Autonomous mobile robot manipulators have the potential to act as robot helpers at home to improve quality of life for various user populations, such as elderly or handicapped people, or to act as robot co-workers on factory floors, helping in assembly applications where collaborating with other operators may be required. However, robotic systems do not show robust performance when placed in environments that are not tightly controlled. An important cause of this is that failure handling often consists of scripted responses to foreseen complications, which leaves the robot vulnerable to new situations and ill-equipped to reason about failure and recovery strategies. Instead of libraries of hard-coded reactions that are expensive to develop and maintain, more sophisticated reasoning mechanisms are needed to handle failure. This requires an ontological characterization of what failure is, what concepts are useful to formulate causal explanations of failure, and integration with knowledge of available resources including the capabilities of the robot as well as those of other potential cooperative agents in the environment, e.g. a human user. We propose the FailRecOnt framework as a step in this direction. We have integrated an ontology for failure interpretation and recovery with a contingency-based task and motion planning framework such that a robot can deal with uncertainty, recover from failures, and deal with human-robot interactions. A motivating example has been introduced to justify this proposal. The proposal has been tested with a challenging scenarioPeer ReviewedPostprint (published version
