide for maintenance and operation of surf ace and aerial targets used in DTGE and OThE of aircraft mission system sensors, data processors, and displays. Aerial targets include two targets, drones, aerostats, and an antiship missile presentation capability for Atlantic Fleet ships utilizing the VANDAL missile and a launch site at NASA Wallops Island, VA. Seaborne targets consist of fixed target arrays, remote- controlled boats and ship hulks. Land targets include manned and remote-controlled ground vehicles and fixed targets located at NAWCAD Patuxent River and Aberdeen Proving Grounds. All targets are tailored ' for the needs of the particular test project by installion of applicable target augmentation devices including visual enhancement, radar, infrared, or acoustic emitters. Services provided include: weapon scoring, telemetry surveillance, divers for test item recovery, target maintenance and repair, real-time impact scoring, laser designator operations and design and fabrication of targets for special project needs. Deep water port facilities at NAWCAD Patuxent River Solomons Island Annex provide the capability to modify ship hulks with target augmentation devices, command and control, r store compatibility testing, missile Technical capabilities include: Range control and surveillance, diving support for test article recovery, real-time weapon impact scoring, remote control land and surface targets, laser designator operations VANDAL target presentation, target ship preparation and operation. Targets, VANDAL, Target Hulk, SEPTAR, Support Vessel I' GENERAL INFORMATION :ility/~apability Title: Teat h Evaluation Data Proceseing (Software h Applications) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Locat ion: Patuxent River, MD T & E Functional Area: Air Vehicle UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Open Air Range TLE S65 I&!z ;LE T69 QTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 9 5% 5 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 8 5 % 5 % Armament /Weapons : 5 % EC : 5 % Other : Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Test 6r Evaluation Data Processing (Software & Applications) Facility Description; Including mission statement: The TLE Data Processing (Software & Engineering Applications Department) Facility consists of workstations, film readers, and video data extract ion equipment. The facility provides data analysis for real-time and post-event processing, performance of requirements analysis with computer aided tools, modeling for structural analysis, and project management support. light test and modeling data are analyzed and/or made available to project personnel to support the TLE of aircraft weapon systems . The facility provides photogrammetric analysis of data retrieved from recordings of carrier suitability tests as well as weapon separation testing. The facility provides independent verification and validation, configuration management, and quality assurance functions integrated with the data analysis. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: The facility supports classified and non-classified data processing with results presented in various formats and media including magnetic, optical, or electronic trans-mission over networks. The facility is interconnected with other workstation servers both locally and remotely. The facility can and has provided reconstruction of aircraft mishaps based on analog, digital, or photogrammetric information recovered from crash sites. Type of Test Supported: The facility provides support of Flying Qualities and Performance, Flutter and vibration Analysis, Carrier Suitability, Avionics Analysis, Weapon Separation, Weapons ~elivery Accuracy, and Structural Analysis tests. The facility provides results during real-time, post-event, and near-real-time (quick-look) phases. The systems-under-test include the air vehicles within the Fleet, such as F-14, F/A-18, AV-8, CH-53, AH-1, P-3, E-2, and V- 22; the avionics systems, such as mission computers, data buses, and cockpit configurations; as well as, ground support systems, including the Automated Carrier Landing System. < TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Test & Evaluation Data Processing (Software & Applications) At least 10 worketatione (plus several multi-proceseor servers) with strategically located storage at several local eitee comprising more than 35 gigabytes for storing both raw and calculated results. Each of these processors is capable of at least 25 million instructions per second. The four film readers are Telereadex compliant with one upgraded to assist pointing up of data from degraded quality film. The Semi-Automatic Film/Video Reader can digitize information for playback in both VHS and 3/4 inch formatted tape. Various and sundry desktop processors provide software (both commercial-off-the-shelf and in-house) technical analysis, consultation, and reduction of test data for the local, joint-service, and commercial customer-base. Datareduction, Telemetry, Real-time, Post-flight, Photographic, Structure C GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Teet Pilot School origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Location: Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Other UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Teet Pilot School lIlhE S&T RE& a2 OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 100% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 100% Armament/Weapons: EC : Other : Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentaqe Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Test Pilot School The U.S. Naval Test Pilot School (USNTPS) provides instruction in the areas of aircraft and aircraft systems flight and integrated ground test and evaluation to two classes of experienced pilots, flight off icers, and engineers each year. Additionally, USNTPS provides short courses and detailed test technique briefings as requested to outside students in order to satisfy NAWCAD Patuxent River and other test organizations' needs to stay abreast of changes and up dates in aircraft test methods and data analysis techniques. In addition to a traditional fixed wing test pilot curriculum, USNTPS offers a complete mission systems test and evaluation syllabus and the only rotary wing flight testing program in the United States. This unique mix of academic and practical application programs attracts students from all U S Military Services, Industry, other U.S. Government agencies, and Foreign nations. USNTPS maintains a diverse fleet of aircraft to support its mission and expose the student to a wide variety of aircraft characteristics in a controlled learning environment. These aircraft are maintained in hangar space adjacent to the school's 42,000 sq. it. academic center. The academic center features modern classrooms and student work areas as well as a flight controls lab and mission systems lab. Both of these areas are fully integrated into the three syllabi and fully support USNTPS student training. Additionally, the flight controls lab support parameter identification efforts and development of flight test techniques for advanced aircraft. USNTPS develops and updates aircraft test, reporting, and data analysis methods and techniques which it publishes in manual form for the aviation community. These manuals are used as the industry standard and provide a common comparison for test data. The unique mix of USNTPS aircraft assets, engineering talent, and skilled aviators also allows the school to conduct special projects such as T-38 engine performance and T-2 updates. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Test Pilot School SNTPS has a long establiehed interconnectivity with CALSPAN, Buffalo, New York for use of heir variable stability aircraft for student demonetrations and advanced aircraft flight ontrols development. SNTPS has an established degree, program with the Naval Postgraduate School (USNPGS), ontery, California in Aerospace Engineering where students are awarded their Masters egree after completion of one year of study at USNPGS and another year at USNTPS. USNTPS offers the only helicopter flight testing training in the United States and inetructs all service ' e pilots and engineers in this discipline. USNTPS trains multiple foreign students annually in teet pilot techniques and maintains an active liaison with foreign test activities including Cold Lake, Canada and Boscome Down in England. USNTPS aircraft support actual test and evaluation as well as training when the need arises to support efforts on T-2, TA-4, or other training assets. USNTPS maintains active interconnectivity with the other NAWCAD Patuxent River facilities sing Center, and the various Test he primary mission of USNTPS ie to conduct teet pilot, test flight officer, and test ngineer training for aircraft and aircraft systems flight and ground training. econdarily, USNTPS develops and promulgates standardized test techniques and methods TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Teet Pilot School USNTPS maintains a fleet of approximately 40 fixed and rotary wing aircraft to support ite training mieeion. Nany of the aircraft are configured with on board instrumentation. The USNTPS staff consiste of civilian academic instructors, contract instructors, and military flight instructors to provide a well founded and broad based teaching staff. USNTPS develope and promulgatee standardized teet techniques and methods to the aviation flight testing community and conducte training in theee new methods as required. USNTPS conducte all helicopter flight teet training in the United States and processes two full claeeee of etudente each year. e Institute Awarding 12 Flight Teet Techniquee, Teet Methode, Test Pilote, Academics TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Air Operations Facility Description; Including mission statement: Mission is to operate a fully functioning airfield, including all air traffic control for the surrounding air space and restricted areas. Interconnectivity/Mulit-Use of T&E Facility: Supports FAA Air Traffic operating in the NAWCAD Patuxent River airspace. Supports local Search and Rescue Operations in the Chesapeake Bay as needed during emergency conditions. Provides backup fire fighting capability for local area fire departments. Type of Test Supported: Operates airfield and seadrome for all types of aircraft. Operates air terminal facilities. Responsible for air traffic control of aircraft moving in assigned control areas. Provides Search and Rescue (SAR) helicopters and surface craft for air-sea rescue. Provides services to support operation of station and transient aircraft. Provides aircraft crash and structural firefighting personnel, equipment and operations. Provides repair and maintenance of ground electronics equipment aboard station. Provides explosive handling and storage and small arms facilities. Summary of Technical Capabilities: Air Traffic Control, Search and Rescue, Fire Fighting, Weapons handling and storage. Keywords : Air Operation8 Department, Air Traffic Control, Search and Rescue, Fire Fighting, Weapons Storage -.v -rq3 : r,f + *\*( qb* #. t. , -. II- v: *-4 $L 3 q," **., & <* 4 "I' 4 : - i . i s * / I 1 TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department Performs intermediate level maintenance on the aircraft, aeronautical equipment, aviation upport equipment, and armament handling equipment located at NAWCAD Patuxent River per or all type/model and series aircraft onboard: avionics, electrical, and instrumentation eating and repair; support equipment support and repair; engine testing and repair; irframes and structures repair and manufacturing; aviation life support systems repair nd testing; production control support; and ordnance repair and testing. First, second & third degree repair on gas turbine. engines. Performs check, test and repair functions on removed airframes and hydraulic system components; electronic8 and electrical system components; fabricates minor aircraft and support equipment. intermediate level maintenance on escape systems. environmental systems, fire extinguishing systems and survival and life support items. Performs maintenance, inspections and repairs on support equipment. TECHNICAL INFORMATION ~acility/~apability Title: Airborne Instrumentation Support Facility - This facility is dedicated solely to the instrumentation/modification process. office and hangar deck space are shared only with a two person shop Beech Aeroepace support shop. This approximately 100,000 sq. ft. facility provides NAWCAD Patuxent River with the personnel, equipment, and hangar deck area t o perform the instrumentation/modification process. It allows the instrumentation engineer access to metal shops, calibration labs,, the Special Flight Test Instrumentation Pool, & instrumentation labs, all under one roof. It also provides enough hangar deck apace to permit what approaches a partial disaseembly of aircraft to accommodate inatrumentation system inetallation. Strain gage installatione, structural tests of Air Vehicle/Weapons test programs. Provide calibration Support for test programe. Provide Airborne instrumentation on an as needed. 55000 iteme of instrumentation equipment valued at 7 . 3 million dollars. Engineering, Calibration Multi level, Technical Documentation T&Z Test Plans, Design & Fabrication of calibration fixtures computer repair. CNC milling, precision machining and grinding, traditional metal working, metal heat treating and finishing, all types of welding, fiberglass fabrication and composite material repair, wood modeling and quality inspection. Mechanical design, classical structural analysie, technical consulting, classical and computer aided drafting. computerized printed circuit board design and schematic capture, CAD/CAM connectivity resource for military and industrial standards. Keywords : Design, Engineering, Fabrication, Calibration, Instrumentation, Structural Test TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Airborne Instrumentation Support Facility Facility Description; Including mission statement: Aircraft Test laboratories & Shop Support Facilities provide general purpose facilities for engineering, technical documentation, test instrument development and fabrication, verification tests, calibration support, maintenance of instrumentation/measurement standards, and instrumentation software and hardware development. Laboratory instrument and calibration facilities support peculiar and general purpose electronic test equipment for all fleet and DT&E/OT&E activities at NAWCAD Patuxent River. Transducer, accelerometer, fluid flow, pressure and microwave frequency calibration systems are configured t o interface type I1 and I11 calibration standards directly with aircraft systems. A strain gage and structural analyses laboratory provides the capability to install and calibrate strain gage instrumentation utilized in measuring aircraft loads during flight on fixed wing and rotary wing aircraft. Test machines available include: one 200K MTS fatigue test machine; one 600K Gilmore T/C machine and one 200K horizontal test machine. Mechanical design and fabrication facilities provide support to RDTLE and OT&E Instrumentation and test project installations and to quick reaction fleet support needs. Capabilities include computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing, computerized structural analyses, traditional metal working, precision machining, all types of welding, f iberglass fabrication and composite material repair. The NAVAIR Special Flight Test Instrumentation Pool, established to eliminate long lead time for acquisition of specialized airborne test instrumentation for aircraft test programs and to promote standardization and resume of airborne test instrumentation, has about 55,000 items of specialized airborne instrumentation located at Navy and contractor test facilities throughout the country. Interconnectivlty/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Interconnectivity between the Telemetry Data Systems (TDS), Design & Fabrication Facility, Strain Gage and Calibration labs are exercised daily. Instrumentation set up & check out, for example, is performed via telemetry link between aircraft in the facility and TDS. This facility provides design services for NRL, NSA, U.S. Army and others requiring an interconnectivity between personnel, hardware and services. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Airborne Instrumentation Support Facility Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Nature of Ligk - Bandwidth/Data Rate Of feted E-Mail x/RTPS Calibrate Files & Setup Files for Telemetry Processing TM Link between A/C and RTPS Test Data and Preflight 500khz to 8Mhz Checkout Modem Link to McDonnell Douglas FA-18E/F Management Info 9600Kbits Aerospace (MDA) TM Link between A/C and Portable Test Data and Preflight Ground Station Checkout Floppy Disk Offered of TDMS and DDAs setup files Instrumentation setup data between MDA and PAX Fax and E-Mail Offered of Memo's, Technical Documents Specifications, Agenda ' 8 etc. CAD/CAM Interconnect to other CAD Drawings Navy Agencies (Computer vision) Floppy Disk "Autocad" System interconnect CAD Drawings to other government agencies & Prime Airframe Contractors, Floppy Disk, E-Mail Modem link to various printed Printed Circuit Board 19.9Kbite circuit board manufacturers tayouts TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Airborne Instrumentation Support Facility - Type of Test Supported: Aircraft Instrumentation Department (AID) - Facility supports TLE ef f orts for the various test directorates at NAWCAD Patuxent River including Test Pilot School instrumentation installations and aircraft modif ications to all type of TACAIR, Vertical Lift, and Maritime platforms. Facility provides instrumentation support to the Carrier Suitability Department through its instrumentation system installed in the Patuxent River C7/MK-7 Catapult and Arresting Gears site as well as shipboard support. Facility provides airborne imaging support to DON and the private sector. Laboratory Services Department/Meaeurement Equipment (LSD ME) - TLE of naval aircraft and proof of concept for aircraft system development installations. Classical structural analysis. LSD - Laboratory Instruments Standards Section (LISS) - Calibration support for AN/APN 421 Radar Altimeter Test Set. LSD - SFTIP - Air Vehicle Flight test. LSD - Airborne Instrumentation/Calibration (AIC) Air Vehicle Flight Test/Ground Test. LSD - Strain Gage - Air Vehicle, Weapons - Ground and Flight Test. Summary of Technical Capabilities: Technical capabilities of AID within this facility include: Approximately 1300 items are listed in the AID hardware inventory, each facilitating the design, buildup, installation, checkout, setup, calibration, and maintenance of aircraft instrumentation installation and modification efforts. All of this hardware is portable. Examples of hardware types are: oscilloscopes, bus analysers, frequency counters, function generators, receivers, discriminators, spectrum analysers, decommutators, etc. Once again, all portable equipment. TECHNICAL INFORMATION ~acility/Capability Title: Telemetry Data System Facility The Telemetry Data Syetem (TDS) Facility is used for reception, processing and real-time display of aircraft and weapon system test data. The system, used for preflight check- out, real-time telemetered flights and for post-flight tape playbacks, consists of six independent identical "streams," each of which may simultaneously handle a flight or a playback at any one time. The streams share a common instrumentation database subsystem for unclassified work and software' development and operate in a dedicated secure mode for classified work. The streams can be fed by any of several 8, 10 and 12 foot tracking antennas and receivers located at the Chesapeake Test Range (CTR) or remotely from NASA Wallops. Portable systems are also available for remote site work. It is co-located with CTR facilities and is a full-service aircraft flight test facility generically applicable to all types of flight testing. Telemetrv Data Svstems De~artmenL - Provides all laboratory and mobile data systems required to process data recorded on magnetic tape and to receive, record and process data transmitted by radio link from test aircraft. Supports technical investigations in the field of magnetic tape and telemetry data proceseing and display systems to ensure that both present and future systems are applicable to requirements. provides standard time of day (IRIG "BW) generation and transmission. Houses technical publications library describing NAWCAD Patuxent River tape and telemetry capabilities to contractors and other government agencies. The TDS facility includes telemetry antennas at two NAWCAD Patuxent River locations and access to telemetry antennas at NASA Wallops, all connected to the TDS Real-time Telemetry Processing System (RTPS) via microwave links. RTPS can select any required measurements from a telemetry data stream for throughput to the interconnected facilities listed below. RTPS also can accept simulation data, time/space position data, etc. from interconnected facilities and merge this data with telemetry data. Telemetry antenna sites provide raw telemetry signals to RTPS, but also interconnect to aerospace contract facilities via satellite. TDS facilities interconnect with other facilities as follows: 1. Electronic Warfare Measurement facility - cable interconnection, 256 Kbps processed telemetry data. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Telemetry Data System Facility Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: 2. Chesapeake Test Range, Range Computation h Control System (RCCS) facility - cable interconnection, 256 Kbps data rate processed telemetry data to RCCS, 100 bps data rate time/space position data returned to RTPS. 3. ACETEF Manned Flight Simulator - broadband cable network, 256 Kbps data rate exchanged between MFS (simulation data) and RTPS (processed telemetry data). 4. Carrier Suitability, Landing Systems Test Facility (LSTF) microwave link, 10 MHz bandwidth, raw telemetry data to LSTF telemetry processing facility. 5. Grumman Aerospace, Calverton ATS facility - satellite link, 3.152 Mbps data rate, multiple telemetry data streams. 6. Bell Helicopter-Textron, Ft. Worth facility - satellite link, 6.352 Mbps data rate, multiple telemetry data streams. 7. RTPS optical-disk selected telemetry data output distributed to project engineer customers at Strike, Rotary Wing, Force Warfare and Systems Engineering facilities post- flight. RTPS has the unique characteristic of providing a broad range of fixed and rotary wing projects with the general and epecific types of telemetry processing and display needed to satisfy airframe and engine testing, flutter testing, mission systems testing, weapons interface analysis and a large variety of other test requirements. ~t is a central facility used by all test directorates as well as contractor teams, and is particularly suited to handling a large and diverse range of customers by quick changeover from project to project, as well as providing both real-time and post-flight processing. t:;;: m a a m a a h 0) m c o a : u m LI Y E ~ @ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ & ~ o o E O D W k Q) m a o m f i m m a a - 4 d u - 4 o m ~ u k u 3 fi m 0) c a 3 0 u . m t l u m k -4 Cn * m f i u m 4 k U 0) m a u k 0 0 0) a Cn fi 3 m OD a 0) U 0 k PI W 0 m ID n 0) m 3 x U U GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Telemetry Data System Facility Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N OrganizationlActivity: NAWCAD Location : Patuxent River, MD T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicle UIC = 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: Open Air Range ULE S&T OTHER = 10 0 % PERCENTAGE USE: 10 0% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles: 85% Armament/Weapons: 5% EC : 10% Other: Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: chesapeake Teet Range (CTR) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = 0 0 4 2 1 T&E Test Facility Category: OAR PERCENTAGE USE: 9 5 % 5 % BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( $ 1 Air Vehicles: 8 5 % 3 % Armament/Weapons: 5 % 2 % Total in Breakout Must Equal 'Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Chesapeake Test Range Physical data links include CTR links to: NASA Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) - Real-time bidirectional - microwave link at l2.9Mbpe (DSA) Fleet Area Control & Surveillance Facility (FACSFAC), Virginia Cages - Real-time unidirectional - encrypted dedicated link at 56Kbps Naval Warfare Assesement Division (NWAD), Naval Warfare Aeeesement Divieion (NWAD), Corona - encrypted telephone link at 9.Gkbps Acoustical Underwater TLE Complex (AUTEC), Bahamas (via Weet Palm Beach, FL) - at 56kbpe (DSO) NISE-East (Webster Field) - microwave link at 6Mbps (DS2) ATLAS - real-time unidirectional landing link at 56Kbps Telemetry Data Center - real-time bidirectional wire link at 1.5Mbpe (DS1) Landing Site Test Facility (LSTF) - real-time unidirectional landline link at 56kbps Ships Ground Station (SGS) - real-time bidirectional encrypted fiber optic link at 1.5Mbps (DS1) Coast Guard Vessel Traffic Control System (CGVTS) development facility - 56kbps Real-time unidirectional CATV coaxial link for tranemission of video and data to multiple sites throughout the Patuxent River complex - Broadband (up to 100Mbps) Air Combat Environment T&E Facility (ACETEP) - real-time bidirectional encrypted at 1.5Mbps (DS1) Type of Test Supported: Types of Tests Supported Include: Airspeed and Altitude Calibrations Antenna Patterns High Angle-of-Attack Evaluations Weapon Delivery Accuracy Navigation Systems Evaluations Landing and Takeoff Performance Testing Acoustic Systems Testing Weapons Separation Evaluations Electronic Warfare Systems Test and Evaluations Communications, Command, and Control Jamming TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Chesapeake Test Range Sea Surf ace Sensor Analysis Structural and Vibration Analysis Aircraft Engine Performance Shipboard/Carrier Suitability Aircraft Flying Quality and Performance Tests Fixed Wing Aircraft out of Control Flight Tests (Spin Tests) CTR operates a wide variety of Range System Instrumentation required to support the above noted test efforts. Following is a list of current instrumentation/assets: Space Position & Velocity Measurement Systems Phototheodolites Automatic Laser Tracking System (ALTS) Mid-Atlantic Tracking Systems (MATS) Photographic/Video Tracking Systems Port able Shipboard Aerial Photographers Voice/Data Communications Systems TR - Chesapeake Test Range, Radar, Laser, OAR - Open Air Range, T&E - Test and Evaluation, INE theodolite, Weapon Separation, Flight Test TECHNICAL INFORMATION ~acility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Summary of Technical Capabilities: (con't) TEMPEST/COMSEC Test Facility The TEMPEST/COMSEC Teat Facility provides the following capabilities: Test equipment to support 3 simultaneous aircraft TEMPEST tests Test equipment to Support 4 simultaneous aircraft COMSEC certifications Various test equipment, benches, racks, wiring harneaaes and mobile test vehicles to support RDT&E and Fleet support of COMSEC systems. Naval Electromagnetic Radiation Facility (NERF) The NERF facility is capable of accommodating test articles from box size to Boeing 747 aircraft size and generating simulated operational electromagnetic fields as follows: Discrete radars from 2OOMhz through 35 GHz 0 - 120,000 mw/cm2 Peak E-fields Swept communication/EW signals from 10 KHz through 18 GHz 0 - 250 V/M CWE-fields ic C h a m / S h i e l d e d The anechoic chamber and shielded hangar provide the following capabilities: Isolation from the external environment Aircraft testing in a shielded enclosure Aircraft support services including electrical, hydraulic, and coolant at six spots in the hangar and one in the chamber In addition, the anechoic chamber provides a near free space radiation capability. TECHNICAL INFORMATION ~acility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) imulation, Instrumentation, Defense Simulation Internet (DSI), Distributed Interactive imulation (DIS). Rapid Prototype, Simulated Warfare Environment Generator (SWEG), ACETEF, odeling, Aircrew Syetems Advisory Panel. Design Advisory Group, Controls & Displays, EC timulation, Electronic Combat (EC), Electronic Warfare (EW), RF Stimulation, IR timulation, Threat Air Defense Laboratory (TADL), Electronic Warfare Integrated Systems eat Laboratory (EWISTL), Communication, Navigation, Identification Laboratory (CNIL), Offensive Seneors Laboratory (OSL), Manned Flight Simulator, Six-degree-of-freedom, motion ase, dome, hardware-in-the-loop, man-in-the-loop, integrated eyatem teet facility, ircraft simulation, aero modeling, avionice modeling, Electromagnetic Environmental ffects (E3), Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Teat Facility, Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP), ertically Polarized Dipole (VPD), Horizontally Polarized Dipole (HPD), Navy Lightning & P- tatic Test Facility, Precipitation Static (P-Static), Lightning, Anechoic Chamber, hielded Hangar, AATF. TEMPEST, EMC/EMI, Radiated Susceptibility, Electromagnetic ulnerability. Intersystem Electromagnetic Compatibility, Hazardous Electromagnetic adiation to Ordnance, Hazardous Electromagnetic Radiation to Fuel, MIL-STD-461 RS03, and igh Intensity Radiated Fields TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Interconnectivity ACETEF laboratories are able to operate both independently (to provide a stand alone test capability) and integrated with other local and remote facilities (to provide a more complex test capability) . For multi-lab operations within ACETEF, the OCC provides scenario control & coordination to any combination of simulation labs & stimulation labs which may be supporting the test of systems on a bench within the lab or installed in an aircraft in the anechoic chamber or shielded hangar. Linking of ground based systems under test and airborne seaborne assets has been accomplished using both tactical data links and test support data links. The local architecture is centered around a fiber-optic network supporting shared memory within each lab. Labs were built adjacent to the anechoic chamber/shielded hangar to reduce signal latency/propagation loss problems. The OCC is also ACETEF ' s portal for interconnectivity with external f acilities, both local (NAWCAD Patuxent) and off site locations. This is done via the Defense Simulation Internet (DSI) and a series of dedicated point -to-point connect ions. To date, ACETEF has successfully connected externally to the REDCAP facility, various facilities participating in WARBREAKER exercises, the X-31 Rockwell simulator, and multiple Defense Interactive Simulation (DIS) projects Locally ACETEF is connected to all facilities via Patuxent River's fiber-optic local area network. Local facilities which have been integrated into various tests include the Chesapeake Test Range, E-2C Systems Test and Evaluation Facility, Ship Ground Station, and Fixed Wing ASIlW and ASW Labs. ~ u l t i - U S e The ACETEF concept provides for maximum flexibility in efficient use of test resources. Laboratories are capable of stand-alone and integrated testing in multiple combinations. By combining the various labs, ACETEF provides the ability to accomplish test tasks in all areas of air combat. ACETEF labs share tools & instrumentation, as well as test sites--the anechoic chamber and shielded hangar. The facility is capable of operating on a three shift basis in whichever labs are required to support a given test. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) r- Type of Test Supported: ACETEF8s primary function is to support installed systems test. Secondary functions include support of modeling simulation tests, hardware-in-the-loop tests, and measurement tests. Specific examples include: ulation & Analveis Operations & Control Center The Operations h Control Center supports testing which requires a high fidelity wargaming environment and those tests which require coordination of multiple labs. As a standalone facility, OCC supports various types of operational effectiveness analyses. In conjunction with other labs, OCC provides scenario generation and simulation, instrumentation, data analysis, laboratory integration, and integration with remote facilities. Aircrew System8 Evaluation Facility (ASEF) The Aircrew Systems Evaluation Facility provides display prototyping in support of human factors testing including Aircrew Systems Advisory Panels, Design Advisory Groups, Controls & Displays working Groups, and training. In addition, ASEF provides a low fidelity man-in- the-loop capability in support of other labs test objectives. EC Stimulation Generally the EC Stimulation Department operates a6 an Installed System Test Facility (ISTF) for the test and evaluation of aircraft EC, Offensive sensors, and CNI systems. In this role, the facility eupports both developmental installations and retrofit installations. This department can support EC system integration, E3 evaluation, weapons integration, and eafety of flight for advanced technology demonstrators, developmental test, and operational test. These tests can be supported in anechoic chambers, shielded hangers, aircraft hangers, flight lines, contractor facilities, off-site DoD facilities, and on operational platforms (land, air, and sea). Manned Fliaht Simulator MFS supports testing of vehicle management and mission managegment systems, mission critical computer resources, man-machine interface and performance, software developmenta and test, and T&E methodology development for existing and notional aircraft . Electromaanetic Environmental Effects Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Test Facility The Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Test Facility supports horizontal and vertical electromagnetic pulse testing of aircraft and aircraft systems. I TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Type of Test Supported: (continued) Navy Lightning & P-Static Test Facility The Navy Electromagnetic Pulse Test Facility supports lightning and P-static testing of aircraft and aircraft systems. TEMPEST/COMSEC Test Facility The TEMPEST/COMSEC Teet Facility supports test and evaluation of IEMPEST/COMSEC systems. In addition, the facility supports COMSEC certifications, R&D of COMSEC systems, and fleet support. Naval Electromagnetic Radiation Facility (NERF) The Naval Electromagnetic Radiation Facility supports any form of radiated susceptibility test including Electromagnetic Vulnerability test, Intersystem Electromagnetic Compatibility test, Hazardous Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance, Hazardous ~lectromagnetic Radiation to Fuel, MIL-STD-461 RS03 tests, and High Intensity Radiated Fields tests for FAA certification of commercial aircraft. A& The anechoic chamber and shielded hangar support all aspects of ACETEF testing including: E3, EC system integration, antenna isolation, TEMPEST, and RF emission signature measurement. Summary of Technical Capabilities: Combat Environment Simulation DeDartment The Simulation & Analysis Dept provides the following capabilities: Simulated Warfare Environment Generator 8 channel data bus instrumentation & data analysis Interlaboratory and interfacility integration 8 Mini-crewstations * Cockpit prototyping system TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Summary of Technical capabilities: (continued) EC Stimulation D w t m e n t The EC Stimulation Ibpt. provides the following capabilities: Dynamic multi-emitter open loop RF threat environment Dynamic multi-emitter open loop CNI threat environment Dynamic closed loop eimulation of EW/ACQ and SAM threat systems Dynamic closed loop eimulation of Blue CNI syetems (GPS, tactical data links, strategic data links) Dynamic multi-target stimulation of Blue fire control radar(APG-71,APG-73) Open loop EO stimulation (laser, missile plume, simple IR targets) Open loop target simulation of anti radiation missiles (for aircraft avionics integration) Hanned Fliaht Simulato~ MFS features a six-degree-of-freedom motion base, a 40 foot diameter dome, and two medium fidelity lab stations. Out-the-window visuals are provided by a Compuscene IVA, a Compuscene IV and a etand-alone Silicon Graphics System. Roll-in/roll-out cockpit6 permit rapid reconfiguration of all simulation stations. Cockpits presently in the MFS inventory include V-22, F/A-18A, F/A-18C, F/A-18Pr F-14D pilot, AH-1W procedures trainer, and a Multiple Reconfigurable cockpit with touch sensitive front display for rapid reconfiguration of cockpit instruments. It provides hardware-in-the-loop testing capability of flight control computers and miseion control computers. Electroma~netic Environment Effects DeDartment Navy Electromagnetic Pulee (EMP) Test Facility: The EMP Test Facility provides the following capabilities: Full Threat Electromagnetic Pulee Simulation. Vertical and Horizontal Polarization. Thirty channels of high speed inetrumentation. Above threat direct injection capability. Navy Lightning & P-Static Teat Facility: The Lightning & P-static Test Facility providee the following capabilitiee: Full Threat Lightning Capability Full Threat P-Stat ic Capability GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Code 60724 Machine Shop Origin Date: May 9, 1994 T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: NIS (Fabrication of Prototypes) PERCENTAGE USE: 40% 30% 30% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles Armanent/Weapons TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/capability T i t l e : Code 60724 Machine Shop The Code 60724 Machine Shop provides a wide range of machinery and equipment capable of producing high quality, cloee tolerance parts required to support research and development activities at NAWCADWAR. The equipment includes 6 grinders, 12 lathes, an optical comparator, a metal disintegrator, 3 drill presses, 3 gear shapers, a honing machine, 2 band saws, a jig orer, 10 milling machines, a control projector, and miscellaneous smaller tools and aterial. This machine shop will be combined with the NAWCADWAR Code 60725 Machine Shop at Patuxent River. The equipment included in these two facilities will be installed in Building 104, rooms 16, 19, and 22 and Building 2186, room 112. Machine Shop, R&D Prototypes TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF) Facility Description; Including mission statement: (continued) Navy Liahtnins & P-Static Test Facilitv This facility subjects Navy and other DoD aircraft and weapons to Lightning and P-Static Threats. TEMPEST/COMSEC (Communications Securitv) Test Facility The TEMPEST/COMSEC Test Facility is used to support the Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard in the RDT&E and Fleet auport of Airborne classified information processing system. The facility supports three main functional areas: TEMPEST Test and Evaluation, the COMSEC cetification Program, and RDTrE and Fleet support of COMSEC systems. Naval Electromaanetic Radiation Facilitv (NERF) The NERF consists of a 1500 square foot lab building, vault, two ground planes (100 @ x 240' surface mounted steel deck and 200' x 400' imbedded grid under the hangar 144 apron) with all required electrical services and high powered transmitters required to generate simulated operational electromagnetic environment for purposes of conducting radiated susceptibility tests for the Navy, Army, Air Force, FAA, and commercial customers. Anechoic Chamber/Shielded Hanaar Shielded Hangar A 300 * x 150' x 60' shielded hangar used for test and evaluation of aircraft electronic combat (mission) system and electromagnetic environmental effects. Anechoic Chambe2 A tactical aircraft sized anechoic chamber (100' x 60' x 35') designed to accomodate fixed and rotary wing aircraft. A 30 ton traveling hoist suspends the test article in a flight configuration. a 15' x 10' x 8' pit allows for special access to electronic test equipment. The chamber ha8 120dB of shielding from the outside environment, allowing tests to be conducted in a secure and uncontaminated RF environment. The chamber provides a near free-space environment over a very wide frequency range (10kHz - 40 GHz) , providing for more efficient use of limited flight test time and resources. GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VH Facility (Executive Transport-2) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Locat ion : WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air vehicles UIC = 62269 into 00421 T&E Test Facility Category : Integration Lab T&E S&T D&E - I E T&D OTHER = l o o % PERCENTAGE USE: 5 0 % 50% BREAKOUT BY T&E E'IJNCTIONAL AREA ( % Air Vehicles Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: VH Facility (Executive Transport-2) Facility Description; ~ncluding mission statement: The VH Facility (HIS-2) verif ies and validates VH avionics hardware and sof tware. Tasks supported include avionics integration, software development, and operational simulation. The equipment includes instrument racks, workbenches, computers and peripherals, crew stations, power supplies, teat racks, and a full-scale mock-up helicopter. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Hardware and Software Design, Development and ~ntegration, Systems Integration Summary of Technical Capabilities: The equipment includes instrument racks, workbenches, computers and peripherals, crew stations, power supplies, test racks, and a full-scale mock-up helicopter. Keywords : Helicopters, Avionics, Software TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Human Centrifuge/Dynamic Flight Simulator (DFS) Facility Description; ~ncluding mission statement: The DFS consists of a full-scale aircraft cockpit with active instruments and controls which is mounted inside the centrifuge gondola along with a computer generated outside visual scene. The control system for the DFS incorporates a high fidelity 6 degree-of - freedom aircraft model which drives the cockpit instruments and displays as well as the centrifuge motion system. The DFS has been used successfully for manned testing of new crew equipment, advanced cockpit configurations, and to assess the performance of current and future high performance aircraft designs. The facility is a unique national asset which enables human performance testing in a realistic, high-G-flight environment, with the safety and repeatability of a ground-based laboratory. Interconnectivity/Mulit-Use of T&E Facility: DFS is supported by the Central Computer Facility at Warminster. Type of Test Supported: Manned testing of new crew equipment, advanced cockpit configurations, and assessment of the performance of current and future high performance aircraft designs. Summary of Technical Capabilities: The Human Centrifuge located at the NAWCADWAR is the largest and most capable man-rated centrifuge in the world. It has a 50-foot arm, a 16,000 horsepower direct-drive motor, and is able to reach a maximum of 40 G's with a 1000 pound payload. Between 1.5 G and 15 GIs, the centrifuge can produce an average g-onset rate of 10 G/second with an maximum instantaneous G-onset of 13 G/second. The crewstation for the centrifuge is enclosed in a 10-foot spherical gondola mounted in a high speed dual-gimbal system. The movable gimbal system enables multi-directional G forces (Gx, Gy, G z ) to be applied on the pilot/subject and is responsive enough to permit closed-loop pilot control. his feature has enabled the development of a unique real-time sustained-G flight simulation capability known as the Dynamic Flight Simulator (DFS). Keywords : G-tolerance, Centrifuge, Dynamic Crew Station, Real-time sustained-G flight simulation. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/~apability Title: Magnetic Media Laboratory Facility ~escription; Including mission statement: The Magnetic Media Laboratory is an RDThE facility dedicated to evaluating the electrical performance parameters, dimensional characteristrice and physical properties of instrumentation quality recording tape. The facility defines salient criteria for state- of-the-art media and determines the required values for proper system performance. The results of these studies are then incorporated into standards and specifications for government procurement of these media. The MML also monitors the quality of delivered products for compliance with these documents. The Laboratory accomplishes its mission by utilizing approximately $2 million of in-house equipment to perform measurements on magnetic recording media. The tests which are performed evaluate the performance, magnetic and physical properties of these materials and determine the usefulness of these products for recording the required types of data. The test results lead to the development of federal and induetry wide specifications and standards. The facility also has the ability to evaluate the compliance of mass produced tape products with these documents. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of Test Supported: Parametric testing of new types of media and statistical behavior of production media. I Summary of Technical Capabilities: The laboratory supports FED-SPEC-W-T-1553 for magnetic instrumentation tape and W-R-175 for intrumentation tape hubs and reels. The physical facility contains 2000 sq. ft. of class 100 cleanroom. Keywords : Magnetic Media, Cleanroom, Recording tape - GENERAL LNFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Code 60725 Machine Shop Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NpWC-AD Locat ion : WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles 1 UIC = 62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: N/A (Fabrication of Prototypes) T&E S&T - D& E - I E T&D OTHER = l o 0 8 PERCENTAGE USE: 40% 30% 30% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( 8 ) Air Vehicles Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Code 60725 Machine Shop Facility Description; Including mission statement: The Code 60725 Machine Shop provides a wide range of machinery and equipment capable of producing high quality, close tolerance parts required to support research and development activities at NAWCADWAR. Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E Facility: Type of T e s t Supported: N / A Summary of Technical Capabilities: The equipment includes 16 lathes, 9 grinders, 22 milling machines, 7 drill presses, 3 band saws, 3 vertical shapers, 2 EDM machines, a jig borer, a cutter, a sander, a power hack saw and miscellaneous smaller tools and materials. This machine shop will be combined with the NAWCADWAR Code 60724 Machine Shop at Patuxent River. The equipment included in these two facilities will be installed in Building 104, rooms 16, 19, and 22 and Building 2186, room 112. Keywords : Machince Shop, R&D Prototyping - - GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Special Access Program Spaces Origin Date: May 9, 1994 OTHER = l o o % Service: N OrganizationlActivity: NAWCAD Location: WARMINSTER INFLUX I T&E Functional Area : (NO details available) UIC = 62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category: N/A T&E PERCENTAGE USE: BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentage Use" On First Line TECHNICAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Special Access Program Spaces Facility Description; Including mission statement: Under the BRAC '91 realignment of NAWCAD Warminster with NAWCAD Patuxent River, 20,000 sq.ft. of Special Access Program Space is being constructed. These spaces, which are all on raised deck, are split between the South Technology Complex (15,500 sq. ft.) and the North Technology Complex (4,500 sq.ft.). ' Interconnectivity/Multi-Use of T&E ~acility: N / A Type of Test Supported: N / A Summary of Technical Capabilities: N / A Keywords : N / A GENERAL INFORMATION Facility/Capability Title: Human Centrifuge/Dynamic Flight Simulator (DFS) Origin Date: May 9, 1994 Service: N Organization/Activity: NAWCAD Locat ion : WARMINSTER INFLUX T&E Functional Area: Air Vehicles UIC = N62269 INTO 00421 T&E Test Facility Category Measurement Facility T&E - s&T D&E - I E T&D OTHER = 10 0 % PERCENTAGE USE: 15% 20% 20% 25% 20% BREAKOUT BY T&E FUNCTIONAL AREA ( % ) Air Vehicles 15% 20% Armanent/Weapons EC Other Total in Breakout Must Equal "Percentaqe Use" On First Line FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPENDIX A woril,<,&7 Drat: JOINT CROSS-SERVICE ( GROUP PROCESS ALTERNATIVES DEPARTMEW I ~ ~ V . S % D T Y ANALYSES: -EXCESS OSD ALTERNATIVES ENVIRONMENT. REVIEW t I t A ETC. A CROSSSERVICE APPENDIX B LIST OF ACTIVITIES AIR FORCE Armstrong Lab, Brooks AFB Armstrong Lab, Tyndall AFB Armstrong Lab, Wright-Patterson AFB Arrnstrong Lab, Williams AFB Human Systems Center, Brooks AFB Wright Lab, Wright-Patterson AFB Wright Lab, Eglin AFB Aeronautical Systems Center, Wright-Patterson AFB Aeronautical Systems Center, Eglin AFB Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center, Tinker AFB (In-service engineering) Ogden Air Logistics Center, Hill AFB (In-service engineering) San Antonio Air Logistics Center, Kelly AFB (In-service engineering) Sacramento Air Logistics Center, McClellan AFB (In-service engineering) Warner-Robins Air Logistics Center, Robins AFB (In-service engineering) Phillips Lab, Kirtland AFB Phillips Lab, Hanscom AFB Phillips Lab, Edwards AFB Space & Missile Center, Los Angeles AFB PAGE 89 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 19. Space & Missile Center, Norton AFB 20. Sacramento Air Logistics Center, Peterson AFB 2 1. Rome Lab, Griffiss AFB 22. Rome Lab, Hanscom AFB 23. Electronic Systems Center, Hanscom AFB 24. Sacramento Air Logistics Center, Peterson AFB (In-service engineering) ARMY Army Research Lab (ARL), Adelphi, MD ARL, Aberdeen Proving Grounds (APG), MD ARL, White Sands Missile Range, NM ARL, NASA Langley, VA ARL, NASA Lewis, OH Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA Aviation Research, Development and Engineering Center, St Louis, MO Aviation Troop Command, Aeroflight Dynamics Directorate, Moffitt Field, CA Aviation Troop Command, Aviation Applied Technology Directorate, Fort Eustis, VA Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD Communications Electronics Command Research, Development and Engineering Center, Ft Mammoth, NJ Communication Electronics Command Research, Development and Engineering Center - Night Vision EO Directorate, Ft Belvoir, VA Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center, Redstone Arsenal, AL Armaments Research, Development and Engineering Center, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Armaments Research, Development and Engineering Center, Benet Labs, Watervliet Arsenal, NY Tank-Automotive Command Research, Development and Engineering Center, Warren, MI USA Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Ft Detrick, MD Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington D.C. USA Institute of Surgical Research, Ft Sam Houston, TX USA Aeromedical Research Lab, Ft Rucker, AL Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD USA Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab, Hanover, NH Topographic Engineering Center, Alexandria, VA Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS USA Research Institute for Behavioral & Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA Simulation, Training and Instrumentation Command (STRICOM), Orlando, FL NAVY 1 . Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, China Lake 2 . Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, Point Mugu 3. Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Patuxent River 4. Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Indianapolis 5 . Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Lakehurst PAGE 90 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Naval Research Lab, Washington D.C. Naval Research Lab Detachment, Bay St Louis Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Bethesda Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Detachment, Annapolis Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Detachment, Louisville Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Detachment, Panama City Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division Naval Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center, RDT&E Division, San Diego Naval Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center, In-Service Engineering, West Coast Division, San Diego Naval Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center, In-Service Engineering Division, Charleston Naval Aerospace Medical Research Center, Pensacola Naval Biodynamics Lab, New Orleans Naval Dental Research Lab, Great Lakes Naval Health Research Center, San Diego Naval Medical Research Institute, Bethesda Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport Division, WA Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock, Philadelphia Detachment Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, RI Naval Undersea Warfare Center (Newport), New London, CT Naval Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, CA DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 1. Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI), Bethesda, MD PAGE 91 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPENDIX C COMMON SUPPORT FUNCTIONS /DEFINITIONS LISTED FOLLOWING PAGES) Product Functions 1 . Air Vehicles - Fixed -- Structure -- Propulsion -- Avionics -- Flight Subsystems - Rotary -- Structure -- Propulsion -- Avionics -- Flight Subsystems 2. Weapons - ICBMsISLBMs - Conventional Missiles/Rockets - Cruise Missiles - Guided Projectiles - Bombs - Guns and Ammunition - Directed Energy - ChemicaVBiological 3. Space Systems - Launch Vehicles - Satellites - Ground Control Systems 4. C41 Systems - Airborne C41 - Fixed Ground-Based C41 - Ground Mobile C41 PAGE 92 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Pervasive Functions 1 . Electronic Devices 2. Environmental Sciences 3. Infectious Diseases 4. Human Systems 5. Manpower and Personnel 6. Training Systems 7. Environmental Quality 8. Advanced Materials PAGE 93 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DEFINITIONS COMMON SUPPORT FUNCTIONS Product Functions 1 . Air Vehicles. Air vehicles are broken out into common support functions for fixed wing and rotary wing. Includes but not limited to all science and technology, demonstration and validation, engineering development, and production activities which support employment and in- service engineering of air vehicles. Included are all air vehicles including their application as UAV's and targets. - Structures. Includes but not limited to all air vehicles structure technology, engineering and production efforts. Include technology and engineering practices which advance structural design and analysis; advanced structural concepts and fabrication techniques; and structural integrity. - Propulsion. Includes but not limited to all technology, engineering and production efforts associated with air vehicle propulsion such as turbine engine, rotorcraft power drive, and hypersonic propulsion components. Such components include compressors, inlets and nozzles, turbines, mechanical systems and control, gears, bearings, shafts, and clutches. In addition, include associated subsystems activities such as turborocket,-turboramjet and rotorcraft transmissions; and supporting technical and engineering disciplines. - Avionics. Includes but not limited to all technology, engineering and production efforts associated with the air platform's integrated avionics system. The avionics suite includes but is not limited to weapon delivery systems, electronic warfare, navigation, communications, radar, electro-optic sensors, signalldata processing and associated software system and support. Includes efforts associated with developing the integrated avionics system (i.e. optimizing functional partitioning, distribution and integration of avionicslrelated functions). - Flight Subsystems. Includes but not limited to all technology, engineering and production efforts for air vehicle support systems such as landing gear; crew enclosures; egress systems; mechanical equipment integrity; electrical component integrity; subsystem integration; and aircraft power, pressurization, and temperature control systems. 2 . Weapons. Includes but not limited to all science and technology, demonstration and validation, engineering development, and production activities which support employment and in- service engineering of ICBMsISLBMs, conventional missiles and rockets, cruise missiles, guided projectiles, bombs, guns and ammunition, directed energy and chemical/biological munitions. Include with each weapon as appropriate, all related technology, engineering and production activities such as fusing/safe and arm, missile propulsion, warheads and explosives, and guidance a.nd control. PAGE 94 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3 . Space. Includes but not limited to all science and technology, demonstration and validation, engineering development, and production activities which support employment and in-service engineering of launch vehicles, satellites and associated ground control systems (satellite control only; ground systems for telemetry of data included in C41). Include under satellites, all technology, engineering and production activities associated with space communications and space-based surveillance (and associated sensors) and space-based C4I. 4 . C4I. Includes but not limited to all science and technology, demonstration and validation, engineering development, and production activities which support employment and in-service engineering of airborne, fixed ground-based and mobile ground based C41 systems. Include all technology, engineering and production activities associated with communications networks, radios and links, distributed information systems, data fusion, decision aids, and associated computer architectures. Pervasive Functions (6.1, 6.2, and 6.3) 1 . Electronic Devices. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities supporting development of semiconductor and superconductor materials for optoelectronic, acoustic and microwave devices. Include all associated electronic materialsldevice fabrication and processing. 2 . Environmental Sciences. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities to improve measurement, characterization and modeling of the earth atmosphere and space environment. -Examples include global prediction systems, space effects, and celestial - backgrounds/astronomical reference sources. 3 . Infectious Diseases. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities which preserve manpower and performance by the prevention and treatment of militarily important infectious diseases that occur naturally worldwide. 4 . Human Systems. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities to enable, protect, sustain and enhance human effectiveness in DOD operations. The focus of this pervasive, multi-disciplinary area is the human and therefore impacts all DOD systems and operations. This area includes: (1) human performance definition, assessment, and aiding; (2) physiologic bioeffects of toxic hazards, ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, biodynamic (bio- mechanical) stress, and extreme environments; (3) military operational medicine; and (4) generic, human-centered design standards/methodologies for crew station subsystems, information management and display, and life support. 5 . Manpower and Personnel. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities which support four broad areas: ( I ) selection and classification of DOD personnel (including pilots); (2) identification of operational tasks performed and requirements for skills, knowledge, and aptitudes; (3) matching the right people with the jobs they are best suited for according to the needs of DOD, (4) and developing techniques for measuring and enhancing the productivity of the operational force. PAGE 95 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 6 . Training Systems. Includes but not limited to all science and technology which support training of personnel, including training strategies, devices and simulators, and computer aided intelligent tutoring systems. 7 . Environmental Quality. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities which support the development of technologies to reduce the environmental costs of DOD operations while ensuring mission accomplishment is not jeopardized by adverse environmental impacts. Specifically, this area encompasses technologies to: ( I ) identify and cleanup sites contaminated with hazardous materials as a result of DOD operations (cleanup); (2) ensure DOD compliance with current and anticipated local, national, and international environmental laws and treaties (compliance); (3) minimize DOD use of hazardous materials and reduce DOD hazardous waste generation (pollution prevention); and (4) provide for protection of natural resources under DOD stewardship (conservation). 8 . Advanced Materials. Includes but not limited to all science and technology activities related to structural, high temperature, electromagnetic protection, electronic, magnetic, optical, and biomolecular materials. Note: excludes materials areas which were included in DDR&E decision of 18 Mar 94 related to the Army's Materials Research Facility at Aberdeen Proving Ground and the Navy's Materials Facility at Carderock. PAGE 96 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY APPENDIX D PAGE 97 31 March 1994 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BRAC 95 DATA CALL 12 PATUXENT RIVER S I T E NAWC AIRCRAFT DIVISION I certify that the information contiuned herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable) -\ G. H. Strohsahl. RADM. USN NAME (Please type or print) Commander Title Date Naval Air Warfare Center Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. NEXT ECHELON LEVEL (if applicable) NAME (Please type or print) Signature Title Date Activity I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. W O R CLAIMANT LEVEL W. C. Bowes. VADM. USN NAME (please type or print) Commander Title Signature dh49 qfi Date Naval Air Svstems Command Activity I cer@ that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF (INSTALLATIONS & LOGISTICS) 3.8. LreeneS 36. NAME (Please type or print) -t hcd\ n Title 3 DATA CALL 1 2 BRAC-95 CERTIFICATION PATUXENT RIVER SITE NAWC AIRCRAFT DIVISION Reference: SECNAVNOTE 11000 of 8 December 1993 In accordance with policy set forth by the Secretary of the Navy, personnel of the Department of the Navy, uniformed and civilian, who provide information for use in the BRAC-95 process are required to provide a signed certification that states "I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief . " The signing of this certification constitutes a representation that the certifying official has reviewed the information and either (1) personally vouches for its accuracy and completeness or (2) has possession of, and is relying upon, a certification executed by a competent subordinate. Each individual in your activity generating information for the BRAC-95 process must certify that information. Enclosure (1) is provided for individual certifications and may be duplicated as necessary. You are directed to maintain those certifications at your activity for audit purposes. For purposes of this certification sheet, the commander of the activity will begin the certification process and each reporting senior in the Chain of Command reviewing the information will also sign this certification sheet. This sheet must remain attached to this package and be forwarded up the Chain of Command. Copies must be retained by each level in the Chain of Command for audit purposes. I certify that the information contained herein is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACTIVITY COMMANDER BARTON D. STRONG NAME (Please type or print) COMMANDER Title Date NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIRCRAFT DIVISION PATUXENT RIVER. MD Activity 'WEDNESDAY, J u l y 19, 1995 NEW YOTX TIMES July 1 9 , 1995 Pg . 1 / 6 Chlefs of Staff, the Senate late today began debti- the bill and la e m - - White House Seeks to Halt Bosnia Bill 2 am-. . -.. - - Approval of the bill, abkh wan ~rowsed bv the mai0ritV leader. mie, a - m a 6 setbacl; Fsms Senate Action Would Disrupt Allies 'Efforts to Curb Serbs , ,, ., with the allies to stop Serbian W- States unilaterally breaks the em- his advlse& a n preparing for a crit. By ALISON MITCHELL gression bargo fn an effort to arm the out- ical meeting of the allies in London WASHINGION, Jw 18 - Admin- bill would requin the United gunned Muslim-led Government. on Friday at which, it a d d be de- -*,, scmmbM wy States to breaf with the United Na- Despite an all-out lobbying effort cided whether United Natiars peace- to hd off legisletlo,, they flons arms embargo in Bosnia under by Secretary of State Warren Quls- keepers show stay in Bosnia and if feared would force udted N~~~~~ certain circumstances. Both France topher, Defense Secretary WUUam so, how. In addition, the new BrltWl and Britain have indicated that they J. Perry and General John Shali- wdmartdsnhulim- ~ l w i t h d r a w t h e i r u m p f m m ka- o f t h . joht BILL...pg. 3 ped their efforts to forge a new Plan peacektepm force I the United stay turned," a senior defense official said. NATO...from Pn. 1 the idea that Gorazde could be saved with minimal While seeking a more aggressive approach in the investment on the ground to be unrealistic. air, administration officials said they remain stead- Offidals said the U.S. assessnent is that between he , ' a senior French official~told Washington Post fast in wanting to avoid anything that hints of a role 3,000 and 12,000 g r d troops would be r e q a correspondent William Drdzdiak last night in Paris. for U.S. pound troaps entering the conflict. to ehsure the security of Gorazde against a deter- In the past, those nations with U.N. peamkeeping m e political logic of that approach was made plain mined Serb assault kom the ' g hills. They D W ~ on the ground in Bosnia have opposed by the results of a new Washington Post-ABC News ugue th.t the S u b r&ce?- d -or abtrkes out of concern their forces are *rable poll in which 58 percent of respondents-said they op would make them &ly &ble to massive to hostagetaking by the Serbs. Four hundred Dutch pose "sending in ground forces to try to stop the which would be capa& of bbting any peacekeepers remain in Serb custody in Srebrenb. fighting in M." Serb offensive, particularly if air power was deployed It remained unclear last night what p h , if any, is Fe-s ix percent said they generally disapproved at an early stage in the campaign. favored by the ~ritish, whose forces make UP the of the way Clintonis handling hnk+. But 50per~ent "Real pain, inflided earb on, is the way to do bulk d the u.N. contingent in Gorazde. In Paris, said they supported an essential element of Clinton this: said one Clinton adviser, adding that the list of French officials said London was on board for the re- policy: keeping in placesthe U.N. arms embargo of legitimate targets should be broadened beyond the inforcement plan. But in Washington, administration ~os*. immediate area of fighting. d€iciah said they believed the British were "soften- It was precisely this question that *ted the th, Senate, meanwhile. suppdrters of the Dole mg their opposibn" to increased aerial bombard- political battling between the White Fiouse and Lieberman measure have &ed the pro@ in merit gress yesterday over a resohtim presented by Sen- recent days to make it more acceptable to moder- &ton, who heM a minute Oval Offie meet- Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.) and Sen. Joseph I. Lieber- a t e who fear it could predpitate a U.N. withdrawal ing with senior national S ~ C u r i t ~ advisers W-Y man (D-Conn.) to unilaterally lift the embargo from ~ 0 s ~ . According to the latest version, fie em- 00 Bosnia, was-due to the U.S. ideas against the Mushclominated Bosnian government. bargo would be lifted only in & event of a with- * with FW president Jaques Chirac and With most congressional leaders adamantly op drawal, or 12 weeks after a Bosnian government re- British Prime Minister John Mapr. posed to using U.S. h e b t e r crews to E m quest for the departure of the peacekeepers. British Foreign Seaetary Malcolm Rifkin was pean reinforcements to Gorazde, dminimtiOn I, a speech on fie Senate floor, Sen. Sam Nunn sdKduled to arrive in Washington last night for talks cials have been struggling to come UP with an m a . ) , ranking minority member of the Armed today. And "c"hrist@er and Peny will meet in LM)- alternative to the French plan fvst ~mnmCe-d Services Committee, said an overwhelming rnaprity don Friday with representatives of nations with Chirac last week The French have threatened to of the Senate favors lifting the embargo. But he peacekeeping troops in v. 4 their troops out ofthe peacekeeping fore alt* urged that the Dole-Lieberman resolution be revised Whatever military plan IS agreed upon, it almost gether if their plan is not accepted. to recognize Cl~nton's commitment to sending oertamly will include the effective of the The actministration is reluctant to ptblidg 25,000 U.S. troops to aid in a U.N. w i M w a l . ~dual-key" approach, wtkh until now has stipulated the door on the French proposal, and Pentagon offi- that U.N. commanders must approve an allied ac- cia)s say &y would consider @tical support for Staf/wrilers Rick Atkinron, Helen Deroar and Wright. Ms. Wright =id she not release the CAO report until Fri- the White House counsel's office. Ms. Tenano said the White Bartlett's concerns about the dis- in an appendix in the GAO report when Mr Barlett plans to dis- House told congressional investi- patch of a special crash firetruck as a "briefing on and inspection of mbute it a t a news conference. She said it is strange,, that gators the number of trips in pres- from Fort Detrick, Md., to the golf classified construction signs at the WNte House idential helicopters had increased some away. Camp David and a golf course In the 16months beforeMr. Wat- visit." d 0 e S n Ot r e q u i r e w r i t t e ll to 14' Earliec kins' trip to the Holly Hills Coun- Three other flights were clas- paperwork to use a presidential at 12, Dee saying Dee "there My rs were put no the other f ry Club in New Market, the sified as secret. helicoptei. A footnote in - the GAO report instances of misuse." HMX-1 uqit, based in Quantico Other examples: Va., flew 1,200 missions - 14 in- On April 15,1994, Secretary of says the White House issued a "It breaks no new ground:' Ms. volving White House officials rid- State Warren Christopher used a memo on May 31, 1994, stating said the GAO rep0rt. Ing solo without the president, presidential helicopter to fly to that if a request to use a Pres- has first lady HiUary Rodham Clinton, giw a speech to Democratic law- idential helicopter involves the been pmvideda of the rep0rt. Vice President A1 Gore or his wife, makers, chief of staff, it must first be ap- Mary Hines, spokeswoman for Tipper. lbo flights of aides were taken proved by the Whlte House coun- Rep. Steve Hornt,.Cqlif~~nia Re- The helicopters, distinctively to inspect the USS George Wash- sel's office. publican and chairman of' the painted green with a white tops, ington, an aircraft carrier Mr. White House spokeswoman House Government Reform and cost about $2,380 an hour to op- Cllnton visited in early 1994. CURRENT NEWS ANALYSIS & RESEARCH SERVICE ROOM4C881, PENTAGON, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20307-7500 Td: f703)695-28MI697-8765 Fax: (703695-6822n260 CHIEF: Bill Monroe CURRENT NEWS BRANCH: Taft Phoebus, Chief, Marilyn Phipps, Acting Early Bird Editor Elmer Christian, Janice Goff, Linda Lee, Meredith Johnson, Lisa Stafford Writer-Editcrs RESEARCH BRANCH: Denise Brown, Chief Alice Boyd, Pat Finnegan, Sharon Foster Writer-Editors SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR: Carol Rippe ADMINISTRATION: Tonya Pollard PRODUCTION: Defense hinting Service (Room 4C853) ELECTRONIC EARLY BIRD DISTRIBUTION: Defense Technical Information Center (703-274-7251, DSN 284-725 1 ) 2 WALL STREET JOURNAL Mideast Prize Svria Tightens Its Grip On Lebanon, May Get Indefinite Control of It Neither U.S. nor Israel Seems Likely to Put Up a Fuss; Secret Police Hold Sway The Army Goes Into Business - By P m WALOMAN S:ajj Reporfer O ~ T I I E WALL STREET JOIIRNAI. BEIRUT. Lebanon - The last time Ghada saw her mother, she watched her being led away from their home by Syrian intelligence officers. They said she would be right back. That was two years ago. Since then, the 24-year-old Lebanese, u-ho insists her family name not be pub- lished for fear of reprisals, has pursued her mother's disappearance to. the highest levels of Lebanon's government. She has learned that her mother is alive, in a Syrian prison on some undisclosed accusa- tion. And. a h.igh Lebanese official told WEDNESDAY, July 19, 1995 July 19, 1995 Ghada, "Once the Syrians have her, there is nothing we can do." So, too, with the Republic of Lebanon itself. Syrian troops swept into this self- destructed capital in October 1990, ostensi- bly to end the 15-year Lebanese civil war. Exhausted, most Lebanese welcomed them. Even Israel and the Bush adminis- tration, eager to gain Syria's help against Iraq, tacitly approved. A Lucrative Occupation However, nearly five years later - and three years after Syrian troops, by inter- Arab agreement, were supposed to with- draw from Beirut-Syria is still tightening its grip. It seems well on its way to reclaiming not just the barren Golan Heights, conquered by Israel in 1967, but the much-richer prize of Lebanon, carved from Syrian territory by French colonial- ists after World War I. The army that came to make peace has dug in to make money. And now Israel. in its U.S.-brokered peace talks with Syria, has said it doesn't care if Syrian troops stay indefinitely. It wants Syria to secure calm on Israel's northern border, where Israel has been fighting a decade-long war of attrition against Iranian-backed guerrillas in south- ern Lebanon. Nor is the Clinton administration push- ing for a Syrian retreat. Officially, the U.S. supporls the "sovereignty and independ- ence" of Lebanon and the withdrawal of all foreign troops. But, eager to coax Syrian I BILL. . . from PE. 2 pg. 1 . President Hafez al-Assad into making peace -with Israel. U.S. officials are es- pousing a new line: It is up to the Lebanese people thems5lves. they say, to define their relationship with Syria. "That's like saying it is up to the Kuwaitis to define their relationship with Iraq," says an angry Lebanese banker, who. like most Lebanese, refuses to be quoted by name on the subject of Syria. Assad the Ascendant The upshot: The wily Mr. Assad, de- spite poor health, a bankrupt economy and the loss of Soviet Union support, is at the peak of his game. Lebanon will probably remain independent as it is today - in name only. Here in Beirut. a city of eternal disap- pointments, the reality that the Syrians plan tostay hasn't sunk in. Lebanese-rich and poor, Muslim and CMstian - resent the heavy-handed Syrians, whose 35,000 troops and pervasive secret police control everything. Yet many still fantasize that a "new reality" is being hatched in Wash- ington by U.S., Syrian and Israeli negotia- tors-and that Lebanon will soon be free. "With peace." a prominent Lebanese trader says, "all of this military structure in the Mideast will end. No country will be able to impose its will on another." Such dreams might come true except for the way many Syrians have turned a military venture into a business bonanza. SYRIA...Pg. 4 Fmlgn Secretary, Malcolm Rlf- kbd,bxhedultdtoarriveInWash- on Wednesday tor talk8 on Bosnia 'Ibe Adminlstratlon ls committed to keeping a Unfted Nations force in Bosnia, partly for humanltarlan rea- som but In large measure to fore- stall a costly and pote~~tlally danger- ous withdrawal The Administration has pledged to support a withdrawal with up to 25,000 United States Bmund troops. Secretary of State Qulotopher sak i today that the Administration was considering proposing an ag- m l v e air campaign to deter Bos- niaa Serb attacks on United Natlons- protected "safe havens" In Bosnia as an alternative to the European plan for reinforcing the areas. As part of the AdmInlstratlon lob bying campaign, Madeleine K. AI- bright, the United States representa- Uve to the United Natlons. placed calls to Democrats to fight the blll sponsored by Senator Dole and Sena- tor Joseph Lleberman, the Connectl- cut Democrat Michael D. McCurry, the White House pnss secretary, branded the legislation a "nutty kJe.a" that wwld lead h e bly to direct United States invoI&t in tbe Balkan war. But in s rebuff to the Adminlstra- tion. the Senate began debate on the bill hours later. "The Adminlstratlon has had no policy for the last two and one-hall years and we haven't had a vote in a year." said Mr. Dole, the leading contender for the Republi- can Presidential nomination. "So , we've walted a long time and nothins has happened, so we think It's time to have a vote." Senate strategists saki that the measure was expected to pass easi- ly, and that the sponsors were push- ing for a vetoproof majority. Last summer, when the Congress was un- der Democratic control, a similar measure passed the Senate by a vote of 58-42 as an amendment to a de- fense authortzatlon bill, but was lat- er dropped In negotiations wlth the House. The United Natlons mission to Bosnia reached a crisls point last week after Bosnlan Serbs began a new offmslve and overran the Unit- ed Natlons "safe area" of Srebreni- ca. forclng as many as 40,000 clvll- ians to flee and trapping more than 400 Dutch peacekeepcm. In response, the French President, Jacques Chlrac, challenged Britain and the United States to jotn France in uslng military force against the Serbs. If they do not, he sald. he will withdraw French troops. Despite Mr. Chirac's pronounce- ment. the allles have been sharply divided over the French proposal which would make a stand for the enclave of Gorazde by using United States helico2,tem to bring in Eu- pean reinforcement8 for a British peacekeeping garrison there. With the London meetlng of the allies set for Friday, Mr. ~1irit.d and Vice President A1 Gore held a 90- minute metlng wlth the national securlty advlwn to consMer what would be a viabk plan lor Bosnia that cwld unite the allies. Mr. McCurry said the Pnsldent made no decision on a policy option. But on Capitol Hill, Mr. ~~~ confirmod plWcly for the &st time that h e Admhwatbn was "dfb cusshy a more aggmwive 8k cam- p a l ~ u a p o m I b k a p t l o n ~ m l l ~ theFrrnchprapodformovingin re inforcamam. Other WathIngm offlclals said the Admlnlstratlon was giving in- creasing camMeration to an aggres- sive air campaign as preferable to the French p h for extra ttoopa The officials said they did not belkve that 1,000 more combat-ready troops would k abk to hold Gorazde against a Bosnlan Serb advance and had questions about how they could be resupplied The officials also said that the French plan would bring the Unlted States closer to havlng a combat force In the Balkans. But offleiah sald that as a condi- tlon of mounting a policy of air strikes they would have to iind a way aruund the cumbersome system un- der which the United Nat im must call for NATO air strikes before they can be conducted And the officials sald it' was still unclear whether Brltaln would accept the idea of ag- gresslve air strikes. Mr. Christopher sald that the President would be tallring to Prlme Minister John Major of Britain and President Chlrac "in the next 24 hours." And Mr. Christopher will be meethg with Foreign Secretary Rif- kma. Despite the Administration's pleas. the supporters of Mr. Dole's legislation saM the Unlted Nations misslon In Bosnia had failed and It was tlme to end an embargo that had hurt the Bosnian Muslims, who are generally less well armed than the - - - - - Bosnian Serbs. These have weapon ry that m a bekmged to the Yugosla vian army. "Every ttme we've raised the Mta of letting the Bosnians defend them- selve8, it's been another excuse 01 why it's bad tlmhrg" said Senator Lieberman, felectlng the Admmis- -3 argument that such a vote could hurt the negotiations with the allles. "I thWr it's good timing, I think it's important timing and I think we ought to go ahtad and pass It this week." 'Ihe blll wwld require the Clinton Administration to stop adhering to the United Natiins arms embargo if 1 the peacekeeplng troops were with. drawn or WthIn 12 weeks of a re- quest by the Bosnian Government for a United Natlons withdrawal It does not specify who would arm the Bosnians, but the Clinton Admin- istration maintains, as Mr. McCurry put it today, that it would be "highly questionable morally" for Congress to lift the embargo and then not provide the Muslims with the equip ment and training they would need to withstand the Serbs and with air cover to protect them until they could obtain weapons. Mr. McCurry said the legislation was "clearly a formula to put this country directly into the fighting in Bosnia with U.S. ground forces." Senate aides say, however, that the Bosnian Muslims could quickly obtain Soviet-style weapons from the Czech Republic and Slovakia, weap ons that the Muslims are already familiar with. They said the only aid the United States could provide would be communications equip ment and night-vision goggles. - _ - - - _ - - _ - - - - ' W E ~ N E S ~ A Y . July 'j 9,1995 SYRIA...Erom Pg. 3 1990 - the so-called Taif accord - quelled proved fruitful. the guns of Lebanon's sectarian militias The Ayashes, for instance, who have Found: Opportunity . . but not the ambitions. Warlords, such as lost two sons in the Syrian maw, have The families and friends of the Syrian Druse leader Walid Junblatt, Shiite Amal visited Syria a half-dozen times to search government, long fettered by a Soviet-style chief Nabih Bam and Maronite Christian for the boys, who were arrested in Beirut in economy at home, are partaking in invest- strongman Elie Hobeika, got key posts in the late 1980s by Syrian agents: Each time. ments and commissions tied to Lebanon's the new government. Ethnic cleansing and the elderly couple was turned back by surly multibillion-dollar reconstruction pro- . other wartime horrors gave way to plun- prison guards. As Sunni M~~slims, the gram. Syrian companies are building derlng the public purse. Ayashes also sought help from their clan's roads. renovating buildings, trucking To pay for peace, several of the war- latest boss. Lebanese Prime Minister Ra- freight and supplying much of Lebanon's lords-turned-statesmen have been ac- fiq al-HaHri.. But the boys! mother says cement and electricity. An estimated 500,- corded their own special pools of public that when she begged for .his help at a 000 to one million Syrian workers - or 15% money to dispense largely as they please. holiday open house in his mansion, he to 3070 of Lebanon's current population- Mr. Barri, Lebanon's speaker of Parlia- looked away and said nothing. are supplying the brawn. In all, economists ment, controls 3 fund for southern Leba- Yet Mr. al-Hariri is Lebanon's only say. Syria earns $1 billion to 53 billion a non, where his Shiite clan predominates. politician who could possibly stand up to year in remittances from Lebanon. mak- Mr. Junblatt, minister of displaced per- the Syrians, people here say. A protege of ing it a vital source of income for the sons, wields money for war victims. King Fahd of Saudi Arabia - Mr. al-Harlri debi-strapped Syrian government. These slush funds, economists say, are became a billionaire building huge proj- For Syrian workers. Beirut is the good one reason Lebanon's public debt has ects for the Saudi royal family - he may be lire. Ziyad, a 25-year-old who three years ballooned to more than $7 billion and its as important to Syria as Syria is to him. ago was earning $6 a day paint in^ houses annual budget deficit is running at about Currency Leverage in Damascus, now gets UOO a month in an of government revenues. As the debt piles up, fueling inflation and keeping Since taking office three years ago. Mr. electronics shop, owns an car and sends ' interest rates above 2w0, the country still al-Hariri has helped persuade interna- half his income home to Syria. suffers severe shortages of housing, clean tional donors and investors that Lebanon's He lives in a high-rise apartment with water, electric power and phone lines. reconstruction program is for real. On the views of Qount Lebanon and the Mediter- The warlord government is a boon to three occasions that he threatened to re-' ranean. The owners of the apartment, , Syria. By resurrecting a system riddled sign because of squabbles with the Syrian- which is crowded with squatters. can't with the same personal and clan rivalries picked ministers in his cabinet, the Leba: afford to gut it to fully repair the wartime that fueled the civil war. Syria's leaders nese lira plummeted, and the Syrians damage or to pay off Syrian and Lebanese preside over a Lebanon in perpetual dis- quickly backed his demands. Bankers here officials to evict the squatters. Shell holes cord. Nearly every week, at least one of say Syria can ill-afford to see the lira in the walls have been patched upwith Lebanon's senior officials. involved in a crash, not only because it would reflect on bricks, and raw wire snakes along the its leadership but because many elite molding, carrying electricity to a light intra-Lebanese dispute, makes the three- hour drive to Damascus to curry favor with Syrians would lose a bundie. bulb. a fan, even aTV set. The toilet works, a Syrian patron. But Mr. al-Hariri has disappointed but drinking water is brought up from the ' In this way. the Syrians influence many Lebanese. 'On the crucial issue of street. "For us. this is paradise," Ziynd , nearly every decision by the Lebanese reforming Lebanon's political system of says. government. "Lebanon is less a function- religious power-sharing- the m t of Leba- But many Lebanese see'a huge, hidden ing state now than it is a series of personal nese instability that Syria has elploited- cost to the Syrian help in rebuilding U??- relationships among leaders in Beirut and he has done nothing. In fact, many say. non. Even long before the civil war, Syr- Damascus," a Lebanese academic says. confessionalism, as thesystem iscalled, is i a ~ s did unskilled jobs Lebanese didn't The Optimistic View : getting worse. Every government job or want. Now, with the Lebanese government project, no matter how minor, is subject to powerl'ess against the Syrian authorities. This exchange, some Lebanese con- sectarian horse-trading. Syrians are also. working at factories. tend, can work both ways. They say that in Meanwhile, the Syrians' most viable ports. farms and building sites. Especially a liberalizing world even Syria will be opponents, the Christian Maronites who hard hit by Syrian competition have been influenced by Lebanon's democratic and essentially ruled Lebanon up through the indigent Shiite Muslims and Palestinian free-market traditions. Eventually, such tivil war, have either moved away or been refugees living in slums and camps south optimists say, the two countries will find a terrorized into submission by Syria's mili- of Beirut; unemployment there tops 3070. happy medium between Lebanese laissez tary and secret police. Recently, even In Beirut, Syrian peddlers hawk their faire and Syrian totalitarianism. some of the Maronites' most recalcitrant wares on the front steps of bombed-out . So far. howcver. Ghada sees little rea- son for such optimism. She still hasn't any leaders say they may participate in the buildings Or from hand-pulled carts. Ac. parliamentary elections scheduled for next cording to Syrian workers, some street idea why her mother vanished in Syrian year. This would drive the Syrian roots merchants are Syrian conscripts serving custody. Every official she meets tells her here deeper still, legitimizing the puppet in Lebanon, who obtain leave-for a fee- a-different story. One said her.mother was government Mr. Assad has created. from their superiors. an Israeli spy; another said she forged Not that elections matter much any- In addition, Lebanese merchants say, . documents for Palestinians. The Interna- more. Under a freeway overpass in central rackets run by officers in Syria's army and tional Committee of the Red Cross told Beirut, a dozen Syrian laborers swap stc- secret police ~ n t r o l thriving trades in Ghada it is harder to trace missing Leba- ries about their lives in Lebanon, the vegetables, cigarettes, clothing and other . nese today than during the civil war: its problems of finding work back home, and commodities. The operations are exten- Beirut office requested permission to visit their dreams of getting married and own- sions of trading networks, established by Lebanon's prisons but received no reply. ing a home. Suddenly, however, silence. Syrian officials over the past 20 years, to According to Amnesty International, ' "Why are you talking to these guys? smuggle goods from Lebanon into scarcity- Syrian and Lebanese authorities have ar- They know liothing!" shouts a man run- ridden Syria. Once. when Lebanese troops rested hundreds of Lebanese, many of ning at the crowd from across the street. tried to close a Syrian-run vegetable mar- whom have allegedly been tortured and His shaven face, dark slacks and leather ket. Ule vendors brandished guns from jailed in Syria. Last Year, the human- shoes make him unmistakable: Syrian beneath their produce; several people rights group gave Syria a list of 90 Leba- secret police. He threatens to tear up this were killed. nese believed to be in Syrian jails. It also reporter's notebook and adds: "1 have a The merchants also complain that the petitioned Lebanon for visas to monitor the gun in the car. 1-11 take you to a place where layer of Syrian authority that hovers over human-rights situation here. Neither move not even God will know where you are." most transactions has increased their a s e . This "Syrian component.'' as one calls it, must be factored into everything, from commissions on large public.works contracts to customs duties. T h e Line Managers As Syrians pursue business in Lebanon, the line managers are the warlords. The peace agreement imposed by ~ y r i a in r- BALTIMORE SUN July 1 9 , 1 995 Pg . 1 I ~~~$~~~'~ after a two- Pentagon is.ordered who sued the Navy after being dis- *he order, enter* by Judge Hat- cl~arged for acknowledging his homo- ter on Friday, was made public yes- to pay gay's court costs ,,,. terday by Petty Officer Meinhold's at- U.S. District JudgeTeny J. Hatter torney, John I. McGuire. calls to the LOSANGELES- A federdjud@ Jr. ordered the government to pay Defense Department for comment ordered the Pelltagon to Fay the court costs for Petty Officer Keith $440.000 court costs for a =lor Meinhold, who won reinstatement GAY ... Pg. 1 3 4 - WEDNESDAY. July 19. 1995 WASHINGTON POST July 19, 1995 Pg. 21 Richard WASHINGTON POST July 19, 1995 other desirable combat Pg. 21 John R. Kasich tics such as speed, rnaneuverabiity. The B-2: expensive and difficult to maintain; the coating degrades with each mis- sion. Stealth is not an all-aspect doak of mvisibility. It is optimized to defeat Stealth radars ! effective ahead from of the 0.ther aircraft. but is Alsop works better a g m t radar Has Its frequencies: ironically. some d. long-- radars are more clHadt to defeat- Other detection such electrO-OPtieal Or infrared* have The Right to Self-Defense? Today the majority leader of the ance and cave in to weak European U.S. Senate, Robert Dole, and policies. And most members of Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman Congress have FL d once again propose legi&tion hearing from London and Paris that that would require President Clin- the U.S. Congress has no right to ton to end U.S. participation in the insist on a new policy because we U.N. embargo barring the supply of did not follow British and French Limits the to detect a stealth air- arms to the government of Bosnia. folly in sending ground troops to craft. A stealth aircraft be This time, unlike the previous Bosnia. For an increasing number advised to do its mission at night. on which similar legisla- of Americans, those troops were Charles Krauthammer's July 13 Stealth can be tion was defeated, Dole and Lieber- unwisely sent in harm's way with cohm praising the B-2 stealth bomb 'g "Iativ* 'low and unmaneuvera- er contains several overstatements ble* a bomber ac- and questionable assumptions. His ar- quired by an enemy fighter aircraft gwnents need to be examined very be an easy arefully before Congress decides I" this as in else wbether to co-t to a program that in War, there is a see-saw between viU cost, by very conservative esti- and defense. Curen*O mates, $31 billion for just 20 more stealth has the upper hand in certain aircaft missions (night attacks with air SuPe- First, the balanced budget environ- riOrity). In the future* in -t has changed the rules of the ' b a l processing# high-static radar Or -. If we decide to add an W d - s"'veillance may degrade geted $31 bi]lim program to the fed- Stealth. This informahon does not make stealth "bad." But stealth is a perishable commodity, and i t i s legiti- - have more than enough votes no dear mission under paralytic to win. Administration arguments U.N. guidelines that render them on Bosnia, steadily undermined by hostages and prevent them from events are no longer convincing. defending themselves, much less 1ndeei among the growing majori- the Bosnians they are there to ty of senators and congressmen help. who believe the embargo is wrong with television images of un- and should be lifted are many who bearable brutality and suffering, have, ma now, accepted Clinton most members of hges~ have administration argument, that lift- found it increasingly diEficult to put ing the embargo would damage aside the central truth about the NATO, widen and *Americanize" war in F3o&& that it is a war of the war and lead to increased casu- territorial aggrandizement c a m 4 dtjes amoag the ~~~~i~~ out - by well& Serbs, largely ne detmOra* of against unarmed civilians, a war in finther cuts on the domestic side? Or mate to ask about the tratim's case was kvitable. After which the shelling of t o m and ness of stealth bombers in a tight it & president himself villages, rape, pilkge and massacre d m u ~ we cut dw pro- fid environmen: and during a p e r ~ wrl;o =@ the hed&w of the are ~r k m e n k of m e t ~ c -. such as tactical strike fighters ', of technological and aircraft carriers, that the B 2 embargo during the 1992 cam- cleansing." supposedly makes redundant! Per- The Department under- bps the latter c.,olce would be the this issue. Its Heavy Bomber more honest one, but B-2 proponents that advances in pre- not suggesbg that. It might an- cision dded munitk)ns (PGMs) mean bgonite camer enthusiasts, for in- that upgrading the existing bmber stance, whose votes are critical. fleet (which includes 20 P ~ ~ V ~ O U S I Y SecOOd, Krauthammer believes in bought B-2s) with PGMs is a better magic technological ~t is a lhan purchasing additional B2s. Finally, let us lay to rest a recent myth. What does Capt. Scott O'Crady Wg Exception have to do nth justifymg more &2s? Does the wnter suggest that ZOO-ton bombers should be enforcing the no- peculiarb American delusion that fly mne over Bosnia? Or does he have there exists a ,,magic bullet" that will a heavy bombing campalgn In mind? Technological wizardry is no substi- forever spare us the necessity to make hard choices in national security tute for foreign policy, just as it does policy. steal& not invulnerability or not dew us to escape the need to invisibility; it IS management of the make hard cho~ces in fiscal policy. a i r d s radar signature. Just as wnbs isa ~ w l k ~ , , there is no "free lunch," stealth is a ,epresentativcfrom ~ , , i ~ ~ n ~ paign and who promised to end it They deplore the failure of the immediately upon u g office. It United Nations to distinguish be- was the president who dispatched tweev the perpetrators and the Wamn Christopher to Europe in victims of aggression, They are May 1993 with a reasoned, pru- a n g ~ that NATO forces, including dent proposal to lift the embargo U.S. air forces, have been subordi- on hsnia and provide strikes to nated to the United Nations. I" support the Bosnian government. increasing numbers they believe, Sady, dangerously, Clinton lacks aS Clinton Once did, that the gov- th, courage of his con,,ictions. ~ , , d ernment of Bosnia has an inalien- eve-y memk of Conme- how. able. inherent right to selfdefense that a weak and indecisive presi- of such primacy that it can no dent, acquie-g to allied de- longer be abridged in the interests man&, has been singing EuropePs uniw Or theories about tune since his policy-now to contain the war and keep it ~ole's-ran into opposition from from spreading. They accept that weak governments in Britain and participation in an embargo that. France. keeps fhe Bosnian Muslims hope- Many members-but fewer with lesdy outgunned aeates a moral each diplomatic each bud- obligation to defend them. Yet they iation of NATO at Serb hands, each h o w it is an obligation the West /ghastly shelling of women and chil- has cynically failed to honor. compromise. The stealthier an air- of the dren-opposed unilateral lifting of For a while. many members ac- craft, the more likely it is to degrade -- the embargo, until now..They be- cepted the administration's argu- . lieved &at. diplomacy would sea me"t that lifting the TIME J u l y 2 4 , 1995 achieve results, that our European prolong the war and I N S I D E W A S H I N G T O N who had sent their sons to increase the suffering. Now they create safe havens b n i a and are appalled to hear this argument, Ikep htween w-g p.r- from ~ r i t u h officials especia~y. A Penchant for Anniversaries-and Murder ties. would eventually succeed, that They remember that the same a- /Mitftalg the embsrgo would weaken g w n t could h a ~ made in The State Department issued a vague warning la* week that j or even destroy the North Atlantic 1940 when Lend Lease "pro- "Middle East terrorists" might attack U.S. targets in,$+uth , ! w ~ e . ,;, i ,, <:, longed" a war that might have been Amenca in July. U.S. intell~gence officials fear that this week' H~~~~ anyone in Washington ended quickly by British surrender may wwtness strikes by Hlzballah, since the Islamic radical now believes that diplomacy will Or Nazi i group has a penchant for anniversaries: Tuesday marks one succeed or that America's NATO As they look for an end to the year since a Hizballah car bomb hlled 96 at a Jewish f a l b e ~ have either a serious policy fightmg, they now see that with center ~n BUENOS AIRES. Hizballah also has yet to retaliate for Or the to imp1ement One. Few their monopoly of heavy weapons what ~t cla,ms was an 1srael1-spansored car bombing last Dec I ; ; " ~ T ~ g ~ ~ ~ O : " ~ e ~ ~ ~ y S ~ t ~ ~ ~ 31 that killed a top operative's brother. abandon its leadership of the alli- PERLE. . . Pg . 6 WEDNESDAY, July 19, 1995 I WASHINGTON TIMES J u l y 19, 1995 MARIO MOZZILLO Bragg, N.C. Why? It seems this activity disturbs the mating habits fallen ,from the nest national debate has been under way for some time about the and wisdom of possibly eployin Alntrican forces in Hc-wtia Absent i o m the discussion ;k a recognition that the ferocity of our nation's fighting personnel has m.arneliorated. It has been made -1tive to the needs of Congress and other species. What this w o n ' s adversaries, from George to Saddam Hussein have failed .to do has now been accomplished. cm guns of our armed forces have been silenced. Pressured by environmentalist and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), t h e Pentagon has arrreed to s t o ~ M-1 suver-tanks and Jlkdley amiored pe&iorwel carri- prs from roaring through the forest and blasting the hillsides at Fort WASHINGTON POST 'We all sleep better dau>wing that ifwe ever have a nuclear exchange with an adversary, it will be an environmentally Fend& occurrence. $f a denizen of this forest, namely ,@e red-cockaded woodpecker. Con- sequently our solicitous public offi- -.. clals have closed some 25,000 acres .pf this rnilityy reservation to, of course, maneuvers. One might ask $hat is a sditacy reservation for, if not to conduct mihtary maneuvers? br, why these gunsare permitted to maim, mutilate or kill humans in partime but not annoy red-cockad- ed woodpeckers in peace time? Maneuvers may be renewed S the generals buy, with our tax dollars, another 11,000 acres for a new home for these birds. Until this is done, American fighting units have been silenced and stopped by an overwhelming force under the com- mdnd of Field Marshan Woody Woodpecker. ,,; This is not to suggest the envi- m y e n t and the EPA have not been 'sollwtous of our natlon's military Xorces. They have been far more ,yderstanding of America's Inter- continental Ballistics Missiles .QCBMs). ,, Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are ,what make air conditioners work. $nfortunately, it is claimed that the ~ l e a s e of CFCs into the atmos- $here contributes to the depletion ;pE the ozone layer in the atrnos- here. The ozone being necessary % the survival of life on Earth. "- Our ever-vigilant EPA, the peo- le's servant, has prevailed on the h~ l\lr mrce to replace CFCinthe 'Tooling system of its ICBMs. We all sleep better k n o ~ i n g that if we ever 'tiave a nuclear exchange with an idversary, it will be an environ- >mentally friendly occurrence with no threat by us to the ozone layer. , p e live in joyful hope that other nuclear powers will be as consider- he as the United States, and will *place chlorofluorocarbons in their ICBMs. Lest you f?ei that there is too 'fiuch emphasis on the nexus behveen America's armed forces &d the environment, please con- Sder the stronger bond forged with 49e military by Congress. - Air Pentagon is rendering a valu- able service to our lawmakers. The Associated Press revorts that an 'Army helicopter flew-united States Sen. Patty Murray and other mem- bers of Congress from Tacoma, J u l y Pg. 1 9 wash ,25 m~les to Seattle for a news 'conference. The trlp took 40 mln- qtes, about as long as it would take b drive by car. But the cost was a , , lot more thangas money. It cost the ;tppayer $1,599. . Although the good senator is &lowed a travel allowance, when ,she flies by rnilitary aircraft it is not deducted from her annual @owance. In addition, the service p m e s with VIP treatment, includ- lng rnilitary escort, meals, lodging, pr and driver. The aides of one g ~ n a t o r eminded the crew to pro- vide chocolate chip cookies for their The aides to the chairman of e House Defense Subcommittee reminded the crew to provide "reg- gar miniature set of liquor togeth- e r with a half case of lite beer and Reineken along with reading mate- Pial (Golf Digest. Golf magazine)." P a d e r , are you not proud of the service you are providing your Elected oflkials? When next you fly commercial, ask the airline to have members of lfhe Joint Chiefs of Staff to be your fight attendants. Maybe Gen. Colin Powell o r present Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. John Shalikashvili would fluff up your>illow. Thank $ou for flying Air Pentagon. - Mario Mouillo is the author of ihe book "Things Am Out ofbint," recently publislivd by Windsor House. Pg. 17 parently still stuck one mile away. 'The attacks Bosnian Serbs, Muslims Threaten IY are resistirig going on. them, B U ~ Bosnian and there sddiers is no are change successful- in the no medicine is available." Reuter after se~aratist Serbs captured the nearby U.N.- The United Nations estimates the government designated "safe area" of Srebrenica, Westem can muster 600 to 1,000 fighters in Zepa. Some S w E V O , b s ~ ' . 1t3-Bosnian Muslims governments were std at an impasse over how to are using armored personnel carriers seized from resisted tank and artillery attacks by Serb forces ta&e the crisis. the Ukrainian peacekeepers on Monday. on the eastern enclave today and threaten* BoSnian government troops have surrounded Volodymyr Yelchenko, a Ukrainian government to use Ukainian U-N. peacekeepers as human the Ukrainian U.N. compound north of Zepa. U.N. offjcizl, urged the United Nations to withdraw his shields if NA4T0 fails to take action. spokesman Alexander Ivanko said in Sarajevo. country's peacekeeping troops from Zepa and G The hard-pressed Ukrainians-79 troops en- 'They said they would use Ukrainian peacekeep razde. "The Ukrainian troops are unarmed and trusted with the defense of the U.N. "safe area" ers as human shields unless NATO airstrikes are completely defenseless. If they are not immediately and its 17,000 Muslim inhabitants- were- under called in against advancing Bosnian Serbs." he withdrawn, a huge tragedy will ensue." he said. threat from both sides as attacking Serbs threat- said. Bosnian government troops in Gorazde stripped ened to kill a group of eight at an observation post NATO jets flew over Zepa on Swlday hut did weapons from the Ukrainian troops Sunday, as- they were surrounding and to target the peace- not strike. saulting their commander and leaving the peace- keepers' base if NATO jets are called in. Serb tanks and artillery resumed attacks UP the keepers defenseless, the United Nations said. With Zepa resisting capture exactly one week ravine leading to Zepa this morning but were a p ~- --.----- ------- - . - - -. - . . are armed. It contemplates their , Tenncco's Newport News PERLE ... from Pg. 5 withdrawal by allowing time for the ' Shipbuilding drvision received a British, French and other govern- I J u 1 y 1 9 , 1 9 95 $404 miUion increase to an existing protected by the embargo, the ments that have troops on the : Pg. F2 contract to continue work on the Serbs have no intention of bringing ground to bring them home. the war to an end. They are placing Time to get home safely. That is i U s Eisenhower aircraft Curier, new credence in Sen. Dole's argu- a great deal more,than,the Westem ' . . . .. . the Pentagon said. Newport News ment that the surest way to end powers have so'far'given th'e peci- , Shipbuikling is overhauling the the fighting in Bosnia is to enable ple of Bosnia. : M~D~nnell Douglas said its entire vessel for the Navy as part of the Bosnians to defend themselves. seumdquarter net income rase 22 there~ular mk-ce wrformed ~ ) o l ~ ~ ~ legislation h a t The writer, o resident fellow at lhe percent, to $169 million, driven by. on marly air& carriers. the U.N. mission in Bosnia is ba~~k- American Enleerise Institute, costcutting md increased & in Gmpiled rrpnis by the &+sxhtnl rupt and that the U.N. forces there wus on a s k t a n t srcrchty of' the co~npany's military aircraft Bloomberg Cusiness News, h w must be withdrawn a s the Bosnians defense from 1981 to 1957. segment J a ~ s New Service, Reute: unl Washmgton PJsc Mh' Pniten WEDNESDAY, July 19, 1995 * I WASHINGTON POST July 18, 1995 Pg. 1 1 I Bosnian Soldiers Evade Serbs in Trudge to Safety I By John Pomfret h l b 5 S m P b . C F ~ S C m . - MEDJEDJA, Fbsnh, July 17- jLbout 4,000 Bosnian army sol- das--many in rags, some a exbau~tion or fear, some bal- d m makeshift stretchers, 0th- ers hgging children as young as ~ d g e d for five days thr~ugh temtory to escape from -& and reach a safe haven hae. m g on leaves, spring water. r ~ d apples, sugar and a little salt, the ragged column broke into this h t - l i n e vilkge beginning Sunday night after moving through Serb ow d e east of here and p i ng the 2nd Corps of the mostly U l i m Bosnian government army. k g i n g from the woods, some of t& sddiers were dad only in un- h e a r , others had bleeding feet -ddled in plastic and cloth. They w e of three battles fought along ' tbe way with Serb forces trying to talt their r e t r d . The soldlers said Serb troops killed hundreds of comrades in am- bnshes and that the fate of thou- sands more fleeing soldiers is un- known. At least 4.000 Muslim fighters are believed by U.N. offi- cials to have been incarcerated by the Serbs following the fall of Sre- brenica last Tuesday. That could mean another 2,000 men either are dead or still alive in the woods. sioce the Bosnian army had 10,000 men in the fallen town. Stragglers antinwd to show up here today. The exodus of the fighting men from Srebrenica marks one of the most dramatlc d t q operations in Bosnia's 39-month-old war. From its start m the dark early hours of Wednesday, following the Qpture of Srebrenica by the Bosnian Serbs, a column of thousands of Muslim soldiers snaked slowly ~~ the heart of enemy territory. It m p e d through woods and open valleys, up mountains and across f i e and rivers, covering at least 60 * it arrived at Medjd*, a Bosnian-held mountain village 1 3 miles from the Bosnian Serb-con- trdhl town of Zvornik along the Drina IZlver. Like an anny of ghosts, the sol- diers moved only at night and, ac- co'iding to Partkipants, slept when the? could each day. They avoided .& by hand signals passed down the column and traveled in enforced ~ l l w . sometimes as close as 60 feet from Serb positions. ''It was homble If that word can mean anything to me anymore." said were still working things out." Omer Ibrahimovic, a 43-year-old The column was cut in half, and fighter who arrived here early today Avdo and the othel: fighters said m rags, with his feet swollen and they didn't know what happened to bloody with sores. Y am truly lucky the soldiers behind the? Serb gun- to be alive." men used megaphones urging them brahimovic limped into this vil- to give up. But with a strong meme kge with his brother. Ramo, 27, by ry of the Serb slaughter unleashed his side. On Saturday night. the on Srebrenica in 1993, and of the younger man recounted momentari- reputation the Serbs have of human ly losing his mind in a torrential rain- rights abuses against prisoners of storm and walking as if in a dream, war, the column marched on. fantasizing about rocket-propelled know a Serb machinegun nest grenades and returning to Srebreni- killed 70 of 'our men at one go,", ca to take back his home-lost to Avdo said. "But we had to keep run- the onslaught of the Bosnian Serbs. ning and marching. It was march or But pushed on by Omer. Ramo die." . made it to safety. The soldiers settled into a grue- "Without him, I know I wouldn't some routine, sneaking through vil- have continued to move," Ram0 said, lages-including Nova Kasaba and looking at the drawn, grizzled face of Glurnina-that are now burned com- his older brother. "He saved my pletely but once were home to thou- life." sands of Bosnian Muslims. The col- The brothers were part of a force umn aossed two mountain ranges of about 10,000 lightly armed Bosni- and two rivers. ai soldiers that was overrun by the For much of the trip, Avdo helped formidably armored Bosnian Serbs carry a stretcher made of branches. Backed by Yugoslav army M-84 plastic, camouflaged coats and wire. tanks and paramilitary forces from His load was a solher with an infec- Serbia, U.N. ofticials said, the Bosni- ted leg wound an Serbs took Srebrenica after about W e suffered a lot, but he had to five days of fighting. Two NATO control himself," Avdo said. "Some- airstrikes failed to stop the advance. times he didn't have the power to On Tuesday. as the old silver min- s e a m Then he fell into a coma." ing town fell, the soldiers melted in- As the column neared Zvornik. to the woods and left tens of thou- Bosnian Serb forces attacked them sands of women, children and elderly again-this time with mortars a s to flee to Potocari, a viuage just as small arms- Better prepared north of Srebrenica. than the first time, the Bosnians "It was a live goodbye," said foughttheserbsoff- Orner, speaking about his farewell On Saturday, rain came and with with his SIX children and wife of it relative protection from the Serb more than 20 years. Y pushed them army. which does not fight well in one way and I went another. It broke downpours. Near Medjedja, Bosflian my heart to leave them to the army forces began an offens~ve, Serbs." The soldier began to uy. A pushing west in a desperate attempt visitor who put a hand on his shou]- to meet up wth the retreating force. der felt only skin and bones. They met them early Sunday, and by Bosnian Serb forces entered poto- that afternoon thousands of Muslim c& on Wednesday. First they sepa- soldiers began pouring into this rated the military-aged men who had fanning vfiage. not fled. Then they began forcibly In one of the Bosnian army push- expelling the women, children and es, Bosnian soldiers captured a jeep elderly. As of today, more than with license plates from the Yuge 23.000 refugees had arrived in the slav m y . killing its crew of five ~uslim-held-~uzla region. men, an indication that Yugoslav Also on Wednesday, the soldiers, forces were involved in the battle for Srebrenica. Today the soldiers exodus had commenced. Soon* Serb drove the jeep and its p]ates-N- forces attacked the column near the 2260-through Medjedja. village of Konjevic Polje. about six Christine Spolar miles outside Srebrenica. The as- sault caught the Muslim sol&ers by afided from Mali Zuornik, Y-la- -..,.. because the march was in "'ke Bosnian who refused its infancy and organization was loose, said Avdo Softic, a 33-year-old to.sh?reddel af'stebrenica came to fighter who also escaped with his be perceived by their Serb assailants brother, Alija. 31. as a deadly serious challenge over "That was the worst of the fight- the weekend. Accordingly, on Sunday the Bosni- ing," said Avdo, who waked to rela- an Serbs pulled forces from the cru- tive freedom early today in rags with his body covered in s,&es. "We cia1 battle in Zepa to defend Zvornik, a Bosnian border town just across the Drina River from here that they feared would come unde~ assault as the remnant of the largely Muslim Bosnian army punched west toward Tuzla. Fighting in Zepa ebbed as the battle for the bprder area intensi- fied. [In Sarajevo today. Bosnian Presi- dent Alija Izetbegovic asked the U.N. command to withdraw the thousands of sick, wounded and el- derly from Zepa, special correspon- dent Samantha Power reported.] One Bosnian Serb source estimat- ed that about 10,000 men who had fought at Zepa and, earlier in the week. Srebrenica, were redirected to comb the hills of Zvornik. The Bosnian army was so con- cerned that it brought in an elite group of fighters, known as the Pan- thers, into the hills, the source said. Roads were closed from the river town to the Bosnian Serb headquar- ters of Pale, off and on, through the weekend. Mortar rounds and grenades ex- ploded frequently on Saturday, and at least 10 grenades fell Sunday in downtown Zvornlk. One poorly lobbed grenade plopped over the TRUDGE.. .Pg. 8 - WEDNES~'AY, July '1 9; '1995 DEFENSE WEEK July 17, 1995 Pg. 1 Air Force OK'd TO Sell TOP for Bauerlein deta ls. declined "He is unable sev ral to speak requests onAir-to-Air Missile To UAE, Israel the subject you are interested in be- cause it's under negotiation and it's classified." said spokeswoman Capt. BY TONY CAPACClO Cecily Christian. Any sales would be through for- mal Foreign Military Sales channels In a decision that introduces a new weaponinto the volatile Middle East, and not direct sales between Hughes, the Air Force last month received classified permission to sell its top air- Raytheon and the respective nations, to-air missile to 'Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Defense Week has sources aid. learned. Israel for its part has been loath to The mid-June decision allows the Air Force to offer both nations the 1988 ask for the missile for its 24 new F- model of its AIM-120 AMRAAM, the world's most sophisticated fire-and- 151 aircraft because such a request forget dogfighting missile. would instigate a request by Saudi The approval could mean billions in dollars of potential sales to Hughes Arabia for the missile. Ajrcraft Co. and the Raytheon Co., AMRAAM co-makers, because the missile But that reluctance is now ren- previously has been sold only to NATO allies. dered moot by the committee's deci- The AMRAAM revolutionizes air combat because it enables a pilot to sion, sources said. And as the UAE launch and leave a salvo of up to four missiles at enemy targets beyond visual negotiations indicate. the U.S. has lost any ability to limit the introduc- range, as each missile independently homes in on separate targets. Geopolitically, introduction of the new air-to-aircapability could be seen by -tion of sophisticated fire-and-forget missilesinto the region when the French Israel's supporters as eroding that nation's "qualitative edge," which the U.S. and Russians are anxious to sell their has sworn to uphold. versions. But that issue was likely settled by source said. As acknowledged last December in In fact, Israeli officials this week the Air Force. "The words we are hear- the Pentagon's "World Wide Conven- are scheduled to be briefed in St. Louis ing are that 'Israel's concerns have tional Arms Trade" report, the MICA by McDonnell Douglas on AMRAAM been appropriately assuaged,' " said "will compete with the U.S. AMRAAM integration during a roytine F-151 up- an industry source. for air-to-air missile sales to a wide ' date, industry and Pentagon sources . The missile decision has even greater range ofcustomers during the decade." said. significance for the McDonnell Dou- UAE officials have insisted through- - Saudi Arabia will likely request the glas Corp. It is vying against France out their Pentagon talks that inclusion weapon once news of the Pentagon's and Russian firms for-bragging rights of AMRAAM iscentral to their buying decision is publicized, sources said. in what aerospace analysts call the last any F-15s from the United States. UAE "I think the significance here was "deal of the century"-the UAE': up- Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Mohamed Bin we had not previously approved the coming multi-billion fighter order. Zayed is scheduled to visit washing- release of any AMRAAM in the re- So heated is the contest that both ton this week and will likely discuss gion," said another military source. Russian President Boris Yeltsin and the AMRAAM issue with Air Force "This was a departure because a his French counterpart Jacques Chirac and Pentagon officials. couple of countries in the region had have lobbied top UAE officials offer- The mid-June decision by the inter- asked for AMRAAM. So the [disclo- ing their respective wares, according agency National Disclosure Policy sure policy decision] did say that, sub- to an industry source closely following Committee will now allow the Air Force uect to certain conditions, AMRAAM the ccntest. to offer UAE the missile--essentially was releasable to these countries, and a Yeltsln is offering the advanced Su- its A model introduced in 1988, ac- certain configuration at that," said the 35 with its AMRAAM-version Vympel cording to diplomatic, Pentagon and source. "We've cleared them for what AA- 12 missile; Chirac was offering industry sources. we consider a perfectly adequate the Rafale and Matra's MICA, the TRUDGE...from P- Dnna River and exploded on the riv- er bank here in Mali Zvornik, on the Serbian side of the Drina. The Bosnian Serb source said about 15 Muslims were killed in a battle over a mortar, and that in all, 25 Bosnian army soldiers were lulled and 80 wounded. The injured were taken to a hosp~tal in Zvornik over the weekend. Bosnian Serb forces decided to give up the search for the Muslims today when ~t became apparent that the mountaln battle could become a blood bath for both sides, a Bosnian Serb source said. FOR MORE INFORMATION For updates throughout the day on the confltct in Bosnia, see Digital Ink, The Washington Post j. on-line news and infirmation service. For - more injarmation, call 1-51@ 5104, ext. 9000. 8 If a country such as a NATO partner AMRAAM but not necessarily the one is not covered by a blanket agreement the Air Force will be using when they granting virtually unlimited access to classified data, the Pentagon must cir- culate a proposal with the State De- partment and other agencies seeking their approval for limited release. It was this process that was completed last month. The committee agreed "in principle" * to allow an Air Force-proposed excep- tion to disclosure policy that governed the release of AMRAAM-specific data to non-NATO nations. "They are authorized to pursue the sale of these systems to the countries and need to release the necessary clas- sified information," a Pentagon offi- cial said. The specific details, such as what modifications-if any-will be made to the A model, remain to be worked out, Pentagon and diplomatic sources said. Air Force Deputy Under Secretary for International Affairs Robert take delivery." DEFENSE NEWS July 17-23, 1995 Pg. 2 Pentagon Seeks Nod For Kuwaiti Arms Deal The Pentagon informed Congress , July 14 that the government of Kuwait has asked to purchase 16 UH-6OL Black Hawk helicopters and associated arnlaments, including 500 HeIlfue mis- silesand 38 Hellfire launchers. The estimated value of the total po- tentid contract is $461 million, Maj. Tom LaRock, a Pentagon spokesman, said July 1 4. The equipment package, which in- cludes night vision goggles, is designed to upgrade Kuwait's ruutmor, day- night missile capability and provide close air support for ground forces, ac- cording to a July 14 Pentagon statemer~l. WEDNESDAY, July 19,1995 I NATIONAL JOURNAL J u l y 15, 1995 Pg. 1813 1 WASHINGTON TIMES I IS IT TOO LATE TO NUKE 'EM? I Diplomotic retognition of Vietnom has whipped Frank J. Gaffney Jr., the Center for July 19, 1995 Pg. B9 Pi?C Environmental lands Navy cleanup WALL STREET JOURNAL Security Poliiy's bard-line director, into a dither of denuntiotion. In this "extroor- dinary, if odious" od, President Clinton has coried up to "the same Communist government whose side he took 25 years ago," Goffney fulminot~ in a fax. But, tben, certain White House aides l o v e been beovering away for years to reword tbe Communist rulers of Vietnam," he adds, before savaging Sen. John Mdoin, R- A r k , a Yietnom-ero POW, whose support for recognition mode "it easier to ignore [Hanoi's] repressive, totolitorian regime." J u l y 18, 1995 Pg. 1/11 PRC Environmental Manage- ment Inc. was awarded a l@year, $260 million contract to pmvide program management and envi- ronmental services to Navy fa- . cilities in Northern W o r n i a , Nevada and Utah. - The McLean-based company will investigate and clean up hazardous-waste sites in a project known as Navy Clean2 The proj- ect is required by federal and state environmental regulations. Russia Warns Showdown in San Diego. The Navy is expected to make a final decision by the end of the month on D E F E N ~ ~ DAILY whether to retain a "cadre" of submarines in San Diego or copsolidate the entire Pacific fleet of attack boats in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. We commander-inchief of Navy forces in the Pacific, Adm. Ronald July 17, 1995 Zla toper , likes the idea, but the corporate Navy says it's unaffordable. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Boorda an&Zlatoper are likely to settle the issue when they meet in San Diego July 25- Pg. 66 27. West on Moves In Bosnian War By JULIE WOLF And CHARLES GOLDSMITH WfRcporterr O ~ T H E WALL STREET JOURNAL BRUSSELS - As Bosnian Serb forces dosed in on a second "safe area." Russian Fhreign Minister Andrei Kozyrev warned that Western military intervention in the cmflict risked "huge casualties. and in- cluding civilian casualties, right in the middle of Europe." Speaking after a meeting with his 15 Buropean Union counterparts. Mr. Ko- tyrev said any "mixing" of the roles of United Nations peacekeeping operations with active militarytary involvement "would be very unrealistic and -certainly very dangerous." His remarks came as Western nations grapple with how to prevent the fall of the eastern Muslim enclave of Zepa and other areas under U.N. protection in Bosnia, fdbwing the capture last week of Srebren- ica by Bosnian Serbs. FrPnch President Jacques C h i c called last week for mili- tary action to recapture Srebrenica, but BU diplomats said the discussion now centers on how to protect Gorazde and Sarajevo, a tacit admission that even Zepa was already lost. ministers from the fivenation "contact group" on Bosnia - Britain. France. Ger- - mahy, Russia and the U.S. "I would like those who talk of a . military and a [North Atlantic Treaty Organization] option to answer a simple question: Are they prepared to really fight a war, and not just play on high moral grounds and public opinion?" Mr. Kozyrev said at the news conference. "This kind of operation would stop the first day [Cable News Network] shows civilian casualties inflicted not by the Bosnian Serbs" but by the intervening Western forces." He urged renewed efforts to find a political solution. "rather than . . . these doomsday scenar- ios." Mr. Kozyrev's remarks took attention away from continuing differences between France, Britain and the U,S. on the next steps in Bosnia. The French foreign minis- ter, Heme de Charette, insisted that a "military solution is part of a coherent effort" in Bosnia. But British Foreign Secretary Malcolm Rifkind stopped short of endorsing military intervention to pro- tect the remaining U.N.-protected- areas. ' Mr. Rifkind, who flies to Washington @day to meet Seeretap of State Warren Christopher, raised questions about the desirability of sending troops to protect the enclaves, and also the logistics involved. Noting that the enclaves are surrounded by Bosnian Serb forces, he said. "We need to address the issue in a very frank and realistic way." One thing that emerged from key players at the EU meetingwas a consensus that U.N. troops shouldn't bewithdrawn at this time. Officials said Friday's meeting in London would seek ways to prolong the U.N. peacekeeping mission. The EU ministers also heard grim reports about the treatment of Bosnian Muslims in Srebren i~ by the Bosnian Serbs who captured it last week. Dutch Foreign Minister Hans Van Mierlo said that Dutch soldiers in the town had wit- nessed atrocities, and the EU's humanitar- ian-aid commissioner, Emma Bonino, said at least 12,W refugees were still missing. L . FROM THE K STREET CORRIDOR NATIONAL JOURNAL A s defense budgets grow tighter, far-flung military organizations a re keeping an eagle eye on doings at the Capitol. In its just-published fiscal 1996 J u l y 15, 1 995 markup report, the House National Security Committee gripes about the Pen- tagon's "increasingly large number of legislative liaison operations and associat- p g . 1 8 3 4 ed ~ersonnel-" At least five A r m y outfits-Forces Command, Training and Doctrine Com- mand, U.S. Army Europe, Allied command guropk and U.S. Forces in Korea-maintain independent legislative offices in Washington. Navy sub- sidiaries such as the Naval Ocean Systems Command and.the Pacific Test Cen- The remarks also showcased the fact tbat while Russia may be moving closer to tbe EU on economic issues, it hardly sees ewto-eye with EU nations on the proper approach to the Balkans, where Moscow has historic ties to the Serbs. Mr. Kozyrev's comments set the stage for a crucial and perhaps testy meeting Friday in London of foreign and defense ter have followed suit. "During a period of downsizing and budget constraint, the committee fiqds it difficult to understand how such legislative liaison operations can be justified," the committee's report said. By Jan. 1, Defense Secretary William J. Perry must submit a census of these proliferating liaison operations and explain why their tasks should not be assigned to the service Secretaries, each of whom also runs a legislative liaison shop. -David C. Morrison WEDNESDAY, Julv 19,1995 I WASHINGTON POST J u l y 19, 1995 - China to Conduct Military Exercise Near Taiwan By Steven Mufson W o b p g b F m t F ~ S b n c c BEIJING, July 18-The Chinese army an- nwoQd today that it will conduct week-long mili- tary exercises in the East China Sea just north of Taiwan. Tbe flexing of military muscle appeared designed ao send a message to Taiwan, which has angered Beijkg by pushing for greater international recog- nition Beijing regards the island as a renegade province of China and was particularly irritated by Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui's visit to the United States last month. The United States does not recognize Taiwan as an independent country and mly granted Lee a visa because his trip was a piMte visit. The timing of the exercises, shortly before a meeting in Brunei of foreign ministers from mem- bers of the Association of Southeast A s i i Nations WEAN). will also serve as a reminder of Chinese might and determination. Chinese Foreign Minister Qlan Qichen and Secretary of State Warren Chris- topher are scheduled to meet on Aug. 1 during the ASEAN conference in an effort to halt a deteriora- tion in relations between the two powers. The exercises will begin on Friday and will in- volve naval vessels, warplanes and the launching of a surface-tesurface guided missiie that will land in the ocean, according to the announcement issued by the official New China News Agency. The army warned other nations to steer their ships and air- craft clear of the exercise area, which will have a radius of 10 nautical miles. Although most andysts discount the prospect of Chinese military action against Taiwan, anxiety on Taiwan runs high. The atmosphere has become significantly more tense since Lee's visit to the United States. Beijing has canceled official and quasi-official contacts be- tween Taiwan and the mainland, and China boarded a coude of small boats in a disputed area of the South China Sea. China also held military exercises late last month, giving Taiwan's stock market a bad case of the jitters. The earlier exercise, dubbed East Sea No. 5, was held June 30 off China's east coast province of Zhejiang, some 240 miles north of the tense 132-mile Taiwan Strait. On China's side, the reestablishment of relations between the United States and Vietnam and con- gressional talk of using Vietnam as a counterweight to Chinese influence in the region have raised Chi- nese fears that the United States is launching a new containment strategy. State Department officials insist they are seeking engagement, not contain- ment. At the regular news briefing in Beijiig, Foreign Ministry spokesman Shen Guofang said, Whether there will be a turning point (in SinwU.S. relations] is to be decided by the meetings between the two foreign ministers in Brunei." "It all hinges upon the results of the talks," he added. (WASHINGTON TIMES July 19, 1995 Pg. 4 1 DEFENSE NE;WS Ju ly 17-23, 1995 Pg- 2 to evlai . . Use of planes operational, and the remaining 13 BY Jem' Se~er are being used for spare parts. ~E-TONTYE~ Mr. Grassley asked Am to % Char)es E Grassley yester- "fully disclose and fully inform day urged the B~1-u of Alcohol, the public" what the airplanes are Ibba-a and Firearms to explain why it needs 22 counterinsur- ATF- *Pg. 13 The decision, shared July 14 with hi Of Arms to Pakistan std f of the Senate Foreign Relations - Committee, now requires congressio- U.S. President Bi Clinton l~as deter- nal approval. mined that while Pakistan should n0l Such a move likely will be opposed receive the 28 F- 16 fighter aircraft il by Sen. Larry Pressler RS.D:, author 01 p ~ c h = d from the United States, the Pressler Amendment, which bars stalled shipments of P-3 reconnais- the United States from transferring n d ~ aircraff, 'hbe-hunched Optically tary goods to Pakistan ude.ss it can cer tracked Wueguided missile launchers tlfy that Pakistan does not possess a nu and Harpoon missilesma~ be delivered, clear weapo* capability. gency, heavy-weapons-capable military aircraft to perform its law enforcement mission. In a speech on the Senate floor, the Icnya Republican said he sus- pects the use cf the 300-mph OV-IOD aircraft ''in the current dimate might continue to feed the public's skepticism and erode the public's confidence in our law en- forcement agencies!' "The KIT'S credibility is impor- tant w t just for itself, but for law enforcement in general," he said. "Tbere is much work b do to re- Sore the public'~ trust a d con- fidence." The WashingtonTimes reported yesterday that ATF had obtained the aircraft from the Defense De- partment for day and night sur- Tdlauce support. The planes were used by the Marine Corps during the Vietnam War for gunfire and missile s u p port of ground troops and by the Air Force during Operation Des- ert Storm for night observation. As military aircraft they a r e equipped wiih infrared tracking systems, ground-mapping radar, laser range finders, gun sights and 2Omm cannons. ATF spokeswoman Susan Mc- Carron said the agency had ob- tained the aircraft but they had been stripped of their armaments. She said nine of the OV-IODs are WASHINGTON POST Ju ly 19, 1995 Pg. 18 Ailug Yeltsin Says He'll Recover Fdy By Lee Hodtstader the ailing president, and all information about his w..ba.gtm pol F~ ~avicc condition m e from Kremlin officials-not from the hospital or doctors treating him. Most of his aides MOSCOW July 18-President hris Yeltsin was had spoken with him only by phone. interviewed on national television tonight for the first time being hospitaliz~ with acute CKdiac dis- h a move that added to speculatim about his con- &- last week, and he assured the Russian public dition, a photo released Friday by the ~~ that that he k recovering well and tending to government to be of y&& in his hospital room turned business daily. out to be identical to videotape shot in April when b k i n g but vigorous, yeit- the president was on vacation. Kremlin officials de- sin, 64, stood in his quarters at ~ o ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ Central i e d today that they had released a deceptive photo, . Clinical Hospital while taking questions for about five but specialists who examined it and compared it to minutes on state-run television's evening news p r e the April videotape said the images were the same. gram. Yeltsin said that while he feels ready to be re- - "I didn't feel very well" last week, said Y&&, leased from the hospital, his doctors insist that he who suffered an attack of ischemia, a restriction in stay longer. His aides have said that even after he is the flow d blood to his heart. "The doctors were- discharged, he will spend time convalescing outside very energetic in their treatment, and in two days I Moscow. Nonetheless, Yeltsin said he would make a felt no more pain," he said. Speaking emphatically, complete recovery and return to an intensive work Yeltsin added: "As the doctors have said, the recov- schedule, as well as to playing tennis. ery will be without any aftereffects." He said he was "Some more time is stiU needed for a full recov- already up and about and working four hoks a day. ery," he said. Y'm receiving and meeting people ev- The president's appearme was clearly intended ery day, so you can say that my ties to Russiaxiprob to substantiate Kremlin assertions that he k recover- lems are not broken." ing S~ee&lY a d is in overall &!d health- He walked 7 will recover soon," he declared, turning to face up to the camera without assistance and appeared the camera directly. Yeltsin also said in the inte*ew alert throughout the interview, fielding the questions that he was stricken on ~~l~ 10, a day earlier than the with ease. date given by Kremlin officials for the onset of his ill- Until today, no pumalists had been allowed to visit ness. 1Ci WEDNESDAY, July 19, 1995 1 BOSTOK GLOBE July 16, i995 Pg. 16 I Specialists offer unpopular advice on US policy .- By Randolph Ryan GLOBE STAFF - Several analysts are arguing strongly fur shifts in US Bosnia policy that US politicians warcely dare mention. Some speciakts are calling for putting US troops on the ground in Bosma Tho hth- erto politically urnentionable step yodd be meant to demonstrate commitment to NATO &=-. -. Others would aha:~don, as unrealistic, the hiplomatic aim of tlen~ing Serb-hrld regions uithin Bosnia the nght to.confederate with Serbia aPtr the war ends. ' . : Specialists inteniewed in recent days are sharply critical of Clinton administration di- plomacy, which they say has been character- -.by big talk and little gumption. -They said threats of action made by US &icials and the erkatit flip-flops that fol- k ~ i i ' d now pose a threat to the cohesion of the-western allimce. Former Ambassador Robert Oakley, a visit&g'fellow at the National Defense Uni- versity, said, "My positicir. hm always been that-we" shouldn't get involved in the Bd- kms, but we have so humiliated ourselves in the eyes of the world, that I've changed my mind. Ths-US is on the verge of being seen by the rest of the world as as weak as x e pretend the UN is. "We have to do something other than be 'a total paper tiger. So I'd be in f a v ~ r of put- ting some people on the ground." .William Odom, a retired Army general ' \rho now directs national security studies at the Washington-based Hudson Institute, strongly favored US participation in a s u b I WASHINGTON TIMES stantial NATO force in Bosnia. "The US has got to go to NATO and take charge like it always has," Odom said. W e have to open multilateral negotiations to put together a NATO army in Bosnia. The Euro- peans should put up 100,000 troops, and me should put up 50,000. "If we deploy them in strong points, there won't be many casualties," Odom said. "But we vcill have to be prepared to stay there for a long long time, at least a genera- tion, as in Korea. That's a viable strategy and it will revitalize NATO." . George Kenlledy, a career diplomat who quit the State Department in 1992 to protest what he called the Bush administra- tion's passivity in Bosnia, said the crisis in Srebrenica has been in part provoked by thr Bosnian government in Sarajevo. "The Muslims are acting like artful vic- tuns," Kennedy said. "They're using the UN, pushing 'the envelope,' launching attach out of the enclaves ;rctl the11 expecting the UN to come to the rescue. 'The answer now is not for the West to go to war, which is the French position, and not to pull out, which is the Republican posi- tion," Kennedy said. "And not just to muddle along, which is the Chton position. "The answer is to try seriously to get n e gotiations going. Discussing the principle of letting Serb-held areas of Bosnia confeder- ate with Serbia would be a good way to get them started, and it would conform to facts on the ground." .James Schear, a Yugoslav specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International July 19, 1995 Peace, called for deployment of the new NATO Rapid Reaction Force to break the siege of Sarajevo by opening roads and by pushing Serb forces back from positions threatening the city and its airport "I would not want to write off the enclaves, but we have to look past Srebrenica and Zepa to Sa- rajevo," Schear said. Barry Blechman, president of the Stim- son Center, a Washington think tank, said an offer by President Jacques Chirac of France to commit troops to defend the remaining so- called safe areas threatened by Bosnian Serb forces is "the first pcsitive move 1x1 a long time." Biechman said tlie offer is "real- istic about the US, because Chirac isn't ask- ing for US groun4 troops I assume we w i l l provide air s~:pport," Blechman said. "If we wn't, it's the end of NATO. President Clin- ton has to show a little courage domestiral- ly.' Harvard political scientist Graham Alli- + son said: "My bet would be that if the UN pulls out it will lead to a widening, deepening war and the Bosnians will lose more. At the end of that war there1 be a negotiation in which a smaller and weaker Bosnia will sur- vive, or maybe it won't survive. "The main message is that the Bmnians have lost, not primarily because of the arms embargo - which is doingtvery little - but because in levels of organization and deter- mination as well as weapons and training the Serbs are stronger. "Some now say the tide could turn in fa- vor of the Muslims," Allison said. "But r e member there are a whole lot more people in Serbia" Pg. 1 accept the interceptor reshic- Moscow balks at ABM proposal tions, he offer but was when withdrawn MOSCOW and balked, n wproposal was made June 22. The diplomatic note, given to Missile stalemate likely to arouse congressional critics m b o t t Depu y by Secretary Russian of Deputy State Strobe For-By Bill Gertz THE mSHYlGTON TIMES A new Clinton administration proposal to clarify the US.- Russian Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty (ABM) was rejected by Moscow earlier this month i l l a se- cret diplomatic note obtained by The Washington Times. The rejection, outlined in the Russian document presented July 9, puts in doubt the future of stalemated talks on missile de- fenses, 1J.S. officials said. The note, an informal position paper, likely will generate new op- position in Congress to continuing talks on the issue. Critics believe Russia is trying to slow develop- ment of U.S. missile defenses that could compete with Russian sys- tems offered for sale on the inter- national arms market. Sen. Jon Kyl, Arizona Republi- can, said President Clinton ap- pears to be trying to rush into a new agreement with Moscow on regional anti-missile defenses over congressional objections. "I hope the administration would ap- preciate that these negotiations are going nowhere beneficial to the United States and they should cease and desist. a s the Congress has asked several times," he said. Congress is expected to bar fur- ther negotiations as part of the fis- cal 1996 defense authorization bill now being drafted. House Speaker Newt Gingrich said yesterday the ABM treaty was outdated. "Without some kind of serious anti-ballistic missile de- fense, we are literally naked to blackmail and we risk losing two or three of our cities," the Georgia Republican said. The 1972 ABM treaty limits de- ployment of strategic-missile de- fenses. The administration is try- ing to negotiate an agreement that would distinguish permitted re- gional defenses - an urgent U.S. defense priority - from strategic systems barred under the pact. n l k s with Moscow in Geneva on the issue have been stalemated for months over Russian insistance on imposing restrictions on 1J.S. re- gional systems. including anti- missile interceptors. The Penta- gon opposes these limits. In May, President Clinton and Russian Presideht Soris Yeltsin is- sued a statement of principles that the administration hoped would move the issue toward a formal agreement. Washington offered to 11 eign Minister Georgi ~ a m e d o v in Buenos Aires during a July 9 meeting, indicates the Russians are insisting that any agreement limit the speed of U.S. inter- ceptors. According to the Russian note, a provision of the new U.S. proposal to allow each side to determine in- dependently if higher-speed anti- missile interceptors are legal un- der the ABM treaty "is not in accord with the demarcation prin- ciples agreed upon by the pres- idents" on May 10 in Moscow. "This mechanism could lead to irreconcilable differences con- cerning compliance with the ABM treaty as a result of possible dif- fering interpretations . . . and could lead to the possibility of ac-

1995 BRAC Commission

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UNT Digital Library