'Institute of Philosophy and Theology of the Society of Jesus'
Doi
Abstract
U radu se uspoređuje razvojni put industrijskog dizajna u Hrvatskoj i Finskoj u svjetlu društveno-političkih okolnosti. Razvoj industrijskog dizajna u Finskoj omogućilo je: (1) postojanje demokratske države i tržišnoga gospodarstva, (2) izgrađen sustav izobrazbe za dizajn (3), vladine potpore sustavu izobrazbe, implementaciji dizajna u industriju i međunarodnoj promidžbi dizajna te (4) postojanje institucija ili udruga koje pružaju potporu dizajnu i djeluju kao spona dizajna i industrije. Činjenica da gotovo cijelu drugu polovicu 20. stoljeća u Hrvatskoj takvih preduvjeta nema glavni je razlog zaostajanja za Finskom u razvoju i implementaciji dizajna u industriju.The article compares the developmental path of industrial design in Croatia and in Finland in light of socio-political circumstances. The development of industrial design in Finland has made possible (1) the existence of a democratic state and market economy, (2) an established system of design education, (3) government support for the education system, for the implementation of design in industry and for the international promotion of design, as well as (4) the existence of institutions and organizations which support design and act as a link between design and industry. The fact that conditions of this kind did not exist in Croatia for almost the entire second half of the 20th century is the main reason for our falling behind Finland in the development and implementation of design in industry
