CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Pumping Alkaline Groundwater to Restore a Put-And-Take Trout Fishery in a Stream Acidified by Atmospheric Deposition
Authors
David R. Dewalle
Charles J. Gagen
William G. Kimmel
William E. Sharpe
Publication date
1 January 1989
Publisher
Online Research Commons @ ATU
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to pump alkaline groundwater into Linn Run in southwestern Pennsylvania to neutralize acidity, reduce dissolved aluminum concentrations, and protect stocked brown trout Salmo trutta and brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis during the springs of 1985 and 1986. A regression model was used to estimate the groundwater volume needed to maintain predetermined stream pH levels for a given streamflow. Equal numbers of brook and brown trout were stocked in a treatment stream section influenced by the wells and a naturally alkaline downstream reference section before and during the fishing season each year. Groundwater addition increased mean stream pH from 4.9 upstream of the wells to 6.0 in the treatment section and reduced mean dissolved aluminum from 0.36 mg/L to 0.03 mg/L above and below the wells, respectively. A large runoff episode following the 1985 preseason stocking overwhelmed the capacity of the wells to neutralize Linn Run, causing at least 25% mortality and reducing the catch rate of brown trout in the treatment section. No mortality of caged trout occurred in the treatment section except during this large runoff event. However, mortality was rapid for caged trout upstream of the wells; median survival times were 67 and 29 h for brook and brown trout, respectively. Otherwise, angler catch rates and trout harvest were not significantly different between the treated and reference sections. Electrofishing surveys revealed greater downstream than upstream movement of stocked trout, which may indicate a response to water chemistry. Alkaline groundwater additions also caused an increase in the density of native brook trout in the treatment section via upstream migration from downstream refuges influenced by groundwater. © 1989 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Online Research Commons @ATU (Arkansas Tech University)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:orc.library.atu.edu:facult...
Last time updated on 23/08/2022