CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
--Ingen tittel--
Authors
for example it looked at mental health experience but the country involved was not immediately apparent, or it was looking at adolescent experience in Norway but it was not clear from what perspective, the study was retained for a closer look. All literature that meets the initial keyword criteria was then re-examined in closer detail by appraising the abstract for fit of key word and inclusion /exclusion compatibility. A further 3 studies were rejected on the second reading of the papers as they proved to be too topic specialized in their findings (1) or did not have enough qualitative content to make a useful contribution the understanding the lived experience of young people (2). The final studies included for thematic analysis was 26 eligible studies.ther Caution was taken if it was unclear at first assessment based on title alone. If the research met two of the three keyword criteria
Publication date
1 January 2022
Publisher
'Saint Louis University'
Abstract
Abstract is not available.
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
UiS Brage
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:uis.brage.unit.no:11250/30...
Last time updated on 30/11/2022